
Ukraine's First Lady Olena Zelenska sends 'letter of gratitude' to Melania Trump for challenge to Putin
Melania has become an outspoken critic of the Russian president, and argued in a letter last week that Putin has a responsibility to protect the children of the world amid reports that at least 20,000 children have been abducted by Russian forces since their full-scale invasion in 2022.
The actual number is believed to be much higher, with some estimating it could be as many as 300,000 children who have been kidnapped from Ukraine and taken to Russia or Russian-occupied territory without the consent of family or guardians.
The issue has become a deeply sensitive issue in the war-torn country, and as her husband, Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky sat down with President Donald Trump on Monday, Zelenska sought to thank Melania for bringing attention to the cause.
She had her husband hand deliver a 'letter of gratitude' to Trump to pass off to his wife, Zelensky revealed on social media.
'I want to thank @ FLOTUS Melania Trump for her attention to one of the most painful and difficult issues of this war - the abduction of Ukrainian children by Russia,' he wrote. 'We deeply appreciate her compassion and her letter to Putin.
'This issue lies at the heart of the war's humanitarian tragedy - our children, broken families, the pain of separation.'
He then announced that he asked President Trump 'to pass along' his wife's letter to the American First Lady, noting that 'her voice matters and her care gives strength to this cause.
Ukraine's First Lady Olena Zelenska has shared her gratitude to American First Lady Melania Trump for her letter challenging Russian President Vladimir Putin
'We are working tirelessly to bring every child home,' Zelensky vowed. 'The same applies for our prisoners of war and civilians held in Russia for years, some since 2014, in very bad conditions.'
'Thousands of people still need to be freed - and this is a part of making peace,' he continued, adding that he will now 'work to negotiate [an] all-for-all prisoners of war exchange and we are grateful to have strong friends who help.'
Zelensky's message came in response to a post from President Trump, in which he said he had also discussed the matter of the abducted children with European Union President Ursula van der Leyen.
'It is a subject at the top of all lists and the World will work together to solve it, hopefully bringing them home to their families,' the American president wrote.
In her letter, Melania told Putin it is his responsibility as a world leader to protect the children of the world.
'Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger,' the First Lady wrote in her letter, which her husband later shared to social media.
'As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few.
'Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all—so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded.'
She then went on to tell the Russian president that it is his duty to protect children and the future generations.
'A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity—an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology,' Melania said.
'Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them—a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future.'
'Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter,' the first lady wrote. 'In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone—you serve humanity itself.
'Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. It is time,' she concluded.
Yet it remains unclear what may come of President Trump's back-to-back meetings with Zelensky and Putin.
Following his sit-down with the Russian leader on Friday, Trump declared they had an 'extremely productive meeting,' reaching some agreements even though Trump was unable to get Putin to agree to an immediate ceasefire.
The Russian president instead declared his country still needs to 'eliminate the primary roots, the primary causes, of that conflict.'
When Trump then met with Zelensky on Monday, the US president said he was prepared to provide military support to Kyiv in the event of a peace deal.
'We will give them very good protection, very good security', the President said. 'There'll be a lot of help when it comes to security. It's going to be good.'
He also refused three times to rule out putting American boots on the ground though any assistance is more likely to come in the form of air support.
Still, there was some debate over whether Russia should regain and retain some of its territory after Trump showed Zelensky a giant battlefield map showing 20 percent of the country under Russian control.
Even then, though, Zelensky said he and Trump did not argue.
'We had a truly warm, good and substantial conversation,' Zelensky said.
Following the meeting on Monday, Trump said he spoke with Putin and discussed plans for a summit between the leaders of Russia and Ukraine, at a location to be determined.
After that Trump said he will sit down with both leaders in an attempt to make peace in the war torn country.
'This was a very good, early step for a War that has been going on for almost four years,' he said.
Zelensky responded by saying 'we are ready' for any leader-level meetings while speaking to reporters after the White House. He said it's the only way to solve these 'complicated and painful issues.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Karoline Leavitt rips into New York Times reporter after giving major update on Trump-brokered Putin and Zelensky talks
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt ripped into press coverage of Donald Trump's Russia-Ukraine peace talks. She also confirmed that Russia 's Vladimir Putin agreed to a one-on-one meeting with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, saying it's a major step toward a Trump-brokered peace deal. Leavitt criticized the media's coverage of the president's summit with Putin in Alaska on Friday and White House talks with Zelensky and European leaders on Monday. The president excused himself after a meeting with Zelensky and the other world leaders on Monday to call Putin to fill him in on progress. The president revealed Tuesday morning in an interview on Fox & Friends that he felt it would be 'disrespectful' to make the call in the middle of the meeting with Zelensky and the European leaders. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and others visited the White House to try and broker a deal between Russia and Ukraine. But Leavitt turned on a reporter from the New York Times who questioned why the president didn't take the call with Putin in the same room with the other leaders. 'If the point is to get everybody on the same page, why wouldn't Trump just take the call from Putin while the other leaders were in the room?' asked New York Times reporter Shawn McCreesh. 'So it would be disrespectful to do that. Why is it disrespectful?' he asked. 'With all due respect, only a reporter from the New York Times would ask a question like that, Sean,' Leavitt shot back. Leavitt also revealed that Putin had officially agreed to a one-on-one meeting with Zelensky after his conversations with Trump. The announcement was a welcome clarification from the White House as the Kremlin has remained elusive about exactly what Putin promised the president of the United States. When a reporter asked to confirm Putin's 'promise' to do a meeting with Zelensky in the coming weeks, Leavitt replied, 'He has, and I just answered that question for you.' Trump indicated on social media Monday night that he spoke with Putin and the pair of them agreed to begin the process to set up a bilateral meeting. 'At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelensky,' the president wrote. The Russians were less transparent. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov appeared to slow-walk the timing of the meeting in an interview, describing the process as 'step by step, gradually, starting from the expert level and then going through all the necessary stages.' Leavitt scolded the press for their negative coverage of the president's meeting with Putin, arguing it was so 'highly productive' that it prompted Zelensky and other world leaders to fly to Washington, D.C., immediately to discuss the details. She said that Trump 'learned a lot' during his meeting with Putin and the importance of open dialog between both the Ukrainians and the Russians. Leavitt excoriated former President Joe Biden for pushing an 'America last foreign policy' that did not leave the option for peace open in the conflict. 'President Trump rejected that failed approach, and instead, over the last seven months, has relentlessly pursued peace throughout his second term,' she said. The president said earlier Monday, he wanted Putin and Zelensky to have a bilateral meeting to solve the war and make assurances to bring about peace, and even rebuild a relationship with each other to negotiate a peace. 'It takes, in this case, two to tango, they have to have a relationship otherwise we're just wasting our time,' he said.


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Welsh Rugby Union set to confirm radical club plans as part of restructure of the game
The Welsh Rugby Union is set to propose reducing the number of Wales' professional clubs from four to two as part of radical plans to restructure the country's national game. Chief executive Abi Tierney, chairman Richard Collier-Keywood and director of rugby Dave Reddin are set to officially confirm the news on Wednesday. However, they will not be finalised as definite because a six-week consultation period will then follow where the WRU will seek the opinions of the Welsh game's stakeholders. Dragons, Cardiff, Ospreys and Scarlets are Wales' domestic sides as things stand. But at least two of those organisations will be at risk moving forward with any halving of teams set to officially come into operation for the 2026/27 season. Cutting from four to two is one of a number of different options being considered by the WRU but the governing body's preferred direction of travel. It remains unclear at this stage whether the two sides the WRU wants to have moving forward will be teams which already exist or new entities altogether. Either way, the plans represent the most seismic moment in Welsh rugby history since Wales moved from a club-based system to what were initially five regions in 2003. The WRU is doing so in reaction to more than two years of struggles in which their men's national side lost 18 straight Test matches. Wales' four current clubs have also struggled to compete for success in the United Rugby Championship and in Europe. In the coming years, the WRU plans for its two teams to have squads of 50 players apiece and have annual playing budgets of £7.8million. It is hoped that will improve their chances of domestic trophies. In time, the WRU also plans to build a new national centre of excellence at which their two domestic sides will be based. Both will also have a women's counterpart. However, the introduction of such plans is unlikely to be straightforward. The WRU owns Cardiff after it fell into administration earlier this year, but the other three teams are all independent businesses and are likely to launch legal action if they're put at risk. The URC is looking at the option of replacing the loss of Welsh sides by adding two teams from the USA to its cross-border competition.


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Footsie hits record high on Ukraine peace hopes: Blue-chip index ends session up 0.3% at 9189.22
The FTSE 100 hit a record yesterday as European markets rallied on hopes of peace in Ukraine. London's index of blue-chip stocks ended the session up 0.3 per cent at 9189.22 – its highest ever close. The rally came after Donald Trump held talks with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and European allies, including Keir Starmer, at the White House. The US President said he has begun arranging talks between Zelensky and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, sparking hopes of an imminent end to the conflict after more than three years of war. In London, the FTSE 100 – which has gained more than 12 per cent this year – was boosted by retail stocks, offsetting a defence sector drop. And the mid-cap FTSE 250 rose 0.4 per cent, snapping a three-day losing streak. In Europe, the CAC 40 in Paris rose 1.2 per cent, while Germany's DAX 40 closed up 0.5 per cent. Meanwhile, oil prices slumped on investor expectations that a peace deal will likely lead to an easing of sanctions on Russia. Despite the stock market rally, London-listed defence giants took a hit on signs that the conflict in Ukraine could come to an end. The companies have been boosted as European leaders raced to rearm amid conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East. Babcock International fell 7.4 per cent, BAE Systems dropped 3.9 per cent and Rolls-Royce lost 2.1 per cent. But the losses were offset by retailers, which made big gains despite news of a delay to official sales data. JD Sports jumped 6.8 per cent following an upbeat statement from protein powder seller Applied Nutrition, which is backed by the sportswear chain. Shares in Marks & Spencer rose 3.5 per cent and Next shares were up 3 per cent. Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at broker AJ Bell, said: 'Far from the adversarial and uncomfortable scenes in the White House earlier this year, the dynamic between the presidents of the US and Ukraine was positive, even friendly.' 'There seems to have been a shift and there may be a feeling that if the fighting ends, the requirements for additional armaments could end with it, although any peacekeeping forces will need kitting out appropriately.'