Texas moves closer to land ban for non-resident citizens of China, Russia, others
On Friday, the Texas House voted to pass Senate Bill 17 after adding seven amendments to the bill on Thursday evening. The bill will now head back to the Senate to either adopt the House's changes, or to start a conferencing committee to find common ground.
In 2021, the Texas Legislature unanimously passed Senate Bill 2116, preventing China, North Korea, Iran and Russia from connecting to critical Texas infrastructure due to national security concerns.
In 2023, State Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, tried to build off the legislation by preventing citizens of the same nations from buying Texas land.
'Texans have raised concerns of national security ranging from energy security to food security,' Kolkhorst wrote in her statement of intent. 'Preventing private property rights from being controlled by entities from adversarial nations is key to ensuring national security.'
The bill underwent several changes due to concerns over rights violations and was eventually killed in the Texas House.
State Sen. Matt Shaheen, R-Plano, introduced an amendment to make those who live in the U.S. legally eligible to buy land regardless of nationality. While the amendment passed 120-19, it immediately drew backlash from some conservative activists and lawmakers on social media.
'3/4 of Republicans vote to allow Chinese nationals with student visas to buy land,' Former Texas GOP Chairman Matt Rinaldi said on X. 'Just enroll in an ESL course at a local community college and you are good.'
'Here's a short explanation on how this guts the bill,' Rinaldi said in a follow-up post. 'Chinese nationals (even those who are members of the CCP) are not prohibited from getting tourist visas (B-2). Once in the United States, immigration lawyers will advise them to enroll in an ESL or other course at a local community college, so they can change their status to a student visa (F-1), which can last 5 years.'
Rinaldi supported three other amendments brought forward by Republicans. The first, by State Rep. Steve Toth, R-Spring, prevented citizens of China, Russia, North Korea and Iran from leasing land for more than a year. Previously, the bill allowed for 99-year leases.
The second, brought forward by State Rep. Mitch Little, R-Dallas, prevented those who are 'a member of the ruling political party or any subdivision of the ruling political party in a designated country,' from owning Texas land.
The last, brought by State Rep. Nate Schatzline, R-Fort Worth, allows the governor to designate new nations to the designated country list at will. Schatzline specifically mentioned Venezuela and the gang Tren de Aragua as a reason the governor may have to act quickly.
On Friday before the third reading, two attempts were made to undo the controversial Shaheen amendment. Both times the amendments failed because they didn't receive the two-thirds majority needed to amend a bill on third reading, but both times they received a majority vote.
'The [Shaheen] amendment… it's not in the Senate bill,' Chuck Guo said. Guo is a Chinese citizen who practices immigration law in Texas on a H-1B visa. 'They will maybe listen to the proponents of the bill to strengthen the bill and to strip the [Shaheen] amendment from the bill that will eventually become law.'
Guo has been concerned about SB 17 since it was first floated as SB 147 in 2023. On Saturday morning, he's helping host a rally outside the Texas Capitol in opposition to the bill.
'Discrimination is still discrimination,' Guo said. 'It is targeting the entire community and is creating a chilling effect.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Says Decision on Marijuana Classification Coming in Weeks
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump said Monday he is considering whether to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug and would decide in 'the next few weeks.' Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Trump told reporters that he had discussed the issue with many people and found deep divisions, with some proponents of changing the drug's status stressing its medical benefits while opponents said the move posed a risk to children. 'I've heard great things having to do with medical, and I've had bad things having to do with just about everything else but medical,' Trump said. 'And, you know, for pain and various things, I've heard some pretty good things, but for other things, I've heard some pretty bad things.' Trump told attendees at a fundraiser in New Jersey earlier this month that he was considering the change, the Wall Street Journal reported. The federal government currently classifies marijuana under Schedule I, which is for drugs with no medical use and a high potential for abuse. Reclassifying the drug could make it easier to buy and sell cannabis. Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie It's Only a Matter of Time Until Americans Pay for Trump's Tariffs ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mar-a-Lago member offers free pierogi for life to Alan Dershowitz after Martha's Vineyard rebuff
With a Martha's Vineyard vendor refusing to cede to Alan Dershowitz's pierogi demands, a South Florida restaurant owner -- who happens to be a member of Donald Trump's private Mar-a-lago resort -- has stepped up and offered free dumplings for life to the former Jeffrey Epstein lawyer. In the latest of Dershowitz's social sufferings at the exclusive summer playground for the ultra-wealthy, the one-time Trump attorney threatened to file a discrimination lawsuit after he was denied pierogi at a farmer's market in July. Dershowitz claimed that the owner of Good Pierogi refused to serve him 'for political reasons' and his support of Zionist causes, suggesting the vendor was antisemitic. After railing against the 'bigoted vendor' online, claiming Good Pierogi's food was 'tainted with the poison of antisemitism' and urging others to boycott the stand, Dershowitz returned to the market last week to once again try to buy some of the doughy treats. Instead, owner Krem Miskevich – who has cited Dershowitz's defense of Epstein as the reason to refuse him service – again turned him away. Good Pierogi supporters chanted 'time to go' at the famed lawyer. After Dershowitz ran to MAGA-supporting media to complain about the ongoing ordeal of his pierogi-less existence on the island, a sympathetic restaurateur came to the rescue to fill all of the 86-year-old Harvard Law emeritus' Eastern European dumpling needs. 'Pierogi should bring people together — not divide them,' Peter Nowocien, owner of PierogiOne restaurant, told the New York Post this week. Nowocien, who is a member of Mar-a-Lago and recently hosted an event at the president's South Florida club, said that no one should ever be denied pierogi before declaring that he'd send Dershowitz and his family free food for life. The restaurant owner, a Polish immigrant who moved to the United States six years ago, told the Post that 'Dershowitz's disturbing experience did not sit right' with him because of his experience growing up in the shadow of Poland's communist regime. 'As a Polish immigrant, I hate to hear about discrimination in the US because of people's political views. That shouldn't happen here,' the Trump-supporting Nowocien said, adding that his father fought against communism. 'Discrimination breeds injustice.' Nowocien also noted that while Dershowitz, who is Jewish, may not be willing to sample his restaurant's Philly cheesesteak, spicy beef, or bacon and cheddar pierogi options, the lawyer could choose the classic cheese and potato variety. Meanwhile, it would appear that – at least for the time being – Dershowitz is going to stop trying to force Good Pierogi to serve him. Following last week's spectacle that saw him shouted out of the market, Semafor's Max Tani asked Dershowitz whether he would return over the weekend to try again. 'Heading to Israel, where they will sell me better pierogi,' the lawyer, who is a fervent supporter of pro-Israeli causes, replied. The Independent has contacted Dershowitz for comment. Dershowitz's war on the West Tisbury pierogi stand began in earnest at the end of last month, when he made a huge public stink after Miskevich refused to sell to him, prompting him to upload a 30-minute video about the 'bigoted vendor' while threatening a lawsuit against Good Pierogi and the local farmer's market. While noting that Miskevich brought up his past defense of deceased sex offender Epstein when refusing him service, Dershowitz has since alleged that the vendor – who is Jewish – turned him away because they are antisemitic. (Miskevinc uses they/them pronouns.) 'As I correctly suspected, the bigot who refused to sell me perogi [sic] — Krem Miskevich — is a notorious anti-semite who is part of an anti-semitic organization that protests Jewish — not only Israeli— cultural events and doesn't believe in Israel's right to exist or to respond to what these haters regard as the 'justified' massacres of Oct 7,' Dershowitz tweeted last week, adding: 'Don't patronize anti-semites who refuse to sell to Jewish Zionists.' Miskevich responded to Dershowitz's accusations by noting that they 'experienced a surge of emotion' when the lawyer appeared at the stand last month because he's represented and befriended 'several sexual predators and abusers including Jeffrey Epstein,' adding that they know many people who have been sexual assault victims. Miskevich also said Dershowitz 'began to harass us, misgender me, and film us without our consent.' Additionally, they pointed out that not only are they Jewish, but they have immediate family members in Israel and friends on the island sometimes refer to them as 'Rabbi Klem.' Despite Dershowitz's vow to boycott Good Pierogi, the celebrity attorney turned up Wednesday to join the long line of customers – most of whom were there to show support for Good Pierogi – looking to purchase the vendor's dumplings. 'I'm here in an effort to try to restore community and to ask you to sell me pierogi in the interest of keeping the island together so we don't have to have two pierogi stands: one for anti-Zionists and one for people who will sell to anybody,' Dershowitz said. 'So I'd ask you to please just sell me any one of your products to show that you're prepared to sell to anybody and not allow your anti-Zionism to decide which people you'll sell to.' Miskevich did not budge, telling Dershowitz that they were 'very surprised that you're here because of the things that you've been saying about us and the business online,' while others rejected Dershowitz's blanket accusations of anti-Zionism and antisemitism. Good Pierogi later posted on social media to thank customers for 'showing up for us in such a visible and powerful way,' adding that they are 'saddened by the lengths to which a disgruntled person will go' and that they 'will not give them any more air.' As for Dershowitz's threats to sue the farmer's market and Good Pierogi for discrimination, legal experts have said that he would likely lose on the merits of the case if he decided to go to court. 'If he tried to claim that he was denied service based on his politics or the clients he has served, it would seem no,' powerhouse law firm Kelley Drye noted. 'Neither Massachusetts state law nor federal law recognize a claim for discrimination on the basis of political beliefs, affiliations, or activities in public accommodations. In fact, almost all jurisdictions, including New York, do not protect political beliefs or political associations under the applicable public accommodation laws.' Dershowitz's past representation of Epstein has attracted renewed interest in recent weeks amid uproar over the Trump administration's handling of the disgraced financier's case. The lawyer helped negotiate a plea deal in 2008 that granted Epstein immunity from federal charges related to sexual abuse of minors, allowing the disgraced financier to plead guilty to state charges of procuring prostitution of an underage girl, in which he served just a 13-month sentence.
E&E News
27 minutes ago
- E&E News
GOP looking again at imposing a federal fee for electric cars
Republicans in both chambers are looking to revive the idea of creating the first-ever annual federal fee for electric vehicles — despite the political uproar generated by a broader car fee proposed in a draft of the GOP's megalaw. The fee would help address — but not completely close — the country's infrastructure spending deficit, offering the Highway Trust Fund its first significant revenue expansion in decades. But getting it through Congress will be a challenge. House Transportation Chair Sam Graves (R-Mo.) generated a bipartisan backlash this spring when he proposed annual registration fees — $250 for electric vehicles, $100 for hybrids and $20 for all other vehicles — in the initial House version of the GOP's megabill (H.R. 1). He almost immediately had to strip out the $20 fee, and the other fees died in the Senate before the bill was signed into law. Advertisement But Graves wants to resurrect some version of that fee in the next surface transportation bill, which needs to be reauthorized by September 2026. The exact fee structure is far from determined, though it's clear that any new fee for vehicles that run purely on gasoline is not politically viable.
