Neurosurgeon loses High Court claim against McLaren branch over snowmobile crash
Barristers for the 54-year-old Floridian told a trial in London earlier this month that the company was negligent and in breach of contract, including allegations that a safety briefing given by guides for a 'snowmobile safari' was inadequate.
They also claimed that a guide sped off, causing Mr Cannestra to lose sight of him and speed up in an attempt to keep up, which led to him losing control of the snowmobile on a turn, veering off the track into deep snow, and hitting a tree.
The company defended the legal action, with its lawyers saying there was 'no evidence' the briefing did not meet safety standards and that the 'irreducible risk' of the activity was 'reasonably controlled'.
In a ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Ritchie said the safety briefing complied with relevant standards and that the crash was caused by Mr Cannestra's 'accidental throttle use' when entering the turn.
He said: 'It was not caused by 'out of sight' guiding. It was not caused by the claimant going too fast because he was trying to keep up with a disappeared guide.
'It was caused by accidental throttle use by the claimant due to failing to follow the instructions which he had been given about safe operation during a left turn, with the guide well in sight before both turns one and two.'
Neil Block KC, representing Mr Cannestra, told a seven-day trial in London in written submissions that Mr Cannestra and his former partner, Kaitlin Mealor, spent almost £24,000 before flights on the 'couples package', with activities including driving a McLaren car on ice, and optional events such as snowmobiling.
While Mr Cannestra had experience driving supercars, he and Ms Mealor were 'absolute novices' on snowmobiles, Mr Block said.
The barrister said the pair were given a safety briefing by two guides, Arto Pitkanen and Jouni Satta, which lasted 'approximately five minutes', but alleged it was not 'proper and adequate' as it did not include information on track layout or the positions of potential hazards.
Mr Block said the Lynx Xtrim 900 snowmobiles had three modes – eco, standard and sport – with the tour beginning in eco mode, which had a top speed of 40kph.
Shortly after the activity began, Mr Block said the group stopped, and Mr Pitkanen approached Mr Cannestra and changed the mode, which increased its top speed and was 'not appropriate'.
Mr Pitkanen was alleged to have then set off at speeds of up to 60kph, causing Mr Cannestra to lose sight of him and speed up as he 'did not want to be on his own'.
He suffered a 'very significant' brain injury and 'orthopaedic injuries' as a result of the crash, the court was told.
Giving evidence, Mr Cannestra acknowledged he initially told others following the crash that it was his 'error', but said he was 'not thinking clearly' at that time due to his 'traumatic brain injury'.
He said: 'The guides simply did not guide me through the turns.
'That put my life in danger, and this never would have happened to me if that had occurred.'
Matthew Chapman KC, for the company, said in his written submissions that the turn where Mr Cannestra crashed was 'quite safe if negotiated at an appropriate speed', and that Mr Pitkanen changed the snowmobile's mode as Mr Cannestra was 'eager' for this to happen.
He added that Mr Cannestra's speed was 'wholly within his control', and the claim that Mr Pitkanen had driven too far in front 'cannot sensibly succeed'.
In his judgment, Mr Justice Ritchie ruled that Mr Pitkanen 'did not ride at excessive speed' and that the change of the snowmobile's mode did not have 'any proven causative effect on the accident', adding that Mr Cannestra was 'a mature, supercar and jet-ski aficionado, who had ridden confidently and wanted more speed'.
He continued that Mr Cannestra's evidence was 'illogical and contrived' and that a 'fundamental problem' with it was that it was 'contradictory to what he said after the accident'.
He said: 'For a man with substantial experience of driving super cars, with very high intelligence and a clear understanding of the dangers of driving at speed on corners, he based his case on ignoring those dangers and desperately wanting to keep up with a guide.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Top Gear
9 hours ago
- Top Gear
Hot or not? Here's what designer Frank Stephenson thinks of the Yangwang U9
Opinion Yangwang's thrown the book of design at the U9, but does the McLaren P1 designer think it's been a successful throw? Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Frank Stephenson is a car designer with more hits than the Beatles, including the Escort RS Cossie, first BMW Mini, Maser MC12, numerous Ferraris and the McLaren P1. These days he runs his own consultancy – Frank Stephenson Design. Here he shares his views on Yangwang's U9 with Top Gear A new wave of Chinese car design is upon us. While traditional European and US marques play it safe, Yangwang has thrown the rulebook out of the window. The Chinese are not merely catching up, they're looking further ahead, charting a future in which they define the direction of aesthetics and performance. Advertisement - Page continues below The U9's design is unapologetically extrovert. Rather than conforming to European or US tastes, the U9 shows how the Chinese design language is evolving, without any heritage or baggage from the past holding them back. But the U9 is far from visually harmonious. The convergence of edginess and the abundance of design elements are something closer to a Fast & Furious fantasy than an attempt at timelessness. There is energy, but aesthetic overload has been the route taken to achieve it. As a result, while the U9 will turn heads, it will struggle to earn the kind of enduring respect reserved for the supercar greats. You might like Still, there's something thrilling about the audacity. Yangwang isn't playing it safe – whether you love or question the result, that in itself is a sign that the balance of power in automotive design is shifting. Headlamp treatment screams of aesthetic overload! Thoughtfully placed aero and cooling elements. Advertisement - Page continues below Clean and minimal greenhouse design. Split 'T' graphic for rear lights. Split 'T' graphic repeated for rear diffuser. Material break element seems unnecessarily complicated. Verdict: NOT Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
BBC News
9 hours ago
- BBC News
Does FIA need to rethink approach to wet race conditions? - F1 Q&A
Oscar Piastri led Lando Norris to a McLaren one-two at the Belgian Grand Prix, extending his drivers' championship lead by 16 points. Formula 1 heads to Hungary for round 14 next weekend before the summer break. BBC Sport F1 correspondent Andrew Benson answers your latest questions. In both races this weekend, it almost seemed to be a disadvantage to qualify on pole because of the slipstream on such a long straight. Is there anything that can be done on this specific track to ensure pole is actually an advantage? - TomIt's true that both the pole winners at the Belgian Grand Prix last weekend lost the lead on the run up to Les Combes on the first lap, and that lost the them the race - Oscar Piastri to Max Verstappen in the sprint, and Lando Norris to Piastri in the Grand though, they were two different sprint was a standing start in the dry. Piastri did all he could, but Verstappen followed him through Eau Rouge and slipstreamed past him up the knew before the race that this was a likely eventuality. That's partly because of the layout of the track, but also partly because Verstappen was running lower downforce than Piastri and so had an advantage on the straight was visible thereafter in the sprint, when Piastri, despite a quicker car and a significant advantage in the middle sector of the lap, could never get close enough to have a go at Grand Prix was different. It was wet, and it was a rolling start. That should have made it a lot easier for Norris to keep the there are questions about his restart, which were even raised by McLaren team principal Andrea Norris went early, and Piastri went with him, so Norris did not have the lead over the start line that would have been helpful in keeping his Norris made a mistake at La Source and that allowed Piastri to get even closer, which pretty much guaranteed Norris was a sitting duck. Piastri then guaranteed he'd pass by going as fast as he dared - faster than Norris dared - through Eau Rouge."Oscar deserved it," as Norris it's not a given that the pole-winning driver will lose the lead at Spa at Les Combes - Charles Leclerc managed to retain it last year, for example. It depends on the for the remark about pole, yes, it's meant to be an advantage conferred on a driver as a reward for qualifying fastest. But it's no more than that. It does not mean the driver who secures it has a divine right to lead at the end of the first lap. Of course they don' why should anything be done about this at Spa in particular? Doing so would mean changing a historic, charismatic and demanding layout. And no one wants to lose that. Safety should and will be always be paramount in F1, but do you feel the FIA needs to recalibrate how to manage wet race conditions? Do you think the FIA's overly-conservative approach is hampering F1 drivers truly demonstrating their all-weather driving abilities? - HarjThere was a feeling after the Belgian Grand Prix that the race director had erred on the side of caution a little too much in deciding when the race should be Verstappen said he felt the race could have been run on schedule at 3pm local time, and that there was no need to red-flag it if they had just let the cars run for a couple more laps to clear some water from the he had a vested interest because Red Bull had changed his car to have more downforce than the McLarens and Leclerc's Ferrari exactly because they were anticipating Lewis Hamilton said he felt that even after the delay they could have started all the drivers acknowledged that they had asked race officials not to start a wet race too early, after an incident at Silverstone where they after a safety-car restart, Racing Bulls' Isack Hadjar smashed into the back of Kimi Antonelli's Mercedes at Copse simply because he could not see it before he hit also have to factor in the dangers of Spa, and the incidents that killed Anthoine Hubert in 2019 and Dilano van t'Hoft in 2023 in junior category of them crashed and then bounced back on to the track, where they were hit at high speed by another car, suffering fatal Piastri put it after the race: "Maybe we could have done one less formation lap. But in the grand scheme of things, if that's one lap too early, is it worth it? No." Is Lewis Hamilton's drop in performance caused by trying too hard and overthinking everything in the whole organisation? Surely there's only so much one person can do? - EdLewis Hamilton's Belgian Grand Prix weekend was actually an anomaly in what had been an encouraging run of form in recent a difficult start to the season, his average qualifying deficit to team-mate Charles Leclerc has been just 0.05 seconds since the Miami Grand Prix in May, and he had out-qualified Leclerc in three of the previous four by Hamilton's own admission, his driving in both qualifying sessions in Spa was "unacceptable".There were, though, extenuating circumstances. There were new braking characteristics on his car in Spa which Leclerc had been running since Canada, and Hamilton had chosen not to until Belgium. And Ferrari introduced a new rear suspension aimed at allowing them to run the car changes to car behaviour caught Hamilton out when he braked hard for the Bus Stop chicane in sprint also had a new data engineer, someone he had previously worked with at Mercedes, last weekend."It's not easy to switch engineers within the middle of a season," Hamilton said. "It's someone that I've known for years. He was actually on my previous team with me. But not in that position. So we're getting used to each other. Having to learn super, super quick."The changes that we had really caught both of us out."And he simply made a misjudgement in just exceeding track limits at Raidillon in qualifying for the grand prix. There was nothing wrong with his pace - he was within a smidge of Leclerc on that lap before it was nothing bigger behind the events of last weekend than that. If Red Bull's new engine next year is clearly down on performance and not likely to be a front-runner that season, how long will Max Verstappen hang around? When will we be able to form an impression of what next year's engine might be able to give him? - GeoffThe first thing to say here is that there is simply no way for anyone to know whether Red Bull's 2026 engine is "clearly down on performance".What can be said is that the F1 grapevine suggests Mercedes have a small advantage over the other manufacturers on their internal combustion engine performance for 2026 so manufacturers are working in isolation, and they will reject any suggestion they might be behind, figures creep out in various even if that's true, next year is not just about internal combustion engine performance. There is the electrical part of the engine, which provides about 50% of the total power output, and the new sustainable fuels, which will also have a significant relative performance levels will only become apparent next are also questions about Red Bull's car design group, of course, after their slump in form in the past 18 months following Adrian Newey's for Verstappen's future, you can pretty much take it as read that he will be staying at Red Bull in 2026. My sources tell me he doesn't want to leave, for a whole raft of given the above explained uncertainty, the logical decision anyway is to stay. That way, Verstappen can see how the land lies in 2026, and if Red Bull are struggling it will be contractually easier to move in that case as well.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri told by McLaren F1 boss what will decide title fight
McLaren pair Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris continued their extraordinarily tight Formula 1 title battle at the Belgian Grand Prix with the Aussie edging out his team-mate at Spa McLaren team principal Andrea Stella has told his title-chasing drivers exactly what factors will decide the outcome of their battle for individual glory. McLaren have been so dominant this year that the constructors' championship already looks like little more than a formality. They are 268 points ahead of nearest challengers Ferrari after only 13 rounds of the 24-race season. There is still a long way to go but, with most teams now focused on developing their 2026 cars for the new regulations, only a far-fetched series of events will stop them now. But there is still plenty to be decided in the hunt for the drivers' title. Max Verstappen is slipping further back and seems highly unlikely to make it five in a row now, and so it is down to the two McLaren drivers to beat each other to individual honours. Lando Norris looked to have been building momentum heading towards the summer break. His back-to-back wins in Austria and at Silverstone, in front of his home fans, saw him narrow the gap to Oscar Piastri above him in the championship to just a single-figure amount. But then the balance of power shifted again at Spa-Francorchamps. Norris got pole but it was Piastri who flew through on the first lap to take the lead and control of Sunday's Grand Prix and, from there, he controlled it with the finesse and calm for which the young Aussie has become so well respected during his still relatively short time in Formula 1. What is clear is that both drivers are operating at an astonishing level, no doubt being pushed to those heights by one another. The points gap between them has been very narrow for some time now and it looks likely to be the case for much of the rest of the year if they can both keep up this standard. Their boss Stella thinks their can and believes it will be the finest of margins which decides who will be the drivers' champion by the end of the year. He said: "There is very, very little between our two drivers, and this is because the two drivers are racing at a very, very high level. "We are lucky at McLaren to have two drivers that deservedly are fighting for the World Championship. I think the difference will be made by the accuracy, the precision, the quality of the execution. We saw in Silverstone that an issue, a sporting issue for Oscar during the Safety Car restart, and the consequent penalty cost him the race. And here we saw that somehow related to the circuit characteristic, like you said before, like it would have always been very difficult for Lando to keep the position, starting first, at the same restart. At the same time, I think Lando didn't help himself. So I think the execution is what is going to make the main difference. "We as a team, we will try and make sure that from a reliability point of view, from team operation point of view, we are as good as possible such that you will be the drivers deciding their own outcome in terms of competing for the Drivers' World Championship."
