UK threatens to sue Abramovich over Chelsea sale
The UK government has threatened to sue former Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich to make sure the money from the club's sale goes to Ukraine.
The £2.5bn in proceeds have been frozen in a UK bank account since the sale, with Mr Abramovich sanctioned after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
The UK government wants the money to be for Ukrainian humanitarian aid, but Mr Abramovich has said he wants it to go to "all victims of the war in Ukraine".
In a joint statement, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required."
They said they wanted "to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible".
They added: "The government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion.
"We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far".
The delay in releasing the funds centres on a disagreement between the UK government and his lawyers.
Mr Abramovich - a Russian billionaire who made his fortune in oil and gas - was granted a special licence to sell Chelsea following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, providing he could prove he would not benefit from the sale.
He is alleged to have strong ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, something he has denied.
He cannot access the £2.5bn sale proceeds under UK sanctions but the money still legally belongs to him.
When he announced his decision to sell the club, he said proceeds from the sale would be donated via a foundation "for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine", which would include those in Russia.
The UK government has pushed back and argued that the funds should only be spent on humanitarian efforts inside Ukraine.
A House of Lords committee said last year said it was "incomprehensible" that Mr Abramovich's promise to use the funds to support Ukraine remained unfulfilled, and that the assets remained frozen.
"This impasse reflects badly on both Mr Abramovich and the government, which ought to have pushed for a more binding commitment," the report said.
Labour ministers yet to hold talks over Abramovich funds
Abramovich tax dodge must be probed, HMRC urged
Roman Abramovich could owe UK £1bn over tax dodge that helped bankroll Chelsea FC
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
25 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Mideast Power Plays in India and Pakistan
Israeli weapons played an important role in last month's conflict between India and Pakistan, highlighting the flourishing India-Israel defense partnership. Israel unequivocally backed New Delhi, and the accuracy of India's Israeli-made weapons contrasted with the ineffectiveness of Pakistan's Turkish-made drones, which appear to have done little damage to Indian targets. Nitin Gokhale, a prominent Indian national-security analyst, says in a phone interview that Israeli drones, including the precision-guided Palm 400, Harop suicide drone and radar-destroying Harpy, performed well during the conflict. According to Mr. Gokhale, the Indian military is also pleased with its French fighter jets, Russian missile defense and the co-developed BrahMos missile, U.S. surveillance aircraft, and the indigenously developed Akash air-defense missile. How did Israel become a major arms supplier to India, the world's second-largest arms importer behind Ukraine? By developing a reputation in New Delhi for dependability in a crunch. Many Israeli weapons are on the cutting edge of technology that India seeks. And Israeli defense firms work closely with local counterparts. Israel Aerospace Industries has several joint ventures with Indian companies and set up an Indian subsidiary. Israel's Elbit Systems collaborates with Bharat Forge to make artillery and mortar systems and with Adani Defence & Aerospace to make drones. For India, cooperation with Israel diversifies its supply chain and expands its access to high-tech weapons. For Israel, access to the Indian market expands its defense-industrial base. The India-Israel partnership also benefits the U.S., whose own weapons sales to India have grown significantly over the past 25 years. India's turn toward American allies draws New Delhi closer to the West and reduces its dependence on Russian weapons.
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Drone attacks are the new front in war. NATO is trying to catch up.
'This is more than an isolated incident — it's a glimpse into the character of future conflict, where war won't be confined to neatly drawn front lines,' said James Patton Rogers, a drone warfare expert at Cornell University. He said the urgent question for NATO, after 'an impressive attack by Ukraine,' is to determine the vulnerabilities of its own air bases, bombers, and critical infrastructure. Before the Ukrainian barrage, Russia had intensified a near-daily deluge of long-range drones to attack military and civilian targets across Ukraine, demonstrating an ability to launch thousands of uncrewed aircraft as quickly as they are built, experts said. By comparison, defense manufacturers in the United States and Europe have struggled for more than three years to ramp up weapons production. Advertisement NATO knows it has much to learn. This year, NATO opened a joint training center with Ukrainian forces in Poland to share lessons from Russia's invasion. Ukraine's military is the largest (aside from Russia's) and most battled-tested in Europe, even if it is struggling to maintain territory in its border region. Advertisement At the same time, much of the military alliance is still focused on warfare of the past and unable to keep up with an unending stream of cyberattacks and other hybrid activity that threatens energy infrastructure, financial institutions, and government databases lying far beyond traditional front lines. China protects its aircraft with more than 3,000 hardened shelters, while the United States has exposed tarmacs 'and assumptions,' Simone Ledeen, a top Pentagon policy official during President Trump's first term, wrote on social media after Ukraine's broad drone attack. 'A well-timed swarm could blind us before we're airborne,' Ledeen wrote. The US military reported 350 drone sightings across about 100 military installations last year, General Gregory Guillot, the head of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, told lawmakers in February. A new government review of Britain's defense capabilities, released this week, made clear that other alliance members are also aware of their vulnerabilities. If forced to fight in the next few years, the review said, Britain and its allies could find themselves battling adversaries with newer weapons and technology. It called for heavy investment in air and land drones, including stockpiling one-way attack drones — those that kill by smashing into their targets and exploding. 'Whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces the quickest will win,' the review noted. Both Russia and Ukraine have spent billions of dollars to build their respective drone fleets since the war began. Two years ago, Ukraine produced about 800,000 drones; this year it is projected to churn out more than 5 million, said Kateryna Bondar, a former adviser to Ukraine's government who is now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies research group in Washington. Among them are weapons known as 'missile drones' because they can purportedly fly as far as 1,800 miles. Advertisement Just last weekend, before the surprise attack on Russia, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine told allies he hoped to scale up his military's drone program with additional financial backing. 'Our operations show the impact that investment can have, especially in drones,' he said. Britain agreed, pledging Wednesday to help Ukraine procure 100,000 drones this year — 10 times more than initially planned. Russia, which is projected to spend more than 7 percent of its gross domestic product on defense this year, has saturated Ukraine's skies and overwhelmed its air defenses with more than 1,000 drones each week since March, experts say. Most of them are Geran-series drones — Russia's homegrown version of the Iranian-designed long-range Shahed attack aircraft — some of which cost as little as $20,000 to build. While far cheaper than, for example, a $1 million long-range Storm Shadow missile, the Geran drones are still likely costing Russia several millions of dollars each day. 'If they can launch hundreds of these a day, that means they have to manufacture hundreds of these a day as well,' said Samuel Bendett, an expert on Russian drones and other weapons at the Center for Naval Analysis. The uptick has coincided with cease-fire talks Trump is pushing as Russia seeks to seize more territory in Ukraine before any settlement is reached. It also aims to remind the world of Russia's enduring might — even if it still suffers setbacks like Ukraine's weekend strikes. Advertisement 'No one, really, in Europe is prepared to adequately handle this type of threat,' Bendett said. This article originally appeared in
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Putin Vows to Take Revenge on Ukraine in Call With Trump
Good morning. Vladimir Putin vows to strike back at Ukraine. Japan's ispace takes another shot at landing on the moon. And a Singapore company hopes to turn its new hospital in China into a hot spot for medical tourism. Listen to the day's top stories. Prospects of a US-brokered ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine took another hit, with Donald Trump saying Vladimir Putin warned that he would retaliate for Ukraine's shocking drone strike on Russian airfields. The pair also discussed Iran and the Russian president's potential involvement in nuclear talks. The call came as Putin rebuffed an offer from Volodymyr Zelenskiy for direct discussion.
