logo
How American consumers are feeling the squeeze, in 4 charts

How American consumers are feeling the squeeze, in 4 charts

Yahoo2 days ago

The lingering effects of high inflation coupled with high interest rates have made it harder in recent years for many Americans to get ahead financially.
The hits just keep coming.
A raft of policy moves from the Trump administration, including particularly steep tariffs that could cause prices to rise, and the whipsaw approach being taken, have stoked uncertainty and driven down sentiment to some of the lowest levels on record.
That combination of higher prices, uncertainty and pessimism can be outright noxious as pullbacks in consumer and business spending can have cascading negative effects on the labor market and the broader economy.
The consumers who power the US economy with their spending have been resilient to date — but they're being increasingly spread thin.
Debt loads are climbing, as are defaults, and indicators of consumer strain are flashing red: For example, an increasing number of people are paying for their groceries in installments.
Among those feeling the biggest squeeze are student loan borrowers who have been mired in confusion since the pandemic and amid two presidential administrations' opposing desires for those outstanding balances. The prospects of sharply reduced monthly payments and, especially, debt forgiveness have faded; instead, those who have fallen behind on payments not only are seeing their credit scores tank as a result, but they also risk having their wages garnished by the government.
Here's a quick look at how household finances are becoming increasingly frayed:
The Covid-19 pandemic upended the US economy — but in the process, some Americans were able to swiftly pay down their debt and sock away money in savings.
Stimulus checks, payment pauses (on student loans and rents, in some cases), cutbacks in travel and other discretionary spending, as well as a $430 billion 'refinancing boom' helped give Americans plenty of dry powder and a leg up on their debts.
The shored-up savings helped to power a post-pandemic recovery, and credit card balances shot up accordingly.
The record-setting balances, on their own, weren't necessarily a troublesome indicator. Credit card use rises as the population grows, as more people shop online, and as the economy and wage gains remain strong.
However, the post-pandemic recovery included a bout of decades-high inflation that the Federal Reserve tried to combat with decades-high interest rates.
Where the rubber meets the road is how people were managing those rising and costly debts.
By the end of last year, Americans were having greater difficulty in managing rising debt and, in some cases, hadn't been that overextended since the aftermath of the Great Recession.
The share of households becoming seriously delinquent on their auto loans and credit cards hit 14-year highs.
Moreover, at the start of this year, it was highly expected that student loan delinquencies would worsen.
The 3.5-year payment pause ended in September 2023; however, an additional provision under the Biden administration provided a one-year 'on-ramp' where borrowers were shielded from the negative effects of a missed payment. That grace period ended September 30, 2024, and missed payments started hitting credit reports.
Student loan delinquencies jumped to 7.74% from 1% following the ending of a pandemic-era pause of reporting past-due loans on credit reports, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's first-quarter Household Debt and Credit Report.
'Adding student loans back into the mix certainly looks like it was a bridge too far for a lot of people, when it comes to their ability to pay the bills down,' Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree, said in a recent interview with CNN.
And when the loans land into the serious delinquency territory (when they're late by 90 days or more), that's a major knock on people's ability to achieve other goals: Defaulted borrowers with credit scores above 620 saw average negative score changes north of 140 points, and those with scores north of 720 saw drops of 177 points on average, New York Fed research showed.
In addition to the credit score impacts, those who have defaulted on their federal student loans will likely see their wages garnished by the Department of Education.
'The money that has to go to student loan payments now is money that can't go to paying off credit card debt or building an emergency fund or working toward other financial goals that build a stable foundation,' Schulz said.
Buy Now, Pay Later installment plans have become more widely available and adoption rates have increased as people of all ages — but especially younger adults — have grown more comfortable incorporating them into their shopping habits.
At their best, Buy Now, Pay Later loans can serve as an alternative to credit cards and are used by consumers who are seeking more flexible payment options, who want to overcome a tight financial spot, or who are looking to smooth out some bigger transactions to better meet their budgets.
But it's the 'at their worst' part where there's greater cause for concern.
Buy Now, Pay Later comes with such ease that people can quickly spend well beyond their means — especially if they start stacking multiple installment loans at the same time. A Bankrate survey conducted in May found that nearly half of all BNPL users experienced at least one problem, and overspending topped the list.
In recent months, however, it's what people have been buying with BNPL loans that have raised red flags among economists and analysts.
One in four BNPL users say the installment loans to buy groceries, according to surveys conducted in April and May by LendingTree. That's up from 14% from a year before.
There was a spike in these types of purchases when inflation hit 40-year highs back in 2022.
'Those loans have traditionally been thought of for clothing and gaming consoles and furniture and things like that,' Schulz said. 'But when people are using them for something as basic and fundamental as groceries, it is certainly concerning.'
'That hints that people are looking for whatever way they can to extend their budgets in the face of higher interest rates, higher prices at the grocery store and elsewhere, student loan repayments and just other economic headwinds people are facing,' he added.
The building economic headwinds are weighing more heavily on Americans.
Consumer sentiment has been freefalling in recent months, and in May remained at a near-record low, according to the University of Michigan's closely watched indicator of how people are feeling about the economy.
Since 1952, when the university started tracking how Americans felt about the economy, there have been nearly a dozen recessions, several oil price shocks, a few wars, a couple of inflationary episodes, a major financial crisis and a global pandemic.
Turns out, a massive trade war nearly trumps all.
Trump's sweeping and steep tariffs and other policy shifts have stoked recession fears and sent sentiment readings south every month this year. The university's index of consumer sentiment is down almost 30% since January.
The biggest concern for the economy is how people and businesses manage those sour feelings and to what extent they change behaviors.
A pullback in spending and business investment could ultimately lead to a contraction in the economy and rising unemployment.
'If [consumers are] watching the headlines to shape their sentiment, they're most likely feeling like deer in headlights — unable to move for fear the car may swerve at the last minute,' Elizabeth Renter, NerdWallet's senior economist, wrote in commentary on Friday. 'Economic policy is in a state of near-constant flux, and with that, so too are consumer feelings about the economy.'
The latest Commerce Department data, however, indicated that Americans' income growth was stronger than expected in April and that people bolstered their savings accounts. That could ultimately help people guard against negative effects of the tariffs yet to come, noted Gary Schlossberg, market strategist at Wells Fargo Investment Institute.
'Solid income growth and a more elevated saving rate should help cushion households from the brunt of inflation's tariff-related increases in coming months, resulting in a second-half 'soft patch' for the economy rather than a bona fide recession,' he wrote last week.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment
Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment

Washington Post

time8 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday appeared to undercut a proposal that was offered by his special envoy to Iran, saying he will insist that Tehran fully dismantle its nuclear enrichment program as part of any deal to ease crushing sanctions. Trump and Steve Witkoff, who is leading the negotiations for the U.S., have repeatedly offered inconsistent public messages about whether Iran would be allowed to retain the capacity to enrich uranium to lower levels for civilian purposes. The Trump administration maintains that it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The negotiations have been framed by Trump as both countries' best chance to avoid direct military conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Tehran, which denies seeking a nuclear weapon, has insisted that it will not agree to any deal that fully scraps its enrichment program. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump wrote on social media. The White House didn't elaborate on the post. Trump's post comes after media reports that Witkoff's latest proposal to Tehran would allow Iran to retain low levels of enrichment for civilian uses like nuclear medicine and commercial power if it agrees to shut down its heavily protected underground sites for a period of time. The U.S. and Iran have engaged in several rounds of direct nuclear talks for the first time in years. Senior officials — including Witkoff and Trump himself — have said within the last few weeks that Iran would not be able to keep enriching uranium at any level. The proposal, reported by Axios and confirmed by two U.S. officials, called for the creation of a regional consortium to handle uranium enrichment for civilian uses — a plan first studied more than a decade ago in negotiations that led to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Trump was sharply critical of that agreement — which also allowed set limits on uranium enrichment but permitted Iran to maintain such a capacity — and withdrew the U.S. from it in 2017 during his first term. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels since its last update in February, according to a confidential report released by the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Saturday. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement before Trump's post. 'Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' The proposal that Trump appeared to undercut on Monday evening included significant concessions by the administration certain to anger Israel along with pro-Israel lawmakers in the United States. Several of the main points were essentially the same or very similar to conditions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal. Early iterations of that agreement negotiated by the Obama administration also suggested the possibility of a regional consortium that would put Iranian uranium enrichment above a certain level under the control of Iran and its neighbors. The idea was scrapped, however, because of Gulf Arab nations' objections and Iranian suspicions of the ultimate aims of the consortium. People who were involved in the 18-month negotiations for the 2015 deal reacted immediately to reports that the Trump administration might allow Iran to continue with an enrichment program at any level, particularly after senior officials repeatedly said Iran would not be able to retain such programs. 'This proposal poses a moment of truth for critics of previous Iran nuclear negotiations/agreements (and) those who have called for a no-enrichment, full-dismantlement deal,' Dan Shapiro, Obama's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. 'Will they hold Trump to the same standard?'

Gov. Mills signs law designating Jan. 6 as 'day to remember'
Gov. Mills signs law designating Jan. 6 as 'day to remember'

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Mills signs law designating Jan. 6 as 'day to remember'

Jun. 2—AUGUSTA — Gov. Janet Mills has signed a new law creating an annual "day to remember" honoring democracy on the anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021 attacks on the U.S. Capitol. The law, signed Thursday, will require the governor to issue a proclamation each year on the date "honoring the resilience of democracy" and encouraging people to use the day to reflect "on the values of democracy, civic responsibility and the importance of protecting constitutional governance." The annual proclamation would also encourage educational institutions and libraries to observe the day with discussions, events and programming to educate people about the importance of civic engagement and the rule of law. Mills condemned the Jan. 6 attacks at the time, saying that leaders across the country should denounce the violence and defend democracy, and that all Americans should work to restore honor and decency. Ben Goodman, a spokesperson for Mills, said Monday that she signed the new law "to honor the courage and sacrifice of law enforcement — particularly the Capitol Police, some of whom lost their lives due to the events of that day — and to remind Maine people that American democracy and the rule of law — which she strongly champions — is fragile and must be protected." Brian Sicknick, a U.S. Capitol Police officer, died after being assaulted and collapsing during the attacks. Four other police officers who responded to the attacks died by suicide in the following weeks. The law was sponsored by Rep. Rafael Macias, D-Topsham, who said last month that he brought it forward as a way of preserving the truth about what happened during the attacks perpetuated by Donald Trump's supporters after he lost the 2020 presidential election. "Jan. 6, 2021, is a day I will never forget," Macias said during a floor debate in the House of Representatives. "I'm so glad it will be remembered for what it was — a rebuffed coup attempt that was completed four years later. We should write down how it really happened, otherwise it will be remembered how (rioters) want our descendants to believe it. This bill puts that day on the record." The bill generated heated debate in the House before being approved 74-65. Republicans argued the proposal was only fueling division and presenting a one-sided narrative around the events of Jan. 6 while Democrats said the day of remembrance is important for documenting history. It later received final approval by a 19-14 margin in the Senate. Copy the Story Link

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store