Huge sum workers may save on commute by driving electric car
The study found EVs have less than a quarter of the running costs for the average-length commute compared to a petrol car.
The Open Agent research found someone who lived 15km away from their work — which is close to the average distance most people live from their workplace according to Census data — pays $58,000 in petrol over a 42-year career.
The cost of charging an electric car over this period and distance — similar to someone travelling from Scarborough to the CBD — is about $13,000.
Those driving to work from 30km away (roughly the distance between Ellenbrook to Perth, or Karrinyup to the airport) face a lifetime work commute charge cost of $26,460 with an EV, or $116,100 for petrol.
At the other end of the spectrum, those driving from 5km away will pay $4410 to charge an EV, or $19,350 for petrol.
The research based the a petrol cost of $1.72 per litre, and an electric cost of 0.042c, which is the standard used by the Australian Taxation Office.
But the Motor Trades Association warns though operational savings are undoubtedly cheaper, the study did not consider the full suite of costs associated with an electric vehicle. A Tesla charging site. Credit: Blomst / Pixabay (user Blomst)
Chief executive Stephen Moir said EVs were generally much pricier to buy than a standard car and incurred extra insurance costs, while also suffering a much faster drop in value withing a few years of purchase.
'I would agree with this initial assessment that it is cheaper to run an electric vehicle if you are only looking at running the car from the time you turn it on to the time you turn it off,' he said.
Mr Moir also questioned the environmental benefits of EVs considering the impact of mining lithium for batteries. However, he said swift advances on technology could soon see lithium batteries replaced with more environmentally friendly options.
RAC general manager of external relations Will Golsby said its surveys showed most EV buyers chose to go electric for reasons like convenience and lower running costs, in addition to the environmental benefits.
'Ease of servicing and maintenance, and EVs being cheaper to power are key reasons people are choosing electric or hybrid over petrol or diesel,' he said.
'Hybrids have also become popular for drivers who aren't ready for a full electric vehicle but want the benefits of lower running costs and reduced emissions.
'However more needs to be done to bring down the up-front cost of EVs. We need to see a wider variety of options at lower price points.
'We support the Australian Government's fringe benefit tax exemption for EVs and continue to call for more action to improve EV affordability for Western Australians.' What it costs driving to work. Credit: The West Australian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
14 hours ago
- 7NEWS
HECS debts and student loans set for slashing as legislation for 20 per cent cuts passes through parliament
Legislation passed through parliament on Wednesday has made long-touted student debt cuts official. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) will automatically erase 20 per cent of student debt amounts as they stood on June 1. Because the cut will be backdated, it will not include the most recent indexation. HELP, VET Student Loan, Australian Apprenticeship Support Loan and other student support loan debts are all eligible for the reduction. 'This will remove over $16 billion in HELP and other student debt,' the Department of Education said. The Greens have criticised the once-off cut, saying the figure actually 'collapses to a mere 7.9 per cent' once indexation since Labor's election in 2022 is accounted for, assuming no repayments had been made on a $30,000 debt. The average HECS debt for someone in their 20s is currently about $31,500, and a 20 per cent reduction on that will equate to about $6300. The Greens said that this 'doesn't even touch the sides of this growing burden'. While Australia Institute senior economist Jack Thrower agreed with that sentiment, he previously told that it would take nine years worth of indexations to bring balances back to where they were before the cuts. That projected example is based on someone with the average sum of debt, who has not made a single repayment, and on indexation rates within the RBA's ideal bandwidth of about 2.5 per cent. The Department of Education said the cut 'will particularly help younger Australians'. 'About 70 per cent of people repaying a HELP debt being 35 or younger. This is a critical time for saving, considering first home buying and supporting or starting a family. 'This measure recognises that many Australians are doing it tough and will take pressure off the costs that Australians have to budget for.'
Perth Now
a day ago
- Perth Now
New Mini Woolies open to support students with disabilities
South Metropolitan TAFE has teamed up with Woolworths to give students with disabilities hands-on experience at a new training facility on the Mandurah campus. The Mini Woolies initiative provides a fully simulated supermarket environment where students can develop practical retail and customer service skills as part of their vocational education. Mandurah MLA Rhys Williams represented Skills and TAFE minister Amber-Jade Sanderson at the official launch last week and said the initiative was a strong example of inclusive education in action. 'The new Mini Woolies at South Metro TAFE is more than just a training space, it's a stepping stone to future education, employment and independence,' he said. 'Mandurah is proudly leading the way as the most accessible and inclusive city in Western Australia and the new Mini Woolies is another step in creating real opportunities for everyone in our community.' Ms Sanderson said the experience would help build the confidence and skills needed for students to move into further training and employment. 'It's another way our TAFE sector is providing training opportunities for Western Australians,' she said. 'Congratulations to South Metropolitan TAFE and Woolworths on this innovative approach to vocational training.'
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
The $50m fight pitting chicken brand Ingham's against the tax office
The tax office is accusing high-profile Australian food brand Ingham's of ripping off taxpayers, in a dispute that has dragged on into its sixth year. The more than a century-old company is a household name for growing chickens, but its accounts from 2019 to now currently are being sat on by a broody Australian Taxation Office (ATO). The multi-million-dollar dispute is understood to be about tax incentives claimed for research and development (R&D) around feed the animals eat. The company's potential claim totals more than $50 million in taxpayer funds — which, in the context of $11.2 billion given out through the entire ATO program in 2021-22, is far from chickenfeed. Barrister Piotr Klank told ABC News that disputes about R&D incentives are complex because they sit at the intersection of science, the law and tax policy. Mr Klank, who is not a party to the dispute and has never advised Ingham's Group, said one of the key issues is that businesses need to prove that there was no other way of getting the necessary outcomes without conducting the R&D. "[You would] assume that if an activity was undertaken, there was a reason for that, and [the company] did that activity to find out something. But that's not how the legislation operates," he said. To encourage companies to spend money on research to develop new products and services, the federal government offers tax incentives. Previously, money spent on R&D attracted a tax offset at a rate of 43.5 per cent. The rate has since been modified. For businesses with a turnover of less than $20 million, it is 18.5 percentage points above the company's tax rate, which is equivalent to 43.5 per cent. Meanwhile, larger businesses receive the company tax rate plus 8.5 per cent for R&D expenditure up to 2 per cent of total expenditure, and the tax rate plus 16.5 per cent for R&D expenditure above 2 per cent of total expenditure up to a $150 million limit, at which point the incentive falls to the level of the company tax rate. If the tax offset exceeds the amount of tax the company was set to pay, the balance is paid to the business, in cash. Everyone involved, from the ATO to consulting firms and specialists that have popped up to help people access the scheme, have reiterated the rigorous regulation around the scheme, including reviews and audits. As the stalled financial records of Ingham's Group show, even a company worth $1.3 billion on the stock exchange can get caught up in proving that what it has claimed for is truly innovative. Ingham's is one of the major processors of chicken meat in the country and produced more than 405,000 tonnes of poultry in 2023, recording a net profit of $101.5 million — up 68 per cent year-on-year. In its most recent annual report, the company says it has been undergoing an audit over an "adjustment approximately equal to the offset claimed" of $8.5 million annually for the years from 2019 to now. Claims for the same issue in 2022, 2023 and 2024 have not yet been submitted, as the dispute has remained without a resolution. "The accounting position involves significant judgement in the interpretation and application of the R&D offset provisions in the income tax laws and estimation uncertainty, however, is supported by advice obtained from the company's tax advisors," the annual report stated. In a message to investors, Ingham's said it will "vigorously defend its position" and take it to court if needed. The company declined to comment further when contacted by the ABC. The president and chair of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (ATSE), Katherine Woodthorpe, has spent her life on the business side of science — from technological equipment sales through to the venture capital that funds many innovative start-ups. While she did not comment on the substance of the Ingham's-ATO dispute, Dr Woodthorpe spoke of the need for more innovation in Australia. "More R&D means that we get more differentiation in our economy," she said, pointing to the low level of "complexity" in Australia's economy. Our top exports are things we dig up. In fact, if you exclude education (our fourth biggest export), our largest earners are iron ore, coal, natural gas and gold. Australia's R&D spend is comparatively low amongst global peers, which experts argue means we're discovering less, not getting more efficient, and falling behind. "Australia currently sits at about 1.68 per cent of GDP," Dr Woodthorpe noted. That puts us below the average among Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) nations, of 2.7 per cent. "If you look at near neighbours: Korea is over 4 per cent and pushing to go higher as well, Japan is 3.3 per cent," Dr Woodthorpe said. "We're really lagging a long way behind." The tax office did not respond to specific questions about the Ingham's dispute, reiterating that it cannot comment about the tax affairs of any individual or entity due to "statutory confidentiality obligations". In a statement it said, while companies self-assess their eligibility for R&D claims, "the ATO has sophisticated systems in place to identify possible non-compliance with the R&DTI [R&D Tax Incentive] program". Companies can apply for a tick of approval before they begin through a system called "advanced findings". As the government has put it, an advance finding "gives you assurance that your registered R&D activities will be eligible for claiming under the R&D Tax incentive". The system has an average processing time of 72 days. However, Mr Klank said there was a reason most applications for the incentive happen after the fact, rather than pursuing an advanced finding on eligibility. "You're required to anticipate what your R&D activities will look like," he said. "One of the things about research is that the activities can change as you're going along. "But while things may change, that 'advanced finding' will apply to the project that you have registered." In a previous role, Dr Woodthorpe sat on a committee that assessed R&D tax rebate applications. She said disputes such as the Ingham's case were more common when the scheme was first implemented. "There was, in those early days of the incentive, a lot of pushing around the edges," she recalled. "I think it's more rare now." Dr Woodthorpe said cases in dispute were decided at what is now called the Administrative Review Tribunal. Now, she said, more companies involved understand the boundaries of what can be classified and claimed as R&D. "It has to be genuinely different, innovative — changing either the way we do things, changing a product itself in a substantive way."
