See who qualified to run for Coldwater City Council
City Clerk Shauna Chávez said only one candidate qualified for each seat in the Nov. 4 election.
The city must hold an election even if only one person files for each seat.
Michigan law allows for write-in candidates. A candidate seeking to be a valid write-in must file a Declaration of Intent with the city clerk by 4 p.m. on the second Friday preceding the election on Oct. 24.
Four incumbents qualified for the ballot:
Mayor Tom Kramer, who has served as mayor since 2011, will serve another two-year term. Kramer first served as a Second Ward councilman from 1985 to 1990, then as a Third Ward Councilman from 1992 to 2011,
Travis Machan has served as First Ward councilman since 2015.
Jim Knaack has served as Second Ward councilman since 2016
Randall Hazelbaker has served as Fourth Ward councilman since 2001 and mayor pro tem since 2018.
Jeff Budd will replace the retiring Mike Beckwith as Third Ward councilman.
Council members recruited Budd when no one else expressed interest in replacing Beckwith, who served 10 years.
Except for the mayor, all terms are four years.
The council is Budd's fourth position with the city of Coldwater. A local CPA, Budd, became the city finance director in 1998. The council hired him as city manager in December 2009 to replace retiring Bill Stewart.
Subscribe Support local news. Subscribe to the Coldwater Reporter
After seven years, Budd shifted in October 2017 to director of the Coldwater Board of Public Utilities.
In August 2021, Budd resigned to become the chief financial officer of Coldwater's auto parts manufacturer, Sekisui Voltek, LLC.
Contact Don Reid dReid@Gannett.com
This article originally appeared on Coldwater Daily Reporter: 5 qualify to run for Coldwater City Council positions on November 2025 ballot
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
07-08-2025
- Yahoo
Senators ask US to probe data security issues with DeepSeek
By David Shepardson (Reuters) -A group of seven Republican U.S. senators on Tuesday asked the Commerce Department to evaluate potential data security vulnerabilities posed by Chinese open-source AI models like DeepSeek. The senators led by Ted Budd and include Jon Husted, Todd Young, John Cornyn, John Curtis, Bill Cassidy and Marsha Blackburn want the Commerce Department to detail any threats from data collected by applications being fed back to Chinese servers or whether the AI models are feeding American personal or enterprise data to China's military or to companies with Chinese military ties. The letter also asks for details on "any findings related to how Chinese open-source models may have improperly accessed export controlled semiconductors or violated use terms of U.S. models to advance their capabilities." Senators have introduced bipartisan pieces of legislation to prohibit DeepSeek from operating on any federal government devices or networks and to prohibit federal contractors from using DeepSeek in government contracts. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in January it appeared DeepSeek had misappropriated U.S. AI technology and vowed to impose restrictions. The Commerce Department did not immediately comment. In June, Reuters reported DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations, citing a senior U.S. official, adding that the Chinese tech startup sought to use Southeast Asian shell companies to access high-end semiconductors that cannot be shipped to China under U.S. rules. The U.S. conclusions reflect a growing conviction in Washington that the capabilities behind the rapid rise of one of China's flagship AI enterprises may have been exaggerated and relied heavily on U.S. technology. Hangzhou-based DeepSeek sent shockwaves through the technology world in January, saying its artificial intelligence reasoning models were on par with or better than U.S. industry-leading models at a fraction of the cost. Sign in to access your portfolio
Hamilton Spectator
24-07-2025
- Hamilton Spectator
Will Southwest Middlesex Say Yes to Wind Turbines?
SOUTHWEST MIDDLESEX – A recent presentation by Venfor Inc. proposing the construction of 17 wind turbines within the municipality has ignited a strong public backlash, as residents raise concerns over environmental impacts, long-term land use, and community transparency. On July 16, representatives from Venfor Inc. appeared before council to present their plan to participate in Ontario's Long-Term 2 (LT2) electricity procurement process. The company seeks municipal approval in the form of a Municipal Support Resolution (MSR), a requirement for its bid submission to the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) this fall. Peter Budd, a founding shareholder of Venfor Inc., emphasized the urgency of Ontario's energy shortage. 'We know we are short of electricity in Ontario,' Budd told council. 'We are importing. The demand is going to double by 2050.' He positioned the project as an opportunity for the municipality to secure new revenue streams through a Community Benefits Agreement, estimating $300,000 annually for every 100 megawatts of energy generated. Each proposed turbine would produce 6.1 megawatts, with the current configuration surpassing 100 megawatts. The company claims to have signed option and lease agreements with 17 landowners and offered $30,000 per year to each for hosting a turbine, potentially over 20 to 30 years. Deputy Mayor Mike Sholdice raised questions about the turbine count and compensation, while Councillor Ed Myers expressed concerns about groundwater contamination, citing 'horror stories in other municipalities.' Budd assured that a full hydrogeological study would be conducted, referencing lessons learned from past issues in Chatham-Kent. Despite these assurances, residents have voiced overwhelming opposition. A Facebook post by Deputy Mayor Sholdice requesting feedback on the proposal garnered over 100 public comments within days, with the vast majority opposing the project. Residents cited concerns about noise pollution, aesthetics, health impacts, and damage to wildlife and farmland. 'Wind turbines ruin the landscape and take away any sense of peace that comes with country living,' wrote one resident. Others questioned the lifespan and reliability of the technology, warning that 'they start severely degrading around 10–15 years' despite being marketed for 20–30 years of use. Water safety emerged as a particularly emotional flashpoint. One commenter claimed, 'This was our well water immediately after they started pile driving the H beams into the ground,' accompanied by a photo of visibly contaminated water. 'They hammered 100-foot steel beams into the aquifer… and the vibrations never let the sediment settle,' another added. These stories have prompted fears of long-term environmental degradation and public health risks. In response, a petition titled Say No to Wind Turbines in Southwest Middlesex was launched online and has begun collecting signatures from residents opposing the project. The sentiment shared among many is that while renewable energy is necessary, this particular development may impose too great a cost on the local community. The presentation also noted that Venfor intends to include First Nations equity partnerships and comply with all provincial regulations, including an Agricultural Impact Assessment and Environmental Review. However, some residents remained unconvinced, with several noting that Venfor is primarily a development firm and may sell the project once permits and agreements are secured. 'Venfor is not the company seeing the project through to decommissioning,' one commenter wrote. 'They won't be the ones honouring the original terms.' Mayor Allan Mayhew thanked the delegation and confirmed that council would deliberate further. 'The proposal cannot proceed without municipal support,' he said. Council is expected to make a decision by mid-October to meet the IESO's deadline. For now, the community remains sharply divided. While some landowners see financial incentive, many residents are calling for more public meetings and transparency before any resolution is passed. As one citizen wrote: 'If council votes yes, they should put them in their own backyard first and tell us how it works out.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
19-07-2025
- Yahoo
North Carolina Senator Ted Budd speaks to FOX8 about recently passed megabill
HIGH POINT, N.C. (WGHP) — Congress had been working around the clock and on weekends to finalize President Trump's megabill that set the parameters for government spending over the next year. A majority of Americans in both parties didn't seem to be happy with the outcome, which isn't uncommon in the political world, in which all 535 members of Congress have a say in what they want. But North Carolina Senator Ted Budd spoke with FOX8's Senior Political Reporter Bob Buckley about his take on the bill, including the claim that Republicans didn't reduce spending enough to get the nation back on a sustainable fiscal track. 'I am all about cutting spending … Let's do it on the essentials that keep this country strong and keep it safe,' Budd said. The case he makes is that the best way to increase government revenues is to grow the economy to bring in more overall tax dollars. 'Let's rein in spending … We need to outgrow this problem, and I think this is step one. It's a step in the right direction … Last night, 3 in the morning, we're voting on rescissions, and that's a step in the right direction … We haven't done this in 30 years or more, but now we took a step in the right direction to rein in spending on things that aren't really representative of what people elected Donald Trump to do,' he said. See more of Buckley's conversation with Budd in this edition of The Buckley Report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
