Thousands evacuated from Cologne after discovery of second World War bombs
Thousands of people were being evacuated from central Cologne in western
Germany
on Wednesday following the discovery of three wartime bombs, in what the city authority called the largest such measure since the end of the
second World War
.
An evacuation zone with a radius of 1,000 metres was cleared from 8am (6am Irish time), impacting about 20,500 residents as well as many workers and hotel guests in the city's historic old town and popular Deutz district, a statement from the authority said.
Three American bombs from the second World War, each with impact fuses, were discovered during construction work on Monday in Deutz, a bustling area on the bank of the river Rhine.
A team of bomb disposal experts plans to disarm the ordnance later on Wednesday, the statement said.
READ MORE
Unexploded bombs are often found in Germany, which had many of its major cities bombed to ruins during the war, and such operations often go smoothly.
The evacuation area includes one hospital, two retirement homes and nine schools, as well as 58 hotels and many museums.
'Everyone involved hopes that the defusing can be completed in the course of Wednesday. This is only possible if all those affected leave their homes or workplaces early and stay outside the evacuation area from the outset on that day,' the city authority said in a statement appealing to residents to follow instructions.
The measures caused major disruptions to transport in and out of the city of more than a million people, with Germany's national rail operator warning that many trains would be diverted or possibly cancelled. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Maybe we shouldn't be quite so smug about Trump's tariffs
The hysteria surrounding Trump's tariffs prompted me to dust down my old economics textbook. I was reminded that tariffs are a legitimate, albeit imprecise and potentially counterproductive, tool used by governments to try to help grow domestic industries. There was nothing in what I learned as an economics student at university to suggest tariffs were inherently evil. But then I was in college before neoliberalism really took off – under a succession of political leaders from Bill Clinton to Barack Obama – to become the world's ruling ideology. The German sociologist Wolfgang Streeck has monitored this hardening of attitudes over the years, noting how 'protectionism' has become a dirty word. Under modern capitalism, 'protection of home populations and their way of life from economic subordination by 'free markets'', has become 'widely regarded as unethical', he writes in Taking Back Control?, his latest book. Streeck is a European intellectual admired by nerdy sections of the left. He was called 'the Karl Marx of our time' in a New York Times profile last year, while President Michael D Higgins has referenced his ideas in past speeches. But Streeck (his name rhymes with 'cake') is also one of the left's chief critics, which may help to explain why he remains a fringe commentator in public debate. READ MORE Before rushing to condemn Trump and his growing band of 'populist' imitators in Europe, Streeck encourages us to consider what their brand of politics hopes to achieve. The desire to protect national economic interests can be traced back to what he calls the 'dual crisis' of capitalism and democracy. 'First, the workings of international high capitalism, set free and financialised by neoliberalism, have increasingly become a mystery to the societies subject to it,' he writes. 'Second, the societies of developed capitalism are suffering from the way the internationalisation of the state system has become bogged down in a contest between the neoliberal internationalism of its elites and the newly emerging nationalism, or localism, of growing sections of their populations.' There is a lot to unpack in those two statements – Streeck's love of compound sentences and his occasional over-exaggerations are other reasons why he remains a fringe commentator. However, there is an undeniable truth at the core of Streeck's thesis: the will of the people and the will of global markets are now at war. A worrying feature in Ireland is the moral superiority that accompanies much commentary around Trump's protectionist agenda and, previously, Brexit. It is very easy for us to paint the Brits and Yanks as insular and jingoistic when our corporate tax policies have helped to create the conditions for both Britain and the United States to be resentful about globalisation. [ Corporate tax receipts drop 30% as Trump's tariffs bite Opens in new window ] There is further irony in the glee that generally accompanies news that Trump's efforts are being stymied by the markets . Since 'Liberation Day' on April 2nd, Trump has had to perform a series of U-turns over his tariff announcements due to bond market hostility. Democrats have begun mocking him with the 'Taco' slogan – short for Trump Always Chickens Out – which was coined by Wall Street traders . Before chortling at Trump's discomfort, however, consider that the markets puncturing Trump's ambitions are the same markets which stopped Ireland from burning bondholders after the 2008 financial crash, and which today are threatening to dictate policy on Ireland's housing crisis. Rents in Ireland are already obscenely high and no political party has a mandate to make tenants pay more. Yet the Government looks set to weaken rent controls under pressure from global capital. Deloitte, one of the Big Four consultancy firms, told Ministers last month that current housing policies were deterring investors and it warned 'the flow of private capital' will go elsewhere without reform. Ireland has benefited more than most countries from globalisation, but at a cost. Increasingly we have had to cede sovereignty to gain the full benefits of international capital flows. How can states 'take back control' from the markets? Streeck believes there are two options. First, to create a 'superstate' – or world government – that purports to regulate the markets in the public interest. Historically, however, 'there is no example of sovereign states merging voluntarily into a superstate', he notes. The other option is 'to rehabilitate the nation-state as the main arena of democratic politics under capitalism'. Voluntary co-operation between nation states can be just as effective as a superstate in tackling issues like climate change and global conflict, he argues. 'A restored democratic nation-state ... could, and should, commit itself openly to economic patriotism, and even protectionism ,' writes Streeck – he italicises the word to highlight its loaded use by neoliberals. 'There is no more important function for a democratic state under capitalism than the protection of its citizens from capitalism's risk and adverse side effects.' That's not to say Trump's particular brand of protectionism is wise. But for Streeck it is understandable why a government acting on the will of the people would wish to 'separate the domestic economy from the outside world'. It is a conversation we need to have here, with less smirking please over other countries' upheavals. Globalisation has brought Ireland huge economic benefits, but it is naive to think other states will prop up a system that benefits us more than them. Naive, too, to assume Ireland will benefit disproportionately from globalisation as time goes on.
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
‘Trump likes this German': Merz Oval Office test gets approval back home
Donald Trump cherishes his German heritage so much that, for years, he claimed his father's roots were in Sweden. That was a big personal reason – ahead of Ukraine or trade uncertainty – why Friedrich Merz was on high alert for his inaugural visit with the US president in the Oval Office. And that is why he ramped up the personal, and dispelled those Sweden rumours for good, by presenting the president with the calligraphic birth certificate of his grandfather. As Trump's admiring eye drifted to the golden frame, Merz kept shtum on why the same grandfather was run out of the Kingdom of Bavaria for good: for not doing his military service. Some things run in the family. READ MORE Before returning to Germany, a relieved Merz said he had felt Trump was 'a person I can speak to well on a very personal level'. Germany and the US had, he added, 'laid a foundation today for good personal but also political talk leading to constructive political goals'. In a private meeting Merz said the two had discussed the growing trade spat and, despite the EU lead here in Europe, promised 'close co-operation and special representatives' to shuttle between Berlin and Washington. Merz said that, in their meeting, he 'thought he succeeded' in impressing on Trump how German-owned car plants based in the US export as many cars to the rest of the world as BMW, Volkswagen and others export to the US. After leaving the White House, Merz was asked on Fox News about calls to ban the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), a move Merz views with a sceptical eye. He said his country cherished freedom of expression and allowed everyone to run for parliament. He also brushed off claims from US secretary of state Marco Rubio that Germany was drifting into 'tyranny', saying the issue 'was behind us' and had not come up in talks with Trump. [ Trade tensions simmer under surface of cordial White House meeting between Trump and Merz Opens in new window ] 'Germany is a mature democracy,' he said, 'and that's why we don't need lectures from outside.' When Fox asked about the spike in anti-Semitic attacks in Germany, as presented in a report this week , Merz attributed this to a struggle with 'imported anti-Semitism through all the migrants we've had in the last years'. Given that dealing with Russia was 'extremely complicated', Merz said he had asked the US president to intervene more strongly. And what of Trump's claim that, had he been president in 2022 Russia would never have invaded Ukraine ? Merz replied diplomatically: 'Speculation.' After Trump's chilly dealings with Angela Merkel – referred to by the US president curtly as 'her' – Merz was aiming to trigger a thaw, even if that meant smiling away Trump's second World War jokes. And on Friday morning a relieved Frankfurter Allgemeine joked that, with Trump, 'even criticism can be flattery'. This referred to Trump's joke that Merz can be 'difficult', to which the chancellor just smiled and nodded. 'Trump could use someone to talk to in Europe to solve problems, such as the Ukraine war,' the newspaper noted. 'During the chancellor's visit to the White House, it looked like Merz could be that partner.' The centre-left Süddeutsche Zeitung, no fan of Merz, headlined its editorial: 'Trump likes this German'. It admitted that Merz had apparently managed to build up a personal relationship with Trump. He also listened quietly while the president mentioned casually he would not withdraw troops from Europe, as threatened, after all. 'It speaks for Merz that he spoke up for Ukraine, whenever he was allowed speak,' the Süddeutsche noted. 'But the chancellor's demand that Trump increase pressure on Putin, Trump ignored that deliberately. The visit may have gone well for Merz, for Ukraine the result is devastating.'
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
‘Wearing thin': Trump-Musk bromance descends into a jaw-dropping feud that is funny, dismal and nauseating
Things unravel fast. The arrangement was for chancellor Merz and the German party to spend the night across from the White House in Blair House after their Thursday visit to the Oval Office. The football enthusiasts in the visiting contingent may have intended unwinding with the highlights of the fabulous France-Spain game. But like everyone else in Washington, DC, the German visitors undoubtedly spent their late afternoon and Thursday evening glued to their screens as the once-heated connection between president Donald Trump and Elon Musk degenerated into a jaw-dropping social media feud that is funny and nauseating and dismal all at once. By nightfall, the richest man in the world had made the unsubstantiated claim, on the social media platform he owns, that president Trump is 'in the Epstein files'. He had reposted decades-old footage of Trump in the company of the late and now-reviled Epstein, whose FBI files remain a source of fascination to a strand of the Maga support base. READ MORE Musk's barrage of posts criticising the Trump budget Bill began during chancellor Merz's sit-down in the Oval Office and continued over the course of a day when his personal wealth fell by an estimated $34 billion, even as shares in Tesla slumped. Once freed from his diplomatic duties, during which Trump admired Mr Merz's facility with German and looked less than thrilled to receive a framed birth certificate of Freidrich Trump, the German grandfather of whom he never speaks, the president was free to attack Musk on his own social media account. Piqued, he noted that the 'easiest way' to save money in the budget is to 'terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts'. He also went public with an observation that had become clear over the past six weeks as Musk's prominence within the administration steadily faded. 'Elon was 'wearing thin'. I took away his EV mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do) and he just went CRAZY!' As ever, the drama once again sent the 47th presidency rocketing into the realm of not just a rolling television soap opera, but the darkest parody of the landmark American political dramas. With president Trump, the old line of history repeating itself doesn't fully apply: the tragedy and farce seem to occur simultaneously. Over the course of their Oval Office press spray, chancellor Merz, restrained and impressive, made several serious and sombre points about the Ukraine and Russia war but it was unclear if Trump permitted the clarity and gravity to penetrate. For much of the time, the German visitor sat silent while Trump riffed on his relationship with Musk, which was, on live television, experiencing the same return-to-Earth's-orbit fate as one of the billionaire's SpaceX rockets. By teatime, Steve Bannon, a long-time vitriolic critic of Musk, had called for his deportation. Meanwhile, the Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill tasked with meeting Trump's expectation that the budget Bill pass the Senate vote and be on his desk for his preferred deadline of July 4th, Independence Day, took stock of the spectacular feud. 'I have a rule. I never get between a dog and a fire hydrant,' the Louisiana senator John Kennedy told a reporter. Kennedy is one of several senators who want to see the Bill amended before it goes to a vote. The Republicans can afford just three defections if it is to get through the Senate. It is already clear that two senators, Kentucky's Rand Paul and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, represent a hard No to the Bill. 'The math doesn't add up,' Paul posted earlier this week. 'I'm not supporting a Bill that increases debt by $5 trillion.' Kentucky congressman Thomas Massie sounded gleeful when he was asked who he would choose in the playground fight between Trump and Musk. 'I choose math. The math always wins over the words. I trust the math over the guy who lands the rocket backwards, over the politician's maths. I think the patient is on life support and if the Senate thinks they are going to rehabilitate it and rewrite it, I think they are endangering this patient. Because people over here are looking for more reasons to be against it.' Now, with Trump's estranged 'genius' and the world's richest man seeking to sabotage the Bill with venom, it looks more fragile than ever. Even during the height of their public union, when they engaged in a public mutual seduction, with Trump attracted to Musk's limitless wealth and Musk dazzled by Trump's mass public appeal and the peerless power that comes with the presidency, it was clear to everyone that it would be short lived. But as recently as February, Musk was moved to post: 'I love Donald Trump as much as a straight man can love another man.' Perhaps he is just a rank sentimentalist at heart. But this week Musk discovered the limitations and the cold commercialism of the presidential love reciprocated. On Monday, even as reports of his rampant narcotics use circulated, Musk suffered the indignity of a going-away present of an outsized golden key which, Trump clarified, he gives to 'very special people'. It created the impression that there is a thousand identical keys crammed into a cupboard near the Oval Office. The billionaire was sporting a black eye, which he claimed he acquired while horsing around with his young son. Musk said he invited young X to 'punch me in the face' and the youngster – perhaps aware of his deteriorating future fortune – didn't hesitate in socking one to the old man. For the past four days, Musk found himself gone from the White House, his magic lanyard and access returned with nothing but a ceremonial key which opens no doors. And for all of the callous indifference to the vulnerable and impoverished Musk displayed as he set about implementing the federal cuts in his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, he may have believed that at some level Trump valued his work. The Bill proposal represents not just an additional burden to America's national debt; it is a personal snub to the man-hours Musk has put in since January. For a man with boundless intellectual vanity, to be made to feel a fool represents the worst insult. And there was a cold truth, too, to Trump's rationale as to why Musk has suddenly gone rogue on him. 'I think he misses the place. He's not the first. People leave my administration and then at some point they miss it so badly. Some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile.' The feud does not bode well for the administration. For the Democrats came the welcome novelty of watching the other crowd infighting. But the bitter and reckless war of words will ask deeper questions of the many Republicans who championed Musk during the days when he was the president's favourite courtier. And the critical decision over the big, beautiful Bill still looms. 'When 15 million people lose their health care and plunge into personal crisis,' Connecticut Democrat senator Chris Murphy wrote on Thursday evening, 'none of them are going to give a shit about a made-for-clicks twitter fight between two billionaires arguing about who gets the bigger share of the corruption spoils.' In happier days, Trump made a shrewd observation about Musk. 'He's a true patriot,' he praised. 'And I don't even know if he is a Republican.' He may be about to find out.
