San Francisco Store Manager Faces Up To A Year For Assaulting Shoplifter
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A former San Francisco-based Walgreens manager faces up to one year in prison and a $10,000 fine after being convicted this week of assaulting a suspected shoplifter.
The Context
The former manager, 46-year-old Guang Hong, was working at Walgreens when he attacked the alleged shoplifter on March 19.
Hong is no longer an employee at Walgreens and hasn't been "for months," a source close to the case told Newsweek.
What To Know
A jury convicted Hong of assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury this week, San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins announced.
Assault is a "wobbler" offense in California, meaning prosecutors can elect to charge it as a felony or misdemeanor. Hong was convicted of a misdemeanor, the DA's office confirmed to Newsweek.
According to California's penal code, any person convicted of assault as a felony "shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years" and those convicted of misdemeanor assault can be sentenced to "county jail for not exceeding one year, or by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment."
Street camera footage shows Guang Hong approaching a suspected shoplifter outside a Walgreens where Hong worked as a store manager.
Street camera footage shows Guang Hong approaching a suspected shoplifter outside a Walgreens where Hong worked as a store manager.
Screenshot via YouTube/San Francisco Bay Times Castro Street Cam
The suspected shoplifter, 30-year-old Larry Whitlock, entered the Walgreens where Hong worked before 5 a.m. on March 19 and took a bottle of shampoo, prosecutors said in court filings.
They said that as Whitlock was leaving the store, "the security guard alerted Mr. Hong, the Walgreens manager, of the theft."
Hong got the shampoo bottle back from Whitlock after a confrontation and Whitlock then left the store.
"After approximately one minute, Mr. Hong noticed that the victim was still outside the store," Jenkins' office said in its statement announcing Hong's conviction. "He confronted the victim again, shouting and pointing with his keys."
He "then charged at the victim and punched him in the face with a key protruding from his knuckles. Mr. Hong then punched the victim two more times with his keys in his hand and kicked the victim as he fell to the ground."
What People Are Saying
Jenkins said in a statement after Hong's conviction: "I would like to thank the jury for their service in this trial. Although I understand the frustration and anger in the community, violence is unacceptable and only makes matters worse. My office takes all crime seriously and is working in partnership with law enforcement to ensure those who engage in criminal behavior are held accountable and face consequences to protect the safety of the public and to restore the public's faith in the criminal justice system and the rule of law."
Assistant District Attorney Max Draskovich said: "Store theft is an important issue, but it does not justify an assault that goes beyond self-defense. Mr. Hong's response went far beyond self-defense, and we are thankful that the jury rightly held him accountable. Justice means upholding the law for everyone, on both sides of the incident."
Hong's attorney, deputy public defender Megan Votaw, said in a statement: "Mr. Hong was a longtime and extremely hardworking Walgreens employee who was working the graveyard shift on the night in question, and he fought in self-defense after attempting to recover stolen items from the alleged victim.
"During the interactions that Mr. Hong and the alleged victim had that night, the alleged victim threw a bottle at Mr. Hong, repeatedly hurled offensive insults – that Mr. Hong interpreted as threats – and came toward him with a fighting posture. Mr. Hong was not holding his keys between his fingers when he punched the alleged victim."
What Happens Next
Hong is scheduled to be sentenced on August 15. Whitlock is also facing charges of petty theft and battery.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
White House Reacts to Report FBI Flagged Trump's Name in Epstein Files
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to a question regarding a recent report from a Democratic senator that the FBI was told to "flag" any records that mentioned President Donald Trump in the federal Jeffrey Epstein files. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary, said last week that his office received information that about 1,000 agents were given that instruction. Durbin's office said it sourced the information from a protected FBI whistleblower disclosure. Leavitt was asked during a press gaggle, "There are reports FBI agents going through the Epstein files were told to flag President Trump's name. Is that something the President aware of or he directed?" Leavitt replied, "I don't believe that was something the White House was aware of. You would have to ask the FBI." Reporter: There are reports FBI agents going through the Epstein files were told to flag President Trump's name. Is that something the President aware of or he directed? Leavitt: I don't believe that was something the White House was aware of. You would have to ask the FBI. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 21, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Russia Will Soon Fire 2,000 Drones a Day: ISW
Russia's drone production has expanded so much that within months, it might be able to launch up to 2,000 of the devices in a single night, according to a report. Moscow fired another barrage of drones and missiles on Ukrainian cities overnight Sunday. Ukraine's Air Force said Moscow launched 450 drones and missiles targeting Kyiv and the cities of Ivano-Frankivsk and Kharkiv. But Ukrainian and German officials have raised the alarm that Russia's production of Shahed-type drones had grown to such an extent that strike packages four times bigger could be possible by November. Newsweek has contacted the Russian defense ministry for comment. Moscow continues to step up its drone bombardment of Ukrainian cities as Russian President Vladimir Putin ignores calls for a ceasefire. Moscow's forces initially relied on Iranian-made Shahed or "kamikaze" drones to wreak havoc in strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure but is now using the technology to produce its own devices in its own factories across Russia. Reports by German and Ukrainian officials about this increasing capacity will raise alarm about Moscow's intentions come winter when it could use the colder months to target the Ukrainian population. Russia has been stepping up its Shahed-type strike drones and decoy drones in overnight strikes with the largest attack so far including 728 drones taking place on July 8. But Moscow is boosting drone production capacity with the aim of launching 2,000 drones in one overnight strike package by November. That is according to the head of the German Ministry of Defense's Planning and Command Staff, Major General Christian Freuding, reported by Ukrainian outlet Suspilne citing comments he made to the a German military podcast. In reporting the comments, the Institute for the Study of War said current growth in Russia's drone production and usage makes this number achievable in that time frame although such a strike package would not be sustainable every night. This is a double the estimate to one made July 4 by commander of the Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Forces Major Robert Brovdi who said increased production and stockpiles means Russia could launch 1,000 drones in a single strike package. This figure is also a marked increase from the assessment on June 9 of Ukraine's Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) that Russia plans to increase production capacity to 190 drones per day, by the end of 2025. Freuding said Saturday that Ukraine and its allies must look at cheaper ways to counter this threat because traditional air defense methods, like Patriot interceptors, are not best suited to defend against drones. It comes as Russia showcased a drone factory near Kazan in the Tatarstan region which is producing drones, including the Geran-2 which is also an Iranian design. In a propaganda video, teenagers are seen assembling the devices for use against Ukraine at the facility at the Alabuga industrial park. the Russian Defense Ministry's television channel it produces a 5,200 Shahed-type strike drones and decoy models a month as of May and will make thousands of Geran drones at the "largest plant in the world." German Major General Christian Freuding: "The Russian army plans to launch up to 2,000 drones over Ukraine at one time." Institute for the Study of War on Sunday: "Russia may be able to launch up to 2,000 drones in one night by November 2025, should this current growth trend in drone usage continue." Timur Shagivaliev, CEO of the Alabuga Special Economic Zone, told Russian defense ministry outlet Zvezda the drone factory in Tartastan is "the largest such plant in the world and the most plan was to produce several thousand (Geran drones) - now we are producing nine times more than planned." Russia is likely to continue its drone attacks on Ukraine which Freuding said Kyiv could counter by striking drone production sites and lowering interception costs. Ukraine has also increased its domestic drone production with President Volodymyr Zelensky saying Kyiv can produce up to 8 million drones annually but it needs more foreign funding. Related Articles Melania Trump Attacked in Russian State MediaRussia and Ukraine Exchange Series of Major StrikesRussia Touts Trump-Putin Meeting for Major DeadlineNATO Scrambles Fighter Jets Amid 'Massive' Russian Attacks 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Florida's attorney general appeals judge's contempt finding in immigration case
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has appealed a federal judge's ruling that found him in civil contempt because of a letter he sent in April after she ordered a halt to enforcement of a new state immigration law. Uthmeier's lawyers last week filed a notice of appealing U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams' ruling to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. As is common, the notice does not detail arguments that Uthmeier will make at the Atlanta-based appeals court. But the appeal is the latest move in an unusual dispute between Uthmeier and the Miami-based judge. The issue stems from a law, passed during a February special legislative session, that created state crimes for undocumented immigrants who enter or re-enter Florida. The Florida Immigrant Coalition, the Farmworker Association of Florida and two individual plaintiffs filed a lawsuit on April 2, contending, in part, that the law violates what is known as the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution because immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility. Williams on April 4 issued a temporary restraining order to block enforcement of the law. She extended the temporary restraining order April 18 and directed Uthmeier to send a letter notifying police agencies that they could not enforce the law. The directive came after reports of arrests. Uthmeier sent such a letter April 18 but followed with an April 23 letter that spurred the contempt issue. Uthmeier has argued that the temporary restraining order — and a longer-lasting preliminary injunction issued later — should only apply to him and local state attorneys because they were the named defendants in the underlying legal challenge to the law (SB 4-C). In the April 23 letter to police agencies, Uthmeier reiterated that position and said he could not prevent police from enforcing the law 'where there remains no judicial order that properly restrains you from doing so,' according to Williams' June 17 contempt ruling. Williams said that statement and other wording in the letter violated her order, writing that in a 'variety of ways, Uthmeier's April 23rd letter conveyed to law enforcement that they could and should disregard the April 18th letter's message that they were required by court order to cease enforcement of SB 4-C.' 'Uthmeier's role endows him with a unique capacity to uphold or undermine the rule of law, and when he does the latter by violating a court order, the integrity of the legal system depends on his conduct being within the court's remedial reach,' Williams wrote in the 27-page contempt ruling. In a court filing in May, Uthmeier's lawyers said he complied with the temporary restraining order by not enforcing the law and notifying law-enforcement agencies about the temporary restraining order. The filing said Uthmeier was free to express his disagreement with Williams' decision in the April 23 letter. 'The attorney general has consistently abided by the court's order to cease enforcing (the law),' the document said. 'Nowhere does the TRO (expressly or impliedly) require the attorney general to refrain from sharing his views about the order with law enforcement.' The filing also said Williams' reading of the April 23 letter 'relies on one portion of one sentence, rather than reading (the) letter as a whole and in the context of what preceded it: the April 18 letter' and a legal brief that also was filed April 23. To carry out the contempt finding, Williams ordered Uthmeier to file bi-weekly reports about whether any arrests, detentions or other law-enforcement actions had occurred under the blocked law — filings he has submitted. Williams on April 29 issued a preliminary injunction to continue blocking the law, saying it likely was preempted by federal immigration-enforcement authority. In part, she pointed to the law requiring that violators go to jail and indicated that could conflict with federal authority. Uthmeier also has appealed the preliminary-injunction ruling to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. He asked the appeals court and the U.S. Supreme Court for a stay of the preliminary injunction but was turned down. Such a stay would have allowed enforcement of the law while the legal battle plays out.
