Skokie strengthens immigration protections ordinance
The updated Human Relations Chapter of the village's code does not conflict with federal law, as it still requires the village and its police department to assist federal officers in serving criminal warrants, officials said. The Village Board unanimously approved the changes to the village's code at its March 17 meeting.
The new addendums in the Human Relations chapter state that the village shall not assist immigration officers who do not have a criminal warrant, assist in information sharing, arrest or detain someone based solely on their immigration status.
The village is also mandated to notify foreign nationals of their right to contact consulates within 48 hours of their booking, support programs available for immigrants who are victims of qualifying crimes and who are potential witnesses for prosecution of a crime, and to respond promptly to requests for visa supporting documents and visa certifications.
Those mandates and restrictions were already in practice in Skokie, according to Mayor George Van Dusen, but the Village Board approved updating to reinforce its stance.
Under President Donald Trump's first term in office, the Village Board approved amendments to its Human Relations chapter in 2017 to create safe zones in health care facilities, schools and universities. Michael Lorge, the village's corporation counsel said at the time that the village granted legal protections to its residents that are commonly seen in 'sanctuary cities.'
Van Dusen defended the integrity of the 2017 protections at a Village Board meeting Feb. 3, and said the Board created those protections before the state approved the TRUST Act.
The subject came back to the Village Board as an honorary proclamation at the Feb. 18 meeting reiterating the village's support for all immigrants.
'Mr. Tsao, with (ICIRR) made some suggestions to us,' Van Dusen said after the proclamation was read by Trustee Khem Khouen. 'In the (Police) Chief's guidance, he states the following, 'Under prohibited activities: No compliance with immigration detainers, administrative warrants or custody transfers without a criminal warrant. No sharing of information about individuals in custody, including release dates.''
'Under stops, arrests and detentions: No stops, searches, arrests or detentions based solely on immigration status.'
'The Chief reiterates, ICE administrative warrants do not justify arrests or detentions,' Van Dusen said. 'Individuals in custody cannot be denied services, benefits or programs based on immigration status.'
'Facilities must notify foreign nationals of the right to contact consulates within 48 hours of booking,' he said.
Van Dusen said the police department does so to build community trust and treat all individuals equitably, regardless of immigration status.
Khoeun thanked Van Dusen for explaining the ordinance publicly, and filed a motion to clarify the village's intentions in its Human Relations Chapter. 'We want to make sure that it's explicit so that we're future-proofing it as well, regardless of who's here,' she said, while adding to her motion a provision for the village to work with ICIRR to be proactive in making changes to the village's code if necessary.
The motion was seconded by Trustee Keith Robinson; the Village Board had approved a first reading of it on March 3.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wealth tax for school funding initiative starts signature collection with opposition pouncing
A copy of the petition to be circulated by the Invest in MI Kids Ballot Proposal Coalition. July 31, 2025 | Photo By Kyle Davidson/Michigan Advance The constitutional amendment to implement a new tax on wealthy Michiganders is still aiming for the 2026 ballot after facing some initial setbacks and new attacks, with its signature collection driving kicking off on Friday. Members of Invest in MI Kids said it started collecting signatures last week using the 100-word summary that was approved June 27 by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers. That has opened up further complications for the effort, as the board on July 10 walked back the approval for the previous 100-word summary and then deadlocked on a revised summary at their July 31 meeting. Initiative officials said Friday that the effort which resulted in the board deadlocking was just one part of well-funded right-wing attacks against the proposal, which is estimated to generate nearly $1 billion annually. But those attacks keep coming. The Coalition to Stop the Business and Family Tax Hike, an organization opposed to the Invest in MI Kids initiative, issued a cease and desist motion to prevent the group from collecting its signatures. Jase Bolger, CEO of West Michigan Policy Forum and a former Republican Michigan House speaker, said in a statement that the amendment would hurt small businesses – even though the initiative was aimed at the wealthiest Michiganders. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'I applaud the move today by the Coalition to Stop the Business and Family Tax Hike,' Bolger said. 'They filed a cease and desist motion to stop the signature gathering for an unapproved ballot initiative. Because, the proponents of this devastating proposal are using language that is misleading. Voters should not be fooled.' In response, Imani Foster, a spokesperson for the Invest MI Kids initiative, told Michigan Advance that the coalition is focused on the task at hand. 'While we're busy engaging Michiganders, together with our thousands of volunteers, we won't be distracted by meaningless letters from big money Washington lawyers,' Foster said. The group also noted its belief that the board had no authority under Michigan law to rescind its prior approval of the petition summary language. 'The petitions currently being circulated by Invest in MI Kids include a petition summary that the director of elections has deemed compliant with the Michigan Election Law twice and that the Board of Canvassers has approved as compliant once,' Foster added. Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration presses Boston to ditch ‘sanctuary' policies
'We know where this is coming from and we know why. Unlike the Trump administration, Boston follows the law and it's as simple as that,' Wu said Friday night in East Boston, according to a recording of her remarks provided by her staff. Bondi outlined her demands to Wu and the leaders of other jurisdictions that the Trump administration believes are impeding his immigration enforcement efforts in letters dated Wednesday. Related : Advertisement 'This ends now,' Bondi wrote, according to a copy of the letter shared with the Globe. US Senator Edward Markey, a Malden Democrat, on Saturday accused Bondi of picking a fight to score political points. 'I know Mayor Wu and Boston leaders are working hard to keep Boston one of the safest big cities in the country, to uphold state and local laws, and to treat all residents with dignity and respect,' he said in a statement. Advertisement US Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Cambridge, said Boston is 'Instead of dividing and distracting, he should be focused on lowering costs and making life better for people across the country,' she said in a statement. US Representative Ayanna Pressley, a former Boston city councilor and Democrat, said Boston is welcoming and expressed support for Wu. 'This authoritarian Administration does not care about keeping our communities safe - their strategy is to divide, fear monger, and target vulnerable people as they distract from the fact that they're ripping away healthcare and giving taxpayers' cash to billionaires,' she said in a statement. Related : In March, Related : The city's Nearly 80 percent of Boston voters said they have at least a somewhat favorable view of that policy, and more than 62 percent said they have a 'strongly favorable' opinion of the Trust Act, the poll found. Josh Kraft, a Democrat who is challenging Wu in this year's mayor's race, said Bondi's demands are 'just another unhinged and bigoted attack targeting our nation's immigrants.' 'We cannot yield to Donald Trump and his band of thugs,' he said in a statement Saturday. Advertisement City Councilor Ed Flynn of South Boston said the city is proud of its immigrant roots, but he supports the prosecution of people engaged in criminal behavior regardless of whether they're in the country legally. 'Boston is an international city, and we must have a close working relationship with state and federal law enforcement partners and necessary resources to address any and all public safety issues,' he said in a text message. Boston This is the second time Trump officials have included Boston on such a list. In May, the US Department of Homeland Security published a The New England states of Rhode Island, Vermont, and Connecticut made the list, as well as the state of New York, New York City, and Rochester, N.Y. In revealing the new list on Aug. 5, the Justice Department pointed to an array of policies that it sees as impeding the federal government's efforts to enforce immigration law. The examples include local governments declining to cooperate with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, establishing offices to advise 'illegal alien communities' on evading federal law enforcement, and public declarations that seek to undermine immigration enforcement. In statements on Friday, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont and Attorney General William Tong, both Democrats, accused Bondi of falsely identifying the state as a 'sanctuary' jurisdiction. Advertisement 'Connecticut is not a 'sanctuary' state,' Lamont said. 'That term has no legal definition, and it is not an accurate description of our laws and practices.' 'This generic, non-specific form letter lacks any meaningful detail and does not merit a response,' said McKee in a statement to the Globe. Bondi's letter to Wu doesn't specify the potential consequences the city could face if it doesn't comply, but signals the administration's willingness to consider funding cuts, criminal prosecution, or civil litigation. Trump outlined possible sanctions in an April Wu told reporters that legal challenges to Trump's threats to cut off funding have been successful. 'Boston does not back down in the face of threats, certainly when the threats and the tactics cross the line and seem to be against the law as well,' she said. A In February, Advertisement This year, Globe correspondent Emily Spatz contributed. Laura Crimaldi can be reached at
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
America starts to feel the squeeze: What we know about tariffs and inflation
Consumers and businesses are feeling the pinch from President Trump's trade war, with costs soaring for grocery staples and critical materials. Why it matters: It's no longer anecdotal. The effects are difficult to ignore across key inflation indicators that might only get hotter in the months ahead. The big picture: Global tariffs are putting upward pressure on costs. U.S. businesses are bearing the brunt, contrary to White House hopes that foreign suppliers would take some of the hit. Between the lines: Import prices might cool if exporters around the globe were discounting goods to help ease the tariff burden for their U.S. buyers. But the opposite was the case last month: Import prices rose at the quickest pace this year, "casting further doubt on the 'foreigners will pay' talk from the administration," ING global economist James Knightley wrote this week. Threat level: Wholesale prices rose at the fastest pace in three years last month — higher costs that might be passed on to the consumer down the line. The data "points to pipeline inflation that's likely to spill into consumer prices in the months ahead," says Michelle Green, a former Labor Department economist, now at corporate planning firm Board. Fresh and dry vegetable prices rose by almost 40 percent alone last month, the largest spike since inflation took off in 2022. The intrigue: Mexico is a leading supplier of America's vegetables, imports now subject to 25% tariff rates — at least until the end of October.. The Trump administration exempted U.S.-bound goods covered under the U.S.-Canada-Mexico trade agreement from tariffs, though the Trump 1.0-era deal largely does not apply to agricultural goods. The Consumer Price Index this week showed evidence of some tariff-related price hikes, though less so than was evident in June. The latest: Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee warned this week that a wave of new tariff announcements for inputs, like semiconductors, as well as final goods could keep upward pressure on inflation. That would be a more bleak outcome than the one-and-done price hike some, including White House economists, predict. "I just want some more surety that that's not going to be a persistent inflation shock," Goolsbee said. Of note: Customs and Border Protection said late Friday that 50% steel and aluminum tariffs would be expanded to more than 400 other goods, effective Monday. What to watch: Persistent inflation could derail a series of interest rate cuts later this year expected by financial markets and demanded by Trump.
