Time for a rethink about what the NHS is able to provide
I agree that we need to have a rethink about what the NHS and healthcare as a whole should do. We need to change the emphasis from treatment to cure, from prescriptions to prevention.
READ MORE: NHS Grampian to scrap free nappies for newborns in bid to save £23m
Using myself as an example, I have been a type-2 diabetic for almost 20 years. First I was prescribed Metformin, the dose of which was gradually ramped up, then another drug was added, then another, then another so that I almost rattle when I walk. 20 years ago, no-one said: 'Go on this diet and come back in six months, fatty'. Nobody said: 'I wonder why his pancreas suddenly stopped working properly'. Nobody ever looks at how my body is working in any detail; everyone looks at their own speciality. If they had looked at me properly 10 years ago when treating me for something trivial, they would have seen the early pathognomonic signs of the life-threatening condition I now am being treated for. I wouldn't have been on unnecessary anti-coagulants for years if an ECG recording had been examined by a cardiologist rather than someone trialling new equipment.
I have had the ridiculous situation where my GP takes blood from me to check on one thing and the hospital consultant repeats the process two days later to look at another factor.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn clashes with Labour MP in BBC interview: 'Don't talk over me'
Medicine and surgery have changed dramatically since the NHS was created. We need to start from scratch and decide what we can afford to do. Life is unfair, and unless the structure of society is radically changed, the majority of us can never have the same options or opportunities that are available to the top 1%. We need more staff and more funding. First of all, we need to train enough staff here in the UK rather than relying on 25% of the staff coming from overseas. Those who gain their initial degrees in Scotland and are trained by the NHS should work full-time in the NHS and the private sector should train its own staff.
We need more time spent on initial consultations; regular health MOTs where every common condition that could affect a patient of that age is assessed. We need to stop providing treatments that modern medicine can do but are the 'icing on the cake'. Would society collapse if assisted reproduction wasn't available on the NHS? Should we offer bariatric surgery? I hate to say, it but should we treat OAPs like me if we can't be discharged home to look after ourselves, if the treatment simply delays the inevitable and gives no quality of life? The hospital service in Scotland will definitely collapse if 10% or more of the available beds continue to be taken up by those who do not require further inpatient treatment but just have nowhere to go.
If Obergruppenfuhrer Starmer can suddenly decide to double the UK defence budget to keep Nato happy, why can't he do the same for the NHS and keep us all happy?
David J Crawford
Glasgow
MAYBE Norman Robertson (Letters, June 17) missed the sardonic nature of my letter of June 16, but at no point did I single out Israel alone. I noted that each country was equally unstable. I also made clear Netanyahu faced internal opposition to his war from within Israel.
What I find interesting is that while Israel is reported on as being a 'state' by UK media, Iran is always referred to as a 'regime'; in fact the orange king of the USA of talks of Iran in terms of a 'regime change' being needed.
READ MORE: Angela Rayner does not rule out following US into war with Iran
The reality is that without USA defence funding and the backing of Zionist billionaires, Israel is busted. Without a war, Netanyahu is heading for criminal fines and possible imprisonment in Israel, all before the ICC gets hold of him for war crimes in Gaza. The only one who gains from further escalation in the Middle East is Netanyahu.
At no time in recent history has bombing of cities changed anyone's minds. The myth of precision bombing still leaves a lot of collateral damage. Ballistic missiles can be off their aiming point from between 200 to 500 metres, no matter their manufacturer's claims.
We are now at Sarajevo in 1914 and, courtesy of Mr Starmer getting a 'trade deal' with the orange king, the UK is already being sucked into the active defence of Israel whether any voter in the UK wishes it or not, with the RAF spy plane and increased Typhoon deployment to Cyprus. The Royal Navy is already active in the Red Sea and Hormuz Strait, shooting down missiles fired from Yemen while monitoring Iranian missile launches for the US and Israeli military.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer to chair emergency Cobra meeting on Middle East
How far away is the UK from putting boots on the ground on behalf of the regime in Israel?
I have seen 'active service', suffered having friends killed and maimed, and like many I would say that no matter how the politicians polish this particular turd, it always ends up in some form of negotiation or defeat, which raises the question 'why did we fight in the first place?'
Neither Iran nor Israel are worth the death of a single UK serviceman or woman, Mr Robertson, it is as simple as that, no matter who hit who first. We are not talking about a 'jackets aff' fight at the bike sheds here, we are looking at a tipping point for World War Three.
Peter Thomson
Kirkcudbright
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
170 patients harmed as a result of cyber attack
Pathology services provider Synnovis was the victim of a ransomware attack by a Russian cyber gang in June last year. As a result more than 10,000 appointments were cancelled at the two London NHS trusts that were worst affected. And a significant number of GP practices in London were unable to order blood tests for their patients. Now the Health Service Journal (HSJ) has reported that there were nearly 600 'incidents' linked to the attack, with patient care suffering in 170 of these. This includes one cases of 'severe' harm, 14 which led to 'moderate' harm with the rest identified as 'low harm'. According to NHS guidance severe harm occurs when patients either suffers permanent harm; needs life saving care or could have reduced their life expectancy, among a number of other factors.
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Jeremy Hunt calls for ‘urgent re-examination' of Lucy Letby case
The Conservative MP pleaded for the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, to 'speed up their normally painfully slow process'. The CCRC is considering evidence presented by Letby's legal team from an international panel of medics who claim poor medical care and natural causes were the reasons for the babies collapsing at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit. The former nurse, 35, is serving 15 whole-life orders after she was convicted across two trials at Manchester Crown Court of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others, with two attempts on one of her victims, between June 2015 and June 2016. Giving evidence in January at the Thirlwall Inquiry over Letby's crimes, Sir Jeremy – who was Health Secretary between 2012 and 2018 – acknowledged the 'appalling crime' took place under his watch and he bore ultimately responsibility for the NHS ' insofar as lessons were not learned from previous inquiries that could have been or the right systems were not in place'. He said: 'I want to put on the record my apologies to the families for anything that did not happen that potentially could have prevented such an appalling crime.' Writing in the Daily Mail newspaper on Wednesday, Sir Jeremy said: 'I am not arguing that Letby is innocent. That is not my place. I believe in the separation of powers. It must never be the role of any politician to second-guess the outcome of any court decision, let alone a jury trial. 'The pain endured by the families affected must also be at the forefront of our minds. Their suffering is beyond our comprehension and they deserve compassion, respect and ongoing support. 'But most of all, they deserve the truth. And recently, some have begun to cast doubt on what actually happened. Were those tragic deaths caused by an evil woman or were they the result of medical error? 'As someone who has campaigned for more than a decade to reduce avoidable death, that matters to me. 'If Letby really did kill seven babies in their cots and attempted to kill seven more, no punishment short of the death penalty is too harsh. But if they were caused by professional shortcomings, we need to know why. 'More than anything else, we need to make sure other families don't have to go through the same tragedy.' Sir Jeremy said he had noted the findings of the international panel of paediatric specialists and neonatologists, and had also read a 'wide range of expert concerns about the conduct of the criminal case', He said: 'Taken together – and it pains me to say it – this analysis raises serious and credible questions about the evidence presented in court, the robustness of expert testimony and the interpretation of statistical data. 'That is why I and parliamentary colleagues such as Sir David Davis, now believe the time has come for these concerns to be addressed as a matter of urgency.' He continued: 'While there is such a high degree of speculation about the potentially unfair prosecution of a healthcare professional, others will feel much more nervous about coming forward about mistakes they may have made. Lessons will not be learned and more babies will die. 'Justice must be done and seen to be done. And that means the CCRC has to speed up their normally painfully slow process.' He added that 'none of this should diminish the compassion we owe the families who have already suffered so much'. He said: 'Re-examination of the evidence is not a denial of their pain. But it will ensure that all of us can have confidence that the truth has been reached through a rigorous and fair process. 'And if medical error was the cause, we can then make sure no more babies die from the same mistakes.' Flagging up the article, Sir Jeremy wrote on his X social media account: 'Took a lot of soul searching for me to get to this point.' Lawyers for the families of Letby's victims dismissed the medical panel's conclusions as 'full of analytical holes' and 'a rehash' of the defence case heard at trial. The mother of a baby boy who Letby attempted to murder said the families 'already have the truth' and they believed in the British justice system and that the jury made the right decision. While the mother of another boy, Baby C, who Letby was convicted of murdering, told the Thirlwall Inquiry: 'The media PR campaign aimed to garner public sympathy for Letby demonstrates a complete lack of understanding for Letby's crimes and the complexity of the case. 'The misinformed and inaccurate media circus surrounding this case, our son and the other babies is potentiating the distress of all of the families involved.' Letby, from Hereford, lost two bids last year to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal, in May for seven murders and seven attempted murders, and in October for the attempted murder of a baby girl, which she was convicted of by a different jury at a retrial. Cheshire Constabulary is continuing a review of deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal units of the Countess of Chester and Liverpool Women's Hospital during Letby's time as a nurse from 2012 to 2016.A separate probe by the force into corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter at the Countess of Chester Hospital also remains ongoing. Lady Justice Thirlwall is due to publish the findings from her public inquiry in early 2026.
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Jeremy Hunt calls for ‘urgent re-examination' of Lucy Letby case
The Conservative MP pleaded for the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, to 'speed up their normally painfully slow process'. The CCRC is considering evidence presented by Letby's legal team from an international panel of medics who claim poor medical care and natural causes were the reasons for the babies collapsing at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit. The former nurse, 35, is serving 15 whole-life orders after she was convicted across two trials at Manchester Crown Court of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others, with two attempts on one of her victims, between June 2015 and June 2016. Giving evidence in January at the Thirlwall Inquiry over Letby's crimes, Sir Jeremy – who was Health Secretary between 2012 and 2018 – acknowledged the 'appalling crime' took place under his watch and he bore ultimately responsibility for the NHS ' insofar as lessons were not learned from previous inquiries that could have been or the right systems were not in place'. He said: 'I want to put on the record my apologies to the families for anything that did not happen that potentially could have prevented such an appalling crime.' Writing in the Daily Mail newspaper on Wednesday, Sir Jeremy said: 'I am not arguing that Letby is innocent. That is not my place. I believe in the separation of powers. It must never be the role of any politician to second-guess the outcome of any court decision, let alone a jury trial. 'The pain endured by the families affected must also be at the forefront of our minds. Their suffering is beyond our comprehension and they deserve compassion, respect and ongoing support. 'But most of all, they deserve the truth. And recently, some have begun to cast doubt on what actually happened. Were those tragic deaths caused by an evil woman or were they the result of medical error? 'As someone who has campaigned for more than a decade to reduce avoidable death, that matters to me. 'If Letby really did kill seven babies in their cots and attempted to kill seven more, no punishment short of the death penalty is too harsh. But if they were caused by professional shortcomings, we need to know why. 'More than anything else, we need to make sure other families don't have to go through the same tragedy.' Sir Jeremy said he had noted the findings of the international panel of paediatric specialists and neonatologists, and had also read a 'wide range of expert concerns about the conduct of the criminal case', He said: 'Taken together – and it pains me to say it – this analysis raises serious and credible questions about the evidence presented in court, the robustness of expert testimony and the interpretation of statistical data. 'That is why I and parliamentary colleagues such as Sir David Davis, now believe the time has come for these concerns to be addressed as a matter of urgency.' He continued: 'While there is such a high degree of speculation about the potentially unfair prosecution of a healthcare professional, others will feel much more nervous about coming forward about mistakes they may have made. Lessons will not be learned and more babies will die. 'Justice must be done and seen to be done. And that means the CCRC has to speed up their normally painfully slow process.' He added that 'none of this should diminish the compassion we owe the families who have already suffered so much'. He said: 'Re-examination of the evidence is not a denial of their pain. But it will ensure that all of us can have confidence that the truth has been reached through a rigorous and fair process. 'And if medical error was the cause, we can then make sure no more babies die from the same mistakes.' Flagging up the article, Sir Jeremy wrote on his X social media account: 'Took a lot of soul searching for me to get to this point.' Lawyers for the families of Letby's victims dismissed the medical panel's conclusions as 'full of analytical holes' and 'a rehash' of the defence case heard at trial. The mother of a baby boy who Letby attempted to murder said the families 'already have the truth' and they believed in the British justice system and that the jury made the right decision. While the mother of another boy, Baby C, who Letby was convicted of murdering, told the Thirlwall Inquiry: 'The media PR campaign aimed to garner public sympathy for Letby demonstrates a complete lack of understanding for Letby's crimes and the complexity of the case. 'The misinformed and inaccurate media circus surrounding this case, our son and the other babies is potentiating the distress of all of the families involved.' Letby, from Hereford, lost two bids last year to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal, in May for seven murders and seven attempted murders, and in October for the attempted murder of a baby girl, which she was convicted of by a different jury at a retrial. Cheshire Constabulary is continuing a review of deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neonatal units of the Countess of Chester and Liverpool Women's Hospital during Letby's time as a nurse from 2012 to 2016.A separate probe by the force into corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter at the Countess of Chester Hospital also remains ongoing. Lady Justice Thirlwall is due to publish the findings from her public inquiry in early 2026.
