Russia says it no longer will abide by its self-imposed moratorium on intermediate-range missiles
In a statement Monday, the Russian Foreign Ministry linked the decision to efforts by the U.S. and its allies to develop intermediate range weapons and preparations for their deployment in Europe and other parts of the world. It specifically cited U.S. plans to deploy Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting next year.
The ministry noted that such actions by the U.S. and its allies create 'destabilizing missile potentials" near Russia, creating a "direct threat to the security of our country' and carry 'significant harmful consequences for regional and global stability, including a dangerous escalation of tensions between nuclear powers.'
It didn't say what specific moves the Kremlin might take, but President Vladimir Putin has previously announced that Moscow was planning to deploy its new Oreshnik missiles on the territory of its neighbor and ally Belarus later this year.
Asked where and when Russia could potentially deploy intermediate-range weapons, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that it's not something to be announced in advance.
'Russia no longer has any limitations, Russia no longer considers itself to be constrained by anything,' Peskov told reporters. 'Therefore Russia believes it has the right to take respective steps if necessary.'
'Decisions on specific parameters of response measures will be made by the leadership of the Russian Federation based on an interdepartmental analysis of the scale of deployment of American and other Western land-based intermediate-range missiles, as well as the development of the overall situation in the area of international security and strategic stability,' the Foreign Ministry said.
Russia's move follows Trump's nuclear messaging
The Russian statement follows President Donald Trump's announcement Friday that he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of Dmitry Medvedev, who was president in 2008-12 to allow Putin, bound by term limits, to later return to the office. Trump's statement came as his deadline for the Kremlin to reach a peace deal in Ukraine approaches later this week.
Trump said he was alarmed by Medvedev's attitude. Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council chaired by Putin, has apparently sought to curry favor with his mentor by making provocative statements and frequently lobbing nuclear threats. Last week. he responded to Trump's deadline for Russia to accept a peace deal in Ukraine or face sanctions by warning him against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' and declaring that 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step toward war.'
Medvedev also commented on the Foreign Ministry's statement, describing Moscow's withdrawal from the moratorium as 'the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy.'
'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with,' he wrote on X. 'Expect further steps.'
INF treaty abandoned in 2019
Intermediate-range missiles can fly between 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,400 miles). Such land-based weapons were banned under the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Washington and Moscow abandoned the pact in 2019, accusing each other of violations, but Moscow declared its self-imposed moratorium on their deployment until the U.S. makes such a move.
The collapse of the INF Treaty has stoked fears of a replay of a Cold War-era European missile crisis, when the U.S. and the Soviet Union both deployed intermediate-range missiles on the continent in the 1980s. Such weapons are seen as particularly destabilizing because they take less time to reach targets, compared with intercontinental ballistic missiles, leaving no time for decision-makers and raising the likelihood of a global nuclear conflict over a false launch warning.
Russia's missile forces chief has declared that the new Oreshnik intermediate range missile, which Russia first used against Ukraine in November, has a range to reach all of Europe. Oreshnik can carry conventional or nuclear warheads.
Putin has praised the Oreshnik's capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds up to Mach 10 are immune to being intercepted and are so powerful that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack.
Putin has warned the West that Moscow could use it against Ukraine's NATO allies who allowed Kyiv to use their longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia.
___
The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
___
Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape: https://apnews.com/projects/the-new-nuclear-landscape/

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump ‘considering' invite for Zelensky to attend Alaska peace summit with Putin
President Donald Trump is 'considering' inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to join him and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska next week, according to a report. Trump and Putin are set to meet for a summit in the Last Frontier state next Friday to discuss the war in Ukraine. Extending an invitation to the Ukrainian leader is 'being discussed,' according to NBC News, citing three people briefed on internal conversations about the meeting. A senior U.S. official reportedly told the outlet that Zelensky's attendance is 'absolutely' possible, but nothing has been finalized. 'Everyone is very hopeful that would happen,' the official reportedly added. Quizzed whether an official invite had been extended to Zelensky, a senior White House official told NBC: 'The President remains open to a trilateral summit with both leaders. Right now, the White House is focusing on planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin.' The Independent has contacted the White House for further comment. Zelensky's reaction to the Trump–Putin summit was dismissive, warning that any negotiations to end Europe's biggest conflict since World War II must include Kyiv. 'Any decisions that are without Ukraine are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work,' Zelensky said. Putin is expected to use the summit to set out Russia's demands for a ceasefire deal. Speaking to reporters at the White House Friday, Trump admitted any peace deal may involve 'some swapping of territories'. 'The highly anticipated meeting between myself, as President of the United States of America, and President Vladimir Putin, of Russia, will take place next Friday, August 15, 2025, in the Great State of Alaska,' Trump declared Friday on Truth Social. Despite facing an International Criminal Court arrest warrant, the meeting slated for August 15 would mark the first time in a decade that Putin has set foot on U.S. soil. The last time the two leaders met was in Helsinki, Finland, in July 2018, during Trump's first term as president. Following the meeting, Trump publicly contradicted U.S. intelligence agencies and appeared to take Putin's word over their findings regarding Russian election interference. The remarks caused bipartisan outrage in Washington, with many accusing Trump of having 'sided with the enemy.' Negotiations on peace talks have been slow-moving and, at times, fraught. Zelensky was ambushed in the Oval Office earlier this year by Trump and Vice President JD Vance. The vice president criticized Zelensky for not expressing gratitude enough for U.S. financial and military support, accusing him of being 'disrespectful.' Trump has also publicly blamed Zelensky – rather than Putin – for starting the war.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Couple who fled Putin's Russia seeking asylum in NYC grabbed by ICE in Trump crackdown
NEW YORK — The last time Ukrainian immigrant Kate Kirilenko saw her husband he was on a bench on the 10th floor of 26 Federal Plaza with chains around his waist, wrists and ankles. That was June 27, three days after the couple went to the lower Manhattan immigration courthouse for what they expected would be a routine hearing for their joint asylum case. They'd fled Russia in 2023 fearing her husband's anti-Putin politics and her Ukranian nationality would lead to persecution. Inside the courtroom, an immigration judge denied a Department of Homeland Security lawyer's motion to dismiss their case and told them to return to court in March 2026 for another hearing. They thought they were safe from the Trump administration's aggressive crackdown on immigration. But federal agents lurking outside the 12th floor courtroom arrested her and her husband, Alex Uzkii, anyway. 'As soon as we exited the courtroom we were grabbed,' Kirilenko, 39, said in Russian, through a translator. 'They directed us into the elevator and pushed us up against the wall. My husband had our documents in his hand and they tried to take them away forcefully. He sort of tried to not let them. So they pushed him into the wall, hit him in the back and handcuffed him right there.' Kirilenko said she was cuffed as they stepped out of the elevator onto what she believes was the 10th floor. The pair repeatedly asked why they were being detained. The agents, several covering their faces with masks, gave no answer. 'Horror. No thoughts. It was just fear,' she recalled. Now, the life Kirlenko and her husband began building in New York is in pieces. She doesn't know when or if he will come home. And though she was released from detention for medical reasons, she fears what will happen when she returns to the courthouse next month. 'I don't know what they'll do tomorrow. I don't know what's gonna happen with me. In September I can be detained. I don't know what will happen with my husband,' she said. 'I'm not sleeping almost at all. I wake up every hour. I have a lot of dreams, a lot of thoughts in my head.' Michael Musa-Obregon, an attorney on the team representing the couple said they are working to free Uzkii, so he can return to New York and fight his case from outside a prison. There is also a possibility Kirilenko could be detained the next time she returns to court, he said. 'People are coming in to duly make their appointments, as is their responsibility and obligation,' Musa-Obregon said. 'The idea of fighting meritorious cases such as [Kirilenko's] and they are now being arrested in that process, you know, there's something wrong with that. You can't be punished for going to your court date. And that's essentially what's happening.' The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to questions about the case. Surprise arrest Despite reading about ICE detaining immigrants at city courthouses, Kirilenko said they didn't expect to be arrested since they had followed the rules. They crossed the southern border using the Biden administration's CBP One app and filing for asylum within the one year deadline after arriving. 'We just didn't think that this would affect us because we were never late, we never missed anything, everything was proper and legal in our case,' she said. 'We just did not realize that people were being detained for nothing.' Kirilenko spent nearly six days in detention before ICE released her for a major abdominal surgery she had already had scheduled. Uzkii, 46, remains in detention, far from home in Livingston, Texas. 'It's not fair that we were detained. We didn't do anything wrong. We came here to look for protection from our country,' she said. 'We did not do anything wrong. I want my husband to get out. He does not deserve to be arrested, to be kept in detention. We are not criminals.' Kirilenko described her holding cell inside 26 Federal Plaza as a cold, cement room where women slept on benches or the floor, with just reflective blankets to keep them warm. The bathroom was attached to the room, with just a waist high wall blocking others' view of the toilet, she said. ICE fed the roughly 16 women being held in her room three times the first day, but other days only twice, she said. The menu included three or four varieties of hot soup, bagels with cheese, protein bars and cookies. 'There were instances where we would have to ask for water multiple times. I'm not sure why you had to ask multiple times,' she said. Kirilenko said agents refused to let her take medication she'd had was prescribed to keep the cyst she would later have surgically removed from her ovaries from growing larger. Meanwhile, Uzkii was inexplicably transported from 26 Federal Plaza to an upstate New York facility and back two times. Kirilenko watched through a glass panel in the door as agents shackled him in a reception area each time for the transport. 'I only saw him through the window. We tried to communicate with our fingers or read lips. It didn't really work,' she said. '[Alex] tried to encourage me. I cried and he looked very upset. We tried to speak but it was difficult because it's very noisy inside the room, and he couldn't hear me,' Kirilenko said of the last time they saw each other on June 27. He was later flown across the country to a Louisiana detention facility before being moved to the IAH Polk Adult Detention Center in Texas. On June 29, ICE officials made Kirilenko download a tracking app to her cellphone and they released her ahead of her major surgery the next day. Kirilenko's surgery went well and she was recovering at a friend's place in Queens. But her rest was almost immediately disrupted when she was woken up from sleep at 7:22 a.m. the next morning by a message from ICE, asking her to report to court in person by 10 a.m. the same day. Kirilenko had five incisions in her abdomen and was hardly able to get up from bed. After submitting a note from her surgeon saying recovery would take four to six weeks, ICE told her she could check in by submitting a photo of herself to the tracking app every week until further notice. Being tracked has left Kirilenko wary of leaving her friend's place, and she won't even walk around the block for fresh air, her friend said. Every morning Kirilenko looks forward to her 10-minute phone call with Uzkii. 'He mostly tries to cheer me up. He doesn't complain much. He just tries to keep up my spirits,' she said. 'He says that nothing much goes on where he is. He said even people who signed the paperwork to self-deport, they're at this facility waiting for two months to be deported.' A lonely July 4 Still thousands of miles apart from one another, Independence Day came and went, and Kirilenko thought of last year, when they went to the Macy's 4th of July fireworks show on the Hudson River. 'It was a huge crowd. It was cool. In my city the fireworks are not so long and so varied. Different shapes. [Alex] also liked it,' she said. 'We were thinking to go this year too.' Uzkii, who was born in Russia, opposed the war against Ukraine and supported Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Kirilenko, who was born in Ukraine and moved to Ryazan, Russia, in 2010 to be with Uzkii, feared the worst living on the enemy's turf. 'The situation became more difficult. The laws became stricter. People were persecuted for supporting Navalny and obviously if they knew you were Ukrainian,' she said. 'It was becoming clear that things were about to get worse and worse. At that point it was literally a threat to our lives to continue to stay there. So we had to leave.' Though it was never their dream to move to New York, Kirilenko said her husband was instantly charmed by the city. 'When we first arrived in New York my husband said, 'Can you imagine we are in New York?' We saw the Empire State Building, not just in pictures. In real life. He was very excited about it,' she said. Kirilenko said they had 'no life in Russia' anymore, and had began building a new life in the city, living in Midwood, Brooklyn, learning English and exploring the city. 'I'm not here just to make money, like some people. I want to live here, to integrate and be a part of it,' she said, adding that she is considering going to college to become a pharmacist or an accountant. Uzkii, who holds a degree in radio technology, told Kirilenko his experience being detained has left him hoping to volunteer for an organization that helps other immigrants and to possibly become a lawyer in the future. 'We were interested in doing a drive through the country to see it. It's so big. See the desert, go somewhere where there's ocean and it's warmer. See the mountains, the animals, the plants. Everything is different. Half of it doesn't exist back in Russia,' she said. 'We were very excited to do that, and now we sort of feel like there's no hope.' For now, they live every day in uncertainty, with no clarity on where their asylum case stands. Kirilenko shared a message from Uzkii in Texas: 'It's not fair that they grab people like that, yank them out of their lives, leaving a bunch of obligations on the outside. I want to be released, go back to New York, where I am a resident, and use my right to defend a case in immigration court without extra pressure.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NASA Aims for U.S. to Be First to Put Nuclear Reactor on the Moon: ‘To Have a Base on the Moon, We Need Energy'
'This is about space exploration. This is about this next phase,' Duffy, interim NASA administrator and 'The Real World' alum, saidNEED TO KNOW Interim NASA administrator Sean Duffy shared plans to make the U.S. the first nation to put a nuclear reactor on the moon 'We're behind, right? … We have to marshal all of our resources, all of our focus on going to the moon, which is what we're going to do,' he said during a Department of Transportation press conference on Aug. 5 Duffy is aiming for NASA to accomplish this by 2030Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, the interim NASA administrator, proclaimed that the U.S. needs to 'get our act together' when it comes to the ongoing race to the moon and Mars against other nations. To do this, Duffy, 53, shared during a press conference NASA's plan to make the U.S. the first to put a nuclear reactor on the moon with an aim of by 2030. 'We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon, and to have a base on the moon, we need energy,' the politician and former The Real World: Boston reality TV personality told reporters on Aug. 5. 'This fission technology is critically important, and so we've spent hundreds of million dollars studying, 'Can we do it?' We are now going to move beyond studying, and we've given direction to go,' Duffy continued. 'Let's start to deploy our technology to move to actually make this a reality.' 'If we're going to be able to sustain life on the moon, to then go to Mars, this technology is critically important,' he added. NASA's ongoing fission surface power project, which expands on the space agency's Kilopower project, is striving to create 'relatively small and lightweight' fission systems that would operate on the moon and Mars. According to NASA, a previously discussed fission system would provide at least 40 kilowatts of power, which would 'continuously run 30 households for 10 years.' However, POLITICO reported just before Duffy's announcement, that NASA is now aiming to build a 100-kilowatt reactor. At the Department of Transportation press conference this week, Duffy noted the need for speed in getting a nuclear reactor on the moon. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'We're behind, right? … We have to marshal all of our resources, all of our focus on going to the moon, which is what we're going to do,' he said, adding, 'This is about space exploration. This is about this next phase.' Read the original article on People