Patriots to move to Kyiv 'as quickly as possible', says NATO top commander
WIESBADEN, Germany - Preparations are underway to quickly transfer additional Patriot air defence systems to Ukraine, NATO's top military commander Alexus Grynkewich said on Thursday, as the country suffers some of the heaviest Russian attacks of the war so far.
"We are working very closely with the Germans on the Patriot transfer", he told a conference in the German city of Wiesbaden. "The guidance that I have been given has been to move out as quickly as possible."
U.S. President Donald Trump this week announced a toughened stance against Russia for its more than three-year war in Ukraine and promised new missiles and other weaponry for Kyiv.
He said on Tuesday that some Patriot missiles, coming from Germany, were already on their way to Ukraine.
A meeting of Patriot-owning nations and Ukraine donors, aimed at finding additional Patriot air defence batteries for Kyiv and chaired by Grynkewich, could take place on Wednesday next week, a source close to the talks told Reuters.
The expert level meeting is expected to be held at NATO's military headquarters SHAPE near the Belgian town of Mons, according to the source.
Grynkewich said there was also an issue of sequence with regard to deliveries to Ukraine.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Fatal abuse of Myanmar maid in Bishan: Traffic Police officer sentenced to 10 years' jail
Singapore Man charged over manufacturing DIY Kpods at Yishun home; first such case in Singapore
Singapore HSA launches anti-vaping checks near 5 institutes of higher learning
Singapore $7,000 fine for eatery chain involved in ByteDance food poisoning case
Singapore Bicycle wheel-inspired care model used to improve trauma outcomes in central S'pore
Life 11 new entries on Singapore's Bib Gourmand list, including three re-entries at Old Airport Road
Singapore NEA monitoring E. coli at Sentosa beaches after elevated bacteria levels delay World Aquatics events
Singapore 15 under police probe for sharing Singpass credentials used in scams
"Secretary (of State Marco) Rubio just talked about capabilities that are in Europe (which) can be moved more quickly than something coming off the production line", Grynkewich noted.
"But the production line can then be used to backfill the capabilities that others donate."
He said he had no sense of what number of Patriot systems might be freed up for delivery to Kyiv. "There will be a lot more to follow, we're going to move as quickly as we can on this," he said.
After a meeting with U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in Washington on Monday, German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said a decision on supplying two U.S.-made Patriot systems to Kyiv could be reached within days or weeks. Germany has already donated three of its own Patriot units to Kyiv.
Ukraine treasures the Patriot system, built by U.S. defence company Raytheon, as its most valuable means to intercept ballistic and hypersonic missiles fired by Russia. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
27 minutes ago
- Business Times
South Korea exports rise at fastest in 7 months before higher US tariffs kick in
[SEOUL] South Korea's exports rose for the second straight month in July, beating market expectations on strong chip demand and shipments being moved forward ahead of higher US tariffs, which are expected to weigh in the second half of the year. Exports from Asia's fourth-largest economy, an early bellwether for global trade, rose 5.9 per cent from the same month last year to US$60.82 billion, trade data showed on Friday, higher than the 4.3 per cent increase in June and the strongest since December 2024. The figure beat a median 4.6 per cent rise forecast for July in a Reuters poll of economists, who also noted signs of front-loading shipments ahead of an Aug 1 deadline for higher US tariffs. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing reciprocal tariffs ranging from 10 per cent to 41 per cent on US imports from dozens of countries and foreign locations. With South Korea, Trump announced a trade deal on Wednesday setting tariffs at 15 per cent, lower than a threatened 25 per cent but higher than the current 10 per cent, which officials, companies and economists cheered for reducing uncertainty over the trade environment. 'Despite the trade deal, demand is still expected to weaken from August as overall tariff rates will increase,' said Lee Jeong Hoon, an economist at Eugene Investment Securities. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Demand for artificial intelligence, however, will continue to be strong, while that for automobiles is growing in non-US markets.' A separate business survey showed on Friday South Korea's factory activity contracted for the sixth straight month in July, as uncertainty over US tariffs weighed on output and orders. The trade-reliant economy grew at the fastest pace in more than a year in the second quarter, buoyed by rebounding consumer spending and a surge in exports driven by demand for technology. Exports of semiconductors jumped 39.3 per cent in July, the biggest annual increase since October 2024, while cars rose by a five-month high of 8.8 per cent on robust demand in non-US markets such as Europe. Ship exports surged 107.6 per cent. By destination, shipments to the US rose 1.4 per cent, after three straight months of declines, as growing technology demand offset the impact of Trump's tariffs on steel and auto parts. Exports to China fell 3.0 per cent, while those to the European Union rose 8.7 per cent. Imports rose 0.7 per cent in July to US$54.21 billion, compared with a gain of 4.3 per cent in June and 2.0 per cent expected by economists. The monthly trade balance stood at a surplus of US$6.61 billion, narrower than the previous month's US$9.08 billion, which was the biggest since September 2018. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
‘Clinton Plan' e-mails were likely made by Russian spies, new documents show
Evidence that undermines the theory that Mrs Hillary Clinton's campaign conspired to frame US President Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election has been declassified. WASHINGTON – The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Mrs Hillary Clinton's campaign conspired to frame Mr Donald Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on J uly 31 shows. The information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel's 2023 report, reveals that a foundational document for that theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies. The document is a purported e-mail from July 27, 2016, that said Mrs Clinton had approved a campaign proposal to tie Mr Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal over her use of a private e-mail server. The release of the annex adds new details to the public's understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analysing purported e-mails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, Mr John Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the e-mails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise. The declassification is the latest disclosure in recent weeks concerning the Russia investigation. The wave has come as the administration is seeking to change the subject from its broken promise to release files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Even as the releases shed more light on a seismic political period nearly a decade ago, Mr Trump and his allies have wildly overstated what the documents show, accusing former President Barack Obama of 'treason'. The release of the annex was no exception. Mr John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from 'a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump's presidency'. And Mr Kash Patel, the FBI director, who has a long history of pushing false claims about the Russia investigation, declared on social media that the annex revealed 'evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax'. In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Clinton approved a plan to tie Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr Durham concluded that the e-mail from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured. Before the 2020 election, Mr Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Mr Trump's first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 e-mail, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did 'not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,' he said. Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the 'Clinton Plan intelligence,' as Durham put it in his final report. In his report, Durham used the US government's knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize FBI officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited. 'Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,' Mr Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins. Mr Durham's report also mentioned that Mrs Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation. But Mr Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign's rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the e-mail he called the 'Clinton Plan intelligence' was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation. The annex shows that the person who supposedly sent the July 27 e-mail, Mr Leonard Benardo of the Open Society Foundations network, told Mr Durham in 2021 that he had never seen the message and did not write it. The network is the philanthropic arm of liberal financier George Soros, who has been made out to be a villain by Russian state media and by some American conservatives. The annex also cited a purported e-mail from July 25, 2016, also attributed to Mr Benardo. Referring to President Vladimir Putin of Russia, the message claimed that a Clinton adviser was proposing a plan 'to demonize Putin and Trump,' adding, 'Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.' That message identified the adviser as 'Julie,' while the July 27 one said 'Julia'. An accompanying Russian intelligence memo identified the aide as Ms Julianne Smith, a foreign policy adviser for the Clinton campaign who worked at the Centre for a New American Security. But the trove of Russian files contained two different versions of the July 25 message – one that somehow had an additional sentence. And Mr Benardo denied sending it, telling Mr Durham's team that he did not know who 'Julie' was and would not use a phrase like 'pour more oil into the fire'. Ms Smith informed Mr Durham in 2021 that she had no memory of proposing anything to campaign leadership about attacking Mr Trump over Russia, although she 'recalled conversations with others in the campaign expressing their genuine concerns that the DNC hack was a threat to the electoral system, and that Trump and his advisers appeared to have troubling ties to Russia'. The annex also shows that Mr Durham obtained e-mails from several liberal-leaning think tanks mentioned in the Russian memos and did not find copies of the messages supposedly written by Mr Benardo. The think tanks included the Open Society Foundations, the Atlantic Council, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Centre for a New American Security. But Mr Durham found other 'e-mails, attachments and documents that contain language and references with the exact same or similar verbiage' to those messages. Those included a July 25 email by a Carnegie Endowment cyber expert that contained an extensive passage about Russian hacking that was echoed, verbatim, in the purported July 25 message attributed to Mr Benardo. Mr Durham also obtained text messages from Ms Smith on July 25 showing that she had unsuccessfully tried to determine whether the FBI had opened an investigation into the Democratic National Committee breach, although they did not mention Mr Trump. And he obtained a July 27 e-mail from Ms Smith asking her colleagues at the think tank to sign a bipartisan statement criticising Mr Trump's denunciations of the Nato alliance as reckless and too friendly to Russia. Mr Durham wrote that it would have been logical for someone to conclude that she played a role in efforts by the Clinton campaign to tie Mr Trump to Russia. Her July 25 texts and July 27 email could be seen as support for the idea that such a plan existed, he added. But ultimately, in weighing all the evidence, Mr Durham concluded that the Russians had probably faked the key e-mails, the annex shows. 'The office's best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the US-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,' it says. The Russian intelligence memos first came to public attention in 2017 after The New York Times and The Washington Post explored the decision by Mr James Comey, then the FBI director, to violate Justice Department procedure. In publicly addressing the investigation into Mrs Clinton, he sharply criticised her use of a private e-mail server but said no charges could be brought over it. Mr Comey later told Congress and an inspector general that he decided to be the face of the decision, rather than allowing Justice Department officials to do so, as is typical, in part because of something in the Russian memos. A Dutch spy agency had hacked the memos from a Russian spy agency's server in 2016 and gave copies to the US government. Two of the memos described purported communications in January 2016 and March 2016 involving a top Democratic Party leader, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, one with Mr Benardo and the other with a different official at the Open Society Foundations. The memos indicated that the attorney general at the time, Ms Loretta E. Lynch, was pressuring the FBI about the e-mail inquiry and sharing confidential information about it with the Clinton campaign. But Mr Comey and other officials also said they believed that the memos described fake e-mails, in part because the January one also said that Mr Comey himself was trying to help Republicans win the election. In 2017, Mr Benardo and Mr Wasserman Schultz said that they had never even met, let alone communicated about Mrs Clinton's e-mails. The Trump administration has also declassified and released a report by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that summarised unflattering claims about Mrs Clinton from the Russian memos without flagging suspicions that the trove contained misinformation. After the special counsel investigating the Trump campaign's ties to Russia, Mr Robert Mueller, issued his final report, the attorney general at the time, Mr Bill Barr, assigned Mr Durham to hunt for evidence proving Mr Trump's conspiracy theory that the investigation had stemmed from a deep-state plot against him. In 2020, as The New York Times has reported, after Mr Durham failed to find evidence of intelligence abuses, he shifted to instead trying to find a basis to blame the Clinton campaign for the fact that Mr Trump's campaign had come under suspicion of colluding with Russia. Mr Durham was never able to prove any Clinton campaign conspiracy to frame Mr Trump by spreading information that it knew to be false about his ties to Russia, but he nevertheless used court filings and his final report to insinuate such suspicions. He brought charges of false statements against two people involved in outside efforts to scrutinise possible ties between Mr Trump and Russia, both of which ended in quick acquittals. NYTIMES
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Russia claims capture of Chasiv Yar after 16-month battle, World News
Russia said on Thursday (July 31) it had captured the town of Chasiv Yar in eastern Ukraine after nearly 16 months of fighting, opening the way for potential further advances. Russia's Defence Ministry said in a brief statement its forces had "liberated" the town. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dismissed the claim as "disinformation". A Ukrainian military spokesperson called it "propaganda". But a video posted by a Russian military unit and verified by Reuters showed a Russian paratroop banner and the national flag being raised by soldiers in the desolate ruins of the town. Russia has been slowly grinding forward in eastern Ukraine as talks to end the 3-1/2 year war have failed to make progress towards a ceasefire, prompting US President Donald Trump to threaten new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its exports from next week. Moscow's forces are also mounting intense pressure on the city of Pokrovsk, 60km southwest of Chasiv Yar. Military analyst Emil Kastehelmi, co-founder of the Finland-based Black Bird Group, said it was likely that battles were continuing near Chasiv Yar. "The terrain of Chasiv Yar has favoured the defender. Forested areas, waterways, hills and a varied building stock have enabled Ukraine to conduct a defencive operation lasting over a year, in which the Russians have made minimal monthly progress," he told Reuters. Gradual advance Kastehelmi said it was likely that the town's fall, if confirmed, would create conditions for Russia to advance further in eastern Ukraine, but still only gradually. "The fall of the city to the enemy is nevertheless a challenging situation for Ukraine, as it will bring the Russians closer to Kostiantynivka, which Russia is now approaching from several directions," he said. "The logistics in the area will also be affected, as Russians can bring drone teams even closer." Zelenskiy, in his nightly video address, said Ukrainian units around Chasiv Yar were "defending our positions. Every Russian attempt at advancing in Donetsk region, in Sumy, in Kharkiv is thwarted in the end." Quoting a report from top Ukrainian commander Oleksandr Syrskyi, Zelenskiy said the most intensive battles were still near Pokrovsk. Ukrainian forces, he said, were repelling Russian sabotage and reconnaissance parties. The popular Ukrainian blog DeepState, which uses open source materials to track the movements of Russian forces, also denied that Moscow's forces were in control of Chasiv Yar. The battle for Chasiv Yar began in April last year, when Russian paratroopers reached its eastern edge. Russian state media reported then that Russian soldiers had begun phoning their Ukrainian counterparts inside the town to demand they surrender or be wiped out by aerial guided bombs. The town, now destroyed, had a pre-war population of more than 12,000 and its economy was based around a factory that produced reinforced concrete products and clay used in bricks. It lies just west of Bakhmut, which Russia captured in 2023 after one of the bloodiest battles of the war. [[nid:720856]]
