Officials still in the dark after ICE shatters windows in alleged wrongful arrest in New Bedford
Cell phone video taken by occupants of the vehicle shows what appears to be federal officers smashing a car window during an arrest of Juan Francisco Mendez, 29, a Guatemalan national who federal authorities say is in the U.S. illegally.
An immigration attorney representing Mendez claims he wasn't the person ICE was searching for and that his wife and child
New Bedford Mayor John Mitchell said Wednesday that he still has not heard from ICE at all.
'I think what we saw in the video requires an explanation,' Mitchell said. 'It didn't seem like it was warranted but there may have been some fact not known to the public that might have justified it. We're just not hearing anything.'
Mitchell said lack of communication with federal immigration authortieis is a recurring issue.
'There's some indication they were waiting on their attorney and so the question is: 'Why not let them wait?'' Mitchell went on. 'What's the rush?"
Mendez's attorney told Boston 25 News her client is not a criminal and that he is in line for asylum status like his wife.
'The video speaks for itself ... (my client) approached the situation in a very respectful, humble manner. He asserted his right to remain silent and his right to have an attorney present.'Ondine Galvez Sniffin said in a statement.
Although Mendez does not have a Green Card, he was in the US as a derivative asylee, meaning he is eligible for asylum because he is the spouse of someone already granted asylum, Sniffin said.
She told Boston 25 News that in her 27 years as an immigration attorney, she's never seen such violence during an arrest but she doesn't expect the officer will be disciplined.
Mitchell, a former federal prosecutor, said there is a protocol to be followed after such an arrest.
'There should be something in the way of a press release saying what the circumstances are and why that individual's been picked up,' Mitchell said.
ICE told Boston 25 News that Mendez is an illegally present Guatemalan man and it concurs with the actions taken by the agents.
'ICE concurs with the actions deemed appropriate by the officers on the scene who are trained to use the minimum amount of force necessary to resolve the situation in a manner that ensures the success of the operation and prioritizes the safety of our officers,' an ICE spokesperson said.
'I've said it in the past, as attorney general, I'm all for getting the bad guys, okay? I investigated, prosecuted and put away a lot of bad guys, including people who are here unlawfully doing bad things. No disagreement. But that's not what we're seeing, and it's not right, and it's really scary because you got a lot of people who are understandably terrified right now in Massachusetts, around New England, around this country,' Governor Maura Healey said. 'We need some explanations for the Department of Homeland Security about exactly what they're doing."
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Appeals court largely keeps restrictions on immigration raids in Los Angeles area
An appeals court late Friday mostly kept in place restrictions on "roving" immigration raids in the Los Angeles area, agreeing with a lower court judge who found that sweeps conducted by the Trump administration in Southern California appeared to have been predicated on people's race and other factors, like speaking Spanish. A panel of judges at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely denied a Trump administration request to suspend the lower court ruling, which required federal immigration officials to have reasonable suspicion that someone is in the country illegally before detaining them. The immigration raids at the center of the legal battle triggered massive protests in the Los Angeles area in June, as well as widespread fears among the region's large Latino community. While most demonstrations were peaceful, instances of violence led President Trump to deploy National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles with orders to protect federal buildings and the immigration agents enforcing his far-reaching crackdown on illegal immigration. Most of them have since been demobilized. Those high-profile immigration arrests in California have continued, led by Customs and Border Protection agents who have been assigned to help Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers with furthering the Trump administration's mass deportation campaign — in some cases, far away from the U.S.-Mexico border. Beyond requiring CBP and ICE to have reasonable suspicion before detaining someone, the July order from U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong prohibited federal agents from basing arrests on people's race or ethnicity, the fact that they speak Spanish or have an accent, their presence in a location, or their occupation. Frimpong stated that any immigration arrests that relied exclusively on these factors violated the U.S. Constitution's 4th Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. "We agree with the district court that, in the context of the Central District of California, the four enumerated factors at issue — apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent, particular location, and type of work, even when considered together — describe only a broad profile and 'do not demonstrate reasonable suspicion for any particular stop,'" the 9th Circuit panel wrote in its opinion Friday. The panel was comprised of Circuit Judges Ronald M. Gould, Marsha S. Berzon, and Jennifer Sung, appointees of former Presidents Bill Clinton and Joe Biden. The cases cited in the lawsuit against the Los Angeles-area immigration sweeps involved arrests in June near a car wash, a tow yard and other locations where U.S. citizens were among those questioned about their legal status and detained by federal agents. Advocates have described the operations as "roving patrols." The 9th Circuit did alter one part of Frimpong's ruling, removing an exception to her ban on using the four factors that include people's race and vocation when making arrests. The panel said that an "except as permitted by law" clause in her order was too vague. Pro-immigrants advocates hailed Friday's ruling, denouncing the Trump administration's immigration sweeps as indiscriminate raids that have instilled fear in the Los Angeles area. "Every person, regardless of immigration status, has the right to live, work, and belong in their community without being hunted, harassed, or locked away," said Lindsay Toczylowski, president of the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, a Los Angeles-based group that represents those facing deportation. The Trump administration has maintained in court that federal officials rely on intelligence packages and certain information — like "past experiences" that immigrants living in the U.S. illegally frequent or work at certain locations — when carrying out immigration enforcement operations. CBS News reached out to representatives for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE and CBP, to request comment on Friday's order.

Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Where in the world is the watermelon man?
The Instagram message I sent went this way: Querido Ivan, ¿Dónde estás? Llevo un par de semanas preocupado por ti. ¿Dónde estás?… Dime que estás pasando desapercibido. … Dime que no estás en la cárcel ni en un centro de detención de mala muerte. O en el México cuerdo.' Ivan is the guy who sells cocos frios — cold coconuts — and watermelon, pineapple and mangos from a cart on an L.A. corner I pass by most days. For nearly a year, whenever I saw his bright rainbow umbrella, my mouth started to water. My usual order: two large chopped watermelon cups — one plain for my girlfriend, and one with a splash of chamoy and tejate, for me — handed over by Ivan or his little brother with a 'Here, my friend.' Sounds dangerous right? Like Ivan and his brother are criminal masterminds? Since the second week in June, as ICE, Homeland Security, the National Guard, the Marines and who knows who else took to the streets all masked up, war-fighting ready, and started disappearing Angelenos, I'd been worried about Ivan. Where was he? Hence the Instagram. I identified myself as tu amigo Miguel, the 'tipo' in the black Acura with the two-watermelon usual. 'Te extraño,' I said. I missed him and the watermelon. I said I hoped he was desapercibido — lying low — and not in a sleazy detention center or back in Mexico, which at least is a sane country. That lying low would be the best-case scenario for Ivan and his brother was absurd. Two guys providing Los Angeles with iced fruit were probably on the lam, unable to earn a living because the president of the United States thought 'real Americans' wanted their cocos frios cart. I told my friend Lance about Ivan's vanishing act. This was his response: 'My youngest son, Chris, went to Cal State Northridge and got his degree in chopping fruit, but he couldn't find a job, so he went to Stanford and got a master's in cocos frios, but still no jobs. Now, thanks to Donald Trump, my boy is going to be on the corner chopping fruit. Finally.' Into July, still nothing from Ivan. Finally, out of town on vacation, I heard back. 'Hola, amigo, estamos bien, muchas gracias habiamos.' One family member was taken, 'pero ya estamos bien' and 'cuanto se calmen los cosas … estaremos.' 'But we're fine' and 'when things calm down, we'll be back.' But when? 'A lot of ICE,' he Instagrammed. 'A lot of la migra.' Not yet. Days went by. Then on Monday, still out of town, I hear my phone's 'handoff' tone. A friend texted me a picture of the rainbow umbrella: 'Your watermelon man is back on his corner.' I tried Ivan. He messaged right back. I'll save you the Spanish: 'Hello, good evening. I'll be waiting for you here. In the meantime, continue enjoying your lovely trip. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it.' Who is this menace to society trying to fool? I owe Ivan $16. I didn't have cash for my last order in early June. Next week, I'll pay up beneath that beautiful rainbow umbrella. And get two more cups of watermelon to go. Michael Krikorian is a former Times staff writer.


The Intercept
3 hours ago
- The Intercept
Guess Who's Eligible for Student Loan Forgiveness: New ICE Agents
As President Donald Trump plots to halt student loan forgiveness for many government and nonprofit workers, his administration is offering a special type of debt relief to one category of workers: new ICE agents. The Department of Homeland Security announced on Tuesday it will offer student loan forgiveness and repayment options to new Immigration and Customs Enforcement recruits — along with a $50,000 signing bonus. The announcement comes as the Trump administration works to limit the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program for groups the president considers political enemies. Since 2007, borrowers employed by the government or nonprofit organizations serving a wide range of public interest causes have been eligible for forgiveness through PSLF. But in July, the Department of Education took a major step in altering the program's rules to exclude certain employers in accordance with Trump's executive order 'Restoring Public Service Loan Forgiveness,' which claims the loan forgiveness 'has misdirected tax dollars into activist organizations that not only fail to serve the public interest, but actually harm our national security and American values, sometimes through criminal means.' Under the revised rules, nonprofits that help transgender youth access gender-affirming care and attorneys who provide legal assistance to undocumented immigrants, among others, might no longer qualify, according to the press release from the Department of Education. Final language has yet to be published; before it takes effect, there will be an opportunity for public comment. Experts in higher education and student debt told The Intercept that the administration is deploying the financial aid system as a tool to advance its political agenda, punish perceived enemies, and reward allies. 'This just shows the lengths that the Trump administration will go to to weaponize Public Service Loan Forgiveness and debt more broadly to achieve their fascist objectives,' said Persis Yu, deputy executive director and managing counsel at the Student Borrower Protection Center. Over the last few years, Republicans have fought to limit student debt relief for borrowers. Last year, Republican attorneys general successfully lobbied the Supreme Court to pause the SAVE Plan, an income-based repayment plan implemented by the Biden administration that allowed borrowers to make smaller monthly payments and achieve debt relief within a shorter time frame. The Big, Beautiful, Bill signed by Trump in July eliminates the SAVE Plan as of July 1, 2028, and replaces it with significantly less generous repayment options for student loans. 'We're going to see a wave of defaults happening, and we're going to see more people who can't afford their payments.' On Friday, the Department of Education resumed interest accrual on SAVE Plan loans, meaning nearly 8 million borrowers are now seeing their debt grow. On top of that, the spending bill creates new limits on federal borrowing for graduate students and parents taking out loans on behalf of their children — meaning families and people attending higher cost educational programs such as medical school will likely have to take out higher interest private loans. 'We're going to see a wave of defaults happening, and we're going to see more people who can't afford their payments,' said Sara Partridge, associate director of higher education at the Center for American Progress. Partridge said implementing changes that will make life harder for millions of borrowers while championing debt forgiveness for ICE agents is peak hypocrisy. 'It is hypocritical to provide additional funding for debt relief for certain categories of workers while seeking to deny it to everyday Americans,' said Partridge. Sam Alig, 36, a borrower enrolled on the SAVE Plan, said Republicans and the administration have left borrowers in chaos as they scramble to figure out how much they'll owe under the new income-based repayment systems. 'It's such a mess,' said Alig. 'Every single time I call, they tell me something else. … It's $400 [per month] now. Six months from now, it could be $800, I have no idea.' The irony of the new DHS announcement isn't lost on Alig. 'It's also funny that Republicans are going to get behind student forgiveness when it comes to ICE agents, because they're so against student loan forgiveness for the entire working and middle class.' It's not completely clear how the ICE loan forgiveness program will be funded. The departments of Homeland Security and Education did not respond to requests for comment. The influx of $170 billion for DHS from the new spending bill could be a mechanism to help pay off new recruits loans. Government agencies can use their own funding to offer loan assistance as a recruitment and retention strategy via a separate initiative, the Federal Student Loan Repayment program, which allows agencies to repay federal student loans for their employees up to $10,000 a year and $60,000 per employee. The contrast between how the Trump administration is treating most borrowers and ICE agents is 'shocking,' said Wil Del Pilar, senior vice president at EdTrust, an education-focused nonprofit. 'The Department of Education is effectively putting other people's cancellations on hold, while fast-tracking this other group of folks who haven't done anything to warrant cancellation,' said Pilar. 'To me, it's outrageous, and it shows where the priority of this administration is.' The expected changes to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program will likely face legal challenge, Partridge said. 'I'm sure there's going to be a lawsuit against it, but still,' said Partridge, 'it's a major abuse of power for the government to wield this tool to advance its political ends and to propose denying loan forgiveness to borrowers who work for organizations that this administration disfavors.' The rule hasn't been published yet, but Partridge said it's expected to impact a wide range of people who have been targets in the Trump administration. 'This administration is wielding the power of the federal financial aid system to advance its ideological goals.' 'If enacted, [it would] deny Public Service Loan Forgiveness to people at organizations doing work that this administration disagrees with, particularly those who do things such as providing legal services to immigrants or providing gender-affirming care,' said Partridge. The vague language around 'substantial illegal purposes' also opens the door for more groups to be cut out of the program. 'It also would allow the administration to deny loan forgiveness to people who work at organizations that they say violate state law, and that includes trespassing, which we know historically has been used against protesters,' she said. 'So there are ways that this administration is wielding the power of the federal financial aid system to advance its ideological goals.' Weaponizing the cost of an education isn't a new tactic from the right. Amid nationwide campus protests against the Vietnam War, then-California Gov. Ronald Reagan and his political allies slashed the budget for public universities, forcing them to charge tuition, arguing that students had become too radical. 'We are in danger of producing an educated proletariat. That's dynamite! We have to be selective on who we allow [to go through higher education],' Reagan's education adviser, Roger A. Freeman, told the San Francisco Chronicle. 'There is a very robust history about how debt has been used as a lever of social control,' said Yu. '[Student debt] is a force that can keep people in place, keep people in line. … That is why it is being wielded as a weapon against people who work in fields that they don't like, and rewarding folks who work in fields that they do like.'