Why Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Is More Than Just a Typing Disorder
It's a condition that can significantly impact your work, hobbies, and overall quality of life. The good news? Over the last decade, our understanding of how to diagnose and treat CTS has advanced dramatically. Whether you're just starting to notice symptoms or have been struggling for years, there's a clear path to relief.
This guide will walk you through what's happening inside your wrist, bust some common myths, and explain the modern, effective treatments that can get you back to feeling your best.
Imagine a narrow tunnel running through your wrist. This isn't a metaphor—it's a real anatomical space called the carpal tunnel. Through this passage run the tendons that flex your fingers and, critically, the median nerve. This nerve is a superstar; it provides sensation to your thumb, index finger, middle finger, and half of your ring finger, and it controls the muscles at the base of your thumb [1].
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome occurs when the space inside this tunnel narrows or the tissues within it swell, putting pressure on the median nerve. Think of it like a garden hose getting kinked. When the flow of water (in this case, nerve signals) is restricted, problems arise. The result is pain, numbness, tingling, and eventually, weakness in your hand and fingers [9]. As detailed in information from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, ignoring these signals can lead to permanent nerve damage [5].
Many people believe CTS is caused exclusively by typing on a computer all day. While repetitive hand and wrist movements are certainly a major risk factor, they are only one piece of a much larger puzzle. The development of CTS is often multifactorial.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a combination of personal and occupational factors often contributes. Other significant risk factors include:
Blaming your keyboard alone oversimplifies the issue and can prevent you from addressing other underlying factors that are just as important for management and prevention.
Getting an accurate diagnosis is the first and most critical step toward relief. Your doctor will start by listening to your story—when the symptoms started, what they feel like, and what makes them better or worse.
Next comes a physical examination. Your doctor may use a few classic in-office tests to try and reproduce your symptoms:
While these tests are helpful, they aren't foolproof [7]. For a definitive diagnosis, your doctor will likely recommend electrodiagnostic studies. These tests, which include nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG), measure how well your median nerve is functioning. They are considered the gold standard for confirming CTS and determining its severity [8]. In some complex cases, an ultrasound or MRI might be used to get a better look at the structures in the wrist [6].
For most mild to moderate cases of CTS, the treatment journey begins with non-surgical, or 'conservative,' approaches. The goal is simple: reduce pressure on the median nerve and allow it to heal.
A 2021 study confirms that a few key strategies are highly effective first-line treatments [2].
If your symptoms are severe, if you have muscle weakness, or if conservative treatments haven't provided enough relief, it may be time to consider surgery. The procedure, called a carpal tunnel release (CTR), involves cutting the ligament that forms the 'roof' of the carpal tunnel. This creates more space for the median nerve, instantly relieving the pressure.
CTR is one of the most common and successful procedures in medicine. There are two main ways to perform it:
Both techniques are highly effective [2]. However, studies suggest that the endoscopic approach often leads to a faster recovery and less immediate postoperative pain, allowing patients to return to their activities sooner [3]. The idea that surgery is a painful, last-ditch effort with a long recovery is largely outdated. For the right patient, it offers a definitive, long-term solution.
Ultimately, there's no single 'best' treatment for everyone. The right approach for you will depend on the severity of your symptoms, your overall health, your daily activities, and the results of your diagnostic tests.
The most advanced clinical thinking advocates for an individualized plan that combines all this information [8]. Working with your doctor, you can weigh the pros and cons of each option. Some patients find lasting relief with a simple night splint, while for others, surgery is the most direct path to restoring full hand function and ending the sleep-disrupting pain for good.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome can feel like a frustrating and persistent intrusion on your life, but you don't have to just live with it. With a better understanding of the condition and a wealth of effective, evidence-based treatments available, relief is within reach. The key is to listen to your body's signals and seek medical guidance early. A proactive approach, guided by a healthcare professional, is your best bet for preventing long-term issues and ensuring a full recovery. For more in-depth patient information, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons provides excellent resources.
[1] Genova, A., Dix, O., Saefan, A., Thakur, M., & Hassan, A. (2020). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review of Literature. Cureus, 12(3), e7333. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7333
[2] Kokubo, R., & Kim, K. (2021). No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery, 49(6), 1306–1316. https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1436204516
[3] Urits, I., Gress, K., Charipova, K., Orhurhu, V., Kaye, A. D., & Viswanath, O. (2019). Recent Advances in the Understanding and Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a Comprehensive Review. Current pain and headache reports, 23(10), 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-019-0811-z
[4] Zamborsky, R., Kokavec, M., Simko, L., & Bohac, M. (2017). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment Options. Literature Reviev. Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5604/15093492.1232629
[5] Dua, K., Osterman, A. L., & Abzug, J. M. (2017). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Initial Management and the Treatment of Recalcitrant Patients. Instructional course lectures, 66, 141–152. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28594494/
[6] Bickel K. D. (2010). Carpal tunnel syndrome. The Journal of hand surgery, 35(1), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.003
[7] Wipperman, J., & Goerl, K. (2016). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management. American family physician, 94(12), 993–999. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28075090/
[8] Padua, L., Coraci, D., Erra, C., Pazzaglia, C., Paolasso, I., Loreti, C., Caliandro, P., & Hobson-Webb, L. D. (2016). Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet. Neurology, 15(12), 1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9
[9] Joshi, A., Patel, K., Mohamed, A., Oak, S., Zhang, M. H., Hsiung, H., Zhang, A., & Patel, U. K. (2022). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Comprehensive Guidelines for Clinical Evaluation and Treatment. Cureus, 14(7), e27053. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27053
[10] Ashworth N. L. (2011). Carpal tunnel syndrome. BMJ clinical evidence, 2011, 1114. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22018420/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
41 minutes ago
'Traditionally, it was a Democrat issue': How RFK Jr. is getting left-leaning food laws into deep-red states
Earlier this month, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. notched one of his biggest wins of the "Make America Healthy Again" movement when West Virginia became the first state in the country to ban artificial food dyes in school lunches. Since then, a handful of other Republican governors have raced to join in, banning certain food colorings from kids' lunches -- sometimes prohibiting other chemical additives, too. Some GOP leaders have gone further, slapping warning labels on certain food additives statewide. Historically the focus of Democrats, including former first lady Michelle Obama -- and derided as "nanny state" politics by anti-regulation conservatives -- food laws have lately had a windfall of support from the other side of the aisle. Kennedy's "Make America Health Again" crusade against food additives, with its strong backing from President Donald Trump, has taken hold in deeply Republican states such as Louisiana, Texas and Oklahoma. "Traditionally, it was a Democratic issue," Kennedy told ABC News at a press conference on Monday, adding that he is hopeful that Democrats will continue pass food laws in their states despite the "partisan brand" the movement brings. West Virginia -- which has the second-lowest life expectancy rate in the nation, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention -- has taken one of the most stringent approaches, intending to further its ban on artificial dyes and other additives to the whole state by 2028. Its law closely mirrors those passed by California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom, who signed similar bills into law before Kennedy and Trump took office. The California Food Safety Act passed in 2023, which banned four additives statewide, and a second California law passed in 2024, which banned six specific synthetic food dyes from school lunches. Both take effect in 2027. "Sometimes you find that there are unorthodox partners, but the key is what you're able to accomplish," West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrissey, a Republican, told ABC News. If the changes improve health outcomes for West Virginians, it'll be "a win," he said. West Virginia is one of 10 Republican states that have taken steps to regulate food since Kennedy took office. Just two Democratic governors, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs and Delaware Gov. Matt Meyer, have signed similar laws in that same timeframe. At the same time, 11 Republican states have applied to the federal government for waivers to prohibit soda or candy from the food benefits program for low-income Americans, SNAP. The sole Democrat-led state to join in on the SNAP policy change is Colorado. More states are waiting in the wings, said John Hewitt, senior vice president of state affairs for the Consumer Brands Association, which represents major food companies such as Kraft Heinz. There's been at least a tenfold increase in the number of food bills introduced or discussed at the state level, he said, and there's been a "substantial shift" in which states are interested. 'Copy and pasting' Democrats' food laws into red states Thomas Galligan, principal scientist for food additives and supplements at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, has worked with states such as California and New York on systemic food reform. And although CSPI has frequently clashed with Kennedy on his policies at HHS, particularly around vaccines, Galligan said on food, "it's fair to give credit where it's due." "I mean, the Trump administration, under RFK Jr., has really elevated this issue on the national stage," he said. But Galligan pushed back on the characterization that it's part of Kennedy's "Make America Health Again" movement, pointing to California's laws, before Kennedy's tenure, as the blueprint. "Most of the bills that we're seeing are really copy and pasting," Galligan said. Six Republican states -- Tennessee, Virginia, Utah, Arizona, Louisiana and Texas -- have passed laws to remove artificial dyes from school lunches, with some states going further and prohibiting additives such as potassium bromate and propylparabens. Texas and Louisiana will also do more -- seeking to warn consumers when they're buying food with additives that are banned in other countries, such as Europe. West Virginia and Arkansas will outright ban certain additives statewide. Some nutritionists and dietitians say that it's best to avoid artificial food dyes, which have been linked in some studies to behavioral changes in children, as well as to cancer in animals, but others say more research needs to be done about the potential negative effects, which are still unclear. Why are food laws different for Republicans this time? For conservatives such as Jeff Singer, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute who studies health policy, the new Republican-led laws around food are a far cry from the days of protesting Obama's "Lets Move!" campaign and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's attempt to ban Big Gulp soda. "I clearly remember all of the criticism, particularly on right-wing media, of Mayor Bloomberg," Singer said. "All the attacks on Michelle Obama for trying to dictate how people should eat, and dictate what should be in school lunches." "They were basically saying, 'keep your nose out of our private affairs, this is not a role for government, we don't need a nanny state.' But all of a sudden, they're all for a nanny state because it was a very good political move to bring RFK into the MAGA movement," Singer said. The lack of conservative pushback this time around has left the food industry, a powerful lobbying force, as the primary barrier to passing legislation, said Meghan Enslow, policy associate for the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "In all of these states, blue and red, there's been immense lobbying and money spent by the food industry against these bills. And I do wonder if that MAHA narrative is part of what's allowed red states to ignore that money and the voice of the food industry and pass these bills," Enslow said. Kennedy said that a few Democratic governors have told him privately that they intend to get on board. "They don't want to call it MAHA because they think that that's become kind of a partisan brand. I don't care what they call it," Kennedy said. "They want to protect their children. And there's no such thing as Democratic children or Republican children. They're our children, and we should all care about them."
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Ultra-processed foods make up the majority of kids' diet, CDC report finds
Ultra-processed foods make up the bulk of what kids eat — and adults aren't far behind, a report published Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finds. About 62% of kids' and teens' daily calories came from ultra-processed foods, the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics found, compared with 53% for adults. The report marks the first time CDC has provided estimates about how much ultra-processed foods make up Americans' diets. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in May cited ultra-processed foods among his list of top issues that need to be addressed to curb what he says is an epidemic of childhood chronic diseases. Last month, the Department of Health and Human Services took the first step to formally define 'ultra-processed foods' — a move, experts say, that could open the door to regulation, including what types of food are eligible for food assistance programs. Diets high in ultra-processed foods have been linked to a number of health problems, including depression, Type 2 diabetes and early death. Previous administrations have also tried to take action on ultra-processed foods, but those efforts have focused mostly on labeling and individual ingredients — such as added sugars and trans fats — rather than on regulating or classifying foods based on their level of processing. In January, during the Biden administration, the Food and Drug Administration proposed requiring a new label on the front of most packaged food and drinks that would alert consumers to how much saturated fat, salt and added sugar they contained. Thursday's report was based on findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, from August 2021 to August 2023. The report's lead author, Anne Williams, a researcher with the National Center for Health Statistics, said the agency identified ultra-processed foods using the NOVA classification system — a framework developed by Brazilian researchers that's the most commonly used tool to evaluate processed foods. NOVA defines ultra-processed products as 'industrial creations' made with little — if any — whole foods. The top source of ultra-processed foods for both kids and adults was sandwiches, such as burgers, hot dogs and PB&Js, Williams said. That was followed by baked goods, salty snacks and sugary drinks. The report found that adults with higher incomes tended to eat fewer ultra-processed foods. It also found that intake of ultra-processed foods for both kids and adults dropped slightly from 2017-18 to August 2021–23. For adults, the decline started even earlier, going back to 2013–14. Williams cautioned that the decline so far has been small — a 56-calorie difference over roughly a decade. Marion Nestle, professor emerita of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University, said the CDC's findings align with what outside researchers have found about Americans' eating habits. Nestle said parents tend to gravitate toward ultra-processed foods for their kids because they're easy to throw in a school lunch bag. But, she added, probably the biggest reason kids eat so many ultra-processed foods is that the food industry heavily markets it to them. 'They're the most profitable products in the supermarket, and the companies sell them, they market them directly to kids,' Nestle said. 'They're seen as cool and are iconic and you're lucky to eat them, because that's how they're marketed.' The term 'ultra-processed food' was created around 2009 and has primarily been used for research purposes, said Susan Mayne, who was director of the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition in both the Biden and the first Trump administrations. Mayne said research has shown that eating ultra-processed foods in general is linked to increased caloric intake and weight gain and that it is associated with greater risk of chronic diseases. The problem with defining ultra-processed foods, she said, is that not all of them are linked to greater health risks. In fact, some — like certain yogurts, whole grain breads and cereals — are actually associated with reduced risks of chronic diseases like colon cancer. States like California have tried to address that by coming up with a definition of 'particularly harmful' ultra-processed foods, she added. The NOVA classification system also has limitations, as it doesn't directly measure processing, Mayne said. Rather, it uses additives and specific ingredients as a proxy for the level of processing. 'FDA is engaging in a public process to attempt to define UPF, which is a good first step,' Mayne said in an email, referring to ultra-processed foods. 'But it would be important to repeat studies to demonstrate that the new definition is as or more predictive of chronic disease risk than existing definitions before it could be used for policies.' HHS hasn't said when it plans to formally define 'ultra-processed.' Nestle said she hopes the Trump administration also targets marketing. 'These are highly convenient products, and the kids will eat them because the kids have been trained to eat them,' she said.
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Americans get more than half their calories from ultra-processed foods, CDC report says
The report comes amid growing scrutiny of such foods by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who blames them for causing chronic disease. 'We are poisoning ourselves and it's coming principally from these ultra-processed foods,' Kennedy told Fox News earlier this year. Overall, about 55% of total calories consumed by Americans age 1 and older came from ultra-processed foods during that period, according to the report. For adults, ultra-processed foods made up about 53% of total calories consumed, but for kids through age 18, it was nearly 62%. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The top sources included burgers and sandwiches, sweet baked goods, savory snacks, pizza and sweetened drinks. Advertisement Young children consumed fewer calories from ultra-processed foods than older kids, the report found. Adults 60 and older consumed fewer calories from those sources than younger adults. Low-income adults consumed more ultra-processed foods than those with higher incomes. The results were not surprising, said co-author Anne Williams, a CDC nutrition expert. What was surprising was that consumption of ultra-processed foods appeared to dip slightly over the past decade. Among adults, total calories from those sources fell from about 56% in 2013-2014 and from nearly 66% for kids in 2017-2018. Advertisement Williams said she couldn't speculate about the reason for the decline or whether consumption of less processed foods increased. But Andrea Deierlein, a nutrition expert at New York University who was not involved in the research, suggested that there may be greater awareness of the potential harms of ultra-processed foods. 'People are trying, at least in some populations, to decrease their intakes of these foods,' she said. Concern over ultra-processed foods' health effects has been growing for years, but finding solutions has been difficult. Many studies have linked them to obesity, diabetes and heart disease, but they haven't been able to prove that the foods directly cause those chronic health problems. One small but influential study found that even when diets were matched for calories, sugar, fat, fiber and micronutrients, people consumed more calories and gained more weight when they ate ultra-processed foods than when they ate minimally processed foods. Research published this week in the journal Nature found that participants in a clinical trial lost twice as much weight when they ate minimally processed foods — such as pasta, chicken, fruits and vegetables — than ultra-processed foods, even those matched for nutrition components and considered healthy, such as ready-to-heat frozen meals, protein bars and shakes. Part of the problem is simply defining ultra-processed foods. The new CDC report used the most common definition based on the four-tier Nova system developed by Brazilian researchers that classifies foods according to the amount of processing they undergo. Such foods tend to be 'hyperpalatable, energy-dense, low in dietary fiber and contain little or no whole foods, while having high amounts of salt, sweeteners and unhealthy fats,' the CDC report said. Advertisement U.S. health officials recently said there are concerns over whether current definitions 'accurately capture' the range of foods that may affect health. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Agriculture Department recently issued a request for information to develop a new, uniform definition of ultra-processed foods for products in the U.S. food supply. In the meantime, Americans should try to reduce ultra-processed foods in their daily diets, Deierlein said. For instance, instead of instant oatmeal that may contain added sugar, sodium, artificial colors and preservatives, use plain oats sweetened with honey or maple syrup. Read food packages and nutrition information, she suggested. 'I do think that there are less-processed options available for many foods,' she said.
