
Pentagon says US strike set back Iranian nuclear program by up to 2 years
"We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the department assess that," Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesperson, said at a news briefing on Wednesday (local time), without providing further details.
"All of the intelligence that we've seen led us to believe that Iran's, those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated," Parnell added.
On June 22, US forces bombed the three Iranian nuclear facilities of Natanz, Fordow, and Esfahan, reports Xinhua news agency.
"No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow," Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi told CBS News in an interview Tuesday. "What we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged."
Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation is assessing the damage, he added.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian issued an order on Wednesday to enact a law suspending the country's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The law calls for a suspension of cooperation with the IAEA until Iran's sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the safety of its nuclear facilities and scientists are fully guaranteed, said Constitutional Council Spokesman Hadi Tahan Nazif.
The law requires that any future inspections of Iran's nuclear sites by the IAEA need approval from the Supreme National Security Council.
In response, the IAEA said in a statement, "We are aware of these reports. The IAEA is awaiting further official information from Iran."
Speaking at a daily press briefing on Wednesday, Stephane Dujarric, chief spokesman for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, expressed concern over Iran's decision, calling it "obviously concerning."
"The Secretary-General has been very consistent in his call for Iran to cooperate with the IAEA, and frankly, for all countries to work closely with the IAEA on nuclear issues," he said.
US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said Wednesday that Iran's suspension of cooperation with the IAEA is "unacceptable."
"We'll use the word unacceptable, that Iran chose to suspend cooperation with the IAEA at a time when it has a window of opportunity to reverse course and choose a path of peace and prosperity," Bruce told a briefing.
Iran must cooperate fully with the UN agency without further delay, she said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
26 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
‘Come home only to be exiled again': Deported Afghans return as outsiders in their own country
Ghulam Ali begins his days in pain, his muscles aching from hauling grain on a rickety cart through the streets of Kabul, homesick for the country he called home for nearly four decades. Ali is among more than 1.2 million Afghans deported from neighbouring Iran since March 2024, according to the International Organization for Migration, after Tehran pledged mass deportations to counter mounting local discontent over refugees. Thousands have also fled this month after Israeli and US airstrikes hit Iranian military targets. For Ali, 51, whose family left Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion in the 1980s when he was just 10, Iran was home. 'I grew up there, worked there, buried my parents there,' he said during a midday break from work in Kabul, sipping green tea with a simple lunch of naan bread. 'But in the end, they threw us out like trash. I lost everything – my home, my little savings in cash, my dignity,' he told Context by video link. Like many others, he has returned to a homeland he barely knew and one that has changed drastically. Outsiders in their own country, many men struggle to support their family while women face severe restrictions on their daily life under the ruling Taliban. Since late 2023, an estimated 3 million Afghans have been forced out of Iran and Pakistan, where they had sought safety from decades of war and, since the Taliban's return to Kabul in 2021, from extremist rule. Unwelcome abroad they have returned to a homeland facing economic collapse and international indifference. UN Secretary-General António Guterres, in his latest report on Afghanistan, called on countries hosting Afghan refugees to protect those in need and abide by international obligations to ensure any returns to Afghanistan are voluntary. 'Returnees face immense challenges... in particular securing housing, employment and access to basic services,' he said. Up to 10,000 Afghan women, men and children are taking the Islam Qala border crossing from Iran on a daily basis, according to the Taliban authorities. Inside Afghanistan, humanitarian aid agencies say conditions are dire, with inadequate shelter, food shortages and no road map for reintegration. 'They return to a homeland that is dramatically unprepared to receive them,' warned Arafat Jamal, the UN human rights agency's representative in Afghanistan in a statement last month. The Taliban's deputy minister for border and refugees affairs, Abdul Zahir Rahmani, also told local media this week that Afghanistan had seen a sharp increase in refugee returns since this month's 12-day air war in Iran. Many said they had no say in the matter. Ali said he was arrested at a construction site in Mashhad, Iran's second-biggest city, lacking documentation during a crackdown on refugees by the Iranian police. He and his wife, six children, two daughters-in-law and five grandchildren were deported in March. 'We were treated like criminals,' he said. 'They didn't care how law-abiding or in need we were. They just wanted all Afghans out.' The extended family – 15 people aged 5 to 51 – is now packed into a two-room, mud-brick house on Kabul's western fringes. Ali said his Persian-accented Dari draws sneers from fellow labourers – another reminder he doesn't fit in. But he brushes off their mockery, saying his focus is on feeding his family. 'We can barely afford to eat properly,' his wife Shahla said by video as she sat cross-legged on a worn rug. 'Rent is 4,000 afghanis ($56) a month – but even that is a burden. One of my sons is visually impaired; the other returns home every day empty-handed.' For women and girls, their return can feel like a double displacement. They are subject to many of the Taliban's most repressive laws, including restrictions on their movement without a 'mahram', or male companion, and curbs on education and employment. On Kabul's western edge, 38-year-old Safiya and her three daughters spend their days in a rented house packing candies for shops, earning just 50 afghanis for a day's work, below Afghanistan's poverty level of $1 a day. Safiya said they were deported from Iran in February. 'In Tehran, I stitched clothes. My girls worked at a sweet shop,' said Safiya, who declined to give her last name. 'Life was tough, but we had our freedom, as well as hope … Here, there's no work, no school, no dignity. It's like we've come home only to be exiled again.' During their deportation, Safiya was separated from her youngest daughter for a week while the family was detained, a spat over documents that still gives the 16-year-old nightmares. In Iran, said Safiya, 'my daughters had inspiring dreams. Now they sit at home all day, waiting', Afghans are also being forcibly deported from next-door Pakistan – more than 800,000 people have been expelled since October 2023, according to Amnesty International. Born in Pakistan to Afghan refugee parents, Nemat Ullah Rahimi had never lived in Afghanistan until last winter, when police barely gave him time to close his Peshawar grocery store before sending him over the Torkham border crossing. 'I wasn't allowed to sell anything. My wife and kids – all born in Pakistan – had no legal documents there so we had to leave,' said the 34-year-old. Rahimi now works long hours at a tyre repair shop at a dusty intersection on the edge of Kabul as he tries to rebuild a life. 'I can't say it's easy. But I have no choice. We're restarting from zero,' he said.


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
After Munir, Pakistan's air force chief in the US. What's happening?
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel For the first time in a decade, Pakistan's Chief of the Air Staff paid an official visit to the US recently to further enhance bilateral defence cooperation. Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmed Baber Sidhu held top-level meetings at the Pentagon, State Department and Capitol Hill to "further enhance bilateral defence cooperation and mutual interest".Coming weeks after Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir's unprecedented lunch with US President Donald Trump , Sidhu's visit signals a possible recalibration in US strategic priorities in the region. Though shrouded in some ambiguity, the optics and timing of these two visits suggest that the US may be seeking a deeper reengagement with Pakistan's military establishment -- a shift that carries significant implications for much of the past decade, US-Pakistan relations have been cold. America's strategic focus shifted decisively toward India as it emerged as a counterweight to China and a central pillar of America's Indo-Pacific strategy . In contrast, Pakistan's deepening military and economic partnership with China, particularly through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), placed it at odds with evolving US strategic the apparent renewal of military-level engagement marks a notable departure. The US hosting Air Chief Marshal Sidhu across its key institutions -- notably ahead of the Quad Foreign Ministers Meeting and Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar's Washington visit -- appears more than coincidental. Symbolically, it creates an image of equivalence between India and Pakistan, a perception India has consistently sought to renewed interest in Pakistan could be driven by several factors. Pakistan's military has intensified operations against Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K), whose regional rise in Afghanistan and spillover into Pakistan represents a shared concern for both Pakistan and the US. As the US recalibrates its counterterrorism posture post-Afghanistan withdrawal, Pakistan remains a geographically critical of Munir's meeting with Trump, with suggestions of discussions around impending US military action against Iran, added another dimension. Amid heightened tensions with Tehran, Pakistan's strategic location and its influence over key border logistics and airspace made it an indispensable years of favouring India in its South Asia calculus, America may now be reintroducing strategic ambiguity. This could serve several purposes such as checking India's drift toward multipolar hedging (for example, its neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict), pushing New Delhi toward more alignment within the Quad, and creating options for leverage in the Indo-Pacific an Indian perspective, the implications of this renewed US-Pakistan engagement are concerning. India has long cherished its emerging special relationship with the US, particularly in defense cooperation, technology transfers and intelligence sharing. If America begins equating Islamabad as a parallel partner in regional military affairs, India's perceived strategic primacy could be Pakistan's civilian institutions weakened and economic distress mounting, any renewed US support, particularly to the military, risks reinforcing the dominant role of the army and air force in Pakistan's political system. A more emboldened Pakistan military, with a sense of external endorsement, could adopt a more aggressive posture toward India, especially in Kashmir or along the Line of Control (LoC). The juxtaposition of hosting Jaishankar and Pakistan's top air force official in parallel engagements sends mixed signals about US commitment to its strategic ties with India and its Indo-Pacific it is too early to see it as a strategic realignment, America's renewed overtures to Pakistan's military leadership mark a significant development. India's economic size and its role in Indo-Pacific maritime security makes it indispensabile to the US global strategy. But it must also prepare for a more competitive regional environment where a Pakistani military backed by the US can play aggressive games.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Unjustified and unfounded': French couple detained for over 3 years on spy charges in Iran; foreign minister demands immediate release
France has strongly criticised Iran for holding two of its citizens on what it calls 'unjustified and unfounded' spy charges. The pair, Cecile Kohler and Jacques Paris, have been detained in Iran for over three years. On Thursday, French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot said the Iranian government has never officially informed France of the charges. However, reports suggest the two have been accused of spying for Israel, something Barrot firmly denied. He called for their 'immediate, unconditional release.' Kohler, 40, and Paris, 72, were arrested in May 2022. They were initially held in Tehran's Evin Prison, a notorious jail known for detaining dual nationals and foreigners often used as diplomatic leverage. A French diplomat was allowed to meet them earlier this week, after growing concerns from their families about their wellbeing. Their relatives had been demanding proof they were still alive following recent Israeli airstrikes on the prison. In an interview with BFM TV, Kohler's sister, Noemie, said the couple had been told they were charged with spying, trying to overthrow the Iranian regime, and 'corruption on Earth.' 'Our understanding … is that they face death penalty,' she said. 'We're really extremely worried about their psychological state and the trauma of the bombings.' According to Noemie, the diplomat's visit took place at a prison south of Tehran, as Kohler and Paris had been moved from Evin Prison after the strikes. Their current location remains unknown.