Trump's Accusations Against Obama Are ‘Ridiculous' and ‘Weak,' Spokesman Says
Mr. Trump, facing criticism over his administration's handling of the files related to the accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, worked to deflect reporters' questions Tuesday, accusing Mr. Obama of betraying his country and declaring: 'It's time to go after people.'
A spokesman for Mr. Obama condemned Mr. Trump's comments as 'bizarre allegations.'
During an extended rant at the White House on Tuesday, Mr. Trump rattled off a list of enemies he wanted his Justice Department to target, including his former F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, and James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, as well as former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. (There are already F.B.I. inquiries into some targets of Mr. Trump, including Mr. Comey and Mr. Clapper.)
'It would be President Obama,' Mr. Trump said. 'He started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper, the whole group was there.'
Mr. Trump, speaking of Mr. Obama, added: 'He's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of.'
Mr. Trump was referring to a report issued on Friday from Tulsi Gabbard, his director of national intelligence, that attempted to undermine the eight-year-old assessment that Russia favored his election in 2016.
Ms. Gabbard's report, which claimed that top Obama administration officials carried out a 'treasonous conspiracy' against Mr. Trump, contradicted a lengthy study by the Senate Intelligence Committee — and was signed by every Republican member of the committee, including Marco Rubio, now the secretary of state.
In fact, the Obama administration never contended that the Russians had manipulated votes; instead, his administration, and the Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee, concluded that Russia mounted a major effort to influence voters.
'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesman for Mr. Obama, said in a statement in response to Mr. Trump's claims. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one.'
Mr. Rodenbush continued: 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
3 minutes ago
- CNN
The jobs report that enraged Trump was flashing a recession warning sign
Job market Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow The bad news in last Friday's jobs report may have been overshadowed when President Donald Trump fired the commissioner in charge of producing it. But economists haven't forgotten about America's job market – and they're growing concerned. Some of the jobs report data has economists using a word they haven't uttered in several months: recession. Hiring over the past three months slowed dramatically, creating problems for the economists and statisticians at the Bureau of Labor Statistics whose job is to make sense of the payroll data they get from thousands of businesses across the country. As new data came in about May and June's employment, the BLS was forced to sharply lower those months' job totals from their preliminary estimates. The BLS revised May and June's jobs totals lower by a combined 258,000 jobs. That massive revision gave economists some serious agita. Larger revisions have happened before, but every time changes that large have taken place over the course of at least two months, the US economy has been in a recession – at least since records began in 1968. 'The job market is terrible,' said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former director of the Congressional Budget Office during the George W. Bush administration. 'Outside of education and health, the economy has lost private sector jobs in the past three months. That's terrible.' The US economy has added an average of just 85,000 jobs per month this year, which is well below the 177,000 jobs that the economy added on average each month before the pandemic. Poor jobs data doesn't mean the US economy is in or going into a recession. Several recent economic indicators are pointing in the wrong direction – weakness in second-quarter gross domestic product and slower-than-expected growth in both the manufacturing and services sectors, for example. But, importantly, the National Bureau of Economic Research, which is responsible for declaring recessions, tracks four big indicators of economic activity – consumer spending, personal income, factory production and employment. None have been pointing to a recession or even that the US economy is on the precipice of a recession. That is, until Friday's jobs report. Yet even the recession alarms it sounded come with some caveats. Recent moribund job growth was likely distorted by business uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariffs, and it's too early to tell whether it will rebound or continue to remain at this low level, noted Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist. 'The US economy is in a muddle-through environment,' said Lerner, who said the Federal Reserve probably needs to take action to lower interest rates soon because the jobs report suggests it might be behind the curve. The Fed has known about the slowing hiring for quite some time. But the sharp pullback over the past few months – data the Fed didn't have when it made its decision last week to hold interest rates steady – probably means the economy is considerably weaker than economists had expected. 'Friday's jobs report was terrible with recessionary level numbers, but slowing hiring is not new,' said Robert Ruggirello, chief investment officer, Brave Eagle Wealth Management. 'While Friday's report does not mean we are entering a recession, it shows that companies are freezing hiring and firing until there is more policy certainty and business confidence.' Ironically, the leading culprit for slowing jobs growth may be the thing that has been holding the Fed back from cutting rates: Trump's tariffs. The Fed had been in wait-in-see mode in case tariffs pushed prices higher. The flip side is that the US economy appeared strong enough to handle higher interest rates. But it seems businesses are no longer waiting. They're freezing hiring and changing their investments as they grow fearful that tariffs could raise costs and hurt the economy. 'The president's unorthodox economic agenda and policies may be starting to make a dent in the labor market,' said Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FwdBonds. 'Businesses are not waiting as they are cutting back on the numbers of new workers they bring on board, which means we can no longer count on the employment markets to be a positive factor supporting economic growth in the weeks and months ahead.' Trump's immigration policy appears to be taking a toll, too. Since April, 1.4 million people dropped out of the US labor force – 802,000 of whom were foreign born. That may have helped make the jobs report look slightly better than it actually is. Because of the way the survey was taken, if the 503,000 who dropped out of the labor force but still wanted to work had told the BLS that they were actively searching for a job, the unemployment rate would have risen to 4.5% last month, Rupkey said. Instead, it rose to 4.2%. The revisions, though surprising for their sheer size, were not fully unexpected. They align with the other inputs that analysts have been tracking, Goldman Sachs economists said in a note to clients Saturday, and they help paint a clearer picture of the economy. Other key jobs indicators 'have slowed significantly in recent months,' wrote Goldman Sachs economist Jan Hatzius. 'Taken together, the economic data confirm our view that the US economy is growing at a below-potential pace.' In other words, Goldman Sachs isn't shocked by the revisions. If anything, they fit with the broader puzzle pieces. The revisions were 'undeniably concerning,' Bank of America economists said in a note to investors Monday. But the 'silver lining' is that a considerable amount of the revisions had to do with seasonal adjustments – basically algorithms that needed adjusting as new data came in. The BLS considers its initial jobs numbers to be preliminary when they're first published, because some respondents fail to report their payroll data by the BLS' deadline. Low survey responses can make the report more challenging to estimate. But the BLS continues to collect the payroll data as it's reported, and it revises the data accordingly. To extrapolate the data for the entire country, BLS economists add in some educated guesswork, based on seasonal hiring trends. The BLS also smooths out the data with calculations known as seasonal adjustments to avoid huge spikes and dips in data each month. The data are also revised because of those seasonal adjustments. If the more complete data comes in well above or below the preliminary data, revisions can be exacerbated by the BLS' seasonal adjustments, which sometimes need to be recalculated. Now that the BLS has a better sense of the job market – one with a much slower pace of hiring – revisions in future months may be far less dramatic than over the past several. CNN's Matt Egan contributed to this report.
CNN
3 minutes ago
- CNN
NASA wants US to be the first nation to put nuclear reactor on the moon
Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy has directed the agency to fast-track plans to put a nuclear reactor on the moon. Expediting work to place a reactor on the lunar surface to help power moon exploration efforts would keep the United States ahead of China and Russia, both of which have 'announced on at least three occasions' a joint effort to develop such a project by the mid-2030s, according to a directive dated July 31 and obtained by CNN. If another country were to achieve this feat first, it could declare a 'keep-out zone' that would effectively hold the US back from its goal of establishing a presence on the lunar surface through NASA's Artemis program. The agency's Artemis III mission, currently planned for 2027, is expected to return humans to the surface of the moon for the first time in more than five decades. But the program still has several milestones in order to reach that target. 'We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon,' Duffy told reporters at a news conference Tuesday on drones. 'And to have a base on the moon, we need energy.' Duffy's orders also call for an executive within 30 days to lead the program. Politico was the first to report the new directive. NASA has previously worked on similar projects in collaboration the Department of Energy and others, including a fission surface power project that would provide the moon with at least 40 kilowatts of power — enough to continuously run 30 households for 10 years, according to the NASA website. A nuclear reactor would assist with long stays on the moon, but the newly unveiled plans do not yet specify when a base could be built. Lunar surface power needs are at least 100kWe for long-term human operations, according to estimates cited by NASA. 'Energy is important, and if we're going to be able to sustain life on the moon, to then go to Mars, this technology is critically important,' Duffy said. The directive is Duffy's first big initiative since he was named NASA's acting administrator in July, an extra job he's been criticized for accepting alongside Secretary of Transportation, an agency that has had a tumultuous year navigating aviation safety incidents. He also issued a second directive last Thursday that could accelerate efforts to create a commercial space station to replace the International Space Station. NASA will seek more proposals within 60 days, and at least two companies will be awarded a contract within six months of the agency's request for proposals, according to the directive. The order changes the way the agency awards contracts by adding some flexibility. The aging International Space Station has experienced problems with leaks in recent years and is expected to be retired by 2030.
Epoch Times
3 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Says Some Deported Farm Workers Allowed to Return Legally
Immigration & Border Security The president is signaling a regulatory fix to protect farmers from labor shortages while deportations continue targeting criminals. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that his administration is allowing some deported farm workers who were in the country illegally to return to the United States legally and is preparing new rules to more broadly address farm labor shortages created by an increase in deportations. In an Aug. 5 interview on CNBC's 'Squawk Box,' Trump said the move is intended to protect farmers who rely on longtime employees, while immigration authorities continue large‑scale removals of people he described as dangerous criminals.
