logo
Pool body sued by transgender player forced to crowdfund money for defence

Pool body sued by transgender player forced to crowdfund money for defence

Yahoo09-04-2025
A pool federation being sued by a transgender player it banned from women's events is crowdfunding to pay for its defence.
The English Blackball Pool Federation (EBPF) says the legal costs involved would 'possibly prove beyond our means'.
Harriet Haynes has taken the EBPF to court after it changed its eligibility criteria in August 2023 to stop those born male playing on its female tour and in its county tournaments.
The case is being heard this week at Canterbury County Court, with Haynes claiming the EBPF's move amounted to discrimination that had caused her a 'loss of opportunity' and 'injured feelings'.
The EBPF launched a crowdfunding campaign to help pay for its defence on the Go Get Funding website – and had raised more than £6,600 by Wednesday morning.
On a page entitled 'Help us defend our female blackball competitions from litigation', the EBPF described itself as a 'non-profit' sports federation 'wholly run by volunteers'.
Stating 'the cost of defending our stance for fair play will be substantial and possibly prove beyond our means', it added of its rule change: 'We made this decision in the interests of fairness, because we believe that people who have gone through male puberty have a competitive advantage over biological women.
'As a consequence of this decision, we are being sued by the transgender player Harriet Haynes. Harriet says that the eligibility rules for the female tour are discriminatory on the grounds of gender reassignment. We say that the rules are necessary to secure fair competition and a justified means of promoting female participation in the game.
'We are disappointed that Harriet has chosen to sue an organisation made up entirely of volunteers who give up their time to promote the game of pool in England, but we stand by our decision, and we intend to defend the claim.'
The crowdfunding page was created by the EBPF's chairman, Paul Thomson, and secretary, Anna Goodwin, who were in court on Tuesday defending its position.
Thomson told Canterbury County Court that the governing body made its decision following an 'unreal' number of complaints from players.
The court was told that about 15 to 20 anonymous written complaints had been passed to Goodwin but Thomson said many more had been raised personally with members of the EBPF's executive committee.
Thomson also said that Haynes was not allowed to play in EBPF events purely because of 'the fact Harriet is a biological male'.
He explained: 'I think the subject was kind of taboo to a certain degree. In this day and age, you can't come out and say what you want to say, because you get called a bigot or transphobic.'
When asked by Haynes's counsel, Robin White, why he had not consulted with transgender players before changing the EBPF's rules, Thomson replied: 'What about the hundreds and hundreds of other women that it affected, am I just supposed to ignore that?
'We had loads of complaints. The amount of complaints was unreal.'
He added: 'As a pool player, I know that males are far superior than what women are at playing pool.'
Goodwin told the court the EBPF's men's category was made into an 'open section' to make it inclusive of all those born male.
She said the decision had been made 'because we didn't think it was fair on our female players', adding: 'We didn't exclude transgender people. We made a section in the open section for them to play.'
What is thought to be the first lawsuit of its kind brought by a transgender athlete in the UK could prove a landmark case in pool and beyond over rules designed to stop those born male taking part in female-only competitions.
A hearing began on Monday, the day after Haynes and Lucy Smith, who is also transgender, faced off in the Ultimate Pool Women's Pro Series Event 2 at Robin Park Leisure Centre in Wigan on Sunday.
Their match prompted protests from demonstrators who shouted, 'He's a man and we stand stand with Lynne Pinches', and held up banners saying 'Save women's sport' and 'He's a man' as Haynes walked past.
Credit: X / @JeanHatchet
Pinches is the player who forfeited a 2023 final in protest at the participation of Haynes and is part of a separate legal action against the Ultimate Pool Group and World Eightball Pool Federation over their refusal to ban transgender women from their own events.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drug dealing teen caught with Rambo knife and £300 of crack cocaine told police: 'I'm going to jail'
Drug dealing teen caught with Rambo knife and £300 of crack cocaine told police: 'I'm going to jail'

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Drug dealing teen caught with Rambo knife and £300 of crack cocaine told police: 'I'm going to jail'

A crack cocaine dealer was 'encouraged to take drugs by his mum', a court has heard. Dylan Thomson grew up "with the absence of a proper parent" and now has "a pro-criminal attitude" according to the probation service. Thomson returned home hoping that his mum would look after him last year, after a spell staying with a relative in Scotland. But Teesside Crown Court has heard that his mother could not care for him and the then 18-year-old was left homeless. In the early hours of February 26, he was travelling in a car stopped by the police, in Grangetown. READ MORE: North-east gang behind £13m international drug smuggling operation that sent 'mules' to Thailand READ MORE: Woman left nervous dog Star with 'ribs and hips sticking out in squalid conditions' The police stopped the Vauxhall on Birchington Avenue after receiving information about possible drug dealing, and Thomson was searched. He had 16 wraps on crack cocaine on him. He told the police: "It's my third time in court, I'm going to jail" before admitting he had a knife with him. He was searched again at the police station, and more cocaine was found. In total, the teen was caught with £300 worth of crack cocaine divided into .2 and .1 gram wraps. He said he kept the Rambo-style knife for his own protection, whilst out and about. Thomson went onto deny the offences at Teesside Magistrates' Court before changing his plea and admitting to the possession of a class A drug with intent to supply; and the possession of a bladed article in public. He has a previous conviction for selling crack cocaine last year; and another for being a passenger in a car, taken without consent. He has never been to prison before. In mitigation, Stuart Bell told the the court that Thomson's grandma had recently died, but that his aunt has offered him a room when he is released from prison. Thomson's aunt listened from the public gallery as the court heard that a pre-sentence report by the probation service found that Thomson's mother "encouraged him to take drugs" last year and that he had endured "a difficult and challenging childhood with the absence of a proper parent." The report stated that he has a "pro-criminal attitude." Judge Richard Bennett told Thomson that his attitude - "...is largely down to your upbringing. You saw pro-criminal attitudes from your parents." Thomson, of Myrddin Baker Road in Grangetown was given a 33-month sentence in a Young Offenders' Institution. "You've now got two very serious crimes on your record for drug trafficking," the judge told him, "do not follow the example of your parents. "Sort yourself out in prison. Get a job, get away from it all. Do you understand?." For Teesside news direct to your inbox every day, go here to sign up to our free newsletter

UK Judge Affirms Legality Of Public-Submitted Road Crime Footage In Landmark Ruling
UK Judge Affirms Legality Of Public-Submitted Road Crime Footage In Landmark Ruling

Forbes

time18 hours ago

  • Forbes

UK Judge Affirms Legality Of Public-Submitted Road Crime Footage In Landmark Ruling

A U.K. court ruling has upheld the public's right to submit dashcam and helmet-cam footage to police, after a retired solicitor attempted to sue a 'caped crusader' cyclist who filmed her using a mobile phone while driving. The judgment, handed down by a judge at Newcastle County Court, found that the cyclist's actions did not breach data protection laws. The solicitor had argued that the footage was unlawfully obtained and that the cyclist—who submitted the video to police via the National Dash Cam Safety Portal—was acting as an unregistered 'data controller.' Had the claim succeeded, the judge warned, it could have required millions of motorists and cyclists to register with the U.K.'s Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and pay an annual fee, under threat of criminal sanction. The court's decision, the judge said, avoids a 'chilling' effect on the submission of road traffic evidence by members of the public. The case is subject to an anonymity order, but I have obtained the judge's decision in full. The decision was delivered in March, but with the involved parties now allowed to discuss it. The case concerns an incident that occurred in Whitley Bay in July 2022. Helmet-cam footage showed the solicitor holding a mobile phone while behind the wheel of a car. She was subsequently convicted, fined, and handed six penalty points. In a 50-page ruling, which has not been published, the judge emphasised the growing role of citizen-sourced evidence in policing, noting: 'Many private motorists and cyclists use dashcams and body-worn video equipment.' He said it was clear that filming road crime from public highways—including with smartphones—is both legal and valuable to police investigations. 'Bringing the activity of responding to police requests for video footage within the scope of data protection law would have a chilling effect on the public's willingness to respond,' said the judge in his lengthy decision. The solicitor, who previously worked for two magic circle law firms, represented herself. She accused cyclists of acting like 'caped crusaders' enforcing a 'police-controlled state.' She claimed that cyclists actively seek out law-breaking motorists and film them without consent. However, the judge found her account to be unreliable and criticised her 'lack of candour' in dealings with the ICO. He stated that she failed to disclose the ongoing legal proceedings when making complaints to the regulator. He further ruled that the footage contradicted her allegation that the cyclist had banged on her car roof. The solicitor also claimed that she was not driving carelessly or dangerously when filmed by the cyclist. The judge dismissed this, saying that the footage 'captured her in a criminal act' and that those who upload videos of such law-breaking help to deter future road crime. Law professor Sally Kyd, the former head of Leicester University's law school, said the judge had provided 'clear support for the police use of third party reporting through uploading videos to online portals' and that the judge had shown the 'deterrent effect on other drivers in seeing the potential to be caught.' Furthermore, added Professor Kyd, it is 'clear that the court takes the commission of the criminal offence of use of a mobile phone whilst driving seriously. This is pleasing to see, given that historically such offences have been framed by some as quasi-criminal.' The cyclist, who also represented himself, told me: 'The judge admitted that the case gave him lots to think about. Thankfully, the court sided with me.' The solicitor told me by email: 'Although [this] is one of the most important data protection rights cases to come before the courts this year, the hostility from the public bodies involved was deliberately used to undermine precious privacy rights. It should not have been left to me as a private citizen to expose the unlawful data protection behaviours of cyclists uploading digital material—obtained covertly from other private citizens—to portals for police prosecution purposes.' Legal experts said the ruling sends a strong signal in support of public involvement in traffic enforcement. Martin Porter KC, joint head of chambers at 2 Temple Gardens, said that although the decision does not set a binding precedent, the judge considered the case with great care 'perhaps with an eye to appeal.' 'The idea that data protection has any bearing on being filmed driving your car on a public road and committing traffic offences is ridiculous,' added Porter. 'The police will be interested in the outcome of this case,' said Professor Kyd, 'as it makes clear that uploading videos is a legitimate means of helping to enforce motoring offences.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store