logo
153 NCAA rules had to be eliminated to clear the way for the House settlement. Numbers to know

153 NCAA rules had to be eliminated to clear the way for the House settlement. Numbers to know

Hindustan Times07-06-2025
The groundbreaking case leading to the transformation of college sports in the United States comes nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House and Oregon basketball player Sedona Prince filed a complaint against the NCAA and the five most powerful conferences alleging they were unfairly being denied of pay for use of their name, image and likeness.
The settlement approved by U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken resolved three antitrust cases — House vs. NCAA, Carter vs. NCAA and Hubbard vs. NCAA — that became known collectively as the 'House case.'
The class-action lawsuits contended the NCAA, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC violated antitrust law by not providing benefits and compensation to athletes and restraining athletes' ability to make money for endorsements and sponsorships.
Incremental gains won by athletes in previous lawsuits against the NCAA set the stage for the House settlement and the all-out professionalization of college sports. A look at key numbers associated with the case:
Athletes who played an NCAA sport between 2016-24 and could be eligible for back payments
Class members who submitted a claim form or updated their payment information, which represents approximately 26.2% of the 389,700.
Athletes who opted out of the settlement and could pursue their own remedies.
Back damages to be paid to current and former college athletes who were denied the opportunity to profit from the use of their NIL rights. The amount will be paid in $280 million installments over 10 years. The NCAA will use reserves and insurance to cover about 40% of the payments. The rest will be covered by the NCAA reducing its annual distributions to Division I schools.
Estimated amount of the $2.8 billion that will be paid in back damages to football and men's and women's basketball players in the power conferences.
The 2025-26 pool of money each Division I school can distribute in direct payments to athletes beginning July 1. The amount represents 22% of the average revenue generated by each school from the five defendant conferences and Notre Dame.
NCAA rules that had to be eliminated to allow schools to provide additional benefits to athletes under the settlement.
All Division I athletes will be required to report to their schools and the Deloitte clearinghouse any and all third-party NIL contracts with a total value of $600 or more, if payment occurs after July 1, 2025. The clearinghouse will determine whether the amount is commensurate with the athlete's fair market value.
The widely accepted estimate by University of San Francisco sports economist Daniel Rascher of additional direct compensation athletes will receive over the next 10 years.
The estimated amount of damages faced by the NCAA and the five conferences if they avoided a settlement and lost at trial.
Plaintiffs attorneys' request for legal fees. The figure is based on attorneys receiving 20% of the NIL settlement fund and 10% of the additional compensation settlement fund as well as an injunction relief award of $20 million paid by the defendants. That does not included about $9 million in expenses attorneys are claiming.
college sports: /hub/college-sports
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A look at Venus Williams' tennis career and comeback. She's returning to the US Open at age 45
A look at Venus Williams' tennis career and comeback. She's returning to the US Open at age 45

New Indian Express

time5 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

A look at Venus Williams' tennis career and comeback. She's returning to the US Open at age 45

Venus Williams is back on the professional tennis tour at age 45 and will be returning to the U.S. Open next week for her first Grand Slam competition in two years. She received a wild-card entry for singles from the U.S. Tennis Association on Wednesday — she will be the oldest player in that event in New York since Renee Richards was 47 in 1981 — after earlier getting one for mixed doubles. Here is a look at the career of Williams, who owns seven Grand Slam titles in singles, 14 in women's doubles with her younger sister, Serena, and two in mixed doubles, plus a record five Olympic tennis medals: Venus Williams' pro tennis debut came in 1994 Williams, who was born in Lynwood, California, on June 17, 1980, played her first WTA tournament in Oakland in October 1994, at 14. In the first round, Williams faced Shaun Stafford, the 1988 NCAA singles champion, and won 6-3, 6-4. In the second round, Williams lost to Arantxa Sánchez Vicario, who would retire with four Grand Slam trophies. The first Grand Slam event for Venus Williams was the 1997 French Open Her Grand Slam debut came at Roland-Garros in 1997, eliminating Naoko Sawamatsu in the first round and losing to Nathalie Tauziat in the second. Later that year, Williams played in the U.S. Open for the first time and reached the final before losing to Martina Hingis. The 1998 Australian Open featured the first Venus vs. Serena matchup Venus beat Serena — who is 15 months younger — in the second round of the 1998 Australian Open, the first of 31 meetings as pros. Serena went 19-12, 11-5 in Slam matches.

State eases laws for agricultural land purchase, introduces property registration reforms
State eases laws for agricultural land purchase, introduces property registration reforms

Hans India

time10 hours ago

  • Hans India

State eases laws for agricultural land purchase, introduces property registration reforms

Bengaluru: On the third day of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly's Monsoon Session (Aug 13), the House passed the Karnataka Land Reforms and Certain Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, simplifying several rules related to the purchase of agricultural land. As per the amendments, educational institutions or other entities can now purchase up to four hectares of agricultural land, with purchase approvals vested solely with district commissioners. Land acquired for establishing an educational institution can also be converted for other purposes if needed. The Bill also allows for the conversion of up to two acres of agricultural land for industrial use without extensive approvals. For renewable energy projects, authorities can issue an auto-conversion certificate. However, using agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes without permission or conversion will attract a fine of ₹1 lakh. In addition, the Assembly passed the Karnataka Registration (Amendment) Bill, 2025, presented by Minister Krishna Byre Gowda. The bill aims to make sub-registrar offices more citizen-friendly and simplify property registration procedures. It also includes measures to curb illegal registrations, halts paper-based property registrations, and mandates that all registrations be done only through the e-Khata system.

SP never talked about Dalits when it was in power, now desperate: UP Deputy CM Maurya
SP never talked about Dalits when it was in power, now desperate: UP Deputy CM Maurya

The Print

time13 hours ago

  • The Print

SP never talked about Dalits when it was in power, now desperate: UP Deputy CM Maurya

'From 2012 to 2017, when I was also a member of this House, SP never remembered Dalits and backward classes. But now, when they see no possibility of power anywhere, they talk of a fake PDA,' he said. Speaking in a 24-hour discussion in the Assembly on 'Viksit Bharat-Viksit Uttar Pradesh, Atmanirbhar Bharat-Atmanirbhar Uttar Pradesh,' Maurya also accused the SP of lacking a comprehensive vision for inclusive development. Lucknow, Aug 13 (PTI) Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya on Wednesday said the Samajwadi Party (SP) never cared for Dalits and the backward classes when it was in power. In the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, people gave a clear message to the then-ruling SP by ousting it, but its leaders 'did not mend their ways,' the BJP leader said. He alleged that the SP regime was marked by lawlessness, rampant crime, and unchecked corruption. Maurya said the reason UP lags behind several states despite rich resources was the partisan politics, which stalled progress for decades. 'States like Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Gujarat have surged ahead, while UP remained backward for long. Before 2017, the situation was even worse,' he said. Maurya said Uttar Pradesh's economy under the BJP has grown from Rs 12.89 lakh crore in 2017 to Rs 28 lakh crore now, while per capita income has risen from Rs 52,671 in 2016-17 to Rs 93,514 in 2023-24. He said that the state was moving rapidly towards becoming a USD 1-trillion economy. The discussion in the House will continue tonight and will end on Thursday. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath remains present in the House. PTI ABN VN VN This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store