MK Party to introduce private legislative bill to clarify section 235 of the Constitution
Led by Parliamentary Chief Whip Mzwanele Manyi, the delegation engaged with local leaders to better understand how Section 235 was being applied.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The delegation visited the area on Monday to engage with local leaders regarding the application of Section 235, which affirms the right to self-determination for communities sharing a common cultural and linguistic heritage.
It enables communities with a shared cultural and linguistic heritage to attain legal recognition and exercise autonomy in preserving and promoting their culture, language, and traditions.
Speaking to the media, Manyi expressed concern over what he described as the misapplication of the constitutional provision.
He cited settlements such as Orania and Kleinfontein, asserting that these predominantly white, Afrikaners-only communities have distorted the intent of Section 235 to serve exclusionary agendas.
"We hold the view as the MK Party in Parliament that section 235 is vague and it leads to all kinds of interpretations and some of those lend themselves to apartheid kind of situations.
'So we want to make sure that clause is further clarified because we hold that view that as much as we must respect all the cultures but the respect of all the cultures must not in any shape or form remind us of apartheid,' he said.
The Gauteng High Court declared last year that Kleinfontein was functioning illegally because it did not adhere to the Tshwane Municipality's zoning laws.
Meanwhile, the EFF in the Northern Cape is set to stage a protest march to the office of Premier Zamani Saul on Tuesday, voicing strong opposition to the continued existence of the town of Orania.
kamogelo.moichela@iol.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Parliamentary committee warns against blocking foreigners from accessing schools and healthcare
Chairperson of the Select Committee on Education, Health and Creative Arts Makhi Feni has urged civil society organisations, such as Operation Dudula to understand their role and not violate the rights enshrined in the Constitution by threatening to prevent children of foreigners from entering schools in 2026. Image: Phando Jikelo / Parliament of South Africa The parliamentary committees on education and health have warned against the blocking of foreign nationals to health facilities and threats to prevent children of foreigners from attending public schools next year. This comes amid Operation Dudula, March and March Movement and Progressive Forces of South Africa preventing undocumented people from obtaining health care at clinics and hospitals. Operation Dudula has since threatened to prevent children of foreigners from being admitted at schools in the 2026 school year. Speaking during a media on Thursday, Select Committee on Education, Sciences and Creative Industries chairperson Makhi Feni said they will never accept that kind of disruption of blocking children of foreigners to take place at schools. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'We don't believe when we want to make things right, it is the way of approach. We, therefore, condemn with utmost contempt those forms of threats and actions, and we are convinced there is nothing to be gained through those actions,' Feni said. He also said civil society organisations should understand their role and should not violate the rights enshrined in the Constitution. 'South Africa is not a banana republic. It is constitutional democracy governed by the rule of law. Our constitution is the supreme law of the land.' Feni added that the role of civil society was to be a watchdog and hold politicians accountable to the Constitution. He questioned how Operation Dudula activists would identify a child who was undocumented as being illegal in the country. 'There are various issues that lead to those kids not having the necessary documents,' he said. 'We are not to allow anarchy to coexist with governance …' said Feni, adding that the select committee was offering itself to engage the anti-immigrant groups while the government was attending to their concerns, and urged them to familiarise themselves with the laws. 'We are to assist them to understand and we must not be seen to be undermining or stumbling blocks to the role of civil society. We can't allow anarchy and therefore we assure, as the select committee, that if they want to contribute in the building of the nation, they must come to the fore,' said Feni. Health Portfolio Committee chairperson Sibongiseni Dhlomo says concerns raised by organisations such as Operation Dudula and other stakeholders about foreigners accessing health care at public institution cannot be wished away, but an approach should be found to handle to address the issues. Image: Phando Jikelo / Parliament of South Africa Health Portfolio Committee chairperson Sibongiseni Dhlomo said while the Constitution states that everyone has the right to healthcare, it was raised during the public hearings for the National Health Insurance Act that only emergency health services is provided to all, including foreigners, not comprehensive health. 'It means every citizen of the world can be afforded emergency health services,' Dhlomo said. However, the issues raised by Operation Dudula and other stakeholders about foreigners receiving public health could not be ignored. 'These concerns can't be wished away, but maybe we should find an approach to handle them for discussion to address those issues,' Dhlomo said. He said Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi, who was previously home affairs minister, has indicated that there are certain Home Affairs Department laws that need to be repealed as their provisions on who citizens are was a 'very wide spectrum'. 'Some of these Acts are very wide and encompassing, some of the people in their view say they should have a bit limitation. It is not possible as a country to have unlimited resources to deal with what is there in the world,' he said. Dhlomo said if Operation Dudula and other stakeholders were to be engaged, a process would have to be found to address their concerns. He spoke against the anti-immigrant activists demanding individuals produce identification before accessing public healthcare facilities. 'There are South Africans who are not documented for various reasons. An absence of documentation should not allow you to block any individual,' he said. 'We are saying the Department of Health must engage with the Department of Home Affairs to fast track (laws) that must be repealed to assist. Those processes should kick in,' he added.
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
Land in hand but no money to build: Gauteng housing project vacant due to lack of foresight
A housing scheme aimed at giving 100 000 beneficiaries fully serviced plots of land has seen ambitions unrealised A land ownership scheme to empower the building of assets has not realised its intended goals. The Rapid Land Release Programme (RLRP) envisioned the handing over of fully serviced plots of land across Gauteng for recipients to develop homes to their own specifications. However, roughly seven years after its launch, the vast majority of stands remain empty, despite having been allocated to beneficiaries. 99% of plots still vacant The RLRP was launched in 2018 by then premier David Makhura and was continued during Premier Panyaza Lesufi's administration. The programme featured roughly 100 000 fully serviced stands and moved away from providing the turnkey apartments common in other social housing projects. The provincial government stated four years ago that the stands were ready for allocation, but to date, only a fraction of stands have seen development. At a recent oversight visit to Palm Ridge Ext 14 by the DA, officials explained that of the 2 200 stands allocated to recipients in the area, only 13 had seen any construction. Speaking to community members, DA representatives were told how constant delays, broken promises and a lack of support had left the stands bare. 'There seems to be no forethought given to how beneficiaries will build and maintain their homes or cover service costs,' stated DA Gauteng shadow Human Settlements MEC Mervyn Cirota. 'It is also unacceptable that the government proceeded with the programme despite knowing that most beneficiaries could not afford to build, secure loans or pay for services.' MEC disputes figures However, Gauteng Human Settlement MEC Tasneem Motara disputed the figures, saying the DA's claims of more than 2 000 undeveloped stands was 'factually incorrect'. 'The project comprises of 758 stands which were developed in 2021/2022 financial year, all of which have been allocated, with title deed registration currently underway,' Motara told The Citizen. The MEC said the 758 stands were part of the broader project called the Ikagelang RLRP and that beneficiaries were approved in line with the National Housing Needs Register and have their ownership linked with housing subsidy systems. Once obtaining the title deeds, beneficiaries receive full ownership; with the only proviso that developments meet municipal planning and building regulations. Motara clarified that under the RLRP, beneficiaries did not need to wait until receiving title deeds to begin construction as the stands had services pre-installed and were given certified letters of allocation. 'This document enables beneficiaries to apply for building plan approval from the municipality and to commence construction in line with municipal building regulations. 'In short, the allocation letter is the enabling instrument, beneficiaries are not left in limbo. 'Palm Ridge Ext 14 therefore remains a key element of our broader human settlements strategy, contributing to both land ownership and spatial transformation,' Motara said. 'Defeats the purpose' The DA claims that the project has cost at least R500 million so far and is calling for the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) to look into the whereabouts of the funds. 'Palm Ridge is just a small microcosm of the whole RLRP. There is no indication whether a transfer has taken place so there may be an allocation, but that is only the first step,' Cirota told The Citizen. Cirota noted the project suffered from insufficient funding, a hold up in deeds transfers and failure to assist beneficiaries with planning. 'It is a multi-pronged attack, and if one of those elements falls away, then the whole process comes tumbling down. 'What is the purpose of having the land if you cannot build a house on the land or maintain the property. It defeats the whole purpose of the whole project,' Cirota said. NOW READ: Gauteng's housing crisis: 150 years to clear the backlog
The South African
7 hours ago
- The South African
Court to decide if City of Cape Town is playing dirty with new cleaning tariff
The City of Cape Town is preparing for a legal battle in September as mounting opposition challenges the legality of new fixed charges introduced in its 2025 budget. In court filings, the city has defended its position, while property owners and residents accuse the municipality of unconstitutional overreach. The dispute centres on three new tariffs: a city-wide cleaning levy, a fixed water charge, and a fixed sanitation fee. These charges, unlike traditional service-based billing, are linked to the municipal value of properties, not to actual consumption – prompting strong resistance from civic groups and property owners. Cleaning Tariff : Applies to all properties, calculated by property value; unrelated to any specific services rendered to the property : Applies to all properties, calculated by property value; unrelated to any specific services rendered to the property Fixed Water & Sanitation Tariffs: Charged regardless of actual usage, and based on property value rather than service consumption Critics argue that this approach imposes a regressive financial burden, particularly on middle-class households that cannot offset increased costs like commercial property owners might. The South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) launched a High Court application in July to have the levies scrapped, citing violations of Section 229 of the Constitution, which restricts municipalities to: Property rates Service-based charges Surcharges on these charges Taxes explicitly permitted by national legislation SAPOA says that none of the new charges meet these criteria, and labels them revenue-generation tools under the guise of service delivery. The Cape Town Collective Ratepayers' Association (CTCRA) – representing 40 community groups – has joined the case as a friend of the court, warning that if these levies stand, they may set a precedent for municipalities across South Africa. 'This is not just a fight for Cape Town,' said a CTCRA spokesperson. 'It's about protecting all South Africans from unlawful taxation masked as service fees.' In its answering affidavit, the City argues that it is operating within its legal mandate to provide services and secure the financial sustainability of the metro. It says the new fees support infrastructure development and a 'pro-poor' budget, with wealthier ratepayers subsidising vulnerable communities. Cape Town Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis has defended the charges as necessary to avoid a R2 billion budget shortfall, warning that removing them would breach the Municipal Finance Management Act by leaving the city with an unfunded budget. The city also disputes SAPOA's constitutional interpretation, arguing that it reflects a 'selective reading' of the law. While city officials have characterised the pushback as a 'rich vs. poor' issue, CTCRA rejects this, noting thousands of objections from residents of all income levels. 'This is not about the wealthy protecting their wealth,' said CTCRA. 'This is about accountability and fair governance.' The matter is scheduled to be heard in the Western Cape High Court on 18 and 19 September 2025. With major implications for municipal finance models across the country, all eyes will be on the outcome. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
