logo
Trump immigration policies targeting Democratic cities energize organizers, leave others confused

Trump immigration policies targeting Democratic cities energize organizers, leave others confused

CHICAGO (AP) — To Jose Abel Garcia, a Guatemalan immigrant in the Los Angeles area, President Donald Trump's latest promise to expand deportations in Democratic-led cities doesn't change much.
The 38-year-old garment worker said Trump's doubling down on Democratic strongholds while pausing immigration arrests at restaurants, hotels and farms doesn't spare workers who are simply trying to make rent.
'He just talks,' Garcia said. 'The raids keep happening and it's going to be hard for him to follow through on that because he isn't acting alone.'
In recent days Trump has vowed to shift immigration enforcement away from political allies and toward political foes, prioritizing deportations in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and cities at 'the core of the Democrat Power Center.' At the same time, he's reversed course and paused arrests in industries that heavily rely on a foreign-born workforce.
Garcia and other immigrants say, either way, fears remain high in their communities, while experts note the Trump administration's pullback on work site immigration enforcement is a lesson other administrations learned long ago. Meanwhile, Democrats and activists insist Trump's moves are calculated and something they'll use as a rallying cry.
Escalating political fight
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has been locked in a widening dispute with the Trump administration, said the motivation behind singling out Democratic cities is clear.
'Incite violence and chaos in blue states, have an excuse to militarize our cities, demonize his opponents, keep breaking the law and consolidate power,' Newsom posted Monday on X. 'It's illegal and we will not let it stand.'
Trump again fixed on New York and Chicago on Monday while pointing to Los Angeles demonstrations against his administration policies, and adding many of 'those people weren't from LA, they were from California.'
'I want to focus on the cities,' he said at the Group of Seven Summit in Canada.
The Trump administration has said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers would target at least3,000 arrests daily, up from about 650 daily during the first months of Trump's second term. Already, the president and his allies have targeted so-called 'sanctuary jurisdictions' with splashy live-streamed arrests, lawsuits and summoning mayors and governors to testify at the Capitol.
'It's clear that Trump is escalating these attacks on Democratic cities because he's threatened by the mass mobilizations,' said U.S. Rep. Jesus 'Chuy' Garcia, a Chicago Democrat. 'I expect Democrats will push back harder.'
In the Los Angeles area, a group of advocates continued community-led patrols to watch for ICE arrests and warn neighbors.
Organizer Francisco 'Chavo' Romero said they're also patrolling Metro rail stations and other public transit hubs.
'They double down, we triple down,' he said.
Worksite arrests
Pulling back on worksite enforcement is new for Trump, but not in recent history.
Going after employers on immigration compliance has been a controversial issue, particularly in industries that rely on immigrant labor. For instance, nearly half of those in meatpacking are thought to be born abroad.
Under a 1996 immigration law, the Clinton administration investigated hiring practices to weed out employees without proper U.S. work authorization and to punish employers. But it didn't last long. Investigations took months. Workers were afraid to come to work. Some farmers complained their crops were suffering. Elected officials began to intervene.
'It pretty much stopped,' said Doris Meissner, a former commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, which was the predecessor to ICE.
Now a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Migration Police Institute, she said other presidential administrations have grappled with the same problem.
'That's always the conundrum: How do you hold the employer accountable?' she said. 'You can go and get the workers and in two weeks there are going to be more workers hired.'
Earlier this month, immigration authorities raided an Omaha meat production plant, angering company officials who said they followed the law. Trump's first administration saw the largest workplace sting in a decade with arrests at seven Mississippi chicken plants.
That made his shift to pause such operations a surprise. He wrote on Truth Social that the arrests were 'taking very good, long time workers' away and it was hard to replace them.
How the pause will play out is unclear. A message left Monday with the Department of Homeland Security was not immediately returned.
Immigrants and activists left baffled
Still, Trump's approach confused many.
'On one hand, he will stay away from certain industries and at the same time double down on Chicago,' said Lawrence Benito, head of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights. 'I'm not sure how to reconcile those two comments.'
He said the group would continue to help immigrants understand their rights in the case of ICE arrests.
U.S. Rep. Delia Ramirez, a Chicago Democrat, accused Trump of trying to silence dissent.
In a lengthy post on his Truth Social site about cracking down on Democratic cities, Trump said, without any evidence, that Democrats were using immigrants living in the country without legal status to steal elections.
For others, the latest policies were simply another thing to worry about.
Jorge Lima, 32, said his immigrant parents from Mexico are only leaving home to go to their jobs as garment workers in California.
'They don't go out anymore,' he said. 'They're afraid but they have to eat.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Suspect In Killing Of Minnesota Rep Faces 6 Federal Charges - The Arena with Kasie Hunt - Podcast on CNN Audio
Suspect In Killing Of Minnesota Rep Faces 6 Federal Charges - The Arena with Kasie Hunt - Podcast on CNN Audio

CNN

time28 minutes ago

  • CNN

Suspect In Killing Of Minnesota Rep Faces 6 Federal Charges - The Arena with Kasie Hunt - Podcast on CNN Audio

Suspect In Killing Of Minnesota Rep Faces 6 Federal Charges The Arena with Kasie Hunt 47 mins A Minnesota Democrat who knew the lawmaker targeted in a politically motivated assassination joins Kasie Hunt to discuss the latest developments in the case. Also, how the politics of the Israel and Iran conflict is dividing the GOP, and what the "No Kings" protests may signal about Democratic messaging.

Here's what's in the Senate GOP's version of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Here's what's in the Senate GOP's version of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

time35 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Here's what's in the Senate GOP's version of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Senate Finance Committee on Monday unveiled its portion of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' containing provisions on Medicaid, taxes and green energy tax credits. The committee's text is the final piece of the upper chamber's version of the bill to be released, and was the most highly anticipated. It contains some of the thorniest provisions that Senate GOP holdouts have expressed concerns about, and the issues that could set the upper chamber on a collision course with the House. The House narrowly passed its version of the legislation last month. Here's what's in the Senate's bill. The bill makes many of the core elements of their 2017 tax cuts permanent but scales back additional cuts from what the House passed. The Senate bill locks in existing federal tax brackets, boosts the standard deduction and maintains the termination of personal exemptions — all without sunsets. In contrast with the House version, the bill sets a lower increase for the child tax credit, raising it to $2,200 per child as opposed to the House's $2,500. The bill creates new deductions for taxes on tips, overtime pay and car loan interest — a priority of Trump's that he campaigned on — but doesn't make them fully deductible. Tips are deductible up to $25,000 through 2028. Overtime pay is deductible up to $12,500, or $25,000 for joint filers, through 2028. Auto loan interest is deductible up to $10,000, also through 2028. Senate Republicans are taking a bigger swing at Medicaid in their version of the bill. The legislation would effectively cap provider taxes at 3.5 percent by 2031, down from the current 6 percent, but only for the states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. The cap would be phased in by lowering it 0.5 percent annually, starting in 2027. Non-expansion states would be prohibited from imposing new taxes, but as was true in the House-passed version, their rates would be frozen at current levels. The lower cap would not apply to nursing homes or intermediate care facilities. Limiting provider taxes is a long-held conservative goal, as they argue states are gaming the current system and driving up federal Medicaid spending. The policies are designed to inflate Medicaid spending on paper to allow states to receive more federal reimbursement dollars. The Senate bill also cuts certain existing state-directed payments to hospitals, which would be a significant hit to the hospitals' bottom line. The House version in contrast limited future payments but grandfathered existing arrangements. The change in the Senate bill is sure to anger Republicans who were already expressing concerns about the impact of the freeze in the House-passed version, including key holdouts like Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.). Provider taxes have become an important lifeline for hospitals, and rural hospitals would be hit hardest by the cuts. Hawley on Monday night signaled dissatisfaction with the newly unveiled text. Like the House bill, the Senate legislation imposes work requirements on Medicaid beneficiaries beginning at 19 years old. But the Senate version says adults with dependent children older than 14 will also have to prove they work, attend school or perform community service for 80 hours a month, while the House-passed version would exempt all adults with dependent children. The bill includes changes to green energy tax credits that are more flexible than those passed by the House — but would still be a significant rollback. The Senate text appears to eliminate the most stringent provision in the House bill, deleting a measure that would have required climate-friendly energy sources to start construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment to qualify for the credits at all. Instead, things such as solar panels and wind farms would need to begin construction this year in order to receive the full credit amount. Projects that begin construction in 2026 would get 60 percent of the credit, while projects that begin construction in 2027 would receive 20 percent. Projects constructed in 2028 or later would not be eligible for the credit. This, too, appears to be more flexible than the House text, which required projects to not just start construction but actually be producing electricity by the end of 2028 to qualify for the credit. Nevertheless, the Senate provisions are still a major rollback of the tax credits passed by Democrats in their 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Under that law, the credits would have lasted until either 2032 or when U.S. emissions from the electric sector are 25 percent lower than their 2022 levels, whichever came later. The Senate text also adds carve-outs for hydro, nuclear and geothermal power, allowing them to receive the full credit if they begin construction before 2034. The Senate bill as drafted would keep the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions at $10,000 a year, rolling back the deal that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) painstakingly cut with blue state Republicans to raise the limit on SALT deductions to $40,000 a year for households earning less than $500,000 annually. It would permanently extend the $10,000 cap, which is scheduled to expire at the end of this year. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Monday afternoon that the $10,000 deduction cap is a 'marker' for talks with House Republicans, and that they will find a number in the middle that satisfies both camps. But the House's SALT Caucus Republicans are insisting on the $40,000 number. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), a key member of the group, wrote on the social platform X that the proposal was 'DEAD ON ARRIVAL' and warned in a statement that a $40,000 deduction cap 'is the deal and I will not accept a penny less.' The bill would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, instead of the $4 trillion increase adopted by House Republicans. The debt-ceiling language is a major problem for Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who has told his leadership he won't support the bill if it includes such a large extension of federal borrowing authority. Mychael Schnell and Al Weaver contributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store