logo
#

Latest news with #Abramovich

Synagogue set alight, protest at Israeli restaurant
Synagogue set alight, protest at Israeli restaurant

The Advertiser

time05-07-2025

  • Politics
  • The Advertiser

Synagogue set alight, protest at Israeli restaurant

An arson attack at a synagogue has forced worshippers to flee, just as protesters descended on an Israeli restaurant nearby shouting "offensive chants". About 20 people at the synagogue fled after a man doused the front of the East Melbourne building in a flammable liquid and set it alight about 8pm on Friday, police said. Everyone inside was able to evacuate through a rear exit and there are no reports of injuries. Firefighters contained blaze to the front of the building. "Police are still working to establish the exact circumstances surrounding the fire including the motivation behind the incident," a Victoria Police spokesperson said. "There is absolutely no place in our society for anti-Semitic or hate-based behaviour." The East Melbourne Synagogue, on of Australia's oldest, is located close to Victoria's parliament in the heart of the city. The suspect was last seen fleeing down Albert Street towards the CBD. A short time later, protesters gathered outside Israeli restaurant Miznon on Hardware Lane in the heart of the city. Police say about 20 demonstrators shouted "offensive chants" and were directed to leave the area. Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich said diners were terrorised as the group chanted "Death to the IDF". "Melbourne, for one night, stopped being a safe place for Jews," Dr Abramovich said. One person was arrested for hindering police and several others were spoken to by investigators. The force said it supports the right of Victorians to protest peacefully but would not tolerate "anti-social and violent behaviour" witnessed. It comes seven months after a devastating fire at the Adass Israel Synagogue at Ripponlea in the city's south. Two of the synagogue's three buildings were destroyed in the early-morning blaze, which also forced members of the congregation to flee. No charges have been laid however counter-terrorism police have raided multiple properties as part of that investigation. The latest incidents also follow disagreement between Australia's special envoy to combat anti-Semitism and NSW MPs, over a call to ban pro-Palestine protests from city centres. Jillian Segal gave evidence to a parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism in Sydney on Friday and was pressed on previous statements where she labelled the weekly demonstrations as "intimidatory" and "sinister". Labor MP Stephen Lawrence suggested her comments were an "uncivil way to describe them and the people participating". An arson attack at a synagogue has forced worshippers to flee, just as protesters descended on an Israeli restaurant nearby shouting "offensive chants". About 20 people at the synagogue fled after a man doused the front of the East Melbourne building in a flammable liquid and set it alight about 8pm on Friday, police said. Everyone inside was able to evacuate through a rear exit and there are no reports of injuries. Firefighters contained blaze to the front of the building. "Police are still working to establish the exact circumstances surrounding the fire including the motivation behind the incident," a Victoria Police spokesperson said. "There is absolutely no place in our society for anti-Semitic or hate-based behaviour." The East Melbourne Synagogue, on of Australia's oldest, is located close to Victoria's parliament in the heart of the city. The suspect was last seen fleeing down Albert Street towards the CBD. A short time later, protesters gathered outside Israeli restaurant Miznon on Hardware Lane in the heart of the city. Police say about 20 demonstrators shouted "offensive chants" and were directed to leave the area. Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich said diners were terrorised as the group chanted "Death to the IDF". "Melbourne, for one night, stopped being a safe place for Jews," Dr Abramovich said. One person was arrested for hindering police and several others were spoken to by investigators. The force said it supports the right of Victorians to protest peacefully but would not tolerate "anti-social and violent behaviour" witnessed. It comes seven months after a devastating fire at the Adass Israel Synagogue at Ripponlea in the city's south. Two of the synagogue's three buildings were destroyed in the early-morning blaze, which also forced members of the congregation to flee. No charges have been laid however counter-terrorism police have raided multiple properties as part of that investigation. The latest incidents also follow disagreement between Australia's special envoy to combat anti-Semitism and NSW MPs, over a call to ban pro-Palestine protests from city centres. Jillian Segal gave evidence to a parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism in Sydney on Friday and was pressed on previous statements where she labelled the weekly demonstrations as "intimidatory" and "sinister". Labor MP Stephen Lawrence suggested her comments were an "uncivil way to describe them and the people participating". An arson attack at a synagogue has forced worshippers to flee, just as protesters descended on an Israeli restaurant nearby shouting "offensive chants". About 20 people at the synagogue fled after a man doused the front of the East Melbourne building in a flammable liquid and set it alight about 8pm on Friday, police said. Everyone inside was able to evacuate through a rear exit and there are no reports of injuries. Firefighters contained blaze to the front of the building. "Police are still working to establish the exact circumstances surrounding the fire including the motivation behind the incident," a Victoria Police spokesperson said. "There is absolutely no place in our society for anti-Semitic or hate-based behaviour." The East Melbourne Synagogue, on of Australia's oldest, is located close to Victoria's parliament in the heart of the city. The suspect was last seen fleeing down Albert Street towards the CBD. A short time later, protesters gathered outside Israeli restaurant Miznon on Hardware Lane in the heart of the city. Police say about 20 demonstrators shouted "offensive chants" and were directed to leave the area. Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich said diners were terrorised as the group chanted "Death to the IDF". "Melbourne, for one night, stopped being a safe place for Jews," Dr Abramovich said. One person was arrested for hindering police and several others were spoken to by investigators. The force said it supports the right of Victorians to protest peacefully but would not tolerate "anti-social and violent behaviour" witnessed. It comes seven months after a devastating fire at the Adass Israel Synagogue at Ripponlea in the city's south. Two of the synagogue's three buildings were destroyed in the early-morning blaze, which also forced members of the congregation to flee. No charges have been laid however counter-terrorism police have raided multiple properties as part of that investigation. The latest incidents also follow disagreement between Australia's special envoy to combat anti-Semitism and NSW MPs, over a call to ban pro-Palestine protests from city centres. Jillian Segal gave evidence to a parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism in Sydney on Friday and was pressed on previous statements where she labelled the weekly demonstrations as "intimidatory" and "sinister". Labor MP Stephen Lawrence suggested her comments were an "uncivil way to describe them and the people participating". An arson attack at a synagogue has forced worshippers to flee, just as protesters descended on an Israeli restaurant nearby shouting "offensive chants". About 20 people at the synagogue fled after a man doused the front of the East Melbourne building in a flammable liquid and set it alight about 8pm on Friday, police said. Everyone inside was able to evacuate through a rear exit and there are no reports of injuries. Firefighters contained blaze to the front of the building. "Police are still working to establish the exact circumstances surrounding the fire including the motivation behind the incident," a Victoria Police spokesperson said. "There is absolutely no place in our society for anti-Semitic or hate-based behaviour." The East Melbourne Synagogue, on of Australia's oldest, is located close to Victoria's parliament in the heart of the city. The suspect was last seen fleeing down Albert Street towards the CBD. A short time later, protesters gathered outside Israeli restaurant Miznon on Hardware Lane in the heart of the city. Police say about 20 demonstrators shouted "offensive chants" and were directed to leave the area. Anti-Defamation Commission chair Dvir Abramovich said diners were terrorised as the group chanted "Death to the IDF". "Melbourne, for one night, stopped being a safe place for Jews," Dr Abramovich said. One person was arrested for hindering police and several others were spoken to by investigators. The force said it supports the right of Victorians to protest peacefully but would not tolerate "anti-social and violent behaviour" witnessed. It comes seven months after a devastating fire at the Adass Israel Synagogue at Ripponlea in the city's south. Two of the synagogue's three buildings were destroyed in the early-morning blaze, which also forced members of the congregation to flee. No charges have been laid however counter-terrorism police have raided multiple properties as part of that investigation. The latest incidents also follow disagreement between Australia's special envoy to combat anti-Semitism and NSW MPs, over a call to ban pro-Palestine protests from city centres. Jillian Segal gave evidence to a parliamentary inquiry examining anti-Semitism in Sydney on Friday and was pressed on previous statements where she labelled the weekly demonstrations as "intimidatory" and "sinister". Labor MP Stephen Lawrence suggested her comments were an "uncivil way to describe them and the people participating".

Levi Colwill takes on central role as Chelsea seek ‘winners only' mentality
Levi Colwill takes on central role as Chelsea seek ‘winners only' mentality

The Guardian

time02-07-2025

  • Sport
  • The Guardian

Levi Colwill takes on central role as Chelsea seek ‘winners only' mentality

Chelsea never won any popularity contests during the Roman Abramovich era. Calling them obnoxious is intended as a compliment. Infused with a champion spirit after appointing José Mourinho in 2004, Chelsea were renowned for their resilience and snarl, impossible to intimidate and more concerned with winning trophies than whether outsiders thought they were a great bunch of lads or liked their style of play. Their mentality was unrivalled and lasted even after Mourinho left. Since Abramovich's sale in 2022, though, Chelsea have gone down a very different road when it comes to building a dressing room culture. There are no ready-made talents arriving at Stamford Bridge and there have been plenty of times during the past three years when supporters have been left wondering why a team once marshalled by Petr Cech, Ashley Cole, John Terry, Frank Lampard and Didier Drogba were so lacking in character. Abramovich's successors are done listening to their critics, though. Pilloried for embarking on a strategy of targeting young players on long contracts, the Todd Boehly-Clearlake Capital ownership sense vindication is coming. The argument that leaders can be developed is starting to hold water, even if it remains valid to argue that bringing in an established star or two in key positions could help Chelsea get over the line in the big competitions. Paris Saint-Germain did not win the Champions League with a team of kids; they also had Marquinhos (31) in defence, Fabián Ruiz (29) playing brilliantly in midfield and Ousmane Dembélé (28) scoring for fun up front. Even so, there is a growing feeling Chelsea will emerge from the adversity and upheaval that followed the change of ownership with a stronger mentality and greater togetherness. There was particular satisfaction at how they fared against Benfica in the last 16 of the Club World Cup last Saturday. An implosion would not have been surprising after a weather delay lasting close to two hours was followed by Benfica forcing extra time after a controversial 95th-minute penalty. Chelsea responded, winning 4-1 to set up a quarter-final with Palmeiras on Saturday, and much was made internally of Levi Colwill's performance after normal time. True, it was risky when the centre-back wagged a finger at the referee, Slavko Vincic, and appeared to swear at the Slovenian after Benfica were awarded their spot-kick. There are usually ramifications for behaving like that and Colwill was lucky not to receive at least a yellow card. Chelsea will expect the 22-year-old to channel his emotions better. Equally, though, they like Colwill is showing fight and desire. He has stepped up and taken on more responsibility in recent months. Colwill scored the winner when Chelsea clinched Champions League qualification by beating Nottingham Forest at the end of last season and his aggression proved vital against Benfica. He refused to be bullied and was involved in the game's turning point, pressing high to win possession and drawing Gianluca Prestianni into a foul that led to the 19-year-old forward being sent off with the game locked at 1-1. There is room for improvement. As an academy product, Colwill is under more pressure than most to show leadership in central defence. Fans demand a lot from one of their own. Proving that you can be the next Terry is not easy. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Colwill knows that he is not the finished article. He has toughened up during the past 12 months, but Chelsea want him to bulk up even more and become more dominant in the air. 'We could be here for ages,' he says after being asked what part of his game needs to be better. 'I am nowhere near where I would like to be. Defending one-v-one has been tough, but I think I've proved that I'm getting a bit better. I'm good at times when I'm trying to make passes and there are other times where I've been a bit lazy.' The England international is hard on himself. 'You've got to be if you want to be the best and strive for the best things possible,' he says. 'You might think a pass is easy – you can take your mind off it. You take your mind off something for half a second and that can make a big, big difference. 'We all know how big this club is and how the culture of the club has always been to win. We're just trying to reinforce that to the young boys, to the boys coming in, that this club is for winners only. That's what we need to strive towards. That's what we want to do together.' Colwill echoed what Chelsea are saying internally. They see a group of kids growing together. There was amusement at the otherwise languid Cole Palmer losing his cool and picking up a booking for getting involved in a shoving match after Prestianni's red card. Perhaps some of the old snarl is returning.

Ministers must walk a careful tightrope in Abramovich case
Ministers must walk a careful tightrope in Abramovich case

Times

time19-06-2025

  • Business
  • Times

Ministers must walk a careful tightrope in Abramovich case

Threats from British ministers to sue Roman Abramovich have brought the Russian billionaire back into the spotlight. A fortnight after Russia invaded Ukraine, Liz Truss, then foreign secretary, announced sanctions against seven of the wealthiest Russian oligarchs. On her list was Abramovich, who at the time owned Chelsea FC. His assets were frozen, a prohibition was placed his on transactions with UK individuals and businesses, and he was subjected to a travel ban. Having owned Chelsea since 2003, Abramovich was granted a special licence to sell the club, provided he could prove that he would not benefit from the deal. In May 2022, Todd Boehly led a consortium, later known as BlueCo, which bought Chelsea — and the sale proceeds remain frozen in a UK bank account linked to Abramovich. While he cannot gain access to the money, it legally belongs to him. This month the government threatened legal action to ensure that the frozen £2.5 billion is ring-fenced to fund humanitarian causes only in Ukraine. Issuing a joint statement, Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, and David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said: 'While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts, if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible.' • Roman Abramovich: government threatens to sue former Chelsea owner over sale The three-year delay in the funds being released centres on sustained disagreement between the UK government and Abramovich. Through his lawyers, the oligarch argues that a much wider set of beneficiaries should receive money, with proceeds being donated via a foundation 'for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine'. That would include Russian soldiers and other charitable causes outside Ukraine. After three years of fruitless discussion, the government is now seeking to break the impasse. But after the threat of legal action against Abramovich — intended to force his hand as Reeves and Lammy have outlined — the government must now walk a legal tightrope in proving its case. They must be careful not to set a precedent for asset-freezing cases that undermines the rule of law, or invites future legal challenges from other sanctioned parties. An attempt by the government to force a release of the sale proceeds will risk a legal confrontation with the established sanctions framework. Legally, they must be dealt with under the terms of the licence granted by the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. However, it is conceivable that if ministers proceed down this road, other legal avenues might be considered, such as those under international investment treaties, depending on the circumstances. Manifestly, turning a high-profile Premier League transaction into a High Court test case for sanctions enforcement will not be straightforward — there are no easy games at this Hastings is a partner at Quillon Law

Russian tycoon Abramovich ‘done' with professional football
Russian tycoon Abramovich ‘done' with professional football

Russia Today

time10-06-2025

  • Business
  • Russia Today

Russian tycoon Abramovich ‘done' with professional football

Russian businessman Roman Abramovich has said he no longer intends to be involved in professional football or own any club again, according to a new book excerpt cited by the Daily Mail. Abramovich was forced to sell the football club Chelsea to a US-led consortium shortly after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict. The UK government imposed sanctions on him in March 2022 over his alleged Kremlin ties. The tycoon has denied the allegations and acted as a mediator between Moscow and Kiev on several occasions. In an interview with Nick Purewal, the author of a book titled 'Sanctioned: The Inside Story of the Sale of Chelsea FC', Abramovich confirmed he has 'no interest in any role in a football club, certainly not a professional role.' 'As for ownership or a professional role at a club, I am done with that in this lifetime,' he was cited as saying. He added that he still wishes to attend a Chelsea match in the future 'to say a proper goodbye,' but reiterated he has no plans for further involvement in the sport. However, he expressed a willingness to support initiatives for underprivileged youth if a meaningful opportunity arises. The British government has increased pressure on Abramovich to approve the release of the £2.5 billion ($3.4 billion) proceeds from the Chelsea sale to Ukraine. Last week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy warned in a joint statement that the UK is prepared to take legal action if he does not authorize the transfer. 'The government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine,' the statement read. While the money is frozen in a UK account, Abramovich remains its legal owner and must approve its distribution. According to The Guardian, officials have held extensive talks with Abramovich's legal team but have failed to resolve a 'fundamental disagreement' over how the funds should be used. Abramovich has insisted the proceeds be used to assist victims of the conflict on both sides, not exclusively Ukraine.

‘I don't have any interest': Roman Abramovich breaks three-year silence on forced Chelsea sale
‘I don't have any interest': Roman Abramovich breaks three-year silence on forced Chelsea sale

Yahoo

time10-06-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

‘I don't have any interest': Roman Abramovich breaks three-year silence on forced Chelsea sale

Former Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich has spoken publicly for the first time since he was forced to sell the club after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. The Russian oligarch was the face of Chelsea's enormous success for nearly two decades, watching the Blues win every available piece of silverware in club football. Advertisement Speaking in a rare interview, Abramovich expressed his desire to one day return to Stamford Bridge and say a heartfelt farewell. He was denied the opportunity to do so three years ago. Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003 for £140 million and transformed the club into a global powerhouse but was forced to step away under immense pressure. He was accused of having close ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which led to sanctions from the UK government in March 2022. Abramovich ultimately had no choice but to sell. He eventually handed the club over to the Todd Boehly-Clearlake Capital consortium following a prolonged two-month takeover saga that saw several candidates interviewed. Advertisement Abramovich recouped an earth-shattering profit on his Chelsea sale, making nearly 18 times his initial investment in the club. He sold the club for £2.5 billion but insisted the proceeds be donated to charities supporting victims of the war in Ukraine. The money has since been frozen in a UK bank account. During the interview, Abramovich made it clear that he has no intention of owning another football club. 'Perhaps one day there would be a situation where I could attend a match and say a proper goodbye, but nothing more than that,' Abramovich said (via the Daily Mail). 'I don't have any interest in any role in a football club, certainly not a professional role.' Advertisement Chelsea had a rough start to life after Abramovich. But they've finally won their first trophy under the new ownership, thrashing Real Betis to win the Europa Conference League in Poland. Enzo Maresca's side also qualified for the Champions League and will use that as a springboard to achieve greater things next season.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store