logo
Rubio wants to ‘aggressively' revoke Chinese student visas. Trump officials won't say how they're vetting them

Rubio wants to ‘aggressively' revoke Chinese student visas. Trump officials won't say how they're vetting them

Yahoo3 days ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio plans to 'aggressively revoke' Chinese student visas, targeting students with 'connections to the Chinese Communist Party' and those who are 'studying in critical fields.'
His two-sentence announcement on Wednesday spared any details explaining how the administration plans to do any of that — blindsiding universities and foreign students now scrambling for guidance about what comes next.
But officials won't publicly say how they're deciding whether they believe students are connected to the country's ruling party or what those 'critical fields' of study even are.
'We don't give details about what our methods are,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters Thursday.
'Giving away the nature of how we choose to do things' could 'give up our hand' and undermine national security, she added.
The State Department says it's scrutinizing China's 'exploitation of universities' including 'theft of research, intellectual property and technologies' exported to students' home countries, according to Bruce.
'Everyone who is here on a visa has to recognize … that America takes their visas seriously,' she said. 'Vetting is not a one-time process, it's continuing. And if things happen — you get arrested, if there's some kind of an issue — it's probably going to be seen at some point.'
Chinese student visa holders 'must recognize' that the Trump administration is 'taking our national security seriously,' she added.
'And we are looking at their visas, and if everything's fine, terrific, but that will be a vetting that certainly continues and it's important clearly to the administration,' she said.
Rubio's announcement on Wednesday said the State Department will work with the Department of Homeland Security to 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.'
'We will also revise visa criteria to enhance scrutiny of all future visa applications from the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong,' he added.
Roughly 277,000 Chinese students studied in the United States last year, making them the second-largest group of foreign students in the country. Foreign students studying in the U.S. last year contributed approximately $44 billion to the U.S. economy.
The announcement also follows the Trump administration's attempt to revoke Harvard University's ability to enroll international students — which has been blocked in court — and Rubio's order to pause any new appointments for student visas globally.
The administration accused Harvard of 'coordinated activity' with China's ruling party, including 'training members of a CCP paramilitary group complicit in the Uyghur genocide.'
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem accused the university of 'fostering violence, antisemitism and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.'
'Chinese Communist Party' was emphasized in boldface.
The Trump administration has launched what critics argue is a politically motivated effort to bend universities and institutions to his ideological commands, including unprecedented scrutiny, funding threats and the arrests and deportations of foreign students involved in pro-Palestine demonstrations against Israel's war in Gaza.
Advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers argue the administration's latest maneuvers escalate a years-long campaign of xenophobia that now risks a serious brain drain in the U.S.
'The wholesale revocation of student visas based on national origin — and without an investigation — is xenophobic and wrong,' stated the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. 'Turning these students away — many of whom simply wish to learn in a free and democratic society — is not just shortsighted, but a betrayal of our values.'
Rubio's 'sweeping policies' targeting students based on their country of origin and field of study 'mark a dangerous escalation in xenophobic rhetoric and risk undermining America's global leadership in science, research, and innovation,' according to the Asian American Scholar Forum.
'This policy threatens to dismantle the international talent pipeline that has long fueled American innovation and excellence,' according to the group's executive director, Gisela Perez Kusakawa.
'Chinese students contribute immensely to our campuses, communities, and economy,' she said. 'Treating them with blanket suspicion not only violates principles of fairness, due process, and our democratic values — it sends a chilling message to the world that America no longer welcomes global talent.'
China's foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning also called Rubio's announcement 'politicized and discriminatory.' The action 'lays bare the U.S. lie that it upholds so-called freedom and openness,' she said Thursday.
Hong Kong's Chief Executive John Lee told lawmakers that the city would welcome students who 'face unfair treatment' in the United States. 'I think this is an opportunity for Hong Kong,' he said Thursday. 'We will work with our universities to provide the best support and assistance.'
A widely shared post from Hong Kong's University of Science and Technology also invited Harvard students to the school to 'continue their academic pursuits' following Trump's threats to international student visas at the Ivy League school.
Average in-state tuition at public colleges and universities is roughly $21,270, and $37,430 for out-of-state. International students pay between $874 and $5,218 more in tuition and fees than out-of-state students, according to a report from the American Council on Education, which represents leaders at 1,600 colleges and universities.
Private tuition rates are thousands of dollars higher.
If Rubio pulls Chinese student visas, the 'damage' to the United States could be 'enormous and hard to undo,' according to Holger Hestermeyer, Professor of international law at King's College London.
'Now imagine your family in China coughs up that money. And after two years your visa is pulled,' he wrote. 'Refunds? What happens now? And for all future students: is that a risk worth taking?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil Advances as OPEC+ Supply Boost Vies With Geopolitical Risk
Oil Advances as OPEC+ Supply Boost Vies With Geopolitical Risk

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil Advances as OPEC+ Supply Boost Vies With Geopolitical Risk

(Bloomberg) -- Oil advanced as OPEC+ hiked production less than some had feared and geopolitical concerns flared over Ukraine and Iran. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months Brent crude for August rose toward $65 a barrel after losing 2.2% last week, while West Texas Intermediate was above $62. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies agreed on Saturday to add 411,000 barrels a day of supply in July, matching expectations, but defying reports late last week that the group was considering an even bigger volume. Meanwhile, Ukraine struck air bases deep in Russia and Iran criticized a report showing its growing stockpiles of enriched uranium, in escalations that reduce the chance of more supply from the sanctioned OPEC+ members entering the market. Trade frictions also remained in focus, after President Donald Trump said he would be increasing tariffs on steel and aluminum. Monday's move higher comes after a turbulent two months that saw prices tumble to a four-year low in the wake of Trump's tariff wars, before recuperating some of those losses. Crude remains almost 15% lower this year, pressured by the simmering trade conflicts and the abandoning by OPEC+ of its former strategy of defending higher prices by curbing output. OPEC+ officials said the quota boost reflected Saudi Arabia's desire to punish over-producing members such as Kazakhstan and Iraq. Some members — including Russia, Algeria and Oman — had wanted a pause. The group next meets on July 6 to discuss output levels for August. 'Brent should be well supported in the middle of our expected $60-$65 summer range until we get a better understanding of how quickly actual OPEC production is rising,' said Robert Rennie, head of commodity and carbon research at Westpac Banking Corp. in Sydney. 'We may be seeing signs that the pace of increase could slow in the coming months' as some members had wanted a lull in the quota hikes. YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies
The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies

WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Poland has elected Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian and staunch nationalist, as its next president in a closely watched vote that signals a resurgence of right-wing populism in the heart of Europe. Nawrocki, who is set to take office on Aug. 6, is expected to shape the country's domestic and foreign policy in ways that could strain ties with Brussels while aligning the Central European nation of nearly 38 million people more closely with the administration of President Donald Trump in the United States. Here are some key takeaways: Nawrocki's victory underscores the enduring appeal of nationalist rhetoric among about half of the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union, and its deep social divisions. The 42-year-old historian who had no previous political experience built his campaign on patriotic themes, traditional Catholic values, and a vow to defend Poland's sovereignty against the EU and larger European nations like Germany. His win also reflects the appeal of right-wing nationalism across Europe, where concerns about migration, national sovereignty, and cultural identity have led to surging support for parties on the right — even the far right in recent times. Far-right candidates did very well in Poland's first round of voting two weeks earlier, underlining the appeal of the nationalist and conservative views. Nawrocki picked up many of those votes. As his supporters celebrate his win, those who voted for the defeated liberal candidate, Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, worry that it will hasten the erosion of liberal democratic norms. Nawrocki's presidency presents a direct challenge to Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who returned to power in late 2023 pledging to mend relations with the EU and restore judicial independence which Brussels said was eroded by Law and Justice, the party that backed Nawrocki. But Tusk's coalition — a fragile alliance of centrists, leftists, and agrarian conservatives — has struggled to push through key promises including a civil union law for same-sex couples and a less restrictive abortion law. Nawrocki, who opposes such measures, will have the power to veto legislation, complicating Tusk's agenda and potentially triggering political gridlock. Nawrocki's election could signal a stronger relationship between Poland and the Trump administration. Poland and the U.S. are close allies, and there are 10,000 U.S. troops stationed in Poland, but Tusk and his partners in the past have been critical of Trump. Nawrocki, however, has a worldview closely aligned with Trump and his Make America Great Again ethos. Trump welcomed Nawrocki to the White House a month ago and his administration made clear in other ways that he was its preferred candidate. While Nawrocki has voiced support for Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, he does not back Ukrainian membership in NATO and has questioned the long-term costs of aid — particularly support for refugees. His rhetoric has at times echoed that of Trump, for instance by accusing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of what he said was insufficient gratitude for Poland's assistance. With growing public fatigue over helping Ukrainian refugees, Nawrocki's approach could shift Poland's posture from strong ally to conditional partner if the war drags on much longer. The election result is a setback for the EU, which had welcomed Tusk's return in 2023 as a signal of renewed pro-European engagement. Nawrocki and the Law and Justice party have criticized what nationalists view as EU overreach into Poland's national affairs, especially regarding judicial reforms and migration policy. While the president does not control day-to-day diplomacy, Nawrocki's symbolic and veto powers could frustrate Brussels' efforts to bring Poland back into alignment with bloc standards, particularly on rule-of-law issues. Though an EU member, Poland has its own currency, the zloty, which weakened slightly on Monday morning, reflecting investor concerns over potential policy instability and renewed tensions with EU institutions. Billions of euros in EU funding has been linked to judicial reforms which Tusk's government will now be unlikely to enact without presidential cooperation.

List of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website following criticism

time16 minutes ago

List of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website following criticism

WASHINGTON -- A widely anticipated list of ' sanctuary jurisdictions' no longer appears on the Department of Homeland Security's website after receiving widespread criticism for including localities that have actively supported the Trump administration's hard-line immigration policies. The department last week published the list of the jurisdictions. It said each one would receive formal notification the government deemed them uncooperative with federal immigration enforcement and whether they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. The list was published Thursday on the department's website but on Sunday there was a 'Page Not Found" error message in its place. The list was part of the Trump administration's efforts to target communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren't doing enough to help its immigration enforcement agenda and the promises the president made to deport more than 11 million people living in the U.S. without legal authorization. The list is being constantly reviewed and can be changed at any time and will be updated regularly, a DHS senior official said. 'Designation of a sanctuary jurisdiction is based on the evaluation of numerous factors, including self-identification as a Sanctuary Jurisdiction, noncompliance with Federal law enforcement in enforcing immigration laws, restrictions on information sharing, and legal protections for illegal aliens,' the official said in a statement. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that there had been anger from some officials about the list. However, she didn't address why it was removed. 'Some of the cities have pushed back,' Noem said. 'They think because they don't have one law or another on the books that they don't qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals.' The list, which was riddled with misspellings, received pushback from officials in communities spanning from urban to rural and blue to red who said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California, the city of Huntington Beach made the list even though it had filed a lawsuit challenging the state's immigration sanctuary law and passed a resolution this year declaring the community a 'non-sanctuary city.' Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his community must have been a clerical error. Davel voted for Trump as did 67% of Shawano County. Davel thinks the administration may have confused the county's vote in 2021 to become a 'Second Amendment Sanctuary County' that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants. He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store