Meet The Mid-Engine V8 Honda Supercar That Almost Was
Meet The Mid-Engine V8 Honda Supercar That Almost Was originally appeared on Autoblog.
In the mid-1970s, when the oil crisis had brought much of America to its knees, Honda was on the cutting edge of efficiency innovations. Its now-famous Compound Vortex Controlled Combustion system allowed the 1975 Civic and subsequent models to pass emissions tests without an expensive and power-sapping catalytic converter, prompting Ford and Chrysler to license the technology. GM executives, however, dismissed the technology as only being suitable for motorcycles and very small cars, not a V8. "Well, I have looked at this design, and while it might work on some little toy motorcycle engine... I see no potential for it on one of our GM car engines."
Dr. Soichiro Honda disagreed, and to prove a point, he had a Chevrolet Impala with a 5.7-liter V8 shipped to Japan, fitted it with the CVCC tech, and sent it back to the EPA for testing, showing the world that the invention cleaned up the emissions from any engine. Around the same time, in 1973, the automaker was considering a mid-engine supercar with a V8 of its own (shown in a video of the new exhibit at the Honda Collection Hall on the モンベル好きS660乗りYouTube channel), way before the first-gen NSX arrived in 1990. After all, Honda was clearly ahead of the curve, so why not redefine it?
Little is known of Honda's contemporary plans for the engine, but we doubt it would have been as humongous as the 5.7-liter beast in the Impala because, although front-engine supercar layouts were being considered by Honda's design team, a mid-engine design made it all the way to a full-size clay model. The sketches show a styling strategy that was typical of the time, blending smooth curves with sharp lines. Despite some clear British influence, it also had a distinctly Japanese look.
View the 2 images of this gallery on the original article
Sadly, it never went further than a clay model, but now, some volunteers in the Honda design department have come together to build a static model complete with paint and wheels. Since it's much too late to waste resources on building a working prototype, this is just a one-fourth-scale model, but the original designers were consulted to ensure that the lines and proportions are just as they originally envisaged.
View the 5 images of this gallery on the original article
Like this forgotten supercar concept, the NSX that eventually did arrive had pop-up headlights, though its design was more directly influenced by the Pininfarina-designed HP-X concept from 1984. The NSX name stood for New, Sportscar, eXperimental, and had Honda chosen to press on with its V8 supercar, it certainly would have fit the bill. Back then, the oil crisis dictated most decisions in the automotive space, and a supercar was seen as too great a risk.
But there's no doubt that the NSX we did eventually get was born in the minds of those mid-1970s designers, and although a V8 Honda supercar never happened, the idea of pushing the brand beyond what others think is possible has been a hallmark of its success. With the automaker working on everything from reusable rockets to hydrogen-powered cars these days, any new idea it has in the pipeline is always worth keeping an eye on. Some may not make reality in their initial form, but the seeds planted by Honda's experimental cars certainly inform future production.
Meet The Mid-Engine V8 Honda Supercar That Almost Was first appeared on Autoblog on Jun 18, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jun 18, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Honda-backed Helm.ai unveils vision system for self-driving cars
By Akash Sriram (Reuters) -Honda Motor-backed on Thursday unveiled its camera-based system to interpret urban environments, dubbed Vision, and said it was in talks with other automakers to deploy its self-driving technology in mass-market vehicles. is working with the Japanese automaker to integrate its technology in the upcoming 2026 Honda Zero series of electric vehicles, which will allow users to drive hands-free and take their eyes off the road. "We're definitely in talks with many OEMs and we're on track for deploying our technology in production," CEO and founder Vladislav Voroninski told Reuters. "Our business model is essentially licensing this kind of software and also foundation model software to the automakers." The California-based startup's vision-first approach aligns with Elon Musk's Tesla, which also relies on camera-based systems as alternate sensors such as lidar and radar can increase costs. However, Voroninski said while has foundation models that work with other sensors, its primary offering remains vision-focused. Industry experts say other sensors are critical to safety as they can act as backup for cameras, which are known to underperform in low-visibility conditions. Robotaxi companies such as Alphabet's Waymo and May Mobility use a combination of radar, lidar and cameras to perceive their surroundings. has raised $102 million to date and counts Goodyear Ventures, Korean auto parts maker Sungwoo HiTech and Amplo among its investors. Vision combines images from multiple cameras to create a bird's-eye view map, which helps improve the vehicle's planning and control systems, the company said. The system is optimized for several hardware platforms made by the likes of Nvidia and Qualcomm. This enables automakers to incorporate Vision into their existing vehicle systems, which include their own technologies for predicting and planning vehicle movements. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Goldman upgrades Chinese EV makers XPeng and Nio on cost cuts, product improvement
-- Goldman Sachs upgraded Chinese electric vehicle makers XPeng (NYSE:XPEV) and Nio (NYSE:NIO) on improving cost structures and new product strategies as both firms navigate an intensely competitive domestic market. The bank raised XPeng to Buy from Neutral and lifted price target to $24 from $18.60, citing improved vehicle competitiveness, stepped-up model launches, and material cost reductions. Goldman said XPeng's organizational and supply chain restructuring efforts are beginning to show results, supporting its expectations for more sustainable volume growth and better profit margins. XPeng's recent models, including the Mona M03 and P7+, have ranked among the top-selling cars in their segments, Goldman said. The company is also accelerating its product rollout, planning to launch around 10 new or refreshed models annually, up from one to two in previous years, helping it maintain visibility in a crowded market. Cost reductions have played a key role, with Goldman noting the company has achieved significant savings through component redesign and sensor suite optimization. The brokerage estimates that lower bill of materials costs have improved gross margins and lifted profitability on key models. Goldman also upgraded Nio to Neutral from Sell on early signs that recent operating cost cuts may help ease margin pressures. It raised its price target slightly to $3.80 from $3.70. Since March, Nio has implemented cost-saving measures, including project cancellations, headcount reductions, and integration across business units, targeting 20%–25% operating expense savings. However, Goldman remains cautious on Nio's volume growth, keeping estimates below company targets due to weaker-than-expected demand and rising industry competition. It also flagged ongoing cash flow concerns and noted the company's high debt levels, despite recent capital infusions. XPeng and Nio are among several Chinese EV makers grappling with thinning margins and volatile consumer demand as new model launches from rivals flood the market. Related articles Goldman upgrades Chinese EV makers XPeng and Nio on cost cuts, product improvement MS starts coverage of at Equal-Weight on balanced risk-reward Caterpillar's E&T segment is likely a core driver to the next EPS cycle: BofA Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
China's electric car revolution is eating itself
In the world's biggest market for electric cars, a sales miracle is turning into a 'Darwinian battle' for survival. The number of electric vehicles (EVs) sold in China rocketed to 6.4m last year, accounting for more than half of all cars sold. Despite this roaring success, growth is now slowing and the market has become oversaturated with companies fighting to win over drivers. It has prompted a vicious price war that has caused alarm in Beijing. Last week, the government issued a stern warning to 16 brands including BYD, Nio, Leapmotor and SAIC Motor, which are among the country's biggest domestic brands, urging them not to destroy each other by merciless undercutting on price. Analysts believe competition is only set to become more intense, with a potentially significant impact on export markets such as the UK and Europe. It will also have consequences for Western brands such as Tesla, which are also fighting for sales in China. 'There's been a Darwinian battle, where the larger manufacturers in China are heavily discounting, and really pushing prices downwards in a brutal fashion,' says Matthias Schmidt, an independent automotive analyst. 'They're looking to destroy their domestic peers and also Western manufacturers, trying to get them to exit the Chinese market.' While the clash may be good for Chinese drivers, who benefit from cheaper cars, it is bad news for Britain. Chinese brands are charging higher prices abroad, using international sales to bank-roll price cuts at home. The battle royal is the culmination of a years-long EV boom in the country, kicked off under Beijing's 'Made in China' strategy. Recognising the fact that Chinese manufacturers were unlikely to overtake Western rivals that made traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) cars, Beijing prioritised support for future hybrid and electric models – known collectively as 'new energy vehicles'. Since then, hundreds of EV brands have emerged off the back of surging consumer demand and massive state support, including subsidies, state-backed loans, investments from local governments and huge spending on charging infrastructure. Growth has been explosive, helping China become the world's largest manufacturer of EVs by far and more recently the largest exporter of cars globally. In 2015, about 100,000 EVs were sold in the country. By 2020 the figure had jumped to about 900,000, rising to 2.7m, 4.4m, 5.4m and 6.4m in the following four years. But the rapid annual growth has slowed from 63pc to just 19pc in the past two years. That has put intense pressure on companies, many of which had built business models contingent on strong sales growth. 'There are far more EV companies in China than can possibly survive in a competitive market,' the International Energy Agency (IEA) has warned. It highlighted that one company alone, Nio, recorded net losses of $3bn (£2.2bn) in 2023. Consultants at AlixPartners have estimated that the number of EV brands will plummet from more than 130 last year to just 19 profitable companies by the end of this decade. The market is already experiencing what analysts have euphemistically called 'consolidation', with the losers forced to declare bankruptcy or pursue mergers with their rivals. To keep the sales coming in, many are resorting to aggressive discounting. But that has prompted concerns in Beijing, as companies have tended to fund this by squeezing their suppliers, paying them later and later. That threatens to have knock-on effects if those companies can't then pay their own workers and bills. Some companies are taking more than 200 days – 28 weeks – to pay suppliers, including XPeng and Dongfeng Motor, according to the Financial Times. Beijing has sought to counter this by imposing new rules that require brands to pay up in 60 days, but there are doubts about whether these rules will be followed and concerns that it may plunge some car companies into deeper trouble. 'We are entering the consolidation phase, and the way producers in China are trying to survive is by price war,' says Endeavour Tian, an automotive analyst at Rhodium Group. The discounting is often led by BYD, the biggest-selling EV brand in China. That is partly because it has more on the line. BYD owns much of its supply chain, a model that requires huge amounts of capital. This means the company is relying on high sales volumes to keep the wheels turning. 'If their revenue is not that high, then there will be problems,' says Tian. The fierce competition in China has dragged on for longer than expected as several brands are backed by local governments reluctant to let them collapse. 'The government either invests in them or provides subsidies to them or provides low interest credit, so that even when some of the producers are really at the brink of bankruptcy they're still saved - and the price war goes on,' Tian says. For example, in 2020 Nio was rescued from collapse through a $1bn (£750m) bailout by state-owned investors. Elsewhere, Dongfeng Motor and Changan Auto – both owned by the central government – are in talks to merge amid the huge market pressures. Among the chaos, Chinese drivers are ostensibly benefitting from cheaper cars. But the price wars are not necessarily good for consumers abroad. In fact, for the UK and Europe, the pressure in China could mean higher prices for longer. Already, the sticker prices of Chinese-made cars tend to be far higher when exported. For example, BYD's best-selling Seagull hatchback starts at 56,800 yuan, or about £5,900, for local buyers. But in the UK, where the car launched this year, the model (renamed the Dolphin Surf) sells for £18,650. Similarly, research by Rhodium last year found that BYD's Seal U sold in Europe for a premium of about £11,000 compared to China. 'Those sales in Europe are essentially subsidising the price war taking place in the China market,' Schmidt says. This is particularly the case in Britain, which has not copied EU tariffs on Chinese EVs. In May, Chinese brands accounted for almost one in 10 cars sold in the UK according to the Society for Motor Manufacturers and Traders. 'The UK is essentially a cash cow market for Chinese manufacturers, it's extremely profitable,' says Schmidt. 'That's the reason we're seeing the UK soak up the highest amount of Chinese cars.' The largest European destinations for Chinese EVs are the UK, Spain and Italy, which make up more than 60pc of sales combined, according to Schmidt. The price war at home means that – at least for now – fears of cheap Chinese cars flooding into Europe may be overdone. Instead, brands may want to protect their margins, says Rhodium's Tian. At the same time, while European manufacturers are finding it hard to compete in China, in Europe they are starting to catch up. Greater adoption of lower-cost lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which have long been used by Chinese brands, have allowed Western manufacturers to bring prices down on a spate of newer models, says Schmidt. The share of EVs sold with LFP batteries in Europe has increased from 3pc to 10pc in just two years, according to the International Energy Agency. Yet Western rivals shouldn't take too much comfort from this. Ultimately, Chinese brands such as BYD are more focused on growth than profits – and they still have plenty of room to cut prices. And once the Darwinian battle at home is over, the newly-crowned winners may decide to bring the price wars to Europe next. 'If they want to play out the same scenario in overseas markets, that's also doable,' Tian says. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
