China calls Boeing ‘victim' of White House tariff policy as jets return to US
China's Ministry of Commerce said both the country's domestic airlines and American aerospace firm
Boeing were victims of US President Donald Trump's tariff hikes, a move analysts said was tacit confirmation Beijing does not blame the company for the White House's actions.
Advertisement
'China is willing to continue supporting normal commercial cooperation between companies in both countries,' said an unnamed spokesperson in an online statement on Tuesday, adding the ministry 'hopes the US will listen to the voices of businesses to create a stable and predictable environment for normal trade and investment activities.'
The statement came after Boeing confirmed some Chinese clients had stopped receiving deliveries of new jets.
Beijing's comments on the Boeing situation can be taken as 'welcome assurance' for the company, analysts said, as Chinese airlines also have an interest in protecting normal business ties from the effects of the
trade war
'Boeing has definitely made a serious statement that they can deliver aircraft [rejected by Chinese buyers] to other clients. But it is obvious that Boeing will suffer,' said Jason Li Hanming, a US-based aviation analyst.
Advertisement
Two Boeing jets allocated to China's Xiamen Airlines have been returned to the US, Reuters reported, citing flight data. Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg confirmed last week that Chinese airlines have stopped receiving deliveries.
According to Ortberg, Chinese airlines had planned to purchase 50 aircraft from Boeing in 2025. During the company's latest earnings call, he said the situation in China 'will take away some of the headroom we've built with our strong first-quarter deliveries'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
In the Indo-Pacific, ‘America first' looks like American unpredictability
Within around 10 days in late May, three top US leaders – US President Donald Trump , US Vice-President J.D. Vance and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth – delivered speeches that together outlined the administration's evolving foreign policy vision. Taken separately, each speech reaffirmed the US' commitment to strength and strategic deterrence. Yet when considered as a whole, they exposed a deep tension at the heart of America's global posture – especially in the Indo-Pacific . For America's allies and partners in the region, these mixed messages raise questions about reliability, strategic clarity and long-term alignment. At West Point on May 24, Trump reiterated his 'America first' doctrine, denouncing foreign entanglements and 'absurd ideological experiments'. He asserted that under his leadership, the military will refocus on core missions: 'crushing America's adversaries, killing America's enemies, and defending our great American flag'. This was paired with an aggressive military posture. Trump emphasised overwhelming strength, boasting of new planes, tanks, drones and the creation of a Golden Dome missile defence shield . For regional allies, this blend of retrenchment and military escalation signals a shift from global stewardship to transactional power projection. A day earlier at the US Naval Academy, Vance presented similar realist rhetoric to Trump's, adding a bureaucratic lens. He said past leaders abandoned hard power for soft power and praised the administration's use of force in Yemen as a model of clarity and decisiveness. The US vice-president also spoke of great-power competition, especially with China, and advocated maintaining a technological edge through investment in hypersonics, drones and battlefield innovation. This fusion of restraint and readiness further muddies the message: Is America stepping back from global policing or simply recalibrating how it asserts dominance?
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US risks hard-won soft power by alienating Chinese students
While the US has resumed processing of student and exchange visitor visas, the future of Chinese students who are attending Harvard remains uncertain. The resumption followed a federal judge's decision last week to temporarily block a ban on Harvard's qualification to enroll international students. The judge set a June 16 hearing for further arguments in the case. Harvard also vowed to continue its legal battle, while working to ensure its international students and scholars can 'fully' pursue their academic work. While many have highlighted how hard Chinese students have been hit by the ban, since they account for one-fifth of Harvard's international enrollment, the visa restrictions imposed by the White House have sent mixed messages. In a phone call last week with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Donald Trump said the 'US loves to have Chinese students coming to study in America'. Earlier, Trump said he welcomed Chinese students, but not those who caused 'troubles'. It is still not clear what he meant.
HKFP
9 hours ago
- HKFP
Taiwan lawmakers approve higher military pay
Taiwan's opposition-controlled parliament approved Tuesday a pay increase for military service members, in a bid to address a manpower shortage and retain soldiers in the face of Chinese military pressure. China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and has not ruled out using force to bring the self-ruled island under its control. The main opposition Kuomintang (KMT) party and Taiwan People's Party passed amendments to an armed forces pay act granting volunteer service members an additional monthly allowance of NT$30,000 (US$1,000). The law previously did not specify the exact amount for allowances. It is on top of increases announced by President Lai Ching-te in March. 'The armed forces are facing new types of operational needs… allowances should be increased to reflect the sharp rise in unit duties and training frequency,' the KMT said in the document outlining the proposed changes. 'By significantly raising allowances and adding an adjustment mechanism, the aim is to improve recruitment incentives and retain outstanding talent.' Other changes passed by lawmakers Tuesday were for conscripts to receive no less than the minimum wage, additional pay for combat units and overtime. Premier Cho Jung-tai, who belongs to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, said the government would challenge the amendments after the cabinet was not consulted as required by the budget act.
