
Letters: If Trump's extortion of UCLA succeeds, it will affect all of California
This assault extends far beyond UCLA. It endangers vital research and educational programs at UC Berkeley and UCSF that our region depends on for medical breakthroughs, technological innovation and educational excellence.
UC President James Milliken warned that 'a payment of this scale would completely devastate our country's greatest public university system,' compromising research that saves lives and drives economic growth throughout California.
While we face multiple challenges from the Trump administration, we cannot allow this attack on our premier public university system to succeed. The damage would ripple through our local economy, medical institutions and research partnerships.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged to 'fight like hell' against this extortion. Bay Area residents must contact their representatives and demand that federal funding be restored without punitive settlements that would cripple the UC system we all rely on.
The survival of UC's mission depends on our immediate action.
Mary McAllister, Oakland
Strengthen e-bike laws
Regarding '4-year-old boy killed by driver on Burlingame sidewalk identified' (Bay Area, SFChronicle.com, Aug. 11): For whatever reason, the driver who killed the boy may have been startled by an electric bike hitting her car and accelerated across the street into the restaurant.
The Burlingame police said an 11-year-old was riding the Class 2 e-bike, and there are no age restrictions or license requirements for operating them.
I do not lay blame on anyone for this tragedy. Except that there seem to be few regulations governing the use of e-bikes.
What parent lets an 11-year-old ride something that can go as fast as a car?
Elected officials need to pass laws regarding e-bikes that set age limits, regulate use on streets and sidewalks, and require mandatory safety instruction and safety gear like helmets. Parents who let kids ride e-bikes under the appropriate age should face steep fines.
In the name of the families and friends of victims, I ask lawmakers to please enact strict enforcement guidelines in the next six months to prevent any more injuries or loss of life.
Annie Cronin, San Mateo
Denounce journalist killings
I think it's important for the Chronicle, along with all newspapers, to condemn the recent killing of Al-Jazeera journalists in Gaza and the horrendous death toll of journalists during the conflict.
Since October 2023, when the war in Gaza started, 184 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed by Israel, compared to the 18 journalists and media workers killed so far in the Russia-Ukraine war, the Associated Press reported, quoting the Committee to Protect Journalists.
Violence against, and killing of, journalists is an attack on the public's right to understand what is happening in war zones. As a librarian who has focused part of my career on promoting media literacy, I think our journalistic institutions need to be clear about condemning these targeted killings.
Gregory Hom, Oakland
History repeats itself
Regarding ''Why did this happen to us? ' Japanese Americans share heartwrenching WWII incarceration memories' (U.S. & World, SFChronicle.com, Aug. 11): Thank you to reporter Ko Lyn Cheang and photographer Lea Suzuki for the timely story about the Ireichō book of names that lists the more than 125,000 Japanese Americans forcibly relocated to concentration camps during World War II.
The Irei Project's book and its two-year nationwide tour to honor every incarceration survivor are a reminder that the Trump administration's current actions are not the first time our government has persecuted innocent immigrants and Americans.
'Oh when will you ever learn?/ Oh when will you ever learn?' The words from 'Where Have All the Flowers Gone?' from the Vietnam War era still hang tragically in the air.
Judith Kirk, Redwood City

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Starmer and Zelensky ‘agree strong resolve' for peace ahead of Trump-Putin talks
Sir Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelensky have said there is 'strong resolve' for peace in Ukraine and a viable chance of a ceasefire, ahead of highly anticipated talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. The two leaders expressed cautious optimism about the prospect of a truce 'as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious' about ending the war, as they met on Wednesday, a Downing Street statement said. In a separate statement, Mr Zelensky said there had been discussions about the security guarantees required to make any deal 'truly durable if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killing'. The Prime Minister hosted the Ukrainian president for a private breakfast in No 10 on Thursday as Europe braces for the face-to-face meeting between the US president and his Russian counterpart in Alaska on Friday. European leaders are hopeful about the potential for a peace deal after a joint call with Mr Trump on Wednesday, during which he reportedly told them his goal for the summit was to secure a ceasefire. But concerns linger over the prospect of Kyiv being excluded from negotiations over its own future, and pressured to cede territory, after the US leader suggested any agreement may need to involve 'swapping of land'. Ukraine has already rejected any proposal that would compromise its borders. In a readout of the morning meeting between Sir Keir and Mr Zelensky, a Downing Street spokesman said: 'They had a private breakfast, where they discussed yesterday's meetings. 'They agreed there had been a powerful sense of unity and a strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine.' On Wednesday, Sir Keir co-chaired a virtual meeting of the 'coalition of the willing' – a European-led effort to send a peacekeeping force to Ukraine to monitor any deal – where he said there was a 'viable' chance of a truce. Downing Street repeated that language on Thursday, with the caveat that it would require the Russian president to take 'action to prove he is serious about peace'. '(Sir Keir and Mr Zelensky) agreed to stay in close touch in the coming days,' the readout said. The Ukrainian president, who was warmly embraced by the Prime Minister, with a red carpet rolled out for his arrival in Downing Street, said the meeting had been 'good' and 'productive'. But he urged the UK to join PURL- Nato's Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List initiative, to provide weapons to Kyiv. 'It is important that, within the framework of the coalition of the willing, we should all be able to achieve effective formats for security cooperation,' he said. 'We also discussed the continuation of support programs for our army and our defense industry. Under any scenario, Ukraine will maintain its strength. 'Keir and I also talked about such mechanisms for weapons supplies as the PURL programme, and I urged the UK to join.' Further sanctions could be imposed on Russia should the Kremlin fail to engage and the UK is already working on its next package of measures targeting Moscow, he said. 'We're ready to support this, including from the plans we've already drawn up to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased,' Sir Keir told allies on Wednesday. 'It is important to remind colleagues that we do stand ready also to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary.'
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Trump on Putin: from flattery to frustration
In the early days of his second term, US President Donald Trump was full of praise for his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, who he meets Friday in Alaska for crunch talks on the Ukraine conflict. But as the months have passed without the peace deal Trump said would be done in 24 hours under his leadership, his tone on Putin has turned sour. Here a look back in quotes at the shifting mood: - 'I get along with him great' - Ending the war in Ukraine was a priority for Trump in January when he returned to the Oval Office. "I think he's destroying Russia by not making a deal," he told reporters on January 20, while also insisting, "I got along with him great." A day later on Truth Social he posted: "I'm going to do Russia, whose Economy is failing, and President Putin, a very big FAVOR. Settle now, and STOP this ridiculous War! IT'S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE." Meanwhile from the Kremlin Putin was flattering, telling Russian state media on January 24 that Trump was "not only a smart person, but a pragmatic person". He also said what he referred to as the "crisis in Ukraine" might have been averted had Donald Trump been US president at the time. "I cannot but agree with him that if he had been president -- if his victory hadn't been stolen in 2020 -- then maybe there would not have been the crisis in Ukraine that emerged in 2022." - 'Vladimir, STOP!' - Good vibes seemed to circulate between the two leaders the following month. Trump described their phone conversation on February 12 as "lengthy and highly productive". "President Putin even used my very strong Campaign motto of, 'COMMON SENSE.' We both believe very strongly in it," he posted on Truth Social. But his tone changed sharply at the end of March. Trump told NBC he was "very angry, very pissed off" when Putin started getting into Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelensky's credibility. Then in April, Trump called on Putin to stop strikes on Kyiv. "Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!" he posted on April 24. He continued in this spirit two days later. "It makes me think that maybe he doesn't want to stop the war, he's just tapping me along, and has to be dealt with differently, through 'Banking' or 'Secondary Sanctions?' Too many people are dying!!!" - 'He's gone absolutely CRAZY!' - By late May, exasperation was taking over. "I've always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!" he posted on May 25. "What Vladimir Putin doesn't realize is that if it weren't for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD," Trump posted a day later. "He's playing with fire!" But when Trump turned 79 on June 14, Putin did not forget to send his best wishes. "President Putin called this morning to very nicely wish me a Happy Birthday," Trump posted, adding that the call was to "more importantly, talk about Iran." It was a brief thaw. "We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless," Trump said at the White House on July 8. "I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night," he told reporters a week later. By the end of July, Trump said he was "not so interested" in talking to Putin anymore. But days before Friday's summit in Alaska he said he expected to have a "constructive conversation" with his Russian counterpart. eab-maj/jj


New York Post
3 minutes ago
- New York Post
Kohberger's ‘living hell,' Trump wants more control of DC police and Zelensky on US / Russia summit
Bryan Kohberger, the man convicted of slaughtering four University of Idaho students in 2022 is being hazed in prison and the guards are letting it slide, President Trump is planning to ask Congress for a crime bill that will allow the feds to control the DC Police longer and Ukrainian President Zelensky catches up with President Trump ahead of Friday's key meeting with Vladimir Putin.