GAA star 'may have fallen asleep at wheel' before fatal accident
The inquest also heard that the man's death two years ago, in a single-vehicle collision, may have occurred after he fell asleep at the wheel due to tiredness.
Denis Kealy, 43, suffered fatal injuries when his Nissan Cabstar truck crashed into a tree on the R154 at Piercetown, Co. Meath, at around 2.30 pm on June 24, 2023. He was pronounced dead at Connolly Hospital in Blanchardstown, Dublin, a short time later. Former GAA star and businessman Denis Kealy. Pic: Rip.ie
His wife, Charlene Kealy, told the inquest that Denis brought her a birthday breakfast in bed on the morning of the crash, before he went off to work. She said she had been celebrating with a number of her girlfriends later that day when she received a phone call about the tragic collision.
A father of three boys and managing director of building firm KeaMac, Mr Kealy was a former GAA player with Meath as well as his local club, Dunshaughlin.
At the inquest, Coroner Aisling Gannon observed that there were no witnesses to the collision, and the evidence had not been able to establish definitively what happened. Former GAA star and businessman Denis Kealy in 2006. Pic: Damien Eagers / SPORTSFILE
Forensic collision investigator Garda John Coughlan told Dublin District Coroner's Court the deceased's vehicle had crossed to the other side of the road 'for some undetermined reason' before mounting a grass verge and hitting a tree. A crash report established that the driver was not wearing a seatbelt.
Garda Coughlan said there was no evidence Mr Kealy had applied the vehicle's brakes at any stage during the incident. Having ruled out any environmental or vehicle factors to explain the crash, Garda Coughlan said he believed it was due to 'driver error' but could not be sure if it was because of 'a distraction or a medical event'.
A postmortem showed Mr Kealy died as a result of catastrophic brain injuries consistent with a road traffic collision, with no pre-existing health condition or alcohol or drugs present in his system that could have contributed to the fatal crash. Former GAA star and businessman Denis Kealy in 2006. Pic: ©INPHO/Tom Honan
Ms Kealy said that her husband had recently filled out a lifestyle form in which he complained of regularly feeling drowsy.
'That stuck out to me,' she remarked. Ms Kealy said she had no concerns about her husband's well-being or his mental health, but that he would sometimes shake his head to keep himself awake.
The inquest heard he had collected a new car the previous day and had arranged to bring his family to one of their favourite restaurants the following day.
Ms Kealy said her husband had taken a day off work to collect the car and that she believed he was 'trying to catch up' with work on the day of the crash.
The inquest heard that on the day before he died, Mr Kealy had gotten up at around 4.30 am and did not get home until 11 pm.
The deceased's wife said he went to bed at 11.30 pm but was up early the following day as he had sent an email at 6 am. Summing up the evidence, the coroner said there was nothing to indicate any intentional act by Mr Kealy in relation to the crash as the inquest had been told of 'significant future-focused acts', like the purchase of a new car and making a dinner reservation.
Ms Gannon noted suggestions that the deceased was 'significantly tired', which she said was a 'more probable' explanation for what may have happened.
Offering her condolences to Mr Kealy's family, the coroner recorded a verdict of death by misadventure, which she explained was because the death was due to an unintended act.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Seán Moran: The FRC set out to save football but may also have rescued referees
We are now less than two weeks from the start of the wild bird hunting season. Soon, shots will ring out, portending existential danger for, among others, red grouse, mallards, gadwalls, shovellers and tufted ducks. And traditionally, referees, who have come to regard this time of year with much the same trepidation as a golden plover. In October 2022, then president Larry McCarthy launched a protection programme, Respect the Referee. The backdrop was almost weekly bulletins on spectator and team official outrages directed at referees. To attend the launch, I had to reschedule a coffee morning. When I explained that I would be attending a new initiative to assist referees, my deferred appointment helpfully suggested something that might also be of interest to game birds: 'Arm them?' In its crusade to save football, however, the Football Review Committee (FRC) may well have provided less lethal measures to rescue refereeing. The impact of the various rule changes or enhancements has been well publicised, especially the solo and go with its tidying up of the flashpoints that occur when a free is awarded. READ MORE The penalties for disrespecting refereeing decisions are also severe – including the 50-metre advancement of disputed frees – and have had the predictable effect of discouraging and vastly reducing dissent and gamesmanship in interactions with referees, allowing match officials clearer minds and greater bandwidth to deal with the primary tasks of upholding rules. There is, though, more to the FRC's impact than the obvious starting point of penalising bad behaviour to the extent that it becomes unprofitable. There were also the methods by which the proposals were formulated in the first place. Speakin g to The Irish Times on Saturday , Tyrone All-Ireland referee Seán Hurson strongly made this point. 'We've seen changes in the past where there was no consultation with officials and then, rules were maybe not implemented the way that some people thought they should have been implemented,' Hurson said. 'But this time, both FRC and the officials seem to be happy, based on our last meeting there a few weeks ago. They also took to heart different recommendations through the season, which was probably a direct result of some of the meetings. 'So, we felt as referees that we were being listened to, and issues that we were having were being addressed.' Coincidentally, on the same day Monaghan intercounty referee Martin McNally was making the same point to Colm Keys in the Irish Independent. Referee Martin McNally said referees have been able to bring concerns and recommendations to the FRC. Photograph: James Crombie/Inpho 'We have had Jim Gavin [FRC chairman] present at nearly every referees' meeting. We have had input and have been able to bring concerns and recommendations to the FRC. It's not a case that these things were being dictated to us,' he said. The easy-going give and take between the committee and referees allowed issues to be resolved without difficulty. This was useful in implementing the stipulation that only captains could speak with the match official. Hurson felt that restriction was a bit of a straitjacket because he valued talking to players, arguing that all referees knew instinctively the difference between genuine queries, particularly given the experimental nature of the rules, and backchat. Having sought clarification from Gavin, he was told that 'the communication was still okay'. [ Four-point goals and handpass restrictions: My experience of playing with football's latest experimental rules Opens in new window ] Maurice Deegan, the former All-Ireland referee and FRC member, who took charge of intercounty practice matches and wrote about for The Irish Times , observed that the knowledge of the new rules on the part of players was very good, often better than in respect of the original rule book. Deegan also said that the two-way communication illustrated genuine interest in the new rules and making sure they were properly grasped. This collaborative approach – administrators, match officials, players and management all pulling together – has been central to the success of the rules and their positive impact. It is true that the new measures are currently under the spotlight during club matches and a season of championships at those levels have yet to be concluded and analysed. It is also true that perhaps the full ordnance of managerial and coach analysis of the new dispensation has yet to be devised with a view to pressurising referees in whatever grey areas can be identified. Neither of these potential vulnerabilities have yet come to pass and the goodwill and co-operation that marked the first six months of the FRC framework have set a positive precedent, but there will be anxious eyes on how it is all progressing. Should the optimal evolution of either game be held back simply to bolster uniformity? Club players are, by most accounts, equally as happy with the FRC rules as their intercounty colleagues and that enthusiasm can help them to bed in this club season. One issue that is coming under strain is the growing disparity between football and hurling rules. Were the four-point goal, which was again trialled recently after being dropped at the start of the year, to re-emerge it would drive in the wedge between the games that little bit deeper. This is not altogether new. After all, in the late Joe Lennon's exhaustive 2000 study, Towards a Philosophy for Legislation in Gaelic games, he states: 'Since these games are completely different in form, it is not surprising that the first sets of rules were also quite different...' The hurling field of play (200 yards x 150) was more than three times the size of a football pitch (120 x 80) and the goals considerably larger (20 x 10 compared with 15 x 8) and playing time was 80 minutes, compared to an hour. Back on planet 21st century, the problem is practical. As Donal Smyth, Croke Park's manager of match officials put it, 'we have 40 per cent of our referees that do dual hurling and football, so one game going away from the other can be a big problem'. Nonetheless, should the optimal evolution of either game be held back simply to bolster uniformity?
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Book review: Duffy returns for more Ulster noir
There is a certain juncture in every Sean Duffy novel when your mind starts to wander. You picture the troubled detective checking beneath his BMW for a tilt bomb, part of his daily ritual, then gunning the car through inevitably rainy Carrickfergus. He's on the way toward the RUC barracks, his every turn backgrounded by the plaintive soundtrack of his beloved Avro Pärt. Then, you wonder for the umpteenth time why nobody in Britain or Ireland has yet seen fit to turn these books into a television show — as big a mystery as any he has tried to solve himself and Hang on St Christopher, the latest, is the eighth instalment in this enthralling series. For the uninitiated, Duffy is a Liverpool-supporting, weed-smoking, poetry-loving, whiskey-chugging Catholic detective serving in an almost exclusively Protestant police force at the height of The Troubles. There's even some GAA in his background. His colourful career intersects with some of the most infamous characters and significant moments in the turbulent history of the violence in the North. Adrian McKinty's genius is how deftly he places his roguish hero at the centre of storylines involving episodes like the Kincora Boys scandal, the De Lorean car farrago, and the double-dealing of Freddie 'Stakeknife' Scappaticci. Having mined some of the darkest chapters in the province to excellent effect, McKinty and Duffy have moved on to the 1990s. Unbeknownst to those still suffering the Sturm und Drang of paramilitary warfare, the place is ebbing towards the cusp of a kind of peace. So too is our hero, by now cast in a state of semi-retirement as an RUC reservist commuting to work from the home he has made in Scotland with his partner Beth and their daughter Emma. Of course, any sort of domestic peace and superannuation doesn't quite suit his restless spirit and, in the way of all great cop dramas, he gets sucked into investigating one more murder. Not just any homicide, either. Turns out that the deceased portrait painter is also an IRA assassin, and his demise has the potential to derail those attempting to bring an end to the fighting. Trying to unravel the various threads from there is a complicated business that takes McKinty into unfamiliar territory, as far afield as the United States, Iceland, and Dundalk. Thankfully, the wit and sarcasm that sustained him through his various brushes with death all along the way remain resolutely intact. Especially when meeting with the IRA honcho in his border town lair. With every book, Duffy has evolved and those of us who have made the journey with him through all the novels have inevitably grown terribly fond of his imperfect character and tolerant of his foibles. Yet, when he almost, but not quite, strays on his partner in this outing, this long-term reader — and I presume others — shared the haughty disdain evinced by DC John McCrabban, his long-suffering partner. 'Crabbie' is a part-time farmer, full-time straight man, and the perfect Presbyterian counterpoint to Duffy's maverick approach to solving crimes and everything else. Like so much about these books, their relationship is perfectly drawn. I am truly envious of those yet to meet Duffy and 'Crabbie', jealous because these people have eight of these treasures waiting to be delved into. Hang on St Christopher, named like all the others for a Tom Waits song, is as good any of them but they should be read in sequence. Aside from creating a charismatic detective, McKinty has woven his intricate way through Ulster's recent, tawdry history. And made from that entertaining and compelling noir fiction, even for those of us who lived through it just down the road. Some achievement.
Sunday World
3 days ago
- Sunday World
‘Fenian c***' – Sectarian thug cleared of 1997 murder is convicted over street attack
Paul Mark Rodney Hobson, acquitted over Robert Hamill killing, and a second man will be sentenced next month Paul Hobson, also known as Marc Hobson, who was convicted of a sectarian assault A man acquitted of the murder of Robert Hamill nearly 30 years ago has been convicted of a sectarian assault. Paul Mark Rodney Hobson, who was cleared of the 1997 killing in Portadown, was found guilty of common assault and criminal damage in June last year. A second man, Simon Millar, was also convicted of common assault and criminal damage on the same date. District Judge Michael Ranaghan told heavily-tattooed Hobson that despite his claims the police had assaulted him and were lying, 'I do not believe that for one second.' The judge said that in contrast, their victim gave his account 'in a straightforward way and his evidence did not change…I do not think he was trying to exaggerate or lie.' Accordingly, the Craigavon Magistrates Court judge recorded convictions against 48-year-old Hobson and Millar (44), finding them guilty of common assault and of causing criminal damage to the victim's Mercedes car. Their victim was called a 'fenian c***', the court heard. The pair were, however, acquitted of a second assault, allegedly committed against a woman, after she failed to attend court. Robert Hamill was killed in 1997 The incident happened on June 23 2024. During the hour-long contest, father-of-four Martin McWilliams told the court he had parked his car and was heading for a tanning session in the Mahon Road area of Portadown when he was subjected to sectarian abuse. Mr McWilliams, who said he was wearing a Mexico City GAA top at the time, testified that: 'As I approached, one of them said 'You shouldn't be wearing that top around here'.' He said he told them he would 'wear whatever I want and I just walked on in.' 'It was as if they were trying to provoke me so I just bypassed it and walked on,' he said, adding that Hobson had followed him into the salon. "He said 'Give us a hug. You know who I am'. Then I realised who he was from Instagram and his food company,' said Mr McWilliams, adding that he told Hobson to leave him alone. After using the sun bed he left but as he opened the car door, Hobson again asked him for a hug. Mr McWilliams refused and tried to get into his car but Millar interjected and called him a 'fenian c***.' Paul Hobson As the victim sat in his car, Hobson stopped him from being able to close the door, the court heard. Mr McWilliams said he kept saying to 'give us a hug' and coming towards him. He told the court Hobson went to punch him but he dodged it and punched him back. As Millar came for him, he started to run around the cars but his flip-flop came off and the defendant caught up. Millar tried to punch him but again, Mr McWilliams was able to dodge the blow and punch the defendant in the face. The court heard how Hobson was behind the victim at this stage, and he tried again to punch him, 'but I moved out of the way and hit him.' Making a break for his car, Mr McWilliams locked the doors but the pair were 'booting the side of the car' and hitting the windows. During cross-examination, Hobson's defence counsel Damien Halleron suggested the defendant had told him jokingly that he was a 'madman' for wearing a GAA top. The victim refuted the suggestion however, and while he admitted striking both defendants, giving them both a bloody nose, he told the court it was done in self defence. Giving evidence on his own behalf, Hobson, from Fitzgerald Park in Portadown, denied that he had chased the victim or that he had prevented him from getting into his car. He told defence counsel Damien Halleron he thought Mr McWilliams was wearing a Celtic top. Asked why he felt he had to remark on it, Hobson said: 'It's just certain areas and that's not my feelings. If someone was walking up the Garvaghy Road wearing a Rangers top, I would have said the exact same thing,' claiming he told the victim he was a 'madman' and was laughing. He claimed the victim reacted angrily and demanded, 'what the f*** are you going to do about it,' denying that he using the word fenian. Hobson also claimed that he was attacked first and when he got up, Mr McWilliams 'was punching Simon.' When asked if he was involved in a sectarian attack or hurled sectarian abuse at the victim, Hobson said: 'No.' Under cross-examination from the prosecutor, Hobson maintained his account that he did not chase Mr McWilliams and claimed that he told police he was the victim of an assault. When it was put to Hobson the sergeant who took his statement had not recorded anywhere that he claimed he had been the victim of an assault, the 48-year-old labelled the officer 'a liar.' The prosecutor put it to Hobson that he took issue with Mr McWilliams as he was wearing a 'Catholic orientated top' but Hobson denied this. Millar, with the same address, also gave evidence on his own behalf, and he claimed he did not hear Hobson using any term of sectarian abuse and that after the victim struck Hobson, 'I went to split it up.' Further claiming that Mr McWilliams 'grappled' Hobson to the floor, Millar told the court that after he was punched on the nose, his eyes 'went all watery' so he 'couldn't even hardly see.' Under cross-examination, Millar accepted that between his police statement and his evidence in court, he had changed his account about drinking alcohol that day, changed his account about seeing Hobson being punched and also about how many times he himself was punched. While he claimed he had also told police he had been a victim of assault, again the court heard there was no record of that. The prosecutor asked Millar whether he accepted 'that's the first time you have said that' but he maintained, 'I did' tell them. Convicting the pair, Judge Ranaghan said: "I do believe he felt threatened following a deliberate sectarian comment and given his fear he does not have to wait to be struck before reacting and striking out in self defence. I think his actions that day were appropriate and proportionate.' Having had it confirmed by the prosecutor that the offences are 'aggravated by hostility,' the judge said he would give the pair 'a chance' and order a pre-sentence report. Judge Ranaghan freed Hobson and Millar on bail, and ordered them to come back to court to be sentenced on September 26. A police landrover at the scene in Portadown, where Robert Hamill was killed Robert Hamill was beaten by a loyalist mob in the early hours of April 27, 1997. He died nearly two weeks later on May 8. His murder was the subject of a public inquiry because it was alleged that four police officers were positioned in a vehicle near the scene of the attack, but did not intervene. A total of six individuals were charged with the murder but the PPS withdrew against five. Hobson proceeded to trial in June 1999 and although the case was dropped and Hobson was acquitted of the murder, he was handed a four-year sentence for affray.
