
Coke with cane sugar may not be that big of a MAHA victory
Major segments of the food industry, including General Mills and Heinz, have pledged to remove certain colored dyes from their products.
The fast-food chain Steak 'n Shake is making french fries in beef tallow rather than vegetable oil.
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has claimed them all as significant victories for his 'make America healthy again' (MAHA) movement as part of its quest to reform the U.S. food supply.
'Froot Loops is finally following its nose — toward common sense,' Kennedy said on social platform X after cereal-maker WK Kellogg Co. agreed to remove synthetic dyes from its cereal by 2027. 'I urge more companies to step up and join the movement to Make America Healthy Again.'
But nutrition and food policy experts say the moves are a far cry from actually making America healthier.
While they praised the administration and MAHA for drawing attention to what they said is a broken food system, the victories touted thus far have been largely symbolic and rely on the goodwill of an industry that is eager to appear helpful to avoid strict government regulation.
'I think if we're really curious about improving public health, some of the small health initiatives, like … replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar, are really not where the administration should be channeling their efforts and leveraging the power that they do have,' said Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at the George Washington University Global Food Institute.
'I think they should be focusing their efforts on initiatives that actually address the root of the problem, which is essentially a food system that promotes excess sugar, salt and fat,' Fielding-Singh said.
Health officials and GOP lawmakers have taken to conservative media in recent weeks to tout the commitments from food and beverage companies to remove synthetic dyes. According to the HHS, nearly 35 percent of the industry has made such a commitment.
But there's been no force behind the companies' actions, which experts said is an issue.
'Simply switching from synthetic to natural colors will not make these products less likely to cause obesity,' said Jerold Mande, a former senior official during three administrations at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of Agriculture and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Barry Popkin, a nutrition professor at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, said Kennedy could make a major statement by banning all colors and dyes.
It wouldn't directly make Americans healthy, but it would go a long way toward making ultra-processed food look less appealing.
'All this voluntary stuff only goes so far. It really does minimal impact,' Popkin said. 'Unless he goes to the FDA and has the FDA change a regulation … there's nothing.'
Kennedy has also singled out the use of high-fructose corn syrup as a major contributor to diabetes and obesity. He has previously called it 'poison,' an epithet he repeated in late April when talking about sugar.
When Steak 'n Shake said earlier this month it was going to sell Coca-Cola with real cane sugar, Kennedy praised the move.
'MAHA is winning,' Kennedy posted on X.
But experts said there's no substantial difference in the benefits of using cane sugar as a substitute for high-fructose corn syrup.
'At the end of the day, a Coke is still a can of Coke. It's not a fruit or a vegetable, right? And so if you're not shifting consumption away from these higher calorie, lower nutrient processed foods, toward nutrient dense, health promoting foods, then you're not actually going to be shifting the health of Americans in the right direction,' Fielding-Singh said.
But if Kennedy thinks sugar is poison, 'they're both sugar and would both be poison, in his words,' said Mande, who is now CEO of Nourish Science.
Health officials argue industry cooperation is key to the MAHA agenda.
'Working with industry is the best place to start. And we believe in industry to do the right thing when called upon,' Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz wrote in a joint op-ed in The Wall Street Journal.
'Our agencies are in a strong position to show Americans which companies are doing the right thing when it comes to popular reforms. By the time we're done, we will have built new relationships and be better positioned to hold them accountable,' Makary and Oz wrote.
Yet there is plenty the agency can, and should do, that industry has pushed back against.
Aviva Musicus, science director of the nonprofit Center for Science in the Public Interest, said MAHA is wasting its political capital.
'It's striking that we haven't seen the administration use policy to improve the food system. It's solely relying on voluntary industry commitments that we've seen repeatedly fail in the past,' Musicus said.
'In pushing the food industry to change, Trump and RFK Jr. have a chance to live up to their promises to fight chronic disease. Coca-Cola is at the table, but they're wasting the opportunity to actually improve health. The administration should focus on less sugar, not different sugar,' Musicus added.
Popkin said he would like to see warning labels on ultra-processed foods high in sodium, added sugar and saturated fat.
Kennedy 'hasn't tackled ultra-processed food yet. That'll be where he could make an impact on health in the U.S. and all the non-communicable diseases, including obesity. But he hasn't gone there yet,' Popkin said.
The coming months will reveal more on the MAHA movement's plans to change how Americans eat. New dietary guidelines will be released 'in the next several months,' Kennedy said recently.
In addition, a second MAHA report focused on policy recommendations is expected in August.
'We have to be considering that there could be real potential down the road,' Popkin said. 'But [there's been] nothing yet. That document will tell us if there ever be.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
25 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Frozen Pasta Alert Map Shows States With New Warning
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued a public health alert for frozen pork and beef tortellini due to the product potentially containing toasted ravioli that may have soy and sesame, which is not noted on the label. Why It Matters The latest recalls and health alerts underscore the persistent risks in the U.S. food supply related to allergen mislabeling, bacterial contamination and foreign-object hazards. With millions of Americans relying on frozen meals for convenience, such alerts are critical for preventing illness, allergic reactions or physical harm. Numerous recalls have been initiated in 2025 due to the potential for damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or allergies every year. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. The frozen pasta is not being recalled "because the products are no longer available for purchase," the FSIS says. What to Know The frozen pork and beef tortellini that may contain the toasted ravioli were produced on May 27, 2025. The product was in a 16-ounce package labeled Schnucks Tortellini PORK & BEEF with a best-by date of May 27, 2026, the FSIS says. "The product subject to the public heath alert bears establishment number 'EST. 13051' inside the USDA mark of inspection," the alert notes. The manufacturer, P.E. & F Inc. DBA DiMare's Specialty Foods, told Newsweek via email Wednesday that 312 packages are affected by the alert. Below is a map of the states impacted by the alert, which include Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Missouri. What People Are Saying The FSIS, in its alert: "The problem was discovered when the establishment notified FSIS that their sole consignee received a consumer complaint of ravioli product in a bag labeled as tortellini," adding, "FSIS is concerned that some product may be in consumers' freezers. Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase." The FDA, on its website: "Food allergies and other types of food hypersensitivities affect millions of Americans and their families. Food allergies occur when the body's immune system reacts to certain proteins in food. Food allergic reactions vary in severity from mild symptoms involving hives and lip swelling to severe, life-threatening symptoms, often called anaphylaxis, that may involve fatal respiratory problems and shock." What Happens Next Customers who have food safety questions can call the USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline at 888-MPHotline or via email at MPHotline@ the alert says.

Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Student senate scholars get lessons in democracy at Kennedy institute
'The government makes decisions for us, and we have to evaluate those decisions to decide the government we want,' Judge Seth Aframe of the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston told the student senators. 'How can you do that if you don't even know how it functions?' Kennedy-Breyer Civics Scholars students watched as committee vote results came in as a part of the program's Senate legislative process simulation. Ben Pennington/for The Boston Globe Advertisement Tuesday was the second session of the program named for the late Senator Ted Kennedy and retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, his friend and former staff member. On Wednesday, the students visited the federal courthouse in South Boston to watch actual court proceedings. On Thursday, they will return for their own mock compassionate release hearing. On Friday, they will also visit the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum for lessons on the presidency. Civics education has always been important to Breyer, a Massachusetts resident who served on the Supreme Court from 1994 until his retirement in 2022. 'Civics gives context,' said Aframe, who helped develop the scholars program through the Breyer Community Learning Center on Courts and the Constitution Center at the federal courthouse in Boston. 'Civics gives background. Civics gives ways to evaluate good or bad, what's happening. Otherwise, you're just dropped into the middle of something, and how do you make sense of it?' Advertisement The 27 scholars are learning how. On Tuesday, before getting down to business, they had a Zoom call with Senator Edward J. Markey and asked him questions. Their queries ranged from his early political days, to his stance on free public transportation, to navigating a partisan Congress. Students in the program listened as Massachusetts US Senator Ed Markey delivered remarks over video call inside the Senate chamber at the Edward M. Kennedy Institute. Ben Pennington/for The Boston Globe 'Right now, we're in a period where a lot of [our] institutions are under attack,' he said. 'We're going to get knocked down. We're not going to get knocked out. We're going to get up, we're going to fight, and ultimately, we're going to win.' After hearing from the senator, it was time for the students to become senators. They raised their right hands and were sworn into office. Laughter and nervous chatter filled the replica of the Senate chamber as they were assigned states and political parties. They learned the biographies of the senate roles they would play. 'I like that they don't treat us like we're kids,' said Ben Austin, 15, from Boston College High School. 'They call us senators and expect us to meet a certain standard. It feels real.' The student senators took up the First Step Act, a bipartisan criminal justice reform law passed in 2018. The legislation, signed by President Trump, aimed to reduce recidivism and ease some of the harshest federal sentencing practices. It also provided funding for rehabilitation programs, expanded use of compassionate release, and reduced some minimum sentences. Advertisement They debated the bill in committees, drafted and amended proposals, and held a full Senate vote. From there, they shifted into a mock House session before selecting a vice president, speaker of the House, and president to sign the bill into law. Students applauded as University of New Hampshire law professor John Greabe, taking on the role of president during the Kennedy-Breyer Civic Scholars legislative process simulation, signed the mock bill students voted on into law. Ben Pennington/for The Boston Globe Some said their first day on the job challenged their long-held assumptions. 'It's definitely different from living in Massachusetts and knowing how people here think,' said Aly DePasquale, 15, of Cathedral High School, who was assigned to play the role of a Republican senator from Texas. 'But it's also a good change to see how other people from other states can think as well.' 'I feel like one of the biggest misconceptions is that teenagers and students don't know what's going on or don't have an opinion or a say,' said Evangeline Hermida, 15, of the International School of Boston. 'But we actually do. We catch up on things from school . . . from our parents. We notice how people interact and how certain conversations bring out different reactions.' Eileen Chi, 14, of Milton Academy, said it is important for students to learn how to speak up. 'Right now, a lot of people are like, 'I can't be the one standing out,'' she said, referring to the current political environment. 'They want that sense of security with the group. The more we talk about things, the less they're stigmatized. That doesn't just apply to politics — it's everything." Advertisement Mellon Academy, Sadaf Tokhi can be reached at


Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump's DOJ rewrites inclusion rules for grant programs
The Trump administration is flipping language about inclusion and diversity on its head to the advantage of white Americans as a requirement to receive federal grants. Why it matters: The move follows the administration's dramatic change to the government's interpretation of Civil Rights-era laws to focus on " anti-white racism" rather than discrimination against people of color. Driving the news: The U.S. Department of Justice on Wednesday released new guidelines for recipients of federal funding and directed them not to be involved in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ("DEI") programs. The guidelines say that federal antidiscrimination laws apply to programs or initiatives like DEI since they involve "discriminatory practices." The department said programs and activities must comply with federal law and not "discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, or other protected characteristics — no matter the program's labels, objectives, or intentions." State of play: The guidelines could have sweeping effects, possibly forcing universities to end ethnic studies programs, media companies to stop paying for staffers to attend journalists of color conferences or nonprofits to cease programs studying health disparities. The new rules will almost certainly face legal challenges. What they're saying: "This Department of Justice will not stand by while recipients of federal funds engage in illegal discrimination," said Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. "This guidance will ensure we are serving the American people and not ideological agendas." Reality check: Companies, media outlets, universities and nonprofits have adopted various forms of DEI programs to combat systemic discrimination in hiring and services for decades. The programs have been credited with diversifying those entities and fighting inequality. However, conservatives on the far right have for years said those programs discriminate against white Americans. Zoom out: Under the new guidelines, the DOJ says recipients can face "significant legal risks" if they're involved in DEI programs. "The use of terms such as 'DEI,' 'Equity,' or other euphemistic terms does not excuse unlawful discrimination or absolve parties from scrutiny regarding potential violations," the department said. The department also advised against using " race, sex, or other protected characteristics for employment, program participation, resource allocation, or other similar activities." The DOJ also said terms like "cultural competence," "lived experience," and "geographic targeting" that function as proxies for protected characteristics violate federal law. Context: Since taking office, Trump has attempted to reverse many of the gains made during the Civil Rights Movement and unravel the late President Lyndon B. Johnson's civil rights legacy from six decades ago. Within hours of taking office, Trump revoked LBJ's 1965 executive order mandating "equal opportunity" for people of color and women in the recruitment, hiring and training of federal contractors. Trump's new order triggered sweeping changes to anti-discrimination rules — including a little-noticed memo stating that the federal government no longer would unequivocally prohibit contractors from operating "segregated facilities." The Trump administration has faced criticism after it purged — and then restored — articles on federal agency websites about Jackie Robinson, Harriet Tubman and WWII-era Navajo Code Talkers. Between the lines: The new guideliness fulfill a promise that Trump campaign allies told Axios about before the election: that the president would push to eliminate or upend programs in government and corporate America that are designed to counter racism against Black Americans and other people of color. A central vehicle for the effort has been America First Legal, founded by Trump aide Stephen Miller. America First cited the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in a February 2024 in a lawsuit against CBS and Paramount Global for what the group argued was discrimination against a white, straight man who was a writer for the show "Seal Team" in 2017. The Heritage Foundation's "Project 2025" outlined how Trump could reverse some of LBJ's initiatives, including his order ensuring equal opportunity in federal contracting.