Do schoolchildren need to ‘advocate for Palestine'?
What should children be taught about the war in Gaza? The simple answer is: nothing. Schools are not political institutions and keeping global conflicts out of the classroom allows teachers to focus on education. More realistically, faced with older pupils keen to discuss hot button issues, some teachers might decide to act as a neutral arbiter of debate.
But the National Education Union seems intent on going further. Britain's largest teaching union not only wants to bring the 'Palestinian struggle' into schools, it plans to train members in how to 'advocate for Palestine'. At a workshop set to be held in Liverpool next month, teachers will learn 'educational approaches that capture the history of the Palestinian struggle' which are 'aimed at strengthening the movement for Palestinian liberation'.
Let's be clear: this is neither neutral 'awareness raising' nor a straightforward dissemination of facts. By bringing 'the Palestinian struggle into schools' in this way, the NEU's leadership is taking one side in a fiercely contested global conflict and encouraging its members to do the same. After the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7 2023, the NEU did not to my knowledge hold workshops advocating for Israel.
Today, sadly, 'strengthening the movement for Palestinian liberation' effectively means siding with Hamas. This turns the classroom into a hostile environment for Jewish students at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise, including, shamefully, within schools and universities.
But the NEU has form on this issue. The hardline head of the union, Daniel Kebede, is a militant anti-Israeli activist who has attended numerous rallies and called on gathered crowds to 'globalise the intifada,' interpreted by many Jewish people as an incitement to violence. Kebede has since said he used those words 'in regards to civic protest and oppose violence' and that he has been 'unequivocal in [his] condemnation of the attacks on October 7'. Meanwhile, another of the union's executive members, Louise Regan, is also a chair of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
The workshop is not the only pro-Palestine activity the NEU has planned. The union is encouraging teachers to hold a day of action at their place of work on Thursday to highlight 'the Palestinian struggle for freedom'. Of course, teachers should be free to hold whatever beliefs they like. And outside of school hours, they should have the same rights to protest as other members of the public. But when your place of work is a school and your audience is children who are compelled to attend, then you are not simply exercising your right to free speech: you are abusing your position.
Teachers exercise huge influence over children's lives. Introducing children to knowledge of the world they have been born into is a huge responsibility and a tremendous privilege. Teachers shape children's attitudes and values. It is because of this power that the UK already has legislation barring the promotion of partisan political views in schools. Educators have a duty not to use the classroom as a recruiting ground for their favoured political causes.
It is perhaps unsurprising that senior union officials seem confused as to where the boundaries lie between activism and teaching; after all, many aspects of schooling have been politicised. From lessons in sexuality and gender identity to the decolonised history curriculum, from campaigners addressing assemblies to pupils making videos to welcome migrants or fasting in solidarity with children in Gaza, the line between teaching and indoctrination appears increasingly blurred. Yet Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson's curriculum review looks set to take schools still further down this path.
But for teachers to exploit the authority they have over children in support of a political cause is morally reprehensible. A teaching qualification should not give anyone the right to use the classroom as a pulpit and the 'Palestinian struggle' should be kept out of schools.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Some LA migrant protests fueled by taxpayer-funded group with Dem ties — another with CCP link
One of the groups leading anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles is a taxpayer-funded activist organization with ties to the Democratic Party, while another has links to the Chinese Communist Party. The Coalition for Human Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) — which received tens of millions of dollars in government grants during the Biden administration — staged a rally last week to denounce Immigration and Customs Enforcement arresting illegal migrants across the city, including those convicted of heinous crimes. 7 CHIRLA staged a rally last week to denounce Immigration and Customs Enforcement arresting illegal migrants across the city. REUTERS Advertisement Protests against ICE escalated since then, with more than 1,000 rioters taking to the streets, assaulting immigration officers, slashing tires and defacing public buildings, the Department of Homeland Security said, prompting President Trump to call in around 2,000 National Guard troops Sunday to quell the violence. According to financial records obtained by DataRepublican, CHIRLA received nearly $34 million in government grants, mostly from the state of California, in the fiscal year ending June 2023, a jump from the $12 million it received the previous year. 7 Protests against ICE escalated since then, with more than 1,000 rioters taking to the streets. REUTERS Advertisement The radical group also received around $450,000 in grants for 'citizenship education and training' between October 2021 and September 2024 from the DHS — the very agency the group was protesting last week. The federal agency cut ties with the group and terminated any further funding in March, including clawing back nearly $101,000 in funding that had yet to be paid out. A CHIRLA spokesman denied that the group had anything to do with the violence in a statement to The Post on Sunday. 7 CHIRLA received nearly $34 million in government grants, mostly from the state of California, in the fiscal year ending June 2023. He said CHIRLA 'organized a press event on Thursday' to protest the round-ups and had 'been sending legal observers to immigration courts and detention centers on Friday, Saturday and today as part of the LA Rapid Response Network. 'We have not participated, coordinated, or been part of the protests being registered in Los Angeles other than the press conference and rally cited above,' the rep said. Advertisement Rioting broke out in LA on Friday as federal authorities resumed the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration, conducting numerous raids in recent weeks and netting 'around 150' arrests, according to Trump's hard-nosed border czar Tom Homan. 7 The radical group also received around $450,000 in grants for 'citizenship education and training' between October 2021 and September 2024 from the DHS. REUTERS Another group that was behind some of last week's protests is the Marxist Party for Socialism and Liberation, which played a part in virulent past anti-Israel campus protests at Columbia University and which was once associated with suspected DC terrorist Elias Rodriguez. PSL has ties to the Chinese Communist Party through funding from socialist billionaire Neville Singham and his wife, Jodie Evans, founder of activist group Code Pink, according to a 2024 report by the Network Contagion Research Institute. Singham sunk millions of dollars into backing the groups after selling his software company, ThoughtWorks, for $785 million in 2017. Advertisement 7 Rioting broke out in LA on Friday as federal authorities resumed the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. AP Singham's ties to the Chinese government and Communist propaganda are well-documented. The New York Times published a lengthy 2023 expose on his far-reaching money machine, which has steered millions to China-praising nonprofits from South Africa, Ghana and Zambia to Brazil, New Delhi and beyond. The PSL did not immediately respond to a Post request for comment Sunday. Rioters gathered Friday after the recent protests to attempt to stop ICE agents from carrying out the immigration sweeps, leading to officers deploying tear gas and other less-lethal methods of crowd dispersal. 7 Another group that was behind some of last week's protests is the Marxist Party for Socialism and Liberation. REUTERS More than a dozen arrests were made Saturday, said Bill Essayli, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California, on X. Images and videos showed hundreds of protesters clashing with riot gear-clad federal agents who were attempting to apprehend illegal immigrants near a Home Depot in Paramount, Calif. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and embattled Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass decried the raids, the latter claiming the federal agents used tactics that 'sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city.' Advertisement 7 Rioters gathered Friday after the recent protests to attempt to stop ICE agents from carrying out the immigration sweeps. Jay Calderon/The Desert Sun / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images In a statement on X on Saturday, Newsom wrote, 'Federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions. LA authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice.' In a fiery response to Newsom and Bass on Truth Social Saturday, President Trump said, 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!.'


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
How far would Dems have let the LA riots go if Trump HADN'T sent in the National Guard?
Police in Los Angeles finally began moving to disperse the anti-ICE rioters late Saturday night — after President Donald Trump announced he was sending in the National Guard. Until then, cops were under orders to stand down as the 'mostly peaceful protesters' hurled rocks, bricks and fireworks at federal agents — also torching vehicles and physically blocking ICE enforcement actions. The rioters filmed their own violence, sharing it on social media. Advertisement And it all followed Mayor Karen Bass' incendiary words Friday as she slammed ICE raids taking dozens of illegal migrants into custody. 'We will not stand for this,' Bass declared, insisting ICE's actions 'sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city' and bragging that her office was 'in close coordination' with lefty 'community organizations' — an outright cue for the rioting to begin. By the time police finally got orders to control the chaos, they had to engage in running battles with the mobs in downtown LA and the suburb of Paramount. Advertisement How bad would it have gotten if Trump hadn't announced that 2,000 National Guard troops were on their way? Gov. Gavin Newsom denounced Trump's move as 'purposefully inflammatory' — a clear sign that he wasn't going to intervene and proving that the prez was entirely right to cut the pretty boy out of the chain of command. We'll never know for sure how bad Bass and Newsom would've let things get — but we do know that just months ago they were completely feckless in the face of a natural disaster. Were they going to be more aggressive in fighting fires set by their own political allies? Advertisement It's guaranteed that reinforcements for the rioters were on the way, from the nationwide cadres of leftist goons that flock to every outbreak of 'unrest' these days — the folks who in 2020 burned down much of Minneapolis in the George Floyd riots (after Gov. Tim Walz waited days to send in the Guard) and for months laid nightly siege to the federal courthouse in Portland, Ore. If you don't shut rioting down fast and hard, it keeps growing: Los Angeles learned that lesson in the 1992 Rodney King riots — though Bass and Newsom have either forgotten that fact, or don't care. Here's the thing: A Democratic president waved 10 million illegal migrants into the interior, and the nation responded by electing Trump to send the masses back home, starting with the violent criminals among them as well as those who'd exhausted their legal claims to stay. But plenty of Democratic pols still hold power — and are using it to protect the Biden-Harris 'legacy' against the Trump deportation drive even in these open-and-shut cases. Advertisement From Newark to New York, Chicago to Los Angeles, Democrats are preaching anarchy, pretending that ICE agents have no legal right to arrest people who are here illegally. Elected officials — from Bass to Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and Boston's Michelle Wu — are calling for 'resistance' to law enforcement. Rallying riots, in other words. Now they're calling Team Trump 'deranged' for moving to shut down the LA rioting. Progressive Democrats think they can still get away with memory-holing any and all evidence that doesn't fit their agenda. All the footage of that masked guy waving a Mexican flag as he motorcycled around a blazing car? You're supposed to just consider it another 'cheap fake.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
WSJ's L.A. Reporter Describes the Scene on the Third Day of Protests
Law enforcement clashed with anti-ICE protesters in Los Angeles over federal immigration operations. WSJ's Ben Fritz reports from the scene.