Electric vehicles 'break down more often than petrol, diesel and hybrid cars', says What Car? and the AA
Electric vehicles break down and leave drivers stranded at the roadside more often than their petrol and diesel engine equivalents, owners reveal.
Of the 30,000 drivers who completed What Car's latest Reliability Survey over the past two years, one in ten (10.9 per cent) said their motor had suffered a fault that rendered it undrivable.
However, when reviewing the feedback from motorists by vehicle fuel type, the poll suggested that drivers of EVs are more likely to need to call for breakdown assistance.
Of the battery car drivers who filled in the survey, 16.8 per cent said their car had broken down in the last 24 months. That compares to just 10.7 per cent of petrol car owners. Hybrids (14.1 per cent) and diesels (15.4 per cent) too had a statistically lower rate of breakdowns, the report said.
And it also went on to show that when electric cars do suffer issues, they are less likely to be repaired at the roadside by a breakdown patrols, meaning drivers cannot continue on their journeys.
The report comes in the wake of AA bosses claiming that EV breakdowns are more common despite a general misconception that they are more reliable because they have fewer moving parts than a traditional car.
Electric vehicles break down and leave drivers stranded at the roadside more often than their petrol and diesel engine equivalents, What Car? and the AA have both stated this week
EV drivers reported that only in one in four instances where their battery cars were stranded at the roadside did the breakdown company manage to permanently fix the issue so they could get back on the route.
In contrast, two in five petrol car owners said a patrol had them back on the road again after being called out.
Unsurprisingly, EVs were the fuel type most commonly transported (because they can't be towed due to the risk of damage to the e-motors if the driven wheels are rotated) to garages for repairs.
In 40.6 per cent of EV breakdowns, the cars had to be recovered from the roadside, whereas only 29.6 per cent of petrol cars were towed to nearby garages or the owner's home.
BREAKDOWNS BY FUEL TYPE
Fuel type Broken down Permanently fixed Temporarily fix Towed Not towed
Petrol 10.7% 40.1% 22.7% 29.6% 7.7%
Diesel 15.4% 30.4% 26.0% 36.5% 7.1%
Hybrid 14.1% 33.8% 30.1% 32.3% 3.8%
Electric 16.8% 25.0% 20.8% 40.6% 13.5%
Source: WhatCar? Reliability Survey based on feedback from almost 30k UK car owners
The report comes just days after bosses at the AA reported that it is attending a higher share of electric car breakdowns that petrols and diesels.
Jakob Pfaudler, CEO at the breakdown service provider, said EVs are prone not only to punctures and flat batteries like all cars with internal combustion engines, but also to a host of problems relating specifically to electric models, including jammed charging cables and technical glitches.
Speaking to The Telegraph, he said it was a 'common misconception' that battery cars are less susceptible to faults than because they have fewer moving parts than internal combustion engine equivalents, claiming the breakdown rate is actually 'slightly higher' for EVs.
Edmund King, president of the motoring organisation, added that EV drivers are more likely to be confused and flustered by warning lights in zero-emission cars and pull off the road to call for assistance.
In stark contrast, he said petrol car drivers are typically more likely to drive to the nearest garage when confronted with warning signals, such as an icon suggesting low oil pressure.
However, Mr King estimated that nine in ten breakdowns involving EVs could be dealt with at the roadside versus 86 per cent for traditional cars, with the battery models often needing a 'simple reboot'. Though this is in conflict to what drivers told What Car?.
Drivers of EVs did have some positives to report relating to breakdowns...
Jakob Pfaudler, the AA's CEO, said EVs are prone to a host of problems relating specifically to battery models, including jammed charging cables and technical glitches
EVs are the fuel type most commonly transported to garages for repairs after a breakdown. They can't be towed due to the risk of damage to the e-motors if the driven wheels are rotated
They told the automotive title that breakdown-related faults were typically resolved for free - more so than any other fuel type, in fact.
According to the survey data, 89 per cent of faulty EVs are rectified at no cost to the driver, and only 3 per cent had to pay more than £1,500 to get their battery cars back on the road after a breakdown.
That's almost as impressive as the record for hybrid cars: 91 per cent of these were fixed for free, and only 2 per cent of owners reported having to pay over £1,500 to have issues resolved.
While petrol cars suffer fewer breakdowns than EVs and hybrids, they are more likely to land owners with repair bills: only 76 per cent of petrol cars were fixed for free, owners told What Car?.
Diesels are the least likely to be fixed gratis, though: only two third of drivers had the cost of their car repairs covered.
Who is providing the best breakdown service?
What Car? also looked at the level of service provided by nine major breakdown recovery companies, and by independent recovery services.
Respondents who had used a breakdown provider in the last two years were asked how long they had to wait for help to arrive and how good the service they received was.
Patrols that arrived in an hour or less and got cars going again gained the highest marks; those that took more than two hours to arrive and didn't fix the car or recover it for repair were given the lowest marks.
BEST RATED BREAKDOWN ASSISTANCE PROVIDERS
Rank Provider Time rating Quality rating Overall rating
1 Britannia Rescue 5 4 5
2 Independents* 4 5 4
3 AA 3 4 4
4 Start Rescue 4 3 4
5 Emergency Assist 3 4 4
6 Green Flag 3 4 4
7 GEM Motoring Assist 2 5 4
8 Autoaid 4 3 3
9 RAC 2 4 3
10 Allianz 2 3 2
Source: WhatCar? Reliability Survey based on feedback from almost 30k UK car owners (Rating out of 5 stars)
*Independents category includes responses from a number of independent recovery services and garages
Overall, the best breakdown provider was Britannia Rescue.
Its patrols attended three-quarters of callouts in less than an hour, and they enabled 53 percent of car owners to continue their journeys.
At the bottom of the satisfaction chart was Allianz, which offers cover directly to car manufacturers, rather than policies that consumers can independently subscribe to.
While it was marginally quicker to respond to callouts than the RAC, it was the worst for performing permanent repairs to stricken cars.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Little-known car insurance could save you £5,000 if your car is written off in accident – everything you need to know
A HIDDEN car insurance trick could save you £5,000 if your vehicle is written off. Motorists claiming on this insurance stand to gain big - as average payouts have tripled in the past four years. 2 The average payout for Guaranteed Asset Protection - or GAP insurance - has soared from around £1,600 in 2021 to nearly £5,000 this year. This little-known insurance hack is rarely used - with a Financial Conduct Authority probe revealing that the average driver with GAP insurance makes a claim just once every 300 years. This product is mainly used to cover a potential shortfall between a car's value and the amount owed on finance if the vehicle is written off or stolen. Drivers who need to make a claim are likely to receive larger payouts, as those who've financed their cars currently face several financial risks. GAP insurance is used not only by those with financed cars but also by owners who bought cars outright—they can claim if the insurer's payout is less than what they paid for the car. Several factors have contributed to the soaring cash value of GAP claims. These include the fast depreciation of certain vehicles - especially EVs - and a rise in insurance write-offs caused by soaring repair costs and parts shortages. Rising motor thefts, targeting models like Range Rovers, have also driven up the cash value of GAP claims. Experts say GAP insurance has shifted from a 'nice-to-have' policy to a 'vital financial safeguard' for today's car buyers. The increase in the value of payouts "underscores the growing financial risk faced by car owners" in 2025, according to MotorEasy, a leading car ownership platform. Ford is forced to immediately shut down factories and halt car production as CEO admits 'day to day' struggle for brand However, this type of insurance has been controversial in the past, as it's often sold by dealers alongside cars - sometimes with limited explanation or inflated prices. It's usually cheaper to buy GAP insurance through brokers. The increase in the value of payouts "underscores the growing financial risk faced by car owners" in 2025, according to MotorEasy, the leading car ownership platform. MotorEasy says the rise in average claim amounts is linked to the lasting effects of Covid-19. However, since so few motorists were using GAP policies, the Financial Conduct Authority launched an investigation in 2023 over concerns about their value. This led to many policies being withdrawn, with about 80 percent of products pulled from the market. Experts now advise car buyers to compare policies carefully and consider brokers rather than accepting dealer offers. Meanwhile, insurance experts have shared eight tips to help drivers slash the cost of covering their cars. Tom Banks, a coverage expert for told SunMotors that one effective way is to choose a higher excess. This means you agree to pay more out of pocket if you make a claim, which lowers the amount the insurer has to cover. Tom explained: "You want to make sure that you will be able to afford to pay it should you need to make a claim. "But it's worth bearing in mind that choosing a higher voluntary excess will usually bring your car insurance premium down." What is car insurance? Consumer reporter Sam Walker talks you through what car insurance is and what it covers you for... Car insurance pays out if your vehicle is stolen, damaged, catches on fire or is involved in an accident. As a minimum, it protects you against any damage you case to other road users, the public or their property - these are called third parties. You only need to claim on your car insurance when an accident is your fault. If another motorist is to blame, their insurance should pay out instead. Car insurance, unlike home insurance, is a legal requirement and if you don't have it you can be fined up to £1,000. You can also have your vehicle seized and destroyed. However, you don't need to insure your car if it is classed as "off-road", or holds a statutory off road notification (SORN). The vehicle has to be kept on private land and not a public highway though. 2
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Electric vehicles 'break down more often than petrol, diesel and hybrid cars', says What Car? and the AA
Electric vehicles break down and leave drivers stranded at the roadside more often than their petrol and diesel engine equivalents, owners reveal. Of the 30,000 drivers who completed What Car's latest Reliability Survey over the past two years, one in ten (10.9 per cent) said their motor had suffered a fault that rendered it undrivable. However, when reviewing the feedback from motorists by vehicle fuel type, the poll suggested that drivers of EVs are more likely to need to call for breakdown assistance. Of the battery car drivers who filled in the survey, 16.8 per cent said their car had broken down in the last 24 months. That compares to just 10.7 per cent of petrol car owners. Hybrids (14.1 per cent) and diesels (15.4 per cent) too had a statistically lower rate of breakdowns, the report said. And it also went on to show that when electric cars do suffer issues, they are less likely to be repaired at the roadside by a breakdown patrols, meaning drivers cannot continue on their journeys. The report comes in the wake of AA bosses claiming that EV breakdowns are more common despite a general misconception that they are more reliable because they have fewer moving parts than a traditional car. Electric vehicles break down and leave drivers stranded at the roadside more often than their petrol and diesel engine equivalents, What Car? and the AA have both stated this week EV drivers reported that only in one in four instances where their battery cars were stranded at the roadside did the breakdown company manage to permanently fix the issue so they could get back on the route. In contrast, two in five petrol car owners said a patrol had them back on the road again after being called out. Unsurprisingly, EVs were the fuel type most commonly transported (because they can't be towed due to the risk of damage to the e-motors if the driven wheels are rotated) to garages for repairs. In 40.6 per cent of EV breakdowns, the cars had to be recovered from the roadside, whereas only 29.6 per cent of petrol cars were towed to nearby garages or the owner's home. BREAKDOWNS BY FUEL TYPE Fuel type Broken down Permanently fixed Temporarily fix Towed Not towed Petrol 10.7% 40.1% 22.7% 29.6% 7.7% Diesel 15.4% 30.4% 26.0% 36.5% 7.1% Hybrid 14.1% 33.8% 30.1% 32.3% 3.8% Electric 16.8% 25.0% 20.8% 40.6% 13.5% Source: WhatCar? Reliability Survey based on feedback from almost 30k UK car owners The report comes just days after bosses at the AA reported that it is attending a higher share of electric car breakdowns that petrols and diesels. Jakob Pfaudler, CEO at the breakdown service provider, said EVs are prone not only to punctures and flat batteries like all cars with internal combustion engines, but also to a host of problems relating specifically to electric models, including jammed charging cables and technical glitches. Speaking to The Telegraph, he said it was a 'common misconception' that battery cars are less susceptible to faults than because they have fewer moving parts than internal combustion engine equivalents, claiming the breakdown rate is actually 'slightly higher' for EVs. Edmund King, president of the motoring organisation, added that EV drivers are more likely to be confused and flustered by warning lights in zero-emission cars and pull off the road to call for assistance. In stark contrast, he said petrol car drivers are typically more likely to drive to the nearest garage when confronted with warning signals, such as an icon suggesting low oil pressure. However, Mr King estimated that nine in ten breakdowns involving EVs could be dealt with at the roadside versus 86 per cent for traditional cars, with the battery models often needing a 'simple reboot'. Though this is in conflict to what drivers told What Car?. Drivers of EVs did have some positives to report relating to breakdowns... Jakob Pfaudler, the AA's CEO, said EVs are prone to a host of problems relating specifically to battery models, including jammed charging cables and technical glitches EVs are the fuel type most commonly transported to garages for repairs after a breakdown. They can't be towed due to the risk of damage to the e-motors if the driven wheels are rotated They told the automotive title that breakdown-related faults were typically resolved for free - more so than any other fuel type, in fact. According to the survey data, 89 per cent of faulty EVs are rectified at no cost to the driver, and only 3 per cent had to pay more than £1,500 to get their battery cars back on the road after a breakdown. That's almost as impressive as the record for hybrid cars: 91 per cent of these were fixed for free, and only 2 per cent of owners reported having to pay over £1,500 to have issues resolved. While petrol cars suffer fewer breakdowns than EVs and hybrids, they are more likely to land owners with repair bills: only 76 per cent of petrol cars were fixed for free, owners told What Car?. Diesels are the least likely to be fixed gratis, though: only two third of drivers had the cost of their car repairs covered. Who is providing the best breakdown service? What Car? also looked at the level of service provided by nine major breakdown recovery companies, and by independent recovery services. Respondents who had used a breakdown provider in the last two years were asked how long they had to wait for help to arrive and how good the service they received was. Patrols that arrived in an hour or less and got cars going again gained the highest marks; those that took more than two hours to arrive and didn't fix the car or recover it for repair were given the lowest marks. BEST RATED BREAKDOWN ASSISTANCE PROVIDERS Rank Provider Time rating Quality rating Overall rating 1 Britannia Rescue 5 4 5 2 Independents* 4 5 4 3 AA 3 4 4 4 Start Rescue 4 3 4 5 Emergency Assist 3 4 4 6 Green Flag 3 4 4 7 GEM Motoring Assist 2 5 4 8 Autoaid 4 3 3 9 RAC 2 4 3 10 Allianz 2 3 2 Source: WhatCar? Reliability Survey based on feedback from almost 30k UK car owners (Rating out of 5 stars) *Independents category includes responses from a number of independent recovery services and garages Overall, the best breakdown provider was Britannia Rescue. Its patrols attended three-quarters of callouts in less than an hour, and they enabled 53 percent of car owners to continue their journeys. At the bottom of the satisfaction chart was Allianz, which offers cover directly to car manufacturers, rather than policies that consumers can independently subscribe to. While it was marginally quicker to respond to callouts than the RAC, it was the worst for performing permanent repairs to stricken cars.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Record number of cyclists report drivers passing too close after major Highway Code rule change in 2022
The number of cyclists complaining to police about being overtaken too closely by drivers has reached record levels after a major change to the Highway Code three years ago. The new rule implemented from 29 January 2022 requires motorists to leave 'at least 1.5 metres' of space when passing cyclists at speeds up to 30mph. This was part of a wider - and highly contentious - overhaul of the Highway Code to better protect vulnerable road users, which included increased rights for cyclists to ride in groups, have priority at roundabouts and position themselves in the middle of lanes on safety grounds. Since the rules were imposed, submissions of video footage of cars, vans, coaches and other heavy vehicles overtaking within dangerous proximity to riders have more than doubled, an investigation has revealed. Some 15,779 clips of 'incidents' were submitted to forces in England and Wales last year, information obtained by IAM RoadSmart found. That is more than double the total of 7,249 in 2021. When the road safety charity polled drivers about the correct passing distance, almost three in five didn't know the legal minimum requirement under the 2022 rules. The Highway Code states that drivers should leave at least 1.5 metres - or 4.9 feet - of space when overtaking a cyclist at speeds of up to 30mph, with a larger gap at higher speeds. This is to allow for cyclists to safely move away from the kerbside to avoid potholes or debris on the road. But despite the rule change, cyclists have submitted an increasing number of clips of dangerously close overtakes captured on helmet cams and worn recording devices. These basic cameras typically cost around £50. IAM RoadSmart contacted all 43 police forces in England and Wales asking how many pieces of footage showing a close pass of a cyclist by a motorist were submitted as part of Operation Snap, an initiative introduced in 2017. Twenty forces provided data following the Freedom of Information request. The responses show the percentage of reports leading to a notice of intended prosecution being served rose from 38 per cent in 2021 to 54 per cent last year. Cyclist are able to submit footage of dangerous overtakes captured on their helmet cams. These typically cost from around £50 and are used by riders to protect themselves from motorists who don't give them right of way 50 major changes were introduced to the Highway Code in 2022 - many of them giving priority to cyclists over motor vehicles Avon and Somerset Police received the most complaints about close passes, with 3,501 people submitting footage of incidents last year. However, it was Bedfordshire Police that had the highest prosecution rate in 2024. A staggering 90 per cent of all reports resulted in a Notice of Intended Prosecution, it said. It was followed closely by Avon and Somerset Constabulary and Cambridgeshire Constabulary. Drivers found guilty of passing too closely can be charged with careless or dangerous driving, which could result in an unlimited fine, disqualification, or imprisonment. Despite the penalty risk, a separate survey of 655 licence holders indicated that most people are not up to scratch on the Highway Code. Some 58 per cent admitted they were not aware that the legal minimum gap when passing cyclists is now 1.5 metres. A third reported that they often see other drivers or motorcyclists performing what they would consider a 'close pass' and almost a fifth (17 per cent) frequently witness other vehicle users overtaking cyclists on blind bends, risking their own lives as well as others. IAM RoadSmart polled over 600 drivers about the distance they must give cyclists when overtaking. Almost three in five didn't know the legal minimum requirement Harriet Hernando, the charity's active travel spokesperson, said: 'It is extremely concerning that more than half of motorists don't know how much space to give a cyclist when overtaking. 'Passing too closely to a cyclist can be intimidating and dangerous, especially if they need to move out to avoid a pothole. 'It is small wonder then that record numbers of cyclists are installing cameras and submitting footage of dangerous or careless drivers to the police. 'While it is heartening to see that prosecution rates have increased, it would be better if it didn't reach that stage and motorists weren't doing it in the first place.' Drivers found guilty of passing too closely can be charged with careless or dangerous driving, which could result in an unlimited fine, disqualification, or imprisonment Provisional Department for Transport figures show 85 cyclists were killed on Britain's roads in 2024. Between 2019 and 2023, most cyclist fatalities occurred in collisions involving a car. Duncan Dollimore, head of campaigns at Cycling UK, reacted to the news of increased reporting of drivers passing cyclists too closely, saying the Highway Code changes introduced in 2022 have 'not seen the big safety impact we'd hoped for'. He added: 'The majority of people who drive simply aren't aware how much distance to give to people who cycle when overtaking. 'This is why it's crucial to educate all road users of their responsibility to protect those most vulnerable.' He called on the Government to 'address this oversight by better promoting the new Highway Code. The January 2022 changes to the road user's handbook also made clear that motorists need to give additional space to horse riders when overtaking. The minimum gap is 2 metres - or 6.5 feet - when passing people riding horses or using horse-drawn vehicles at speeds under 10mph. The same safe distance applies when passing pedestrians - particularly ramblers - walking in the road when there is no footpath available. Highway Code rule changes introduced in 2022 to give cyclists more priority Changes to the Highway Code to reflect the safe overtaking distance when motorists pass cyclists was not the only major overhaul to the rules to benefit cyclists. Of the 50 significant changes introduced on 27 January 2022, there are a further six rules updates to protect those pedalling. 1. Cyclists can ride in the middle of a lane (even if there is a cycle lane) The Highway Code says cyclists can ride in the centre of their lane on quieter roads, in slower-moving traffic and at the approach to junctions or road narrowings. When travelling along more congested roads with faster moving vehicles, cyclists should keep at least half a metre (just over 1.5 feet) away from the kerb edge - and can ride even closer to the middle of a lane where it is 'safer to do so'. These rules apply even when there is a cycle lane available, with the Highway Code stating that cyclists are not obliged to use the dedicated lanes it if they prefer not to. Cyclists are within their right to cycle two-abreast in a single lane. The 2022 Highway Code encourages this for large groups of riders, like the one pictured 2. Groups of cyclists encouraged to ride two-abreast Cyclists riding in groups need to be 'considerate of the needs of other road users' but can legally ride two abreast in a lane. In fact, the Highway Code's wording encourages this in particular scenarios, such as in larger groups, or when accompanying children or less experienced riders. That said, when a vehicle is approaching from behind, groups of cyclists are told they have a duty to allow a driver to overtake, for example by reverting to single file or stopping. In slow-moving traffic, cyclists are permitted to pass vehicles on the left or the right, whichever they choose 3. Cyclists can overtake on the left or right in traffic The Highway Code update in 2022 included provisions for cyclist to pass vehicles in slow-moving or stationary traffic both on the right and the left. However, it does urge particular caution to cyclists when passing (particularly on the left where drivers might not be expecting them to be) on the approach to junctions and especially when passing lorries and large vehicles that may not have seen them and are a major injury risk. 4. Cyclists have priority when going straight on at junctions The code recommends that people cycling should act like any other vehicle when dealing with junctions where there are no specific cyclist facilities in place. This includes positioning themselves in the centre of their chosen lane where they feel able to do this safely. This should make them more visible to drivers and prevent traffic overtaking them when they're trying to turn. The code update in 2022 also clarified that when people cycling are going straight ahead at a junction, they have priority over traffic waiting to turn into or out of a side road, unless road signs or markings indicate otherwise. People cycling are asked to watch out for motorists intending to turn across their path, as people driving ahead may not be able to see them. 5. Motorbike riders need to give priority to cyclists at roundabouts The Highway Code clarifies that anyone driving or riding a motorcycle should give priority to people cycling on roundabouts, meaning they should not attempt to overtake them in the lane they're travelling in and should allow cyclists to move across their path as they travel around the roundabout. And while cyclists and horse riders were already allowed to use the left-hand lane of a roundabout no matter which exit they were taking, additional guidance introduced in 2002 states that drivers have to take 'extra care' when entering a roundabout to make sure they do not cut across these road users. Drivers and told to use the 'Dutch Reach' technique when exiting vehicles on the roadside in a bid to prevent collisions with cyclists 6. Drivers and passengers to use 'Dutch Reach' technique when exciting cars The code recommends motorists and their passengers exit vehicles using a technique called the 'Dutch Reach'. Where drivers or passengers in a vehicle are able to do so, they should open the door using their hand on the opposite side to the door they are opening. For example, using their left hand to open a door on their right-hand side. This will physically force them to turn their head to look over their shoulder behind them, which means they are more likely to spot people about to cycle past their door. The code also says that cyclists should leave a door's width - or one metre - when passing a parked car to avoid being hit if a passenger or driver swings it open.
