logo
MANDEL: Lawyer temporarily suspended over allegations of "reprehensible" conduct

MANDEL: Lawyer temporarily suspended over allegations of "reprehensible" conduct

Yahoo2 days ago
Toronto lawyer Andrew Rogerson once made headlines for launching a $5.5 million lawsuit against Havergal, claiming the private girls' school failed to protect his daughter from bullying.
Six years later, the Toronto lawyer's reputation is in tatters with allegations he ignored a court injunction to return a $90,000 retainer and even helped a client move $1 million in gold bars that were ordered frozen. While he denies their findings and appeals the decision of the Northwest Territories court and the Law Society of Ontario investigates the allegations against him, Rogerson has been suspended from practising in Ontario.
'We have reasonable grounds to believe there is a significant risk of harm, both to members of the public and to the public interest in the administration of justice, if the respondent continues to practise law while these investigations continue,' says a recent decision by the Law Society Tribunal.
The tribunal quoted from the NWT Supreme Court's 'scathing' judgment that called Rogerson's behaviour 'reprehensible:'
'Refusing to be cross-examined by a female member of the bar, for an invented and meritless reason, and then dismissing her with a sexist remark, is reprehensible,' the court wrote. 'Refusing to properly account for the dissipation of trust funds, much less ones restrained by Court Order, is reprehensible.'
Rogerson didn't respond to a request for comment.
In 2023, Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation in the Northwest Territories accused Ron Barlas of funnelling millions of dollars that should have gone to the First Nation into companies he controlled, allegations he denied. Just two days before Barlas knew his worldwide assets were going to be frozen over the alleged fraud, he wired the $90,000 retainer to Rogerson.
The NWT court found Rogerson not only refused to return the money frozen under the Mareva order issued on April 28, 2023 but he spent it, and not on any legal work invoiced to, or approved by, his client. 'I find as a fact that the purported fees were contrivances to justify draining the retainer,' wrote Justice N.E. Devlin in a March decision.
'Even more troublingly, in May 2023, Rogerson facilitated the shipment of more than $1 million worth of gold and silver bullion (since returned) from Barlas' possession in the Northwest Territories to his offices in Ontario. I find as a fact that he did so in knowing breach of the Mareva Order.'
Rogerson was ordered to return the retainer and pay almost $47,000 in legal costs. The judge also sent his ruling to the Law Society of Ontario. A few months later, the LSO applied to the tribunal to have Rogerson's licence temporarily suspended while they investigate.
It wouldn't be the first time. Earlier this year, the Law Society Tribunal suspended Rogerson for a month for sexual harassment of a female employee.
Recommended video
As for the Havergal lawsuit, he's been repeatedly criticized by Ontario judges for flouting court orders, continually delaying the process and not paying $145,000 in legal costs awarded to the other side. He blamed financial and health problems. Last year, Superior Court Justice William Chalmers finally stayed the lawsuit for Rogerson's 'complete disregard' for court processes.
In this case, the tribunal found there are enough red flags to warrant suspending Rogerson while the law society investigates the findings in the NWT court decision.
'The allegations of misappropriating or misapplying trust funds are serious. So are the allegations that the respondent consciously defied a court order and obstructed a court process. If proven, they would demonstrate that the respondent profoundly lacks integrity as a lawyer,' concluded Paul Aterman on behalf of the three-member panel.
'The concerns around integrity would be compounded if it is also shown that the respondent treats women colleagues in a sexist manner.'
So for now, this lawyer is indefinitely out of office.
mmandel@postmedia.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets
Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elizabeth Warren Probes Lutnick Son on Reported Tariff Bets

(Bloomberg) — Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Ron Wyden wrote a letter to Cantor Fitzgerald LP Chairman Brandon Lutnick raising questions about possible conflicts of interest and insider trading in bets the firm reportedly made on the legality of Trump administration tariffs. Lutnick is the son of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, a key figure in the Trump administration's tariff policies. The letter, dated Wednesday, was released by the senators on Thursday morning. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The firm's alleged bets on the legality of the tariffs were reported by Wired in July. 'What is being reported about our business is absolutely false. Cantor is not in the business of positioning any risk, taking views or facilitating business in litigation claims involving the legality of US tariffs,' Cantor Fitzgerald spokesperson Erica Chase said in a statement. —With assistance from Todd Gillespie. Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Electric Pickup Truck Boom Turned Into a Big Bust ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over ‘salacious' Epstein comments
Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over ‘salacious' Epstein comments

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over ‘salacious' Epstein comments

US first lady Melania Trump has demanded that Hunter Biden retract comments linking her to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and threatened to sue if he does not. Ms Trump takes issue with two comments Mr Biden, son of former president Joe Biden, made in an interview this month with American journalist Andrew Callaghan. He alleged that Epstein introduced the first lady to now-President Donald Trump. The statements are false, defamatory and 'extremely salacious' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in a letter to Mr Biden. Mr Biden's remarks were widely disseminated on social media and reported by media outlets around the world, causing the first lady 'to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm', he wrote. Mr Biden made the Epstein comments during a sprawling interview in which he lashed out at 'elites' and others in the Democratic Party he says undermined his father before he dropped out of last year's presidential campaign. 'Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep,' Mr Biden said in one of the comments Ms Trump disputes. Mr Biden attributed the claim to author Michael Wolff, whom Mr Trump disparaged in June as a 'Third Rate Reporter'. He has accused Mr Wolff of making up stories to sell books. The first lady's threats echo a favoured strategy of her husband, who has aggressively used litigation to go after critics. Public figures like the Trumps face a high bar to succeed in a defamation case. The president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modelling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998. The letter is dated August 6 and was first reported on Wednesday by Fox News Digital. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer who has represented Mr Biden in his criminal cases and to whom Brito's letter is addressed, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

KOREN: TIFF's shameful erasure of the Israeli perspective
KOREN: TIFF's shameful erasure of the Israeli perspective

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

KOREN: TIFF's shameful erasure of the Israeli perspective

The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) has long prided itself on being one of the world's premier cultural events — an institution that champions artistic integrity, fearless storytelling, and the exchange of ideas. This week, it abandoned all of that. TIFF quietly dropped The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue from its lineup. The documentary, by Canadian filmmaker Barry Avrich, tells the harrowing true story of Noam Tibon, who drove from Tel Aviv to Kibbutz Nahal Oz on October 7 to rescue his son and two young granddaughters trapped in a safe room while Hamas terrorists rampaged through southern Israel — murdering, raping, and kidnapping civilians. These atrocities were proudly recorded by the terrorists themselves, often on GoPros, and broadcast for the world to see. The film is not propaganda. It is not even political. It is a deeply human story about courage, family, and survival in the face of unimaginable evil. By any honest standard, it belongs at TIFF. After public criticism, TIFF CEO Cameron Bailey apologized and said he would explore ways to reinstate the film. That's welcome — but it only underscores how quickly the festival's first instinct was to sideline the Israeli perspective, and how reluctant it remains to defend that perspective on principle. The official reason for the removal? Copyright concerns. According to the festival, the filmmakers did not have permission to use some of the October 7 footage. In other words, TIFF is faulting them for not obtaining a release form from Hamas terrorists. This is not just absurd — it is shameful. The decision is also a betrayal of TIFF's own stated mission: To 'enlighten, enrich understanding, and foster empathy.' How can you foster empathy while erasing an entire perspective from the public square? Let's be clear about what is happening. TIFF is not just avoiding controversy; it is preemptively silencing the Israeli narrative. The festival is operating on the same three principles adopted by Arab leaders at the Khartoum Conference of 1967: No peace, no recognition, no negotiations. The anti-Israel movement in the West has embraced these principles more rigidly than many Arab states themselves. And now, TIFF has chosen to comply — whether out of fear, convenience, or both. This is not an isolated act. Across North America and Europe, the Israeli perspective is being pushed out of cultural spaces. Plays cancelled. Exhibits pulled. Speakers shouted down. Filmmakers told to find another platform. The goal is not debate — it is erasure. The irony is that Israel's enemies often claim they want dialogue, 'critical conversations,' and 'multiple narratives.' But in practice, their position is simple: The Israeli narrative has no right to exist. It must be excluded, shamed and buried. And the more violent and disruptive the threats, the faster institutions fold. TIFF's decision comes at a perilous time. Canada is moving toward recognizing a Palestinian state, even as Hamas openly calls on supporters to escalate violence worldwide. In recent months, Jewish Canadians have been assaulted in Victoria, Montreal, and Saint John. Synagogues, schools, and businesses have been vandalized. The message from extremists is unmistakable: There is no place for Jews — physically or narratively — in public life. By caving to that pressure, TIFF has sent a chilling message to Toronto's Jewish community, which has played an integral role in the festival's history: Your stories are not safe here. This is more than a snub to one filmmaker. It is a test of whether our cultural institutions have the courage to live up to their own values. TIFF's choice makes the answer clear: When forced to choose between artistic integrity and political convenience, it will choose convenience every time. WARMINGTON: TIFF film censorship shows Toronto's antisemitism to the world KINSELLA: Public humiliation a familiar tactic for antisemites There was a time when film festivals understood their role. They were guardians of expression, even when the stories they screened were uncomfortable or unpopular. They believed audiences were capable of engaging with difficult truths. They knew that empathy cannot be selective — that the whole point of art is to bridge human experience, not narrow it. By uninviting The Road Between Us, TIFF has failed that role. It has told the world that the Israeli perspective is too dangerous to be shown — not because it is false, but because it might make some people uncomfortable. That is not integrity. It is capitulation. And it will not end here. If the precedent stands, it will be easier to erase the next Israeli story, and the one after that, until an entire people's lived experience is absent from our cultural record. That is how erasure works — not with one grand act of censorship, but with a thousand small acts of cowardice. TIFF now has a second chance. It can follow through on the CEO's apology and reinstate the film, standing by the principle that art is for everyone — not just those with the loudest, angriest voices. To do otherwise is to abandon the very foundation of artistic freedom. There is still time for TIFF to prove it has the courage to live by its mission. But every day it delays, the damage grows — not just to its reputation, but to the cultural fabric of this city. Because if a film about a grandfather rescuing his family from terrorists can't be shown at a festival supposedly dedicated to truth and empathy, then TIFF is no longer a festival. It's a filter. And the stories it filters out are the ones we most need to see. — Daniel Koren is the Founder and Executive Director of Allied Voices for Israel

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store