logo
Musk vs Trump Feud: 10 ways they can destroy each other—legally

Musk vs Trump Feud: 10 ways they can destroy each other—legally

Time of India06-06-2025
When Thomas Anderson is first unplugged from the Matrix, his body convulses. His mind rejects the truth. 'He's going into arrest,' they warn, as his world crumbles. Because when you've lived too long in an illusion, reality doesn't just disappoint—it short-circuits you.
That's where
Elon Musk
is now. He's been yanked out of the
warm, binary womb of TrumpWorld.
No more bromance tweets. No more wink-wink White House briefings. No more red-carpeted corridors of power where he could whisper about AI doomsday while nudging
SpaceX
contracts. Just cold, hard betrayal.
And now? Now he wants revenge.
Here are 10 gloriously real, absurdly powerful, and completely legal ways that Trump and Musk can rip each other apart—like Neo and Agent Smith in an alley full of bad ideas.
1. Trump Pulls the Plug on Musk's Federal Billions
Trump, fresh off a fiscal sobriety bender and looking for budgetary scapegoats,
has a new mantra
: 'No woke space toys on my dime.' He's already floated cutting $3 billion worth of contracts to Musk's empire. That's not just pruning—it's taking a chainsaw to the money tree. Tesla loses its tax credits. Starlink gets kicked out of the Pentagon's good books. SpaceX is told to sit in the corner while Blue Origin waves from the Oval Office with a smug Bezos smirk.
This isn't just defunding—this is strategic neutering.
2. Musk Threatens the Republic via Rocket Blackmail
Musk didn't wait to be hit first. He threatened to
decommission the Dragon spacecraft
—the one that ferries
NASA
astronauts and lunch packets to the International Space Station. The unspoken message? Nice space programme you've got there. Be a shame if something happened to it. Suddenly, space diplomacy looks more like a hostage negotiation with a Bond villain in a Twitter hoodie.
3. Trump Can Yank Elon's Security Clearance
Every time Elon boasts about top-secret briefings, there's an Air Force general somewhere crying into his gin.
His clearance—granted through his role in military space launches—could be revoked with one swipe of Trump's Montblanc pen. Without it, Musk becomes a liability rather than an asset. He can still launch memes, just not missiles. And without Pentagon favours, his whole 'Iron Man meets Ayn Rand' routine collapses into a Reddit thread.
4. Elon Funds a Third Party Just to Spite Him
In classic Musk fashion, the Tesla tzar tweeted a poll asking if he should start a new centrist political party. It was part libertarian fantasy, part MAGA middle-finger, and 100% chaos. Over 1.8 million people voted 'Yes.' Even
if it doesn't win
, a Musk-backed third party could siphon off enough voters to sabotage Trump's 2028 ambitions.
Think Ross Perot meets a Neuralink experiment gone rogue.
5. Trump Targets Musk's Ketamine Chronicles
Bannon has demanded a drug probe into Musk's ketamine-fuelled soirées,
suggesting the billionaire is 'not of sound mind.'
That's ironic coming from a man who looks like he was raised on moonshine and conspiracy theories. But in TrumpWorld, personal destruction is political strategy. Imagine Musk dragged into a Senate hearing with Marjorie Taylor Greene asking, 'Were you or were you not high when naming your child X Æ A-12?'
6. Musk Unleashes Epstein Allegations
Without warning, Musk lobbed a digital hand grenade: that Trump's White House
deliberately delayed the release of Epstein files
because his name may have been in them.
He offered no evidence—just vibes and vengeance. But in a country where 30% of voters think Wayfair sells children, that's enough to spark headlines, hearings, and hashtags. When Elon says, 'Mark this post,' he's not just trolling—he's threatening to turn on the lights in a room no one wants to see.
7. Trump Ends DOGE—the Bureaucratic Crypto Baby
The Department of Government Efficiency, nicknamed DOGE, was Musk's vanity project: part startup, part prank, part Silicon Valley fever dream.
Its mission? Replace Washington's bureaucratic sludge with blockchain optimism and quarterly reports. Trump could axe it tomorrow and return the halls of power to their natural state: clogged, confused, and blissfully analog. No more agile government. No more 'lean federalism.
' Just 500-page PDFs printed in triplicate.
8. Elon Withholds the Final $100M
Musk had pledged a total of $350 million to support Trump's 2024 run. But the
final $100 million is still hanging
—like a Sword of Damocles in a cryptocurrency wallet.
Trump, a man who treats loyalty like a Costco membership, doesn't forgive open wallets with closed zips. This isn't just about money—it's about respect. And Musk knows just how much Trump hates being ghosted, especially by someone richer.
9. Trump Questions Musk's Citizenship
The Birther playbook is back.
Bannon claims Musk is an 'illegal alien.'
Never mind that Elon's been a naturalised American citizen since 2002. Trump doesn't need facts—just vibes, slogans, and a red hat. Expect rallies where Trump says, 'Elon? Great guy.
But I'm hearing things. People are saying.' That's how the political meat grinder starts: with an innuendo and ends with a Senate subcommittee.
10. Musk Starves MAGA's Internet
Starlink, Musk's satellite internet service, powers vast swathes of rural America—aka MAGA heartland. One well-timed update and Fox Nation stops loading. Steve Bannon's podcast gets frozen mid-rant. Truth Social becomes Truth Unavailable. Musk doesn't even need to admit fault.
He can just smirk and say, 'Server overload. We're working on it.' MAGA may love him, but they'll riot if they miss Tucker's rerun.
Final Thought: Welcome to the Unplugged War
This isn't a feud—it's a glitch in the Matrix. Two megalomaniacs,
both convinced they are The One.
Trump, the spiritual father of populist politics. Musk, the meme-mad prophet of techno-libertarianism. They fed each other, validated each other, needed each other. But now the code is breaking.
And if The Matrix taught us anything, it's this: when reality reasserts itself, the ones who rejected it scream the loudest. Musk took the red pill. Trump wrote the damn pill into law. Now they're locked in a fight to see who can bend reality back first. Only one can emerge from the simulation. The other gets ratioed on his own app.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Joe Root press conference : On Mohammed Siraj fake anger, why he punched his bat, update on Woakes
Joe Root press conference : On Mohammed Siraj fake anger, why he punched his bat, update on Woakes

Time of India

time4 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Joe Root press conference : On Mohammed Siraj fake anger, why he punched his bat, update on Woakes

Trump Breaks Silence on India & Russia's Oil 'Breakup' | 'New Delhi May Stop…' 'I heard India may stop buying Russian oil,' said US President Donald Trump, calling it a 'good step.' But reports say Indian refiners are still sourcing discounted Russian crude. As U.S. pressure mounts, New Delhi defends its ties with Moscow as 'steady and time-tested,' while balancing key strategic relations with Washington. Will India bow to American pressure or stick with its long-time energy partner? 29.0K views | 1 day ago

Trump repeats claim he ended India-Pakistan conflict through trade
Trump repeats claim he ended India-Pakistan conflict through trade

Business Standard

time4 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Trump repeats claim he ended India-Pakistan conflict through trade

US President Donald Trump on Sunday yet again took credit for stopping conflicts around the world, including the recent one between India and Pakistan. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim on several occasions. Trump's latest claim comes days after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for ending several conflicts around the world including the one between India and Pakistan. On Sunday, in a post on Truth Social, Trump slammed radio host and author Charlamagne Tha God, and said he (God) knows nothing about him or what he has done, like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, where Seven Million people have died, and there was no end in sight. He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy, Trump said. Just a day earlier, Trump said in an interview on Newsmax that he has settled a lot of wars. You take a look at what's happened just over the last little while. We've settled a lot of, a lot of very beautiful wars have been settled One of the wars India, Pakistan, nuclear, Trump said adding that he settled conflict between Thailand and Cambodia as well as Congo and Rwanda. I settled that up. And I settled it up with trade. I settled a lot of them with trade. I said listen, you guys are going to fight. You can fight all you want. I mean, just fight your hearts out. But we're not doing a trade deal'. All of a sudden they end up not doing a war. I settled a lot of wars. I think I settled averaging about a war a month. But, you know, we're saving millions of lives, he said. Trump on Wednesday announced the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment. The tariff for Pakistan was 19 per cent, lower than the 29 per cent announced by Trump in April. In fact, Trump on Wednesday also announced sealing a trade deal with Pakistan and said that Washington will work with Islamabad to develop what he described as the South Asian nation's massive oil reserves. At a White House press briefing on Thursday, Leavitt said that Trump has now ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia. She said that the president has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, she said. Since May 10, Trump has repeated his claim nearly 30 times that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan and that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a lot of trade with them if they stopped the conflict. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in Parliament this week that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor launched by India in retaliation after the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that killed 26 people. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, asserting that the halting of the military action was also not linked to trade as claimed by Trump. Intervening in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar said Prime Minister Modi and Trump did not have any phone calls between April 22, when the Pahalgam terror attack took place, and June 16.

MPC must ignore Trump's latest jibe, and stay focused on inflation risks and price stability goals
MPC must ignore Trump's latest jibe, and stay focused on inflation risks and price stability goals

Economic Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

MPC must ignore Trump's latest jibe, and stay focused on inflation risks and price stability goals

Oh, it's very much undead Nothing is certain except death and taxes,' said Benjamin Franklin. In the post-Trump world, one can add a third: slower growth and higher inflation or stagflation, in economists' lexicon. And possibly a fourth: Trump-induced turbulence, as evidenced by the latest round of tariff hikes announced last week. In a profession noted for its discontents-'If all the economists were laid end to end, they'd never reach a conclusion,' said George Bernard Shaw-Trump has achieved the near impossible. He's ensured almost complete unanimity among economists on the likely outcome of his chop-and-change policy on tariffs: lower growth, higher inflation. What explains economist-dominated MPC's decision to tread a different path and take a decidedly one-sided view of how Trump's tariffs will impact India's macro economy? Indian exceptionalism? Market capture? The desire of a relatively newly minted MPC (it has yet to complete a year in office in its present avatar) to respond to a nod-and-a-wink from North Block? 'Core inflation remains subdued, and overall inflation is comfortably below the RBI's 4% target, affording room for the easing cycle to be sustained,' says the finance ministry, crossing the unstated Lakshman rekha between the executive and RBI on interest rate policy in its latest monthly report. More importantly, will it continue down that path at its three-day meet, starting tomorrow? Unlike its peers worldwide, MPC seems to believe that growth will be adversely impacted, but not inflation. So, it has cut the policy repo rate by 100 bps since February 2025, reduced CRR by 100 bps and flooded the system with liquidity. All this, even as central banks in the US, China, the EU and Britain have opted to hold rates constant till there is greater fall in inflation to a more than six-year low in June was driven primarily by F&B group, which accounts for close to 46% of the consumption basket/index and can quickly reverse (one extreme weather event is all it takes). The US and Britain have seen an uptick in inflation. Oil prices are likely to move up post-Trump's threat to impose a penalty (100% tariff?) on countries that buy oil from Russia (India is a big buyer). Hardeep Puri has warned that removing Russian supplies from the market could push oil prices to $130-140 a the market has been signalling higher rates for some time now, with savers deserting bank deposits for riskier forms of investment, including, yes, cryptos. In its third buyback of this fiscal year, on July 17, RBI accepted only 79% of the notified amount, suggesting market participants wanted higher yields than its comfort level. Experience has shown that more liquidity may or may not spur credit growth, and hence economic growth. But it will almost definitely spur inflation in a scenario where supply-side factors (disruption of supply chains and higher tariffs worldwide) are likely to shift the balance of risks towards higher inflation, even as our domestic-focused economy navigates these shocks better. No wonder IMF has just hiked its growth projections for India. There is also the attendant risk of banks and NFBCs lending to less creditworthy borrowers. In a conversation with Raghuram Rajan, Jerome Powell, put it well: 'Tariffs are highly likely to generate at least a temporary rise in inflation. The inflationary effects could also be more persistent.'In a speech on economic outlook in April, Powell said: 'Our obligation is to keep longer-term inflation expectations well anchored and to make certain that a one-time increase in the price level does not become an ongoing inflation problem. We may find ourselves in the challenging scenario in which our dual-mandate goals are in tension. If that were to occur, we would consider how far the economy is from each goal, and the potentially different time horizons over which those respective gaps would be anticipated to close.'To assume, as Sanjay Malhotra seems to have done, 'Inflation is under control, and we can assume that we have won the is good, but there is still room for improvement,' is unwise. RBI's mandate under the inflation targeting regime is clear. It is 'price stability, keeping in mind the objective of growth'. It is not a dual objective, as in the case of the US Fed. In terms of priorities, inflation ranks first. It is most certainly not 'aspirational' growth, a term that has newly entered MPC's might have won the battle against inflation, thanks in part to statistical sleight of hand (base effects) but not the war. Fortunately, RBI governor seems to have realised he might have erred. Last month, Malhotra's statement that 'though the RBI has won the battle against inflation, it continues its war against price rise, keeping in mind its objective of price stability', is a notable shift. One that suggests he, and MPC, will not rush in with another hasty rate cut. Never mind what Trump says, or the market wants. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Zomato delivered, but did the other listed unicorns? US tariff hike to hit Indian exports, may push RBI towards rate cuts Will TCS layoffs open the floodgates of mass firing at Indian IT firms? Indian IT firms never reveal the truth hiding behind 'strong' deal wins Is Bajaj Finance facing its HDFC Bank moment? Tata Motors' INR38k crore Iveco buy: Factors that can make investors nervous Stock Radar: Strides Pharma stock hits fresh 52-week high in July; will the rally continue in August? F&O Radar| Deploy Short Strangle in Nifty to gain from Theta decay For investors who can think beyond Trump: 5 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 36%

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store