logo
What the ‘big, beautiful bill' means for economic growth

What the ‘big, beautiful bill' means for economic growth

Politico23-05-2025

President Donald Trump and top Republicans have heralded the 'big, beautiful bill' as a catalyst for a massive economic expansion that will unleash corporate investment and household spending.
That won't be an easy bar to clear.
The economic stimulus that could come from the larger individual tax breaks and new deductions for businesses is likely to be offset by the bill's hefty cuts to the social safety net and its elimination of previous corporate incentives. While budget analysts and economists say it could moderately contribute to output, they consider the administration's sunny economic forecasts overly optimistic — particularly given the drag that higher tariffs and deficits could have on growth.
'This is definitely not a growth vehicle,' said Kent Smetters, a University of Pennsylvania business professor who serves as the faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model.
The main elements of Trump's 2017 tax bill, including lower corporate rates, were already permanent, Smetters said. What's more, many of the largest deductions included in the new bill are only temporary, including highly touted provisions that allow businesses to deduct capital investments and R&D expenses.
That will make some of the immediate growth effects 'a bit of a mirage,' he said.
The White House Council of Economic Advisers estimated that an earlier draft of the bill — specifically the tax provisions that cleared the House Ways and Means Committee last week — would add 4.2 to 5.2 percent to gross domestic product over the next four years compared to what would occur if Congress allowed existing tax cuts to expire. That report was central to the administration and House Republicans' case that the tax bill would not only preserve the status quo but unlock an economic boom.
Kevin Hassett, the head of Trump's National Economic Council, told Fox Business earlier this week that he anticipates annual growth will exceed 3 percent over the coming years — a level of economic success that few modern presidents have consistently enjoyed. If that happens, the 'tax bill basically pays for itself,' Hassett said.
Joe LaVorgna, the chief economist at SMBC Nikko Securities and a former Trump economic adviser, said he believes that the president's second-term economy is on a much stronger trajectory than most other economists assume and that the tax bill could push it even higher.
'The baseline I'm working off of is how we did during the first three years of Trump 1.0, when GDP was at 2.8 percent. If it was 2.8 percent [then], why can't it go to 3.0 percent?' LaVorgna said. 'If we grow at 3 percent, then the cost of this bill is going to be extremely limited compared to what everyone out there is saying.'
Other estimates of how the bill's policies will impact GDP are far more muted. The nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation on Thursday said the measure would increase annual growth by just 0.03 percentage points — from 1.83 percent to 1.86 percent. Penn Wharton's May 19 report on the legislation's economic effects estimated that GDP would climb by 0.5 percent by 2034 — but that assumes Trump drops tariffs back to pre-April 2 levels, Smetters said.
In a client note, Goldman Sachs economists said they anticipate negative growth when spending cuts, tariffs and changes to immigration were layered on top of the pro-growth policies included in the House GOP's legislation.
While there are certainly components of the legislation that are stimulative — including boosts to the standard deduction, child tax credit and temporary revival of valuable corporate deductions — they're not huge. Goldman's analysis said they could positively affect year-over-year GDP by somewhere between 0.5 and 1 percentage point by mid-2026.
Those effects are moderated by other provisions that could dent household finances and investment. The bill includes hefty cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program that will likely trim health care and consumer spending. Opportunities for clean energy projects that were incentivized by President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act would be substantially diminished.
White House spokesperson Kush Desai said Republicans had voted to 'prevent a $4 trillion tax hike, the largest in American history, on American families when they passed The One, Big, Beautiful Bill.'
'Locking in President Trump's first-term tax cuts will give American businesses and families the confidence they need to invest in the future,' he said in a statement. 'Additional relief for working-class Americans — by eliminating taxes on tips and overtime — and rewarding American manufacturing with full equipment and factory expensing will turbocharge America's economic resurgence.'
Notably, Wall Street has blanched at the bill's price tag. Investor appetite for U.S. debt securities weakened over the last week amid a broader reckoning over the growing likelihood that deficits will continue to climb for the foreseeable future, putting upward pressure on long-term interest rates. That trend has likely been exacerbated by notions that protectionist trade policies may weaken the attractiveness of U.S. markets in the future, Smetters said.
'The government is going to have to try to sell these bigger deficits, this bigger amount of debt, in a world where [investors] have less global demand for that debt because of tariffs and trade,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Treasury Yields Rise on Stable Employment Ahead of CPI
Treasury Yields Rise on Stable Employment Ahead of CPI

Wall Street Journal

time16 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Treasury Yields Rise on Stable Employment Ahead of CPI

1600 ET – U.S. job creation slows less than expected, reducing odds of a dovish Fed. Bond markets react with a selloff that boosts yields. May's job creation slows less than forecast and unemployment remains at 4.2%. CME data show diminishing odds of a rate cut before September. Two or more cuts this year still represent the highest odds, but bets on only one or no cut rise. Wells Fargo foresees May's 12-month core CPI, due Wednesday, accelerating to 3.3% from April's 2.8%. The 10-year gains 0.089 percentage point this week, including 0.155 p.p. today, to 4.507%. The two-year rises 0.125 p.p. in the week and 0.115 p.p. today, to 4.039%. ( @ptrevisani) 0846 ET – U.S. job creation didn't slow as much as expected in May, spurring a bonds selloff that takes Treasury yields higher. May payrolls slowed to 139,000 from a downwardly revised 147,000. Economists surveyed by WSJ forecast 125,000. Unemployment was unchanged at 4.2%, as expected. The data likely supports expectations of a Fed hold. Yields were already rising ahead of payrolls, as markets watched the Trump-Musk break up. They rose faster after the data, particularly in longer maturities. The 10-year trades at 4.452%% and the two-year at 3.985%. ( @ptrevisani)

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

USA Today

time19 minutes ago

  • USA Today

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store