logo
RFK Jr.‘s ignorance about autism is bad enough. Republicans' Medicaid cuts are worse.

RFK Jr.‘s ignorance about autism is bad enough. Republicans' Medicaid cuts are worse.

Yahoo04-05-2025

April 2025 was the weirdest Autism Awareness Month in my life, thanks largely to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The secretary of health and human services finished the month as he began it: spreading conspiracy theories, misinformation and lies about autism, vaccines, basic medical theories and more. He promised a study that would find the causes of autism by September (a timeline his NIH director immediately abandoned). He threatened to form a registry of autistic people, then pulled back, but not before parents began canceling assessments out of fear of what the government might do with that information. And in an interview with Dr. Phil, he not only offered more false links between vaccinations and autism, but also chemtrail conspiracy theories and an insistence that parents considering vaccinating their kids should 'do their own research.'
That's plenty of 'awareness' — the wrong kind of awareness. I need families like mine — my 18-year-old son is autistic — and those who care about us to become aware of the threats against Medicaid. I need awareness of the consequences that proposed GOP cuts would exact on families like mine, and what we can do to stop or mitigate the coming disaster.
I don't know that we can stop Kennedy from saying ignorant and stigmatizing things, but we can't spend the next four years chasing down and debunking a man who literally doesn't believe in germ theory. But the Republican-controlled Congress, backed by the president, is planning radical cuts to Medicaid, and there's nothing more important for autistic people, their families and everyone with any disability or a loved one with a significant disability in America.
Zoe Gross, director of advocacy at the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, says it's been the 'most intense April' for her in terms of media advocacy, with the need to refute public statements from the Trump administration, address community panic around the 'registry' and more. But the time spent just trying to bat back the worst statements comes with a cost. 'What we're missing,' she told me, 'is looking at the practical needs of autistic people in the U.S., how they can be met, and the government's role [in meeting them].'
She's worried because the administration is 'trying to take hundreds of millions of dollars out of Medicaid' and there's no way to do that without cutting back on Home and Community Based Services (HCBS), which allow autistic people to live independently and prevent family members from having to leave the workforce to care for their loved ones. Right now, recipients of HCBS have their needs assessed, then get assigned a number of hours of support based on that assessment — already a highly contested and stressful practice.
'If Medicaid gets cut, states are going to have to make decisions,' Gross says. 'One thing they could do is cut people's hours. People will be stuck in apartments, in wheelchairs, unable to bathe, dress, go to the bathroom.' People who rely on support professionals to get them to and from work, to grocery shop, to function as highly independent members of society will lose that independence. People who need 24/7 care may be forced into institutions, or family members will have to leave the workforce to provide care at home.
My son is autistic and needs a responsible adult around at all times. He also has Down syndrome, is intellectually disabled, and is nonverbal but a great communicator. I always worry that accurately describing his support needs will wrongly convey the idea that he's a burden. He just requires specific kinds of supports. They aren't really that expensive and are pretty easy to provide. Medicaid supplies him health care, an aide who allows him to access the world in the same ways that other teenagers do, and access to therapeutic programs not otherwise covered in school.
As he grows older, HCBS will enable him to be supported while living at home (with us!) or in some other community context — if HCBS survives this budget process, that is. The other options are: institutionalization, which we won't do (though others' medical circumstances may warrant shifting to residential care), or a family member providing all the daily support without sufficient state assistance.
Our situation isn't atypical, but one problem is that many Americans who rely on Medicaid, or love someone who does, don't even know it. States administer Medicaid under many different state-based program names, and users often don't know their state program is, in fact, Medicaid. One person who might help ensure people know this would be, of course, the secretary of health and human services. But at his confirmation hearings, alas, Kennedy seemed not to know anything about the $800 billion program.
Autism Awareness Month began in 1970, and there have been both upsetting, divisive and downright weird months before. We're always a divided community, with splits among autistic people, among parents (many of whom are autistic, others of whom perpetuate the worst stereotypes about autism as epidemic), and between family and self-advocate communities. April can exacerbate such divisions, sadly, even without Kennedy perpetuating horrific stereotypes. Increasingly, the autistic community focuses on autism 'acceptance' rather than awareness, because acceptance is an action, something each of us can, and must, do.
But Gross says that maybe this once, awareness might help. 'If there's increased awareness of autism this month, that's great,' she said, '[because] we want you to be aware of the precarious situation of Medicaid right now. We depend on it for daily survival.'
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio
Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gina Ortiz Jones, lesbian and military vet, elected mayor of San Antonio

Gina Ortiz Jones, a lesbian and military veteran who served in President Joe Biden's administration, has been elected mayor of San Antonio, the second-largest city in Texas and seventh-largest in the U.S. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. Jones beat Rolando Pablos, a former Texas secretary of state, in a runoff election Saturday. The margin was 54.3 percent to 45.7 percent, according to Ballotpedia. They advanced to the runoff because no candidate out of 27 in the May 3 general election received a majority of the vote. In the general election, Jones led with 27.2 percent and Pablos came in second with 16.6 percent. The current mayor, Ron Nirenberg, could not run again due to term limits. Races for mayor and other city positions in San Antonio are officially nonpartisan, but this election was partisan in practice. Jones emphasized her affiliation with the Democratic Party, while Pablos, who was elected secretary of state as a Republican, highlighted his ties to leading Republicans such as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. RELATED: Jones was undersecretary of the Air Force during the Biden administration; she was the first lesbian, second member of the LGBTQ+ community, and first woman of color (she's Filipina American) to serve in the post. She twice ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. House as a Democrat. She was an intelligence officer in the Air Force and was deployed to Iraq during the war there, serving under 'don't ask, don't tell.' After leaving the Air Force, she worked for the federal government as an adviser on intelligence and trade, with agencies including the Defense Intelligence Agency and Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. She left government service six months into Donald Trump's first term. In the mayoral race, 'she campaigned on her plans to expand early-childhood education to more children and increase affordable housing and work programs for unskilled workers,' The New York Times reports. 'San Antonio showed up and showed out,' she told supporters Saturday night after the results came in. 'We reminded them that our city is about compassion and it's about leading with everybody in mind. … So I look forward to being a mayor for all.' RELATED: Lesbian Gina Ortiz Jones Wants to Be Texas's First Out Congress Member Two other cities among the largest 10 in the nation have had LGBTQ+, specifically lesbian, mayors. Annise Parker was mayor of Texas's largest city, Houston, from 2010 to 2016. Until recently, she was president and CEO of the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund. Houston is the fourth-largest city in the U.S. Another lesbian, Lori Lightfoot, was mayor of Chicago, the third-largest, from 2019 to 2023. Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson hailed Jones's victory, releasing this statement: 'Every one of us deserves leaders who value equality and will fight to ensure that we can live freely without fear of discrimination. Gina Ortiz Jones is that leader. That's why HRC was proud to make calls and knock doors to help mobilize Equality Voters in San Antonio and put her over the finish line. Her win isn't just exciting, it's historic; as the first ever openly LGBTQ+ mayor of San Antonio during a time of ceaseless attacks on our community, Gina is emblematic of the resilience, strength, and joy that our community has already used to thrive in challenging times. We can't wait to see her get to work tackling the problems that are impacting our neighbors, families and coworkers and standing up for the rights and safety of every San Antonian.' Evan Low, president and CEO of LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, which endorsed Jones, issued this statement: 'Gina Ortiz-Jones is LGBTQ+ Victory Fund family, and we are proud to see her rise to lead America's seventh-largest city as mayor. As a veteran, her service reflects the estimated 1 million LGBTQ+ veterans who have contributed to our nation with honor, distinction, and an unyielding warrior spirit. San Antonio voters made the right call by sending Gina to City Hall, not only making history but selecting a candidate who is driven to make lives better in her hometown.' Jones will be sworn in June 18 for a four-year term.

Trump to keep Starlink at White House despite break with Elon Musk
Trump to keep Starlink at White House despite break with Elon Musk

CNBC

time36 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump to keep Starlink at White House despite break with Elon Musk

President Donald Trump said on Monday he has no plans to discontinue Starlink at the White House but might move his Tesla off-site, following his announcement over the weekend that his relationship with Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of both companies, was over. "I may move the Tesla around a little bit, but I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink. It's a good service," Trump told reporters, referring to the satellite internet company that provides high-speed broadband access. It is a unit of Musk's SpaceX. In March, Trump said he had purchased a red Tesla Model S from Musk, Trump's then-close ally. Last week, a White House official said Trump might get rid of it after a public feud erupted between the two men. The Tesla was seen parked at the White House over the weekend. On Saturday, Trump said he had no intention of repairing ties with Musk. On Monday, the president said he would not have a problem if Musk called. "We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well," Trump said. Musk responded with a heart emoji to a video on X showing Trump's remarks. Last week, Trump and Musk exchanged a flurry of insults after the world's richest man denounced Trump's tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination." Musk's opposition has complicated Republican efforts to pass Trump's "big, beautiful bill" in Congress, where the party holds slim majorities in the House of Representatives and Senate. Since the dispute began last Thursday, Musk has deleted some social media posts critical of Trump, including one signaling support for impeaching the president. Sources close to Musk said his anger has started to subside, and they believe he may want to repair his relationship with Trump.

Sen. Mike Lee, House conservatives demand changes to Trump's tax bill
Sen. Mike Lee, House conservatives demand changes to Trump's tax bill

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. Mike Lee, House conservatives demand changes to Trump's tax bill

WASHINGTON — Fiscal conservatives are demanding a number of changes to the Republican-led reconciliation package, including the elimination of some provisions that were key to getting the bill through Republicans' slim majority in the House last month. The House Freedom Caucus began circulating a memo Monday evening outlining dozens of changes to the tax package, which passed the House in a narrow 215-214 vote in late May. The bill is now being considered by the Senate, but House conservatives have made it clear they are not satisfied with the final product — and are demanding their colleagues in the upper chamber make edits. 'Through the negotiations in the House and the hard work of the President and the White House, we took significant steps to improve the reconciliation package known as 'One Big Beautiful Bill,'' the memo reads, according to a copy obtained by the Deseret News. 'However, there remain substantial concerns and a great deal of misinformation circulating about the bill. … Below, please find specific recommendations for the Senate to deliver a product we can pass in the House.' At the top of the list — underneath a headline that reads: 'The Senate Needs to Improve the House OBBB' — the fiscal conservatives are demanding Senate Republicans find deeper spending cuts than those included in the current resolution. The tax reconciliation package currently allows for up to $3.7 trillion in tax cuts over the next decade, according to projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. However, the bill includes only $1.3 trillion in spending cuts to offset those costs, raising concerns among Republicans that the package will raise the national debt. While GOP leaders, including Utah Rep. Blake Moore, argue the report doesn't factor in the economic growth that will likely come from the tax cuts tucked into the package, members of the Freedom Caucus say 'savings are backloaded and are subject to the whims of a future Congress, heavily affected by future policy changes and tax extensions, and unlikely to fully occur.' Notably, the conservatives are also demanding the Senate scale back an agreed-upon increase to federal deductions for state and local taxes paid, also known as SALT. Republican leaders offered to increase the current deduction cap to $40,000 — up from the current $10,000 limit — for individuals who make $500,000 or less a year. That cap would then increase by 1% every year over the next decade and remain permanent after that period. The policy mostly affects high-tax states, but the changes were made to appease a group of blue-state Republicans who repeatedly threatened final passage if a higher deduction was not included. Members of the House Freedom Caucus have pushed to undo that deal, arguing it 'disproportionately benefits high-income households in high tax (Democrat-run) states,' according to the memo. That's unlikely to go over well with the faction of New York Republicans who spent months negotiating a SALT increase. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., who helped lead that charge, has warned for weeks that if the Senate changes the numbers, he and his fellow New York Republicans would reject the bill. 'Cool. Good luck with that,' Lawler said in a post on X shortly after the memo was released. The memo also urges Senate Republicans to 'hold the line' on certain provisions included in the House version, including language that would fully repeal green energy credits passed by the Biden administration through the Inflation Reduction Act. 'Hold the line on the House OBBB reforms to significantly strengthen the rollback of IRA subsidies for wind and solar to end during President Trump's term — otherwise they will inevitability be renewed as in the past,' the memo states, 'and, by that point, the grid will become generally unreliable with no quick fixes to inevitable widespread unaffordability and power outages.' That demand comes in response to a push by some Republicans in the Senate — including Utah Sen. John Curtis — who want to preserve some of the clean energy tax incentives in the IRA, arguing they are crucial for Trump's agenda to remain energy independent. Conservatives are similarly pushing for deeper cuts to Medicaid benefits, outlining specific changes that would 'protect the most vulnerable' while addressing 'money laundering, fraud, and abuse.' Suggested language would be to implement specific definitions to crack down on Medicaid coverage for undocumented immigrants as well as stricter work requirements for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. The demands come as Senate Republicans have hinted at major changes to the House-passed reconciliation bill — with some suggesting to ease the deep spending cuts already passed while others have argued the package does not go far enough. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, has been at the forefront of demanding those changes, telling the Deseret News that 'everyone understands there are going to be some modifications made to the House bill.' 'Nobody believes that the House bill, unadorned, unmodified, is going to pass,' he said. For example, Lee supports maintaining the full repeal of the IRA green energy credits as well as cracking down on illegal immigrants relying on Medicaid. Meanwhile, the president is telling the Senate to 'make the changes they want' — sending mixed messages as Republicans consider alterations to the budget framework advancing policies on the border, energy, national defense and tax reform. Some of the hard-to-convince lawmakers hope their stubbornness will ward off any of their Senate colleagues from making drastic changes, noting the drawn-out process in the House should deter them from doing so. 'I think after seeing how painful of a process this is and how difficult it is to get anything through this side, I think that will send a strong message in the Senate that you can't really change it,' Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., a member of the Freedom Caucus, told the Deseret News last month. Contributing: Brigham Tomco

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store