Maputo Port to double container capacity with $165 million expansion
Image: Supplied
The Port of Maputo plans to double its container terminal capacity following a $165 million (R3.04 billion) expansion by a key operator of the port, the Dubai-based DP World.
The Port of Maputo is operated under a concession by the Maputo Port Development Company (MPDC), which includes DP World, JSE-listed Grindrod, and Mozambique's state-owned railway operator.
Mozambique's Minister of Transport and Logistics, João Jorge Matlomb attended a ground-breaking event to mark the commencement of the expansion project, a statement from DP World said on Friday.
The project will significantly enhance the capabilities of the port and position it as a trade and logistics hub for Southern Africa, and open a gateway for larger container ships. The expansion is expected to meet growing global trade demands, create thousands of new jobs, and contribute to Mozambique's growth, the company said.
'The port of Maputo is at the heart of transforming trade on the African continent, as it has the potential to connect the land-locked countries of Southern Africa to the rest of the world. This investment reinforces Mozambique's role as a key cargo gateway, improves its global competitiveness, and positions the country as a dynamic business hub,' said DP World CEO and MD for Southern Africa Mohammed Akoojee.
The port will be equipped with the latest technology and infrastructure to boost operational capacity and efficiency, with the terminal yard and quay undergoing a revamp and modernisation.
Yard capacity will increase by 6.48 hectares, doubling throughput from 255 000 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) to 530 000 TEUs, while the total quay length will be extended to 650 metres and the berth deepened to 16 metres.
To manage larger container volumes and a diverse range of commodities, new equipment will be introduced, including three ship-to-shore (STS) cranes capable of handling post-Panamax ships and an expanded fleet of rubber-tyred gantry (RTG) cranes, complementing the existing mobile harbour crane (MHC) fleet.
Reefer container capacity will increase to over 700 plugs, supporting agricultural export growth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
18 minutes ago
- IOL News
Thungela maintains financial strength despite 80% drop in interim profits
Thungela's full year guidance for export saleable production of 12.8 million tons to 13.6 million tons 'remains appropriate as production is seasonally weighted towards the second half' of the year. Image: File photo Tawanda Karombo Thungela Resources remains in a strong financial position despite an 80% plunge in interim profits for the period to end June, with its stronger balance helping it to continue with strategic investments after paying a R2 per share half-year dividend. Shares in Thungela were 2.74% weaker at R88.17 in afternoon trade on the JSE on Monday, extending the stock's 6% and 5% fall in the past seven and 30 days, respectively. Headline earnings per share (HEPS) for the half-year period to June 30 fell by 80% to 192 cents on the back of lower coal prices on global markets, although its strong balance sheet brightened up future prospects. 'Despite challenging markets, Thungela's balance sheet is strong,' said Greg Davies, head of wealth at Cratos Capital. Thungela has net cash holdings of R6.3 billion, which will help the company by 'ensuring financial resilience' in spite of the 12% plunge in interim revenues to R14.8bn. More importantly, Thungela is set to 'continue (with) strategic investments' such as the Zibulo North Shaft and Elder, which are 'on track' and crucial 'for long-term sustainability as some mines approach closure,' said Davies. Cash flows from operating activities for the half year amounted to R1.2bn. After investing R703 million in sustaining capital expenditure, the company closed the period in an adjusted operating free cash flow position of R484m. 'Our robust balance sheet position enables us to execute on our core strategic priorities. We continue to reserve R500m to complete the Zibulo North Shaft project and a further R300 million to complete the Lephalale Coal Bed Methane project,' said Thungela CEO, July Ndlovu. Despite the HEPS and revenue plunge for the period under review, Thungela is in addition to declaring the R2 interim dividend undertaking a share buyback of up to R140m subject to favourable market conditions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ndlovu said it was 'appropriate' for the company to maintain 'a cash buffer' of R5bn given the weak coal prices, US dollar weakness and supply chain risks emanating from ongoing trade and tariff uncertainties. Thungela also has undrawn credit facilities of R3.2bn. Global trade and tariff uncertainties currently pervading world markets have occasioned weak demand in key coal demand regions. This has translated to softer prices, a situation reminiscent of the Covid-19 pandemic. Thungela's financial performance for the half-year under review thus reflect the continued pressure on coal prices, with the average realised export prices in South Africa and Australia declined by 11% and 10%, respectively, during this period. The company blamed the softer coal prices as well as a weaker US dollar to South African rand exchange rate, for the revenue plunge. In South Africa, Thungela's export saleable production, however, increased by approximately 300 000 tons to 6.4 million tons mainly due to productivity gains at Zibulo and Mafube. Production at Khwezela was impacted by abnormally high rainfall in the period. The free on board (FOB) cost per export tonne excluding royalties for the period of R1 258 was in line with Thungela's guidance range. Its full year guidance for export saleable production of 12.8 million tons to 13.6 million tons 'remains appropriate as production is seasonally weighted towards the second half' of the year. Consequently, Thungela deems its guidance for FOB cost per export tonne excluding royalties of R1 210 to R1 290 as appropriate. Positively though for Thungela, the South African coal industry continues to benefit from the improved rail performance. It said over the first half of the year, Transnet Freight Rail achieved an annualised run rate of 54.3 million tons compared to 51.9 million tons in the same period a year ago. 'The improved rail performance stems from the ongoing industry collaborative initiatives as well as further optimisation projects, such as the signalling project, which are expected to improve rail performance going forward,' noted Ndlovu. BUSINESS REPORT
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
South Africa's Q2 farm exports to US surge but tariffs dampen prospects
South Africa's produce exports to the US rose 26% in the second quarter after strong harvests, agriculture minister John Steenhuisen said on Monday, but a 30% tariff imposed by President Donald Trump could affect future shipments. South Africa is fighting for lower tariffs in a proposed trade deal with the US after it was given the highest rate in Sub-Saharan Africa. The US is South Africa's second-biggest bilateral trading partner after China. The country exports mainly citrus, grapes, apples, pears, nuts and wine to the US and has warned that tens of thousands of jobs in the agricultural sector could be lost due to the impact of tariffs. The value of exports from Africa's most advanced economy to the US was $161m (R2.84bn) during the quarter, Steenhuisen said. 'The recent imposition of a 30% tariff on our exports by the US has brought to light the urgent need to diversify our export markets and enhance our competitiveness to mitigate the economic impact of losing preferential trade access,' Steenhuisen said. In the first quarter of 2025, South African agricultural exports to the US were $118m (R2.08bn), up by 19% year-on-year, he added.
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Africa's mineral wealth must fuel its own factories, not the world's
To escape the trap of raw mineral exports, Africa must build a regionally integrated beneficiation and manufacturing ecosystem, powered by the AfCFTA and a new industrial hub-and-spoke model. Africa is home to some of the world's most significant reserves of critical minerals; cobalt, lithium, manganese, graphite, and rare earth elements, which are vital to the global energy transition. Yet despite this endowment, the continent continues to operate at the margins of global value chains. The bulk of its mineral exports remain unprocessed, destined for processing hubs in Asia and Europe, where the real value is captured through beneficiation, manufacturing, and innovation. This structural imbalance is not new. In countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which accounts for around 75% of global cobalt production, nearly all output is exported in raw form. Zimbabwe's lithium, Ghana's bauxite, and Zambia's copper follow the same pattern. The result is a massive loss in potential economic value: where raw bauxite fetches about $70 per ton, refined aluminium sells for over $2,300. This disconnect highlights the urgency of rethinking Africa's role in the critical minerals value chain, not merely as a supplier of inputs but as a co-architect of industrial systems. Policy responses have emerged beneficiation mandates, special economic zones, and localisation requirements, but often within fragmented national frameworks. They are rarely aligned with the continent's diverse industrial capabilities or regional market dynamics. This disjointedness undermines scale, weakens competitiveness, and fails to generate durable economic multipliers. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) provides a historic opportunity to change this. From extraction to integration: The case for a regional approach Africa's current trade architecture remains structurally extractive. Intra-African trade, despite reaching US$220 billion in 2024, still accounts for just 14.4% of the continent's total trade, and remains spatially concentrated in Southern and West Africa. South Africa alone drives nearly a fifth of all intra-African trade, while Nigeria, despite growing export volumes, continues to rely heavily on crude oil. What's missing is a continent-wide industrial logic that links mineral extraction to value-added production in a coherent, regionally distributed system. The key to unlocking this potential lies in a regional hub-and-spoke model for beneficiation and manufacturing. In this model, countries are not expected to develop full value chains independently. Instead, they contribute according to their comparative advantages: mineral reserves, processing capacity, energy resources, logistics infrastructure, or technical expertise. This model allows for distributed manufacturing while preserving scale and competitiveness. For instance, South Africa may serve as a beneficiation hub for platinum group metals, leveraging its advanced metallurgy sector. Zambia and the DRC can anchor upstream copper and cobalt extraction, while Mozambique contributes energy and port infrastructure. Ghana and Guinea can support bauxite and aluminium value chains. This functional complementarity rather than duplication, creates a networked production ecosystem with the scale needed to serve regional and global markets. The AfCFTA as a platform for structural change The AfCFTA, now ratified by 48 countries and with seven actively trading under its provisions, represents a shift from political agreement to practical implementation. However, its full potential remains constrained by three interlinked challenges. First, the production base across much of Africa remains misaligned with AfCFTA's liberalisation goals. Without a strong manufacturing sector, tariff reductions alone will not deliver structural transformation. Second, the soft infrastructure necessary to facilitate trade, customs systems, harmonised standards, and logistics platforms, is concentrated in a few countries, leaving many others unable to capitalise on the agreement. Third, and most crucially, industrial policy remains overly national in scope. There is limited coordination of investment regimes, sector priorities, or infrastructure plans across borders. Without regional alignment, the AfCFTA risks reinforcing old patterns: countries trading the same commodities while importing manufactured goods from outside the continent. Infrastructure and investment: Building the foundations Industrial integration cannot happen without robust infrastructure. Transport costs in Africa are among the highest globally. Poor road density, limited rail networks, and inefficient ports all add to the cost of moving goods. For landlocked countries, this challenge is existential. In many cases, logistics expenses account for up to 40% of the final price of goods. No industrial strategy can succeed without addressing these physical constraints. Equally important is the development of regional energy grids, shared certification systems, and integrated digital platforms. These investments do not merely support trade; they enable value chains to form and function. For example, aligning energy supply from Mozambique or Ethiopia with processing zones in Southern Africa could lower beneficiation costs and attract investment. Lessons from other regions Africa is not the first region to grapple with the challenge of aligning national interests with regional industrial ambition. The European Union offers a high-capacity example, with fiscal instruments and policy frameworks designed to bridge industrial disparities. ASEAN, by contrast, demonstrates how strategic corporate investment and light-touch coordination can create transnational production systems. Africa must find its own pathway, drawing lessons from both models while responding to its unique geography and institutional realities. The Gulf Cooperation Council's integration around petrochemicals and the Greater Mekong Subregion's corridor-based industrial zones also offer useful templates for Africa's mineral-rich regions. Each of these examples points to one lesson: industrial integration must be deliberately built through investment, governance, and aligned incentives. A new industrial future for Africa Africa's critical mineral endowment offers more than export earnings, it offers the foundation for a new industrial future. But realising that future will require bold regional thinking and coordinated action. The hub-and-spoke model provides a framework for doing so. It builds on Africa's strengths, addresses its constraints, and prioritises collective value capture over fragmented ambition. In this model, no country is left behind. Each contributes to and benefits from the collective industrial system. Beneficiation happens where it makes economic sense; manufacturing scales where infrastructure allows; and trade flows along corridors designed for efficiency and impact. This is not merely a vision. It is an imperative. Africa cannot afford to remain a warehouse of raw materials while the rest of the world captures the value of its resources. It must become an architect of its own future, by integrating its economies, aligning its industrial strategies, and investing in the infrastructure of regional production. Africa's minerals are the starting point. But its industrial destiny lies in what it builds with them. DM Author: David Mparutsa, Pan Africa Head of Enterprise & Supply Chain Development (ESD) at Absa Corporate & Investment Banking (CIB), he writes in his personal capacity. About Absa Group Limited Absa Group Limited ('Absa Group') is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and is one of Africa's largest diversified financial services groups. Absa Group offers an integrated set of products and services across personal and business banking, corporate and investment banking, wealth and investment management and insurance. Absa Group owns majority stakes in banks in Botswana, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, South Africa, Tanzania (Absa Bank Tanzania and National Bank of Commerce), Uganda and Zambia and has insurance operations in Kenya and South Africa. Absa also has offices in the People's Republic of China, Namibia, Nigeria and the United States, as well as securities entities in the United Kingdom and the United States, along with technology support colleagues in the Czech Republic. For further information about Absa Group Limited, visit
