9th May cases: SC to hear IK's bail plea today
A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi and comprising Justice Shafi Siddiqui and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, on Tuesday, heard Imran Khan's appeal against the Lahore High Court (LHC)'s order in cases linked to May 9 mayhem.
At the onset of the proceedings, the chief justice asked Imran Khan's lawyer that you have filed some additional documents, which he could not read. He, therefore, deferred the case for Wednesday (Aug 20) at 10:30 am.
Barrister Salman Safdar, counsel Imran Khan, wanted to make submission but the chief justice told him that they will hear him tomorrow, adding the documents required to be studied before hearing of case.
The bench on August 12 questioned whether the merit of the case could be touched by the LHC in PTI founder's post-arrest bail plea.
A division bench comprising Justice Syed Shahbaz Ali Rizvi and Tariq Mahmood Bajwa had dismissed the incarcerated ex-premier's bail petition last month, citing his alleged involvement in planning attacks on military installations in anticipation of his arrest on May 9, 2023.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Sun of justice will rise, says Imran
Former prime minister Imran Khan was allowed on Tuesday to meet his lawyer, Ali Bukhari, while his wife Bushra Bibi met her daughter and sister-in-law at Rawalpindi's Adiala Jail where the couple is detained. However, Imran's three sisters — Aleema Khan, Uzma Khan and Noreen Niazi — were denied access, prompting them to stage a protest late into the night at a local roadside restaurant. Police later cracked down and detained six PTI workers. However, it was later reported that police assured Imran's sisters they would be allowed to meet him today (Wednesday). Ali Bukhari, speaking to the media after the meeting outside the jail, said the PTI founder remains steadfast despite solitary confinement. Bukhari said six names had been submitted to authorities for permission to meet Imran but only he was allowed to meet the former premier. He also noted that his client has been denied access to newspapers and television, and was not even allowed to meet his wife. According to him, Imran insisted that "the sun of justice will rise" and urged supporters not to lose courage. Separately, Aleema Khan told reporters at the Police Factory checkpoint that warrants had been issued against her and she had not sought bail. "Our brother is inside; arrest us too," she said, adding that the authorities were not concerned about Pakistan or the PTI founder. She demanded answers about May 9, 2023 rioting incidents. "Bring the CCTV footage — were cameras not installed at such major institutions [attacked on that day]? Those who stole the footage are the ones who set the buildings on fire. "Why should we apologize? It is they who must apologize to the PTI founder. This injustice must end; the system cannot continue like this," she added. Meanwhile, PTI Secretary General Salman Akram Raja also lashed out at the authorities, saying that court verdicts against PTI leaders in May 9 cases rested only on the testimony of two policemen who claimed to have entered Zaman Park wearing "invisibility caps". Speaking to the media near Adiala Jail, he said the PTI founder had been kept in solitary confinement for four weeks in defiance of an order of the Islamabad High Court. He called the cases part of a conspiracy to implicate the PTI founder, demanding transparent investigations. "On the basis of two policemen's testimony, parliamentarians are being handed ten-year sentences and their properties confiscated. Even the British during the freedom movement did not commit such excesses," Raja said. He revealed that Imran had directed the party not to contest by-elections on vacant seats. "Some leaders believe we should participate, but for us, his word is final. Without meeting him, further consultation is not possible," he added, noting that since March 25 family and lawyers have been denied meetings with the PTI founder.
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
JCP to finalise criteria for HC judges, CBs
Meetings of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) subcommittees led by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail have been scheduled for August 21 to prepare draft rules for the annual judicial performance evaluation of high court judges, as well as criteria for the selection of judges for constitutional benches. Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi had earlier formed two committees led by Justice Mandokhail. Other members include Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Awan, Senator Farooq H Naek (from treasury benches), Senator Ali Zafar (from opposition benches), and Pakistan Bar Council representative Ahsan Bhoon. The first committee was to draft proposed rules to establish effective standards for the annual performance evaluation of high court judges under Article 175A(20) of the Constitution, inserted through the 26th Constitutional Amendment. The CJP had constituted this committee during the JCP meeting on June 19. Earlier, CJP Afridi had also formed a committee comprising the same members to draft an objective criterion for selecting judges for constitutional benches. A notification issued in this regard stated that, in light of the chairperson's decisions during three JCP meetings held on February 28, the committee was tasked with drafting objective criteria for the appointment of judges under Clause (4) of Article 175A of the Constitution and for the selection of judges for constitutional benches under Articles 191-A and 202-A. Interestingly, the JCP had decided to form a rules committee in January, and CJP Yahya Afridi issued its notification on March 4. However, the committee has not held any meeting for the last five months. Legal experts have since questioned why the committee was not constituted immediately after the passage of the 26th Amendment. Since its enactment, judges for the Supreme Court and Sindh High Court's constitutional benches have been appointed without a structured selection process. The government, however, has been fully satisfied with the performance of the Supreme Court's constitutional benches, which endorsed the trial of civilians in military courts, approved the transfer of judges from different high courts to the Islamabad High Court, and annulled the reserved seats decision that had declared the PTI entitled to reserved seats after the 2024 general elections. Meanwhile, the constitutional bench has yet to take up petitions challenging its very creation. Lawyers have also raised questions about the wisdom and logic behind the nomination of a particular set of judges for constitutional benches, pointing out that judges perceived as critical of the present regime are often excluded. Advocate Rida Hosain expressed surprise that a judge elevated only a few days ago could be nominated to a constitutional bench, while several senior Supreme Court judges with extensive constitutional expertise were not. In the absence of clear criteria, she noted, such nominations appear arbitrary. Soon after the passage of the 26th Constitutional Amendment, SC senior puisne judge Syed Mansoor Ali Shah had called for establishing clear guidelines for nominating and determining the number of judges on constitutional benches. "The commission has already nominated and determined a number of judges of the Supreme Court and the Sindh High Court for the CBs in the absence of any mechanism or criteria in place," Justice Shah wrote in a nine-page letter to the JCP secretary in December last year. "Therefore, there has been no logic or reason backing the nomination and determination of the number of judges for the CBs." Justice Shah stressed that nominations under Articles 191A and 202A of the Constitution cannot be made in a vacuum, and that the JCP must first establish objective criteria through the proposed rules. He suggested that such criteria could include the number of reported constitutional judgments authored by a judge, including dissents or additional notes, while serving on larger benches that heard significant constitutional cases.
Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Govt mulls military courts appeal law
The federal government has begun consultations on a piece of legislation to grant ordinary citizens the right to appeal against trials in military courts, reliable sources revealed. On May 7, 2025, a seven-member constitutional bench of the Supreme Court, in a majority verdict, upheld the military trials of those accused in the May 9 cases and also restored the relevant provisions of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 — provisions that had been voided by an SC bench in October 2023. The court ruling further stated that parliament must legislate within 45 days to ensure that ordinary citizens facing court-martial proceedings are given the right to freely appeal before high courts. Former chief justice of Pakistan Jawwad S Khawaja, who is also a party in the main case, later filed a contempt petition against Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, arguing that no legislation had been passed to grant the right of appeal in violation of the court order. A highly reliable source told The Express Tribune that the government has now initiated consultations to provide the right of appeal to civilians convicted by military courts. According to sources, after the consultation process, a bill will be introduced to give the right of appeal before high courts. The ruling coalition now holds a two-thirds majority in parliament. The civil and military leaders of the country decided to refer cases of over 100 people who allegedly took active part in attacking military installations in the wake of former prime minister Imran Khan's first arrest from the premises of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on May 9, 2023. The PTI and a number of other petitioners including ex-CJP Khawaja approached the Supreme Court against trial of civilians in military courts and a SC full-court on October 23, 2023 not only declared these trial illegal by a majority vote but also annulled some provisions of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952.
