How Lance Armstrong's scandal changed Livestrong forever
Introduced in 2004 as part of his cancer foundation, those wristbands were on the wrists of tens of millions of us, including celebrities, politicians, and even Armstrong's rivals at the 2004 Tour de France.
They were a symbol of the investment we all had in the success of the well-spoken, handsome, inspiring athlete, who went from battling advanced testicular cancer at 25 to dominating his sport only a few years later.
What a story! Marketed by NIKE and bought by so many of us, Lance Armstrong as we understood him was a myth we all wanted to believe was true. Those few not blinded by the desire to believe Armstrong's story, who knew he was doping, suffered greatly. Given how prevalent doping was in cycling at the time, it may be that the truest scandal in the whole saga was his lying and bullying.
For the newest episode of United States of Scandal, we spoke with his one-time and whistleblower teammate Floyd Landis, reporter David Walsh, and team carer-turned- whistleblower Emma O'Reilly, all of whom tried to bring to light evidence of his doping. They saw firsthand how the confidence and intensity that Armstrong used in his pursuit of perfection on his bike could be viciously turned on those who dared to question him. The specifics of his brutality toward these whistle-blowers, as well as close friends like Betsy Andreu, the wife of former teammate Frankie Andreu, are a stunning parallel to the behavior Armstrong showed in his sport.
He had a shield – the investment of corporate sponsors such as NIKE, which said that Armstrong misled the company for more than a decade. In fact, several interviewees told us that, had Armstrong not attempted a comeback after his retirement, at a time when he was no longer the unquestioned champion, they think the system protecting Armstrong from public scrutiny might never have cracked. Upon the revelation, he was stripped of his seven consecutive Tour de France titles, along with major endorsements and one Olympic medal. He was banned from the sport of cycling for life. Everyone was parting ways from the former legend.
The Livestrong organization remained the one uncontested part of Armstrong's story. However, in the words of the foundation's CEO Suzanne Stone, 'In 2012, Livestrong and Armstrong got a divorce. He got the bike, and we kept the house.' The essence of the movement continues. They are focused on helping people live with cancer — as Lance Armstrong so valiantly embodied in the early years of his career.
Ultimately, we discovered that the story of Lance Armstrong is more than a simple story about an athlete cheating; it asks compelling questions about the nature of champions, and the responsibility of the systems that support them. We hope you'll tune in Sunday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
24 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Reigning Olympic, world champ Camryn Rogers wins fifth national hammer throw title
OTTAWA - Camryn Rogers has secured her fifth national title. The Richmond, B.C., native had a top throw of 77.30 metres to win the women's hammer throw event at the Canadian track and field championships on Thursday. Jillian Weir of Kingston, Ont., finished second with a mark of 72.61. Jinaye Shomachuk of Airdrie, Alta., placed third with 65.18. Rogers, the reigning Olympic and world champion, set a new national record with 78.88 metres on July 5 at the Prefontaine Classic on the Diamond League circuit. The 26-year-old will look to defend her world title at the world championships in Tokyo from Sept. 13-21. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 31, 2025.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Allegations against Ineos's David Rozman put Team Sky's entire legacy under the microscope
In the soft-focus documentary which follows Team Sky during their hugely successful 2012 season, when Bradley Wiggins wins the Tour de France, we are told a story of what can be achieved when good clean British ingenuity takes on the world's most morally bankrupt sport. Dave Brailsford's colleagues swoon over the benefits of their team principal's 'marginal gains' ploy; colour-coded water bottles, standardised seat heights, a luxury bus: they all count. In one clip, team chef Soren Kristiansen cheers his energy-conserving food programme while chopping some aubergines. In another, team physio Dan Guillemette lauds their 'really good' pillows. 'That's the whole thing about marginal gains,' he says, after tucking in the sleep-enhancing sheets beneath a hypoallergenic mattress. 'On their own they probably don't make a great deal of difference, but add them together and that's the difference between this team and our rivals.' But what we later discovered was that the pillows and the power food were supplemented by a ploy to exploit grey areas in the rules, according to a 54-page report by a parliamentary select committee, which concluded that Wiggins used triamcinolone before major races to enhance performance, questioned Brailsford's 'winning clean' ethos and accused Team Sky of 'crossing an ethical line' by cynically exploiting therapeutic use exemptions. Team Sky, who later became Ineos, have always maintained that they have stuck to the rules, and Wiggins has vehemently denied wrongdoing, as have his teammates who included fellow yellow jersey winners Chris Froome and Geraint Thomas. But fresh revelations over the past week have restored the spotlight on Sky's era of success. David Rozman, a long-term member of the team's staff, left this year's Tour de France mid-race after allegations by Germany TV station ARD that, in 2012, he exchanged messages with Mark Schmidt, a notorious German doping doctor who was convicted in 2021 of leading a sophisticated doping ring involving multiple cyclists and skiers. Rozman is a team 'carer' – essentially an assistant who carries out rider massages among other support duties – and worked closely with Wiggins and Froome during his career. Some of the messages were published by The Times. They included a text, allegedly from Rozman to Schmidt, sent one month before the 2012 Tour de France won by Wiggins, which read: 'Do you still have any of the stuff that Milram [Schmidt's disgraced former team] used during the races? If so, can you bring it for the boys?' Then, during the Tour, the day before Froome won on La Planche des Belle Filles and Wiggins claimed the yellow jersey, it is alleged that text messages reveal how Schmidt visited Team Sky's hotel to meet Rozman. In another message, Rozman sent Schmidt the contact details for a suspected drug dealer, based in Slovenia and codenamed Maestro Baltazar, who was allegedly in the business of supplying banned substances. The International Testing Agency is investigating the case. Rozman is yet to speak publicly about the claims, and The Independent has approached him for comment. Ineos Grenadiers said in a statement: 'To date the team has received no evidence from any relevant authority. In response to the team's request for information, the ITA has advised the team that it cannot share any further information, due to legal and confidentiality restrictions. Both David [Brailsford] and the team will of course cooperate with the ITA and any other authority. The team reiterates its zero-tolerance policy and is unable to comment further at this time.' Brailsford was the genius hand pulling every string of Sky's great era, giving every department unwavering focus, unity and direction, from medical and nutrition to strategy and performance, to the riders themselves on the road. He returned to the Tour de France this month after his brief foray into football with Manchester United, but refused to answer any questions on the Rozman issue, telling journalists: 'No comment, and adding when they persisted: 'F****** come on guys.' Rozman may be cleared of wrongdoing. Or he may be found guilty and then simply be dismissed as a rogue operator, a bad apple in the bunch. After all, there are skeletons on most team buses in this sport, one where an eye-watering number of alleged, accused or admitted dopers are still employed among top teams. But then you remember that culture, media and sport committee report, and the whistleblower who alleged Wiggins and several teammates were using corticosteroids out of competition 'to lean down in preparation for major races'. You remember that so little of what went on can be examined because team doctor Richard Freeman destroyed his laptop with a blunt instrument and failed to keep adequate records; you remember Geert Leinders, who worked with Team Sky in 2012, and who was later banned for life for multiple doping violations from 1996-2009 on a previous team. And now we have the unproven allegations against Rozman. As a British cycling fan, it was hard not to feel smug watching their decade of dominance. This was a sport that the British had no hand in – road cycling didn't begin in Britain, it wasn't codified by the British, and it was rarely won by British riders, let alone a British team. Brailsford and Team Sky changed all that, taking a grip of the Tour de France peloton with the kind of carefully calibrated control that irked many of those in the sport's heartlands. Now it is hard not to feel disconsolate. Rozman may be exonerated, Team Sky reprieved. But the scrutiny on that era remains more than a decade later, like a knife scratching at the story's edges, chipping away at what we thought we knew. The outcome of the ITA's investigation could rewrite the legacy.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
New 'Old Skool' Vans shoes sell out, listed for hundreds on resale market
Vans' Premium Old Skool Shoe appears spraypainted with multicolored tweed detailing and Vans-themed pins for "bag-like embellishments." Squeaky clean sneakers may just be a thing of the past. Sold out in less than 24 hours, Vans' new sneaker features a pre-worn style with muddled coloring, tweed fringe detailing, and laces and soles that appear dirty – though they are brand new. The Premium Old Skool Shoe in Souvenir Warm Brown went live on the Vans website late July 30 and by the next day, the sneakers were already sold out. The Vans website, as of July 31, states that 118 people had purchased the sneakers. Originally $125, the limited-edition sneakers are now available for between $500 to $1,600 on eBay. Here's what we know about the Premium Old Skool Shoe and what Vans fans think about them. 'Y'all getting these???': Nike is releasing dirty Air Force 1s, social media is perplexed Vans Warped Tour: First few bands for 2025 comeback following hiatus What do the Old Skool 36 'Souvenir' Vans look like? The canvas of the low-top skate sneakers appears spraypainted with brown leather overlays. The sneakers feature multicolored tweed strip detailing and Vans-themed pins on the sides for "bag-like embellishment." The laces are a dark, off-white and the white soles appear dirty, though they are brand new. The sneakers appear to be inspired by Chanel's On the Pavement messenger bag, a part of the designer's Graffiti Collection, first introduced in 2014. The messenger bag, which is only available for high-dollar resale prices online, features the same spraypainted, muddled brown coloring, multicolored tweed detailing, vintage-style pins and overall distressed apperance. A version of the messenger bag is available on the Sotheby's website for $15,150. Vans brushed off comparisons in a statement to USA TODAY, saying the shoes were rooted in its creative branding. What are people saying? On Instagram, some of the comments on a vague Vans Instagram post promoting the sneaker's launch July 30, criticized the shoe's design. "I want 'em and get the reference. Very good creative direction, but take one step back and they do lowkey look like barf," one Instagram user commented on the Vans' post. Other creators and social media users are upset that the shoes were sold in such a limited run, with the sneakers going live on the Vans' website, and available in some retail stores, ahead of the date and time Vans promoted on social media – 9 a.m. ET on July 31. Back to school: Top shoe deals from Hoka, Rothy's, Nike and more Vans in its statement told USA TODAY that the official launch of the sneaker was July 31. The pre-worn trend Vans is certainly not the first brand to tap into the pre-worn style. Actually, Golden Goose is known for the trend, releasing its popular line of distressed sneakers in 2007, which continue to dominate the "pre-worn" market. Golden Goose's top-selling Super-Star sneaker, which sports a "dirty, scuffed" sole, is nearly $600. In 2021, New Balance released its "Protection Pack," a line of sneakers that appear to have torn fabric. Last year, Puma released a collaborative sneaker with A$AP Rocky called "Inhale Distressed." The $130 sneakers, now sold out, came in a grungy box and appeared covered in grease. And earlier this year, Nike released its Air Force 1 Low in "Dirty Triple White." The $130 sneakers appear dirty, creased and scuffed despite being brand new. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
