logo
What's going on with redistricting in Florida?

What's going on with redistricting in Florida?

Yahoo6 days ago
TALLAHASSEE – Gov. Ron DeSantis won the redistricting fight he started years ago.
Despite that, he's eyeing another battle – hinting that he would be in favor of redrawing Florida's Congressional map, which already favors Republican lawmakers.
DeSantis hasn't officially committed to making the change, but said he would look 'favorably' on lawmakers if they did recut Florida's districts.
'I haven't done it yet, I think that I will when I need to,' DeSantis said last week during a news conference. 'But this is obviously something that we're looking at very seriously.'
Both the Florida Senate President Ben Albritton and House Speaker Daniel Perez declined to comment about whether they were considering redistricting.
The possible change comes as President Donald Trump has pushed for redrawn maps to ensure that Republicans keep control of the U.S. House in the upcoming midterm elections.
Here's what to know about redistricting in Florida, and what could happen next.
Why are we talking about redistricting now?
Trump and his team have put pressure on Texas and other red states to redraw their Congressional maps in order to protect the Republican majority in Congress.
Currently, Republicans control the House and Senate, but the margins are narrow.
Mid-decade redistricting is rare, experts say. Each state must redistrict every decade, based on the census.
But states hoping to redraw sooner than required are noting there's nothing in the Constitution forbidding extra redistricting.
It may not be only the red states looking to recut maps. In response to Trump, some Democratic lawmakers have said they plan to fight back with redrawn maps of their own, despite their limited options.
'Redistricting, which is supposed to translate votes into representation, is becoming just a game for politicians to play hardball with,' said Douglas Spencer, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Colorado.
If states redraw their maps with a partisan advantage, the courts could strike them down. But even if the courts strike the maps down, it could come after election season.
'Trump gets the benefit of having a midterm election where Republicans maintain control for his term and after he's gone I don't think he cares,' Spencer said.
Florida's current map
DeSantis hasn't promised Florida will redistrict, but he said to 'stay tuned.'
Amy Keith, the executive director of voting rights group Common Cause Florida, said if DeSantis were to redraw Florida's maps, it would be hypocritical.
In July, the Florida Supreme Court upheld Florida's Congressional map, which was drafted – atypically – by DeSantis' office.
'The governor just got the map that he drew,' Keith said. 'The map that the governor wanted is the map that was just upheld. And now the governor's saying he wants to change that map.'
The governor's map favored Republicans winning 20 of Florida's 28 Congressional Districts – which is exactly how the results shook out on Election Day in 2022.
Plaintiffs who challenged the map said it reduced Black voting power by dismantling a North Florida seat held by former U.S. Rep. Al Lawson. DeSantis said the long district, which stretched across the panhandle, relied too much on race.
The Florida Supreme Court sided with DeSantis' argument, saying that the district was likely an illegal race-based gerrymander. After that ruling, DeSantis on social media said Florida's map his office drafted was 'always the constitutionally correct map.'
But as of last week, DeSantis said his office was looking at some other areas where 'there may be problems with the map,' including in South Florida.
What are Florida's rules?
In 2010, Florida voters approved a constitutional amendment from Fair Districts Florida.
That amendment says that no plan can be drawn to favor or disfavor a political party, along with requiring that districts cannot be drawn to deny equal opportunity to racial minorities.
In 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court said that partisan gerrymandering couldn't be ruled on by federal courts – meaning its exclusively state court that can decide if a redistricting plan violates the rules, Spencer said.
As DeSantis has talked about the possibility of redrawing Florida's Congressional seats, he's avoided talking about a political motivation for it.
But if Florida were to redraw the maps, groups could still challenge it as a gerrymander even if DeSantis never explicitly mentions the political advantage.
Dan Vicuña, a senior policy director at Common Cause, said 'we don't have to rely on the pretext that the governor is giving.'
Instead, groups can rely on tools like random computer generation to see the odds of a government coming to a map with a specific partisan tilt, he said.
What's the deal about the Census?
As DeSantis has talked about redistricting, he's also raised concern about the 2020 census.
Florida got one extra congressional seat because of population growth. But the U.S. Census Bureau later released a report showing that Florida was undercounted.
DeSantis said the Trump administration has considered a mid-decade census, which would be unusual.
Whenever the next census does come, whether it's early or not, DeSantis said he would want it to exclude foreign nationals.
The Trump administration in 2020 considered adding a question about citizenship to the census but the U.S. Supreme Court blocked it.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, who was working in the Trump administration at that time, played a key role in adding that question.
Jeff Kottkamp, the executive vice president of the group Florida TaxWatch, said the census undercount affects leads to a loss of billions of dollars over the decade that could have come into the state.
When it comes to whether or not to count people without citizenship, Kottkamp, the former Lieutenant Governor of Florida, said that's a debate politicians can have.
'All we care about is that every state counts the same way, and that clearly didn't happen last time,' he said.
The U.S. Constitution says that the census will count 'the whole number of persons' in each state.
Kottkamp said some blue states put extra time and effort toward making sure foreign nationals are counted, while red states don't – to their own detriment.
'We're playing the game with two different sets of rules, and that's not good for Florida when it comes to funding and political power,' he said.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The American Fighting to Pry His Company Back From the Kremlin's Grasp
The American Fighting to Pry His Company Back From the Kremlin's Grasp

Wall Street Journal

time16 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

The American Fighting to Pry His Company Back From the Kremlin's Grasp

American businessman Leonid Smirnov first got the feeling that something was off when local Russian newspapers began airing rumors that the government was looking at taking over his company, the biggest producer of canned goods in the country. It was only when he received a phone call from an employee at 3:30 a.m. at his Los Angeles residence last October that he found out for sure that Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered the nationalization of Glavprodukt. His was the first U.S.-owned company to fall victim to what is now a mounting wave of Kremlin business seizures.

Newsom calls Trump's $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, says California won't bow
Newsom calls Trump's $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, says California won't bow

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom calls Trump's $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, says California won't bow

By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -California Governor Gavin Newsom said on Saturday that a $1 billion settlement offer by President Donald Trump's administration for UCLA amounted to political extortion to which the state will not bow. WHY IT'S IMPORTANT The University of California says it is reviewing a $1 billion settlement offer by the Trump administration for UCLA after the government froze hundreds of millions of dollars in funding over pro-Palestinian protests. UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze $584 million in funding. Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. KEY QUOTES "Donald Trump has weaponized the DOJ (Department of Justice) to kneecap America's #1 public university system — freezing medical & science funding until @UCLA pays his $1 billion ransom," the office of Newsom, a Democrat, said in a post. "California won't bow to Trump's disgusting political extortion," it added. "This isn't about protecting Jewish students - it's a billion-dollar political shakedown from the pay-to-play president." CONTEXT The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests and in doing so violated Jewish and Israeli students' civil rights. The White House had no immediate comment beyond the offer. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's war in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Experts have raised free speech and academic freedom concerns over the Republican president's threats. The University of California says paying such a large settlement would "completely devastate" the institution. UCLA PROTESTS AND ENVIRONMENT Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. Rights advocates have noted a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. RECENT SETTLEMENTS The government has settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both accepted certain government demands. Settlement talks with Harvard University are ongoing.

Decade-old photo misrepresented as South Korean reaction to Trump's tariffs
Decade-old photo misrepresented as South Korean reaction to Trump's tariffs

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Decade-old photo misrepresented as South Korean reaction to Trump's tariffs

An old photo of a crowd celebrating former South Korean leader Park Geun-hye's impeachment has resurfaced in social media posts falsely claiming it shows the public's reaction to Donald Trump saying the United States will impose a 15 percent tariff on the country's goods. The photo -- juxtaposed next to an image of a 2007 protest against a proposed free trade agreement between Seoul and Washington -- was taken nearly a decade before Trump's tariff announcement. The photo of a joyous crowd, superimposed with Korean-language text that reads "Response to 15 percent tariffs", was shared on Facebook on August 7, 2025. The photo is contrasted with an image of a protest, which is labelled "Response to 0 percent tariffs". The comparison circulated after Trump's July 30 announcement of a 15 percent tariff on South Korean imports -- below a 25 percent tariff that the US president had threatened earlier -- after extensive trade negotiations with Seoul (archived link). South Korean President Lee Jae Myung of the centre-left Democratic Party called the agreement the "first major trade challenge" since his administration came into power in June after the impeachment of Yook Suk Yeol from the conservative People Power Party (archived link). Opinion polling shows that a significant proportion of South Koreans believed Lee had fared well in negotiations, crediting him with avoiding a collapse in trade talks and preventing even harsher measures (archived link). The image comparison was also shared in similar posts elsewhere on Facebook and Threads, as well as on right-wing forum Ilbe. "That's why we say leftists are brain-dead," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "What are those people thinking?" But the image comparison misleadingly uses a photo unrelated to any trade agreement between Washington and Seoul. Impeachment rally A reverse image search on Google found the photo of the celebrating crowd in a report published by The Korea Economic Daily on December 10, 2016 -- nearly a decade before Trump's tariff demands (archived link). According to its caption, the photo shows citizens cheering the impeachment of then-president Park Geun-hye, who was embroiled in a corruption scandal (archived link) The photo was taken shortly after lawmakers passed the impeachment bill, following months of peaceful mass protests calling for Park's removal. A reverse image search of the protest photo used in the false posts led to an article published in left-wing online newspaper Newscham on January 16, 2007 (archived link). Its caption says it shows protesters in Seoul rallying against the US-Korea free trade agreement (FTA), which was signed later that year (archived link). Opponents of the FTA feared it would flood the Korean market with cheap US agricultural products, threatening the livelihoods of domestic farmers (archived link). Lee and his administration are frequent targets of disinformation online, which AFP has debunked multiple times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store