NZ to spend $2 billion on new maritime helicopters
New Zealand will spend billions replacing the Defence Force's aging maritime helicopters, as global tensions increase.
Along with the $NZ2 billion ($A1.85b) for the helicopters, the government said it would increase baseline spending by $NZ239 million ($A207m) for the Defence Force each year over the next four years.
"It is very clear that New Zealand is not immune from the increasing tensions being felt throughout the world," New Zealand Defence Minister Judith Collins said in a statement on Monday.
"(This) sets us on our path for defence spending to reach two per cent of GDP by 2032-33," she said.
New Zealand's Defence Force has struggled with systemic underspending over the past several decades, which amounts to just over one per cent of GDP now.
In April, the government said it would boost defence spending with $NZ9 billion ($A8b) of new funding over the next four years.
"There is no economic security without national security. Global tensions are increasing rapidly, and Defence personnel need the right equipment and conditions to do their jobs," Collins said.
"As a maritime nation we are prioritising naval capability," she said.
New Zealand's first national security review in 2023 called for more military spending and stronger ties with Indo-Pacific nations to tackle climate change and strategic competition among the West, China and Russia. New Zealand has eight SH-2G(I) Seasprite maritime helicopters.
Collins said replacing these will increase the defensive and offensive capabilities and surveillance range of New Zealand's frigates.
Collins added she will have more to say about defence investments in the coming year when the government unveils its budget.
New Zealand's budget is scheduled for May 22, and will outline spending for the 12-month period to June 30, 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
27 minutes ago
- West Australian
JACKSON HEWETT: Australia's appeal to global capital, if it gets the settings right, could see flood of funds
Australia is in the box seat to receive a flood of capital seeking refuge from economic turbulence in the United States, according to some of the country's largest investors. At a symposium hosted by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Future Fund chief executive Dr Raphael Arndt said many of the world's largest fund managers are heavily exposed to US assets and are now looking for more stable jurisdictions to diversify. 'In the listed markets, the US is somewhere between 60 and 70 per cent of global market cap... in private markets, it's even more,' Dr Arndt said. 'So every investor in private markets in the world has a huge exposure to the US. Many investors, including us, are thinking hard about how we should diversify that exposure. Australia is right up there in terms of attractive investment destinations, alongside parts of Europe and Japan.' That sentiment was echoed by ASIC chair Joe Longo, who said recent discussions in Washington DC and Doha revealed Australia was seen as a safe harbour. 'Australia is seen as a sophisticated market, with strong rule of law and institutions. I'm certain that Australia has a real opportunity here, if we play our cards right,' Mr Longo said. The increased capital interest could drive further momentum in Australia's already buoyant equity market, which hit near-record highs this week despite volatility in global equities triggered by US President Donald Trump's new round of tariffs. But it's not just equities that may benefit. Panel participants noted that private investment markets are also experiencing rapid growth — particularly in private credit, where both demand for yield and investor appetite for uncorrelated returns are driving activity. Australia's largest super funds, such as AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust, now invest around 30 per cent of their portfolios into unlisted assets encompassing infrastructure, private equity, property, and private credit. The Future Fund, which does not publish returns in the same way, also maintains substantial allocations to private markets. Jason Collins, Australian head of investment giant BlackRock, which manages $US11.6 trillion ($17.7 trillion) globally, said his firm had $280 billion in Australian public and private assets. Over the past five years, BlackRock had significantly expanded its private markets operations, deploying $30 billion across 50 local investments — a move Mr Collins said was driven by structural changes in the global economy. 'Governments around the world have high debt to GDP levels — above 90 per cent globally,' Mr Collins said. 'The US is under 125 per cent, Japan over 200 per cent. Governments also have reducing tax bases. In 22 of the 27 EU member states, the working age population is declining. In Australia, one in 10 people will retire in the next 10 years. 'So with high debt to GDP and a lower taxation base in the future, there's a real need for private capital to meet some pretty critical needs in the global economy, especially in infrastructure. That's the thinking behind our private markets expansion.' Global investor appetite has followed, and Australia is increasingly attractive, with 80 per cent of the capital flowing to Australia via BlackRock from international investors. 'Earlier in my career I was selling BlackRock to Australians. Now I sell Australia to BlackRock,' he said. ASIC has welcomed the interest in Australian assets but is also keen to understand the extent to which they are reshaping Australians' investment opportunities. While listed equities remain dominant at $3 trillion, private capital has surged 161 per cent over the past decade to $148 billion. With initial public offerings at a 20-year low in 2023, ASIC this week announced new regulations to fast-track the listing process. Even so, the panel noted, private markets are increasingly appealing as equity markets become more concentrated. That trend is partly driven by the rise of large superannuation funds, which are so closely benchmarked under the government's MySuper performance tests that they predominantly track the ASX index, investing heavily in top companies. Matthew Michelini, head of Asia Pacific for private equity firm Apollo Global, which manages $US785 billion, described the Australian market as a concentrated bet on a few miners and four major banks. He said that global monetary policy over the past two decades had channelled excess liquidity into financial markets, distorting public equities. 'Most of that surplus went into financial markets. There are very few places that can absorb that. So public markets, by and large, became indexed, correlated, concentrated, driven by passive money,' Mr Michelini said. As a result, traditional portfolio construction of 60 per cent equities and 40 per cent bonds no longer offers the same diversification. Investors are turning to private markets in search of uncorrelated returns. 'Public markets aren't particularly good places to fund a growth company that has to reinvest in its own business or acquire businesses to turn around,' Dr Arndt said. 'That's how you create a lot of value as an investor, and that's why we would expect higher returns in private markets.' However, ASIC has raised concerns about transparency in private investment, especially in private credit markets. Commissioner Simone Constant said several submissions to ASIC's inquiry warned about the lack of visibility. 'What did surprise me, actually, was the number of submissions that said this is something you should be worried about,' she said. 'It may not be a problem now, but you need to understand the size of this wall of money in case it becomes one.' Ms Constant also noted the sheer size of private enterprise in Australia. 'One of the numbers that stood out to me was that 96 per cent of Australian companies earning over $100 million a year are private. That's really significant when you look at the employment numbers; it's about 85 per cent of people employed in the private (sector)'. With one in ten Australians set to retire over the next decade, demand for higher-yielding private investments is likely to grow. Global giants like BlackRock and Apollo are looking to expand access, but the lack of data and investor understanding remains a risk. Peter Warne, a non-executive director at UniSuper and chair of Virgin Australia, said improving valuation standards for unlisted assets was crucial to building trust. 'One of the big triggers for the GFC was the poor mortgage lending market in the US. That was all done at the state level, and no one was collecting the data,' Mr Warne said. 'The Federal Reserve didn't actually know how big this thing was until it blew up. I think we'd all be better off with more data to assess whether systemic risks are building.'
The Australian
7 hours ago
- The Australian
Anthony Albanese ‘open' to defence funding boost
You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Give us your feedback. You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Anthony Albanese is opening the door to lifting defence spending ahead of his potential meeting with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 next week, while declining to confirm publicly whether he considers China a national security threat to Australia. The Prime Minister has for weeks stood firm on his position that he would not blindly tick off on the call from US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth for Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent, but on Tuesday left the door open to increasing funding for defence more broadly. 'Arbitrary figures lead to a cul-de-sac and we want to make sure as well that every single dollar that defence spends results in actual assets,' he told the National Press Club ahead of travelling to the G7 this week. When asked if defence spending as a portion of GDP could feasibly increase as investment in such assets and capabilities went up, Mr Albanese said: 'Of course, we'll always provide for capability that's needed. I've made it very clear – we will support the capability that Australia needs. 'I think that Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence. Simple as that.' It follows senior ministers such as Richard Marles and Pat Conroy indicating a similar willingness to boost spending on defence, with Mr Conroy confirming last week the government was 'open to having a conversation about increasing defence funding'. Former Defence Department deputy secretary Peter Jennings said the critical question for Mr Albanese was whether the current defence spend was adequate to the strategic challenge, arguing that the answer was a resounding 'no'. 'He's got a little bit of wriggle room now, if he finds that he's under pressure from Trump or other allies or the calls for increasing spending just get too great, too loud domestically, well, then he does have a way out of it,' Mr Jennings said. 'What he's doing is just describing a process; when he's pressed on this issue, all he says is, 'well, what we do is that we consider our needs based on proposals that are put in cabinet'. 'He's not locking himself out of doing more, but clearly, I think he's reluctant to, because they haven't so far.' Strategic Analysis Australia head of research Marcus Hellyer said he was sceptical over Mr Albanese's language, arguing that for more investment to be made in specific capabilities, the government had to tick off on an increase in defence spending, rather than the process occurring the other way around. 'We have had review after review … and assessment after assessment, which have determined the capabilities we need, yet the current investment program doesn't include them, why?' he said. 'Because the current investment program was designed around a certain funding envelope. 'That's why it's ludicrous when people pompously say 'we will acquire the capabilities we need' when governments are the ones setting a funding envelope.' While giving himself room to move on the issue of defence spending, Mr Albanese also sought to dodge direct questions over whether China posed a national security threat to Australia and argued that simplifying what was a 'complex set of relationships' was neither 'diplomatic' nor 'mature'. 'We engage constructively in the region, including with China, and including with ASEAN nations and what we say is that it is in Australia's interests and indeed, the world's interest for there to be peace and security in our region,' he said. 'That's our position. That's the mature way in which we are able as a middle power to exercise influence in the region.' It follows a Chinese flotilla circumnavigating Australia ahead of the election, with Mr Marles confirming Australia engaged in an 'unprecedented level of surveillance' of the ships that he said were conducting exercises and 'seeking to … demonstrate' capabilities. 'We are very aware of what that task group was doing, the exercises that it was engaging in, what it was seeking to be able to demonstrate,' he told Sky. Despite the expected meeting with Mr Trump being just days away, Mr Albanese once more made veiled inferences over the danger of 'copying' policies from overseas – or more specifically the US – that would leave Australia 'narrower, less generous and more divided'. It followed Labor accusing the Coalition of importing policies from overseas numerous times during the election, arguing the opposition would 'Americanise Medicare' if it won office. Mr Albanese also confirmed that other policies on top of the question of defence spending, such as the news media bargaining code and the under-16s social media ban, were also not 'on the table' when it came to speaking to Mr Trump about lifting the tariffs imposed on Australian products by the US.
Sky News AU
13 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Beyond parody': Albanese Labor government leaves Australian Defence Force ‘toothless'
Sky News host Andrew Bolt claims Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is leaving Australia's Defence Force 'toothless'. 'Let me show you something truly crazy, it is a brilliant example of what you do get from a defence force when it is headed by a prime minister like that,' Mr Bolt said. 'Albanese has stripped the Australian Defence Force to the bone to pay for nuclear submarines we won't start getting for another decade or more. He just won't top up its budget … three Chinese warships can circumnavigate Australia firing guns and we couldn't even put a frigate in the sea to follow them.'
