‘One chance': Neighbor coalition pushes for city to fund its portion of Austin's I-35 Cap and Stitch
AUSTIN (KXAN)—A coalition of Austin area neighbors is making a final push to get the City of Austin to commit to funding some or all of the so-called 'caps' that would run over the interstate. It's a part of the I-35 Cap and Stich expansion project.
The city would need to pay for the caps, also known as green spaces, and pedestrian access over the road.
Now, a coalition comprised of neighborhood association leaders and nonprofits is spreading awareness to get more people to speak up ahead of a city vote at the end of May. That vote would determine whether the caps are included in the Texas Department of Transportation's I-35 expansion project.
'We have one chance,' Adam Sparks, Cherrywood Neighborhood grassroots organizer said.
Sparks created the FUND the CAPS website, breaking down TxDOT's project, and the city's responsibility to fund structural elements needed, in order for TxDOT to build the caps. 'We have a chance of getting 26 acres of public land in the center of Austin,' Sparks said. 'And it seemed like most Austinites did not know that the funding for caps was at risk.'The caps are in other cities, like Dallas, according to the city of Austin's vision 2024 vision plan.
In February 2025, the city said it's waiting to see whether any of its federal funding that would be used for the project is at risk due to the Trump Administration's nationwide cuts.
$105M federal grant for Austin's I-35 'cap and stitch' project on shaky ground
'The truth is that there are also other federal funding sources that the city is looking into those, those decisions take time, but the state right now is asking for a decision by the end of May,' Tom Wald, executive director at Red Line Parkway Initiative, a part of the neighbor coalition said. 'If we delay this decision, the next opportunity will be in the year 2100. We won't have this opportunity again for 70 years. This council is pretty much never faced with that sort of decision.'
From the beginning of TxDOT's cap and stitch project there have been a number of concerns, including how much it costs.
Austin's full capped I-35 'vision plan' could cost over $1B
But those in support of the project in its entirety maintain say it's worth the investment.
'The Downtown Austin Alliance supports the Cap and Stitch project as a transformative opportunity to convert I-35 from a longstanding barrier into a community connector. Reconnecting East and West Austin will enhance the city's economic and cultural vitality by supporting small businesses, creating new community public spaces and new development opportunities.
'With intentional design and strong public-private-philanthropic partnerships, Cap and Stitch can deliver lasting value. Klyde Warren Park in Dallas is proof that when infrastructure is designed for people, it can reshape a city and spark new life around it.
'To realize this vision, full funding to future-proof the caps will be essential. This is a pivotal moment to invest in infrastructure that supports Austin's future.'
Downtown Austin Alliance
The city said it was set to find out about whether its federal funding for the project was cut on Feb. 20. Staff provided KXAN with a statement.
After hearing feedback from the community, the city created a vision plan for all the capping opportunities and presented cost estimates to council in 2024. On may 6, staff will present updated information at Austin city council's work session. City council is then scheduled to consider an advanced funding agreement with the texas department of transportation on may 22 for roadway elements. City staff are still in negotiations with the u.s. department of transportation regarding the awarded $105 million neighborhood access and equity grant for the cesar chavez street-fourth street cap. As of now, no final decisions have been made regarding that funding. '
City of Austin Transportation and Public Works Department
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Both sides of raging argument over public money for Browns dome: I-Team
CLEVELAND (WJW) – The FOX 8 I-Team did some digging into the firestorm around $600 million in public money going to the owners of the Cleveland Browns to help build a dome. It has become almost a guarantee that state lawmakers will approve the money to help the Browns build a dome and development around it in Brook Park. Some state and local leaders are piling on, trying to stop any money for the Browns. They're arguing the state needs more money for things like education. 'We say to the owners, 'look, you want to build it? Build it yourself,'' Cuyahoga County Executive Chris Ronayne told us in the last week. I-Team: New video, police response from Lee-Harvard shooting that left 7 injured 'I have a big problem with rewarding a billionaire family with a $600 million performance grant,' state Senator Casey Weinstein said. 'What we talked about is giving billionaires money from Ohioans that they, quite frankly, don't need,' state Senator Nickie Antonio added. But on Wednesday, Ohio Senate Finance Chairman Jerry Cirino fired back. 'Let's be careful about disparaging billionaires or highly successful people. They are an important part of our economy. They pay most of the taxes,' he said. 'Easy way for naysayers to say, 'Why should we give money to billionaires?'' Browns owner Jimmy Haslam told the I-Team in April. Haslam reminded everyone that his company is investing more than $1 billion in the dome complex. 'That'll be the fourth or fifth largest project ever done in Ohio. Period. And the largest in Northeast Ohio,' he added. I-Team: Video shows Gregory Moore, accused of killing Aliza Sherman, booked into jail Lawmakers now have come down to the final weeks for deciding on one of three plans to help fund a dome for the Browns. The public money would be paid back. Meanwhile, the state Senate president took on another common complaint about lawmakers simply giving in to political influence. 'What's your response to that?' we asked state Senate Rob McColley. 'We haven't been influenced by the Haslams. We do this for economic development projects of this size all the time,' he answered. 'This is a good investment for Ohio. It's one that's going to bring in more money to the general fund for other priorities in the state.' The Browns keep moving closer to getting state money and the voices for and against keep growing louder. State lawmakers will be taking a final vote on the budget by the end of the month. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is your favorite taco truck slower than usual? ICE raids are sending street vendors into hiding
Francisco has been working as a taquero for over a year, but he's never felt as worried as he does now, in the shadow of a week of ongoing sweeps in Los Angeles by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "We can't go out to work as much on the streets now," the 23-year-old said in Spanish. "We've heard from some colleagues who work in other positions, and they've even arrested a couple of them. We go to work afraid they might arrest us." To stay safe, Francisco — who provided only his first name out of fear for his safety because he is undocumented — said he has limited his movement, turning to Uber Delivery for necessities like groceries and medicine. But he continues to come to work. "If we don't go out to work, how do we cover our expenses?" he said. The risk of being arrested and deported versus the need for economic security is plaguing undocumented vendors throughout Los Angeles, said Elba Serrano, the associate vice president of East L.A. Community Corp. ELACC is a member of the Los Angeles Street Vending Campaign coalition and assists vendors with securing permits. Around 80% of their clients are undocumented, Serrano said. "Vendors don't want to be seen as 'illegal,' " she said. "They always have been wanting to be part of the economy, and our goal was for them to be seen as a legitimate small business." The problem now, Serrano explained, is that to secure permits, vendors must file an I-10 form, which categorizes filers by their citizenship status. "One of the things that we've always understood is that the IRS is only there to collect taxes — they're not checking for, you know, anybody's status," she said. "But now, this new administration is seeking to get a list of potential people who are undocumented, and the easiest way to find somebody who's undocumented is by looking through I-10s." Since the onset of ICE's raids last weekend, Serrano said several vendors have canceled their appointments with the agency. With the rampant ICE presence in the city, whether undocumented vendors seek to file taxes or go into work has become a "personal risk assessment." For many vendors, the risk is not worth it. At the Hollywood location of Leo's Tacos Truck, a popular taco truck chain, only five guys were working the late night rush. Typically, the night shift is staffed by 10 people. "We've been dealing with this problem of missing people for two weeks," said security guard Ricardo Rodriguez. Notably, however, the decision to leave the house affects not only vendors, but also their customers. On a typical night, Rodriguez said the truck receives around 950 customers. The line snakes throughout the parking lot. Now that number has dropped to 500 and features few Latino faces. "It's a little customer. A little employees," he said. "People feel a little intimidated by the protest." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Slap in the face.' Nephew of General Cavazos upset over army base's name change back to Fort Hood
KILLEEN, Texas (KXAN) — Two years ago, an Army post in Killeen, Texas, was redesignated to honor General Richard Edward Cavazos, a native Texan, war hero and Medal of Honor recipient. Past coverage: Fort Hood becomes Fort Cavazos The post was one of nine U.S. Army installations redesignated in 2023 based on the Naming Commission's recommendations to remove the names, symbols, displays, monuments and paraphernalia that honor or commemorate the Confederate States of America, according to the U.S. Army's website. Now, it's one of several of those whose names are being restored back to their previous names. President Donald Trump announced the move at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, on Tuesday. The same day, the U.S. Army issued a release stating that it would 'take all necessary actions to change the names of seven Army installations in honor of heroic Soldiers who served in conflicts ranging from the Civil War to the Battle of Mogadishu.' RELATED | Army restores the names of seven bases that lost their Confederate-linked names under Biden Fort Cavazos was initially named Fort Hood after Confederate Gen. John Bell Hood. The base will again be renamed, back to Fort Hood, but with a different namesake: World War I Col. Robert B. Hood. According to the Army, Col. Hood received the Distinguished Service Cross for his 'extraordinary heroism' during WWI during an 'intense shelling' near Thiaucourt, France. Texas Public Radio reported earlier this week that Trump announced plans to restore the names of seven Army bases that were changed in 2023. TPR noted that it would be illegal under federal law to rename a military base once again after John Bell Hood, but it is not illegal to name it after Col. Robert B. Hood. 'It's a slap in the face,' a family member said Thursday. Albert Ochoa, an Austin resident and retired teacher, is a nephew of Gen. Cavazos. He said he and several of his family members are upset about Trump's call to rename the post once again. Ochoa said he and the general 'go way back.' He explained that Cavazos was raised by his mother on King Ranch, and Ochoa grew up having a personal relationship with the general. Ochoa called Cavazos a 'family man, through and through,' and described him as a dedicated soldier. 'He was a great man, really, a soldier's soldier,' Ochoa said. 'So, you know, I can't tell you enough about how he dedicated his life to the army and to be disrespected like this goes beyond anything I can think of.' Ochoa said that when the base was redesignated as Fort Cavazos, it was a celebration for him and his family. He said more than 100 relatives of Cavazos went to the redesignation ceremony. 'It was an affirmation of his career and the dedication he had to this country and the Army,' he said. 'You got to understand discrimination was still very big, and he was Hispanic… but he went on to become the first Hispanic four-star general [and was] quoted in Schwarzkopf books.' Ochoa said he was 'dumbfounded' when his son sent him an article about the base being named back to Fort Hood. 'To me, it's a slap in the face to the Army and all the veterans who served before. Trump… doesn't know a thing about war, strategy, tactics, the Army, armed forces, period.' He's not just upset about the renaming of the Killeen post, either. Ochoa mentioned the other posts affected by the decision and said, 'in effect, he's saying that the Confederacy was OK.' Ochoa said regardless of the name change, he wants people to remember what the base stood for and its stance as one of the major bases in the country. 'Changing the name is not going to change what it was about or what it did for this country,' Ochoa said. 'A name change isn't going to make that much of a difference. You know, it's disrespectful. We don't, we don't agree with it, but, you know, it's a slap in the face to all Army veterans that have ever served there… But it'll continue, regardless of how it's treated.' KXAN also reached out to Fort Cavazos to ask for commentary on its name change back to Fort Hood. We will update this story if we receive a response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
