
Harmeet Dhillon's Civil-Rights Revolution Comes With Tea and Roses
Harmeet Dhillon at her Senate confirmation hearing in February.WASHINGTON—One night in April, Harmeet Dhillon was making spiced Indian tea she said she needed to power through her 12-hour days running the Justice Department's civil-rights division.
'Continuity and fragrance in a sea of change,' she wrote on X, sharing her masala cha recipe and a video clip.
The next day, Dhillon rattled division supervisors with an email telling them she had overhauled their mission in service to President Trump.
In her first weeks on the job, Dhillon has redeployed the division from its traditional civil-rights priorities to one advancing a MAGA agenda. So far that has meant fighting diversity initiatives, transgender rights and 'wokeness,' while advocating for the rights of gun owners and religious groups.
In the past week alone, the Trump administration launched an investigation into whether Chicago engaged in racial discrimination by hiring Black employees for top jobs; announced it would use an antifraud law to pressure universities to end diversity and inclusion programs; pulled back from federal oversight of local law enforcement; and sued an Idaho town of 925 people for refusing to allow a small Christian church to operate in a commercial zone.
'In prior Republican administrations, little attempt was made to actually harness the civil-rights division for affirmative policy change,' Dhillon said last week. 'We are taking the mandate of the voters and we're implementing that on our policy priorities.'
The civil-rights division is always subject to significant shifts in agenda with each change in administration, but Dhillon has gone further by enlisting it in a plethora of conservative causes that have never been part of its portfolio. At least 250 lawyers—well over half of the division—have left, according to current and former officials.
'What we're seeing now is a complete gutting of all the traditional work of the civil-rights division and then a rump of the civil-rights division being used almost exclusively to pursue right-wing Trumpist agenda items,' said Samuel Bagenstos, a former senior civil-rights official in the Obama Justice Department.
Dhillon, 55, has long been among Trump's staunchest legal allies. She led a group of conservative lawyers in trying to help Trump challenge his 2020 election loss. The namesake law firm she founded in 2006 has been involved in many Trump-related legal battles, including restoring him to Colorado's 2024 presidential ballot and successfully defending him in a defamation case brought by adult-film actress Stormy Daniels.
One of Dhillon's first moves at the Justice Department was to rewrite the division's mission of protecting minorities from discrimination to align instead with Trump's executive orders. She urged investigations on issues including transgender athletes in women's sports, affirmative action in education and alleged voter fraud by unauthorized immigrants.
'The zealous and faithful pursuit of this section's mission requires dedication of the section's resources, actions, attention, and energy to the priorities and objectives of the President,' Dhillon wrote.
She has said she inherited an office full of liberal activists and that lawyers shouldn't work at the Justice Department if they can't get behind the administration's agenda. 'Personnel is policy,' Dhillon posted on X.
She has developed an influencer-level presence on the platform, offering the 1.2 million followers of her personal account a constant stream of posts that mix conservative views with tips about gardening, knitting and crab ravioli. Shortly after the personnel post she shared a picture of some blooming pink roses that she said were 'legacy flowers in my new home.' A number of her followers shared their own bloom pictures in return.
In her pre-Trump days, Dhillon took her stress-relief knitting hobby and expanded it into her own textile business, creating knit products with wool sourced from sheep on a ranch where she and her husband, Sarvjit Randhawa, owned a home.
'Ten years ago I would have called this touchy-feely hippie nonsense. But it's a conservative value to not rely on foreign labor and materials,' Dhillon once told the San Francisco Chronicle.
Randhawa died last year, and she frequently posts about navigating life in Washington without him.
Dhillon sees leading the civil-rights division as a chance to make progress on causes she has long championed.
Born in northern India, Dhillon grew up in North Carolina, where her conservative parents started a Sikh temple and raised money for Republican politicians, including then-Sen. Jesse Helms.
She has had personal experiences with hate crime and discrimination. A former husband, a Sikh doctor, was shot and wounded in 1995 on a New York City bus while wearing a turban. After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Dhillon sought to protect Sikhs who experienced civil-rights violations.
During a campaign for a party leadership post in 2013, she endured ethnically tinged attacks from fellow Republicans who called her a 'Taj Mahal princess.'
Dhillon moved to San Francisco in 2003 and rose in politics there, where she said Republicans felt forced to hide. Dhillon became leader of the California Republican Party in 2016.
Dhillon's approach at the Justice Department has drawn praise on the right and condemnation from traditional civil-rights advocates, but there is widespread agreement that it is unconventional.
The Trump administration, for example, is adopting an approach typically used to investigate misconduct in police departments to examine whether the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department systemically violates residents' gun rights. Dhillon has said she hopes to do more.
Her Chicago probe came after Mayor Brandon Johnson, speaking at a local church, highlighted the number of Black people he had put in senior roles.
'If these kind of hiring decisions are being made for top-level positions in your administration, then it begs the question whether such decisions are also being made for lower-level positions,' Dhillon wrote in a letter to Johnson. The mayor called the probe divisive.
The division is 'twisting itself into a weapon against civil rights,' Maya Wiley, chief executive of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights said last week after Dhillon moved to drop Biden-era lawsuits alleging unconstitutional policing in Minneapolis and Louisville, Ky.
Dhillon said criticisms of her approach are 'untethered to reality' and ignore her work as an attorney representing refugees, workers, domestic-violence victims and those abused by police.
Some religious groups have voiced support for Dhillon, pointing to her focus on antisemitism during college campus protests of Israel's military campaign in Gaza.
Nathan Diament, the executive director of the Orthodox Union Advocacy Center, said Dhillon has been receptive to the Jewish organization's suggestions, including that she issue guidance to local authorities on what constitutes free speech versus harassment and discrimination. 'She said they are working on that actively,' Diament said.
After two Israeli embassy staffers were shot dead outside a Jewish museum on Wednesday, Dhillon said on X that the civil-rights division stood 'ready to seek justice for the victims and families of this shocking crime in our capital. We have been pushing hard on these issues, but we must do more.'
Write to Sadie Gurman at sadie.gurman@wsj.com
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nightmare for Tesla shareholders as $150 billion wiped out in market value after Elon Musk and Donald Trump's Public fight, Big fear is: Trump is not going to play ...
Tesla shares plunged more than 14% on Thursday, wiping out $150 billion in market value, as a public spat between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump intensified, raising fears of regulatory backlash against the electric vehicle maker. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The sell-off followed a heated exchange over Trump's budget bill, which turned personal when Musk claimed Trump's election victory depended on his support. Trump retaliated on Truth Social, writing, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' hinting at targeting Musk's companies, including Tesla and SpaceX. The market's reaction was swift, with Tesla's stock drop erasing more value than the market capitalization of Starbucks or many other major U.S. companies. The decline partially reversed a surge since November, when investors poured hundreds of billions into Tesla stock, betting Trump's administration would ease regulations and support Musk's vision for autonomous 'robotaxi' services. Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, a Tesla bull, expressed concern to the AP, stating, 'The whole goal of robotaxis is to have them in 20 or 25 cities next year. If you start to heighten the regulatory environment, that could delay that path.' Ives added, 'There is a fear that Trump is not going to play Mr. Nice Guy.' The feud also casts a shadow over SpaceX, Musk's privately held rocket company, which relies on billions in NASA contracts for lunar missions and International Space Station operations. SpaceX's Starlink subsidiary has recently secured deals in Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, and elsewhere, potentially aided by Musk's ties to Trump. A recent private financing round reportedly valued SpaceX at $350 billion, up from $210 billion a year ago. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Tesla's stock had soared post-election, gaining over $450 billion in value as investors anticipated regulatory leniency. However, Thursday's losses hit Musk personally, slashing his Tesla holdings by $20 billion in a single day, the AP reported. With Tesla's robotaxi testing set to begin in Austin, Texas, this month, investors now worry that Trump's threats could jeopardize the company's ambitious driverless car plans, critical to its future amid struggles in its core electric vehicle business.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Musk vs Trump Feud: 10 ways they can destroy each other—legally
When Thomas Anderson is first unplugged from the Matrix, his body convulses. His mind rejects the truth. 'He's going into arrest,' they warn, as his world crumbles. Because when you've lived too long in an illusion, reality doesn't just disappoint—it short-circuits you. That's where Elon Musk is now. He's been yanked out of the warm, binary womb of TrumpWorld. No more bromance tweets. No more wink-wink White House briefings. No more red-carpeted corridors of power where he could whisper about AI doomsday while nudging SpaceX contracts. Just cold, hard betrayal. And now? Now he wants revenge. Here are 10 gloriously real, absurdly powerful, and completely legal ways that Trump and Musk can rip each other apart—like Neo and Agent Smith in an alley full of bad ideas. 1. Trump Pulls the Plug on Musk's Federal Billions Trump, fresh off a fiscal sobriety bender and looking for budgetary scapegoats, has a new mantra : 'No woke space toys on my dime.' He's already floated cutting $3 billion worth of contracts to Musk's empire. That's not just pruning—it's taking a chainsaw to the money tree. Tesla loses its tax credits. Starlink gets kicked out of the Pentagon's good books. SpaceX is told to sit in the corner while Blue Origin waves from the Oval Office with a smug Bezos smirk. This isn't just defunding—this is strategic neutering. 2. Musk Threatens the Republic via Rocket Blackmail Musk didn't wait to be hit first. He threatened to decommission the Dragon spacecraft —the one that ferries NASA astronauts and lunch packets to the International Space Station. The unspoken message? Nice space programme you've got there. Be a shame if something happened to it. Suddenly, space diplomacy looks more like a hostage negotiation with a Bond villain in a Twitter hoodie. 3. Trump Can Yank Elon's Security Clearance Every time Elon boasts about top-secret briefings, there's an Air Force general somewhere crying into his gin. His clearance—granted through his role in military space launches—could be revoked with one swipe of Trump's Montblanc pen. Without it, Musk becomes a liability rather than an asset. He can still launch memes, just not missiles. And without Pentagon favours, his whole 'Iron Man meets Ayn Rand' routine collapses into a Reddit thread. 4. Elon Funds a Third Party Just to Spite Him In classic Musk fashion, the Tesla tzar tweeted a poll asking if he should start a new centrist political party. It was part libertarian fantasy, part MAGA middle-finger, and 100% chaos. Over 1.8 million people voted 'Yes.' Even if it doesn't win , a Musk-backed third party could siphon off enough voters to sabotage Trump's 2028 ambitions. Think Ross Perot meets a Neuralink experiment gone rogue. 5. Trump Targets Musk's Ketamine Chronicles Bannon has demanded a drug probe into Musk's ketamine-fuelled soirées, suggesting the billionaire is 'not of sound mind.' That's ironic coming from a man who looks like he was raised on moonshine and conspiracy theories. But in TrumpWorld, personal destruction is political strategy. Imagine Musk dragged into a Senate hearing with Marjorie Taylor Greene asking, 'Were you or were you not high when naming your child X Æ A-12?' 6. Musk Unleashes Epstein Allegations Without warning, Musk lobbed a digital hand grenade: that Trump's White House deliberately delayed the release of Epstein files because his name may have been in them. He offered no evidence—just vibes and vengeance. But in a country where 30% of voters think Wayfair sells children, that's enough to spark headlines, hearings, and hashtags. When Elon says, 'Mark this post,' he's not just trolling—he's threatening to turn on the lights in a room no one wants to see. 7. Trump Ends DOGE—the Bureaucratic Crypto Baby The Department of Government Efficiency, nicknamed DOGE, was Musk's vanity project: part startup, part prank, part Silicon Valley fever dream. Its mission? Replace Washington's bureaucratic sludge with blockchain optimism and quarterly reports. Trump could axe it tomorrow and return the halls of power to their natural state: clogged, confused, and blissfully analog. No more agile government. No more 'lean federalism. ' Just 500-page PDFs printed in triplicate. 8. Elon Withholds the Final $100M Musk had pledged a total of $350 million to support Trump's 2024 run. But the final $100 million is still hanging —like a Sword of Damocles in a cryptocurrency wallet. Trump, a man who treats loyalty like a Costco membership, doesn't forgive open wallets with closed zips. This isn't just about money—it's about respect. And Musk knows just how much Trump hates being ghosted, especially by someone richer. 9. Trump Questions Musk's Citizenship The Birther playbook is back. Bannon claims Musk is an 'illegal alien.' Never mind that Elon's been a naturalised American citizen since 2002. Trump doesn't need facts—just vibes, slogans, and a red hat. Expect rallies where Trump says, 'Elon? Great guy. But I'm hearing things. People are saying.' That's how the political meat grinder starts: with an innuendo and ends with a Senate subcommittee. 10. Musk Starves MAGA's Internet Starlink, Musk's satellite internet service, powers vast swathes of rural America—aka MAGA heartland. One well-timed update and Fox Nation stops loading. Steve Bannon's podcast gets frozen mid-rant. Truth Social becomes Truth Unavailable. Musk doesn't even need to admit fault. He can just smirk and say, 'Server overload. We're working on it.' MAGA may love him, but they'll riot if they miss Tucker's rerun. Final Thought: Welcome to the Unplugged War This isn't a feud—it's a glitch in the Matrix. Two megalomaniacs, both convinced they are The One. Trump, the spiritual father of populist politics. Musk, the meme-mad prophet of techno-libertarianism. They fed each other, validated each other, needed each other. But now the code is breaking. And if The Matrix taught us anything, it's this: when reality reasserts itself, the ones who rejected it scream the loudest. Musk took the red pill. Trump wrote the damn pill into law. Now they're locked in a fight to see who can bend reality back first. Only one can emerge from the simulation. The other gets ratioed on his own app.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
RCB's parent company Diageo continues to maintain silence on Bengaluru stampede
New Delhi: It's been close to 48 hours since 11 lives were lost and 75 were injured due to the on June 4, hours after they ended their title wait. The celebrations in and around the Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru turned out to be a big fat mess and many innocent lives were lost due the chaos. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The franchise has copped plenty of criticism but it has come as a surprise that its parent company - Diageo - a British multinational alcoholic company, continues to maintain silence over the matter. There have been a couple of statements by the RCB but not a single word from Diageo yet. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. reached out to the company last night with a very specific set of questions - reaction to the Bengaluru stampede, reason for the company's silence, whether they were satisfied with the arrangements made by the RCB and whether it mars the end of 18-year-long wait for a title - but there has been no response yet. The story will be updated the moment they share a response. Gautam Gambhir sends stern message after Bengaluru tragedy The Bengaluru Police have already swung into action and have arrested RCB's marketing head earlier on Friday morning. Apart from Sosale, three employees of DNA Entertainment Networks were also arrested. The police, in the FIR, have claimed that they denied RCB the permission to conduct the parade at the Chinnaswamy. Further investigation and rounds of questioning will reveal what actually transpired on June 4. The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) continues to maintain that the event was organised by the RCB and they had no role to play in it. IPL Governing Council Chairman Arun Dhamal has asserted that he alerted the RCB officials when things went out of control outside the cricket ground. Meanwhile, the event inside continued even when chaos prevailed. During a press conference on June 5, India head coach Gautam Gambhir minced no words on the tragedy in Bengaluru. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Scene outside the Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru where a stampede occurred on June 4. 'I was never a believer that we need to have roadshows. Never. When I was playing, I had the same statement even after winning the 2007 (T20 World Cup)… The lives of people are far more important and I will continue to say that,' Gambhir said ahead of the team's departure for England. 'What has happened is very tragic. My heart goes out to the families who have lost their loved ones,' he said. 'I hope in the future nothing like this happens because I think we all are responsible citizens. We should take care of all this,' Gambhir added. It now remains to be seen what transpires next because what happened in Bengaluru has not pleased the top brass of the Indian cricket board too.