Edinburgh taxi drivers granted extra extension on age and emissions limits
Cab drivers in Edinburgh have been given a one-year reprieve from possibly needing to sell off their old vehicles.
Councillors voted on Monday to approve a waiver to the city's hire vehicle age and emissions policy, meaning cabs older than a decade are still allowed to travel on city streets.
Under the city's hire car regulations, as of 2021, any petrol cabs or private hires need to be 10 years old or less, and either comply with Euro 6 emissions standards or be Euro 5 and retrofitted to meet council requirements.
However, every year since 2020, the council has approved a four year extension to this time period, meaning the maximum age of a cab or private hire car on city streets is 14 years.
Every six months after a vehicle passes ten years old, it needs to go through an inspection to make sure it is still in compliance with the city's regulations.
A report by officers to councillors said that some members of the taxi trade had found difficulty in finding vehicles that meet the city's current age and emissions standards.
SNP councillor Norman Work asked council officer Andrew Mitchell: 'Was there any sort of timescale for this? There have been these extensions. Was there any idea how long it would go on for?'
Mr Mitchell said: 'The initial target was 2021. The pandemic intervened, and the committee quite rightly gave an adjustment to the timeline.
'So the final timeline for Euro 6 then became 2023. The vast majority of the fleet has been compliant for quite some time.
'A smaller number [of drivers] have struggled, either for financial reasons or various other reasons.'
Regulatory Committee convener, Liberal Democrat councillor Neil Ross, asked: 'Over two thirds [of vehicles over ten years old] have failed their first presentation for testing.
'I know there have been efforts made to encourage compliance with these older vehicles, but I'm wondering if there's anything else that could be done to incentivise better presentations?'
He said: 'You're in the territory of, if you repeatedly fail, then you bring the operators to committee.
'It's not something we've done except in fairly extreme examples. But if you're testing them twice a year, and they're still turning up for their annual tests and failing, I struggle to see [what can be done].'
Another council officer, Catherine Scanlin, added: 'What we're finding on testing is that it's wear and tear of the rest of the vehicle. And with the best will in the world, it's very very difficult, and very expensive in the main, to keep on top of that.
'So when they're coming for tests, even when the vehicles are prepped, they can't forsee some of the issues.
'Historically, older vehicles were passed down the line to new people coming into the trade. That's not possible with these vehicles.
'Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the operator to ensure that vehicle is fit for public service. It is a challenge, and it's difficult. Even the best maintained vehicles – it's a challenge for them as well.'
The report also said that a report would come to the committee in the near future updating on the council's progress towards a 100% wheelchair accessible taxi fleet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Press and Journal
4 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Nicola Sturgeon admits in new book she got it wrong on oil and gas - as Aberdeen paid the price
Nicola Sturgeon has admitted the SNP over-inflated promises about oil and gas in the independence campaign, just before a collapse hit Aberdeen and the north-east hard. The former first minister looks back at policies and pledges central to the regional economy in an extract from her new memoirs, called Frankly. The much anticipated book relives the events running up to the crucial vote on Scotland's future in September 2014. In it, she reflects: The publication of the book comes just as government figures were forced again to respond to falling North Sea revenue and a widening financial deficit. In her book, Ms Sturgeon looks back more than 10 years when prices were riding high. 'The numbers we had used in the referendum White Paper to illustrate an independent Scotland's fiscal position had been heavily dependent on oil revenues,' she writes. 'And, of course, we had based these on the optimistic estimates that Alex had insisted on. 'I didn't know then that a total collapse in the oil price was just around the corner. 'In early 2015, this caused significant political and practical problems. The practical came from the impact on the economy of Aberdeen and the north-east, which is heavily reliant on the oil and gas supply chain. 'As the major companies started to shed jobs and curtail activity, the effects were quickly felt across the region.' As first minister, Ms Sturgeon set up a taskforce but powers were limited and political opponents sensed opportunity. 'To have the price of a barrel of crude fall to around 40 US dollars when we had relied on a figure of well over 100 US dollars in the referendum blew a massive hole in the credibility of our argument,' she added. 'I resolved then that in any future referendum, we must not allow the strength of the independence prospectus to stand or fall on the volatile value of oil, especially as it is a finite commodity. 'We needed to show how Scotland's economy would be sustainable in the long term without it.' On Wednesday morning, the volatility of North Sea revenue and government policies were again under scrutiny with the publication of annual revenue and spending. It coincides with another push for independence under First Minister John Swinney. The difference between revenue and public sector spending, including capital investment, was a deficit of 11.7% of gross domestic product in Scotland. When excluding the North Sea, there was a deficit of 14.4% of GDP – equal to £30.6 billion. The Scottish Government has faced criticism for delays to an energy strategy and lack of vocal support for oil and gas. Much of the crucial policy power rests at Westminster where the Labour government is under pressure to address a windfall tax on profits. Russell Borthwick, chief executive at Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said: 'If the UK Government continues to tax the industry at 78%, then we face an accelerated industrial decline, we will lose our world class supply chain to other parts of the word, and our oil and gas imports will continue to soar, syphoning tens of billions of pounds out of the UK economy. 'However, there is another future, one where we commit to sourcing the oil and gas we require as a nation from the North Sea, supporting jobs, public services and – crucially – creating the bridge required to a just transition while we build out renewable energy projects.' Responding to the new figures, Scottish Government Finance Secretary Shona Robison said: 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security.'
Spectator
8 hours ago
- Spectator
Ian Blackford refuses to rule out Holyrood bid
Well, well, well. After Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes announced she was stepping down at next year's Scottish parliament election, speculation about who could stand for her Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch constituency has been rife. Some have suggested that Ian Blackford, the former SNP MP for Ross, Skye and Lochaber and onetime Westminster group leader, could make a return to frontline politics by standing for an area he represented down south for almost a decade. So will he make the leap? When quizzed on Spectator TV about whether he would stand at next year's Holyrood election, Blackford did not rule it out – however he remarked: 'It would be a big push for me to get myself there.' How interesting… The investment banker-turned-politician went on: I didn't put myself forward for vetting to be an SNP candidate. It wasn't in my mind to stand for the Scottish parliament. What I've done is I've sought to be respectful to those that have asked me from the constituency over the course of the last few days. I've reflected on some of the some of the things which are going on. I am deeply concerned about the economy. When the UK cannot increase its debt level, the Chancellor will increase tax levels again in the budget this year. But we are not far away from a financial crisis. How do we create the economic growth that will make a difference for, for all of us in these islands and certainly for Scotland as well? I would like to find a way that I can still have an influence in that debate. And I don't believe that I have to be in the Scottish parliament to do that but I will carefully reflect on what people have asked me to do. The speculation began almost immediately after Forbes made her announcement. The Deputy FM was widely expected to run for the party leadership, whenever the next contest will take place, and her impending departure has raised the question of who might succeed First Minister John Swinney when the time comes. One nationalist told Lucy Dunn that: '[Blackford] is the dark horse here. Does he suddenly then become an outsider that could be the next leader, potentially, especially if you're looking at a caretaker regime that's basically saying the new kids on the block aren't ready to take the reins yet?' As an investment banker, Blackford could be a perfect fit to take on the role of economy secretary when Forbes steps aside – if, of course, the Nats hold onto her seat. But whether Forbes is as keen about the possibility of a Blackford return is a different story. On whether she would back a Blackford bounce-back, she told an Edinburgh Fringe audience: 'I am taking those headlines with a huge dose of salt. I did have a chat with him a few days ago and that wasn't in the conversation.' Would she vote for him? 'I will wait and see what the options are,' she replied. Not quite a full-throated endorsement, eh?
The Herald Scotland
9 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
The SNP's welfare spending rise outpaces revenue growth
The difficulty for the SNP, with the Scottish Fiscal Commission warning of a £5 billion black hole in the finances, is whether we can afford it. READ MORE Wednesday's GERS figures show total public spending for Scotland rose 5.5% to £117.6 billion in 2024/25, but within that the biggest line item — social protection — grew 7.9%, faster than the UK's 5.3%, and now accounts for roughly 30% of all spending. Officials explicitly link that faster growth to programmes such as the Scottish Child Payment and the replacement disability benefits. The Adult Disability Payment is due to rise to £3.13 billion from £2.63 billion, the Child Disability Payment to £514 million, and the Scottish Child Payment to £454 million. This is reflected in the increased spending per head in Scotland, now £2,669 more per person than the UK average, up from £2,311. Revenues are not keeping up with that growth. Overall Scottish revenue edged up to £91.4 billion, while spending rose to £117.6 billion, taking the net fiscal balance to -11.7% of GDP. How will the SNP bridge that gap? They are putting a lot of stock in their efficiency programme. Ministers believe a Public Service Reform drive can make £1 billion of savings over five years, largely through corporate functions and shared services. Speaking to journalists in St Andrew's House, Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee, who is charged with delivering these efficiencies, said he was confident the government would meet its promises. 'We are absolutely clear-eyed about what that challenge is, but also about what the solutions are, and we have been very explicit in laying those out.' The welfare spending, he added, was an investment. 'It's about getting young people, giving them the best start in life, so they end up being contributing members to society, rather than the opposite. And that's really, really important.' The tables accompanying the GERS report show devolved social security payments rising by hundreds of millions. Aggregate social security spending in Scotland rose from £25.29 billion to £27.60 billion in a single year, before adding social care and pensions-related items within social protection. The government argues that devolved revenues cover devolved spending. But GERS shows that total spending growth is being driven by social protection faster than revenue growth, which is why the overall balance deteriorated despite onshore tax gains. Even if Mr McKee meets his £1 billion target, the annual increases in social security and wider social protection are already outpacing it. The question then is: what next? If social protection is ,er, protected in the budget, and if health spending is, as per usual, protected, then what needs to give for the government to keep its social contract? The obvious choices are higher taxation or further cuts. There are tough choices ahead.
