Legislators propose 22 amendments for Louisiana
Louisiana legislators have filed 22 proposed state constitutional amendments during the 2025 legislative session. However, only a handful of those amendments may end up on the ballot and one has already been withdrawn.
Some of those proposals are duplicates and others were losers from the moment they were filed. Those that haven't been heard by a committee face tough futures. Others are rewritten amendments that voters rejected on March 29.
Senate Bill 8 would make it easier to fire state classified employees who are protected by civil service. It is awaiting a vote by the full Senate.
The new city of St. George in East Baton Rouge Parish would be allowed to create a school system by SB 25. It passed the Senate 26-5 and was sent to the House.
The state's homestead exemption that gives homeowners a $75,000 tax exemption could be increased by $22,500 by parish governing authorities by SB 56. It is still in committee. House Bill 271 would allow parish governing authorities to increase the homestead by $5,000. It was approved 9-5 in one committee and sent to a second committee.
Another bill, SB 57, would remove income limitations on freezing the homestead exemption property assessment for persons ages 65 or older. It is awaiting a Senate vote. SB 115 authorizes a new assessment level for homeowners who meet the federal poverty guidelines. It is awaiting a final Senate vote.
The House has HB 269 that increases the homestead income special exemption level from $100,000 annually to $200,000 for those 65 and older, veterans and the disabled. It is still in committee. HB 300 is a similar amendment.
Judges have to retire at age 70 and SB 86 would repeal the retirement age for judges. That has been tried more than once and been defeated by the state's voters. The amendment failed 12-25, its first vote in the Senate. The House has a similar bill, HB 63, that is still in committee.
The spending of any foreign money in state elections is prohibited by SB 109. It passed the Senate 34-5 and is in a House committee.
HB 294 says 20% of all severance taxes should be sent to parishes and eliminates dollar amounts. It is awaiting House final passage.
An amendment that limits government spending, HB 295, has passed one committee and is in another one.
Fire protection officers employed by an airport authority would become eligible for state supplemental pay under provisions of HB 349. It is still in committee.
Two new members would be added to the five-member Louisiana Public Service Commission by HB364. They would be appointed by the governor. It is still in committee.
Parishes would be authorized to exempt business inventory taxes from property taxes by HB 366. They would receive state funding if they exempt those taxes. It has passed the House unanimously and is in the Senate.
HB 448 would prohibit nonprofit organizations from receiving a property tax exemption on property used for commercial purposes, even if it relates to the income-tax-exempt purposes of the organization. The bill is still in committee.
Solar facilities would have limited eligibility from participating in the Industrial Tax Exemption Program by HB 464. It is still in committee.
School systems would be able to provide salary increases for teachers and other school employees under HB 466, which is not an amendment. It is awaiting House final passage. Three education trust funds would be eliminated by HB 473 in order to fund teacher and support raises required in HB 466. The amendment is awaiting a final vote in the House.
Constitutional amendments would be limited to one object under provisions of HB 471. It is still in committee.
The Revenue Stabilization Trust Fund would be eliminated and its funds would be transferred to the Budget Stabilization Fund (the rainy day fund) by HB 678. It is awaiting House final passage. The goal is to provide legislators with additional budget funds.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump rails against Democrats as Senate takes up his nominees
President Trump blasted Democrats again for delaying the process of getting his nominees confirmed by the upper chamber and praised Senate Republicans for staying in Washington and working on getting the president's picks approved. 'Very proud of our great Republican Senators for fighting, over the Weekend and far beyond, if necessary, in order to get my great Appointments approved, and on their way to helping us MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,' Trump wrote in a Saturday post on Truth Social. The president then hammered Senate Democrats, arguing they are doing 'everything possible to DELAY these wonderful and talented people from being' confirmed. 'If George Washington or Abraham Lincoln were up for approval, the Dems would delay, as long as possible, then vote them out. The Democrats want our Country to fail, because they have failed,' the president said, thanking Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and 'our Republican Warriors in the Senate. Fight and WIN. I am with you all the way!!!' Thune told reporters on Thursday that recess appointments, to help tackle the backlog of over 160 nominees, mostly for lower-level positions, are 'on the table.' 'I think everything is on the table,' Thune said, adding that changes to rules would 'make more sense.' 'Fixing the rules, not just for now, but for the long term, would be a better solution for it. But at this point right now, I wouldn't say we're taking any options off the table,' the South Dakota Republican said. GOP senators have expressed openness to forging an agreement with Democrats to help confirm a tranche of Trump's nominees, but they are open to pivoting to other options if the deal does not go through. 'If we can't then we will have to resort to other options and we've got a lot of support for doing that,' Thune said in a Saturday interview with Politico. Republicans would need virtually all of their conference to vote for changing the rules. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has backed the party's approach to the president's nominees, saying Saturday that 'historically bad nominees deserve historic levels of scrutiny.' 'We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as Trump's,' Schumer said in a post on social media platform X. 'And they know that.' Thune and Schumer's offices have been in contact this week and the New York senator had sent a counterproposal on Friday, according to Politico.
Axios
22 minutes ago
- Axios
Senate GOP eyes recess appointments as stalemate drags on
Fed-up Senate Republicans are starting to whisper about recess appointments again as Democrats stonewall them on nominees, cutting into the start of August recess. Why it matters: Senate leaders and the White House are still negotiating on a deal to end the standoff. But skipping town and letting President Trump speed-run his nomination list is an increasingly attractive option, some GOP senators told Axios. "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for," Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) posted on Saturday. Recess appointments, as well as using the nuclear option to change chamber rules with a simple majority to expedite the confirmation process, are becoming real possibilities as talks drag into the evening. The Senate is in session on an August weekend voting on nominations, as Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and the White House struggle to find a compromise. How it works: Recess appointments would give Trump leeway to jam through numerous nominees without having to go through the usual Senate confirmation process. The Senate would have to agree to adjourn with a majority vote, and the House also would have to come back into town and agree to adjourn and cancel scheduled pro-forma days. Those nominees would only be able to serve through the end of 2026 — and without payment. Zoom in: Schumer wants the White House to release withheld federal funding in exchange for passing a small batch of uncontroversial nominees, per a source familiar. Democrats are also willing to commit to another batch later in the year — but only if it is formally written into an agreement that the deal is off if the White House so much as sends over another rescissions package. Republicans continue to point out that Democratic stonewalling is unprecedented. Typically, even the minority party ultimately allows some level of deference to the party in power and allows lower-level nominations to move more quickly.
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Dems dig in, Trump demands all: Nominee fight boils over in Senate as GOP looks for a deal
The path to a deal on confirming a slew of President Donald Trump's nominees appeared shaky at best in the Senate Saturday, as Republicans and Democrats sparred over terms and conditions to find a way forward. Senators were supposed to be long gone from Washington by now, but Trump's demands to ram his nominees through Senate Democrats' historic blockade have kept lawmakers in town. But by late afternoon, not much progress had been made. When asked if any headway had been made, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told Fox News Digital, "Unfortunately, not really, no." "The Dems are dug in on a position that's just not working," he said. Negotiations have been ongoing among Republicans, Democrats and the White House. Thune and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., met last night to discuss an offer from Democrats. The two have not spoken directly since then, instead communicating through intermediaries, Thune said. However, he expected they would talk again later Saturday. Senate Republicans want to strike a deal that would see nominees that made it through committee with bipartisan support get lightning-fast votes on the floor, but Schumer has not relented. A source familiar with negotiations said Senate Democrats are looking for deals on the release of funding withheld by the White House and a guarantee that there will be no future rescissions packages — a particular sticking point for them heading into the looming deadline to fund the government. In exchange, they are offering a tranche of nominees to go ahead now, and another round later in the fall. But Trump, who is at his Bedminster, N.J., golf course, has demanded that lawmakers stay in town and pass the entire slate of nominees on the Senate calendar, which has ballooned to over 150. The president lauded Senate Republicans in a post to Truth Social on Saturday "for fighting, over the Weekend and far beyond, if necessary, in order to get my great Appointments approved, and on their way to helping us MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" "The Radical Left Democrat Senators are doing everything possible to DELAY these wonderful and talented people from being approved," he said. "If George Washington or Abraham Lincoln were up for approval, the Dems would delay, as long as possible, then vote them out." While Republicans have confirmed well over 100 of the president's nominees, the only pick to make it to the floor without objection was Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Not a single one of Trump's nominees has gotten a voice vote or gone through unanimous consent, two floor actions that have been routinely used to advance nominees in the upper chamber throughout the years. At this point four years ago, 49 of former President Joe Biden's picks had been confirmed by voice vote. Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., explained that Republicans have three options that they have enough support among the conference to move forward with: reach a deal with Democrats; adjourn the Senate and give the president runway for recess appointments and finally, a rules-change package, which some Republicans consider the "nuclear option." On recess appointments, a move floated since before Trump took office, Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., contended it would be up to Democrats whether Republicans actually went through with it. "The Democrats' obstruction is leading to, in very short order, us taking the necessary actions to give the President power to make recess appointments," he said. While it would be a touchy move that would set off a firestorm among Democrats, Republicans aren't afraid to move ahead with a rules change. When asked if a rule change should be done before lawmakers leave town, Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., said "I think that'd be best." But the preference is to strike a deal, preferably on a potential package on over 60 nominees that were advanced out of committee in a bipartisan fashion. "The reason why we're that way is because Schumer led us down this road," Mullin said. "He didn't have to do it this way."
