Votes at 16: Yorkshire teenagers have their say on Government plans
'I want a say on how my taxes are spent'
Noah, 16, is the treasurer of Skipton's Youth Council.He says he is "really excited" for people who will be able to vote in the next general election as a result of the proposed change."A 16-year-old can pay taxes, join the armed forces, get married with consent, and that is a lot of responsibility," he says."I am starting an apprenticeship in September. I will pay my national insurance, I will pay my tax."I want to get involved with how the country is going to evolve in the future."He says being over the age of 18 does not necessarily mean you know more about politics."You could say that anybody is not mature enough to vote," he adds."There are many adults out there who are not as well-educated as others."
'It's important we're heard'
Rosie, 18, is part of a youth group in Leeds and says she would have voted in 2024 if the rules had changed sooner.She says she would have done extra research to learn about the political parties."Lots of people are worried about people that are uneducated voting but I think there won't be much of a problem with that," she says.Albert, 17, agrees, adding: "I think it's really important for younger people to have their voice heard, in a way that isn't just protesting.""The people who would vote would be conscious of the decision they're making and how it impacts people."
'It will tackle low turnout'
Anna Calvert, who lives near Skipton in North Yorkshire, missed out on voting at the 2024 general election by less than three months."I was a bit gutted that I wouldn't have a say on who would be looking after my constituency for the next five years," she says.Anna, now 18, is a member of the UK Youth Parliament, which has campaigned for the voting age to be lowered since its creation, 25 years ago."The group chats were all going mental when the plans was announced," she said."We were just all so surprised."She is hoping that politicians will focus more on issues that matter to young people during the next election campaign, as she says the generation currently feels "ignored".Anna believes that engaging young people in politics will also help to tackle low voter turnout."If you start getting people interested in politics young, you'll have voters for life."
'We need to be informed'
Will, 15, York's member of the UK Youth Parliament, believes 16-year-olds are "mature enough, but possibly not informed enough" to vote.However, he says that is not the fault of young people and he hopes education about politics will improve as a result of changes to the voting age."At the moment, people turn 18 and learn about politics online, which can be good but also can be difficult, because you can't help the spread of misinformation," he says."Or they're voting with their parents and that can lead to tribalism, and that's just not a true democracy."Young people need to be taught how to identify misinformation online in time for the next general election, he adds.
'Policies affect my future'
Lucas, 16, is says he is pleased with the proposed change as "a lot of the new terms and policies affect me as a young person".However, he says he feels many people his age would not be able to make an "informed vote", because of a lack of teaching about the "current state of the UK" in schools.Meanwhile, Charlie, 15, says he reads the news and added: "I look at some of the parties now and then but I wouldn't look too greatly into them."Evie, 14, says a lot of young people she knows are "particularly interested" in the possibility that they will soon be able to cast their ballot."I think it's a great idea and I'm really looking forward to my first vote," she says.
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
20 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Swinney: New work for bus maker Alexander Dennis being explored
The First Minister said details remain commercially sensitive Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Scottish Government is actively exploring a package which could deliver new work to the troubled Alexander Dennis bus maker, John Swinney has said. The First Minister said he could not provide further details due to 'commercial sensitivity'. He has asked the company to consider an extension to its consultation period while the package is developed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad General view of the Alexander Dennis site at Camelon, near Falkirk | PA Last month, Alexander Dennis announced it was proposing to consolidate its UK operations at a single site in Scarborough, North Yorkshire. The decision puts 400 jobs at risk at its facility in Falkirk in another blow to the Forth Valley, which has already seen more than 400 jobs go at the Grangemouth refinery this year. Mr Swinney said: 'Scottish ministers place the utmost importance on the presence of Alexander Dennis in Scotland and the retention of its highly skilled manufacturing workers. 'The Scottish Government has committed to exploring any and all viable options throughout the consultation period to allow the firm to retain its skilled employees and manufacturing and production facilities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'While I cannot provide details due to commercial sensitivity at this time, I hope this update provides the workforce and local community with further assurance that the Scottish Government remains wholly committed to supporting the future of bus manufacturing in Scotland. 'We will undertake this work in tandem with every other short, medium and long-term opportunity we continue to explore in close collaboration with the company, Unite, GMB, Scottish Enterprise, Transport Scotland and the UK Government.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes will meet with the unions GMB and Unite today to update them on the proposal. Labour previously accused Holyrood ministers of overlooking Scottish industry in favour of ordering buses from China. Mr Swinney argued state aid regulations – in the form of the UK-wide Subsidy Control Act – prevent the Government from directly procuring from a single supplier like Alexander Dennis. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Speaking to The Scotsman last month, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: "They [the Scottish Government] have to look themselves in the mirror. But they should be leaving no stone unturned about how we can keep this bus company open."
New Statesman
21 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Will Keir Starmer recognise Palestine?
Photo byThe image stays with you: this week it has covered the front pages of the world's newspapers. A mother, herself worn down and bruised by 21 months of conflict, cradles her child, who is swaddled in a bin bag. The child has lost a third of its body weight, it now weighs 6kg. Such images are not unique in Gaza, where starvation is general to a community after the blockade of humanitarian aid. The international community is looking on in horror, pleading with Israel to reconsider. On Sunday, the Israeli government issued a temporary reprieve allowing deliveries of aid into parts of Gaza. In the UK, there is pressure on the government to officially recognise the state of Palestine. This pressure originally mounted from the backbenches, but now, even members of the cabinet (Shabana Mahmood, Wes Streeting and Hilary Benn) are ramping up their private calls for Starmer to recognise Palestinian statehood. Over the weekend, 220 MPs from nine political parties – including 131 Labour MPs – signed a letter calling for the immediate recognition of Palestine. In the run up to the 2024 general election, the party's manifesto included a pledge to recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution towards a renewed peace process which results in a two-state solution, but a year on, and both Starmer and his Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, are yet to make good on this promise. The government's current position is that the UK will acknowledge Palestinian statehood as part of a peace process, but only at the point of 'maximum impact'. On Saturday, Starmer doubled down, rejecting renewed calls for the UK to reconsider and immediately recognise a Palestinian state, reasserting the UK's alignment with the US on this issue (a move which one cabinet minister told The Times was 'deeply inadequate'). The opportunity for Starmer to recognise the Palestinian state has presented itself more than once. Most recently, it was thought that Starmer might wait to go ahead with recognition alongside the French President, Emmanuel Macron. The UK and France argue a historical responsibility for the continuation of a Palestinian community in the Middle East, and so plenty suspected the countries would make a dual statement. But the opportunity for joint Franco-UK recognition has now passed. On Thursday 24 July, Macron announced France's intention to recognise Palestine at the upcoming UN general assembly. (Starmer, on the other hand, almost simultaneously released a statement sticking to the government line). Backbench MPs are losing their patience. Rachael Maskell, who lost the Labour whip last week following her involvement in the welfare rebellion, believes 'time is running out' for any governmental recognition of Palestine to have its desired effect. 'We should have recognised Palestine many, many years ago,' she said, 'it's been Labour party policy since 2014'. Maskell was one of 60 MPs to sign a letter to the Foreign Secretary in July calling for Palestine's immediate recognition. Ian Byrne, the Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby agreed: 'We had a vote over a decade ago about Palestine. [Recognition] was in the manifesto. What we're seeing now with the genocide, there's the political will now from all sides of the house to do something.' Byrne said now is the time for the UK to step up and take international responsibility. 'The UK has the opportunity to do the right thing. We are one of the world leaders and sometimes you need a leader to take the lead.' He criticised the government for acting 'extremely slowly' on Gaza. Even more moderate back-bench Labour MPs are ramping up the pressure on the government. One member of the 2024 intake told me, 'It's beyond horrific, we have to seriously consider our relationship with Israel.' Israel has now offered a brief cessation of its full scale aid blockade, and Lammy has said the channelling of aid into the Gaza strip must be 'urgently accelerated'. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe No country is likely to get involved in this conflict militarily (unless a UN peacekeeping force is assembled), instead, more substantial diplomatic levers could be pulled such as suspending the UK-Israel trade agreement and imposing sanctions not only on the most outspoken ministers (as the UK has already done with Smotrich and Ben Gvir) but all Israeli political and military leaders involved in the conflict. Many Labour MPs would agree with this. Byrne called for an 'arms embargo, military cooperation to be ended, and comprehensive sanctions'. And it is not just Labour. Kit Malthouse, the Conservative MP for North West Hertfordshire said Lammy could end up in the Hague over his inaction on Gaza as he called on the government to press for an immediate ceasefire. This week the Daily Express carried a front page bearing the face of an emaciated Palestinian child crying 'enough is enough': concern over the plight of Palestinians now transcends party politics. This is unlikely to be an electoral downfall for Keir Starmer. But, with the pro-Gaza independent MPs taking seats last summer otherwise ordained for Labour, it is obvious that this is damaging to the party on its left flank. The Prime Minister may continue to prevaricate. But were we at the polls tomorrow, votes would be shed because of it. [See more: The abomination of Obama's nation] Related
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK gambling industry launches summer charm offensive to head off tax rise
Gambling lobbyists are staging a summer charm offensive designed to stop ministers from raising taxes on the sector, the Guardian has learned, including meeting with Treasury insiders and hosting a darts evening with Labour special advisers and MPs' staff. The Treasury is considering whether to simplify the various rates of duty applied to gambling products, a measure that the £11.5bn-a-year sector fears would increase its overall tax bill. The Betting & Gaming Council (BGC), whose members include high street bookmakers and online casinos, is understood to have outlined its objections in a submission to the Treasury, based on a report written for the trade body by the accounting firm EY. But the BGC has also embarked on a back-channel lobbying push, according to emails sent to its members and seen by the Guardian. In at least one case, a social event was promoted to Labour staff directly by the Labour Staff Network (LSN), offering them the opportunity to attend and hear speeches. The event was a darts-themed evening, hosted by BGC and Flutter plc, the owner of Paddy Power, Betfair and SkyBet, an event the trade body said would help it 'continue building constructive engagement across Westminster'. At the event, more than 100 Labour staff and ministerial special advisers heard an address from the BGC chief executive Grainne Hurst, a former Ladbrokes executive and one-time aide to the former Conservative MP Philip Davies, who has railed against tax increases. The social at the end of June was promoted via the LSN, which is run by and for the staff of Labour MPs and is independent of party HQ. It was held in partnership with Prostate Cancer UK. A Flutter UKI spokesperson said: 'The Labour staffers event was a great opportunity for us to talk about our 'Big 180' partnership with Prostate Cancer UK – built around the World Darts Championship – which has so far encouraged 350,000 men to check out their risk of developing the disease.' As part of the charm offensive, the BGC's chair, the former Labour MP Michael Dugher, met Katie Martin, the chief of staff to Rachel Reeves, and was also 'in touch' with the chancellor herself, according to the emails. A source close to Reeves said she had no formal meeting with the BGC and would not ever have discussed the tax changes. Senior BGC figures also told members in emails that they had briefed Labour MPs including Jo Platt, Gareth Snell and Adam Jogee on tax, as well as meeting the sports minister Stephanie Peacock – who is Dugher's successor in his former Barnsley East seat. The emails said Dugher also met the special adviser to the government's chief whip, shortly after the bruising defeat on the welfare reform bill. They say BGC representatives attended a campaign fundraiser event for Labour's business champion Gregor Poynton MP and Imogen Walker, the parliamentary private secretary to Reeves, attended by the prime minister's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, who is Walker's husband, and the UK's ambassador to the US, Peter Mandelson. The BCG also hosted events for the Tories, sponsoring the inaugural Conservatives in Sports drinks reception, addressed by the shadow culture minister, Stuart Andrew, and attended by the shadow gambling minister, Louie French, and the chair of the DCMS select committee, Caroline Dinenage. A BGC spokesperson said: 'It is entirely common and appropriate for trade bodies like the BGC to routinely meet with ministers, shadow ministers and MPs as well as officials and advisers across government. All donations and hospitality are consistent with the parliamentary and other rules and are fully declared and transparent. 'Ministers have been clear in public and in parliament that they would be meeting with the relevant stakeholders as part of the consultation on tax harmonisation proposals. That includes the BGC, which represents companies employing over 100,000 people and a sector enjoyed safely by millions of customers each month. 'The BGC also recently met with the minister leading the tax consultation, James Murray, as would be expected as part of any government consultation on measures which would impact businesses and customers.' It comes as the Treasury considers raising tax on the sector to help Reeves shore up the UK's ailing public finances. The industry took £15.6bn from British punters last year, of which £11.5bn went to betting and gaming organisations and the remainder to the national lottery and other lotteries. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion A number of Labour MPs are pushing to toughen up the government's approach to gambling – despite longstanding links of party veterans to the industry. Those who have joined the all-party parliamentary group on gambling include new MPs Beccy Cooper, Sarah Coombes, Alex Ballinger and Andrew Pakes. The MP Dawn Butler, who intends to run for mayor of London, and the mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, have also been pushing to hand more power to councils to block the spread of 24-hour slot machine venues. Butler launched a campaign on Wednesday to stop the spread of high street betting shops, saying her own borough of Brent in north-west London had at least 102 venues, including betting shops, casinos, and adult gaming centres. 'Nearly one person a day dies by suicide linked to gambling addiction. This is a public health crisis, and it's time our planning laws reflect that and stop these gambling companies preying on communities that are often vulnerable and deprived,' she said. Butler has submitted a parliamentary motion, calling for legislative changes to the Gambling Act 2005 to give local authorities greater power to refuse new gambling premises where there is clear evidence of community harm – especially as these venues are being targeted in areas of deprivation. Gambling companies are projected to pay £3.6bn in duties this year, of which £1.2bn is 'remote gaming duty', a tax of 21% applied to online gambling. A further £713m is 'general betting duty' paid by high street bookmakers at a lower rate of 15%. One option under consideration is to harmonise the two rates. This has met vehement opposition from the horse-racing industry, which fears the impact on a sport whose finances are already under severe pressure. Senior figures from racing have made this case personally in a meeting with Reeves, according to one industry source. Some in racing are understood to have made clear they would not object to much higher taxes on online casino products, as long as the sport is left untouched. Several gambling industry sources said this could result in taxes on online gaming products, such as casino games and digital slot machines, being raised from 21% to as much as 35%. The Social Market Foundation (SMF) thinktank is preparing a report on how much could be raised by adjusting gambling taxes, putting forward several scenarios. At last year's budget, the Treasury considered but ultimately rejected a proposal from the SMF that would have doubled taxes on the most harmful gambling products to 41%.
