Kraft Heinz planning grocery business spin-off
This would leave the company with products such as its namesake Heinz ketchup and Dijon mustard brand Grey Poupon, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter.
News of the potential move was the second effort last week by a storied US company looking to shore up shareholder value as shoppers ditch their pricey products in an uncertain economy.
Earlier last week, cereal maker WK Kellogg agreed to a US$3.1bil buyout deal from Italy's Ferrero.
'As announced in May, Kraft Heinz has been evaluating potential strategic transactions to unlock shareholder value,' a company spokesperson said.
The company's shares closed up 2.5%. It currently has a market value of US$31.33bil.
Kraft Heinz was formed in 2015 after Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway and Brazilian private equity firm 3G Capital combined the former Kraft Foods with H.J. Heinz, which they bought in 2013. But it has been a challenging investment for Berkshire.
Inflationary pressures and a shift in focus toward fresher, less processed food have hurt demand for the company's lunch combos and other products.
It lowered annual forecasts and reported a dour quarter in April, hurt by muted consumer spending.
Kraft Heinz also said last month it would stop the launch of new products with artificial colours in the United States after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr outlined plans to remove synthetic food dyes from the US food supply to address chronic diseases and conditions.
According to the Wall Street Journal report last Friday, a split could be finalised in the coming weeks, but Kraft Heinz has discussed other scenarios with its advisers and its board has not signed off on a final decision.
The company is also working on which brands would be part of the spun-off entity, the report said.
'Kraft Heinz spinning off its grocery business echoes the 2023 Kellogg spin-off in which the company spun off its cereal business, which had been in volumetric decline for some time,' said Connor Rattigan, analyst at Consumer Edge.
'As consumer packaged goods makers (CPGs) contend with both changing consumer preferences and a challenging consumer environment, other CPGs may look to mergers and acquisitions and or similar corporate actions to improve their category exposures and improve their top-line trajectory,' Rattigan said. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Brazil opts for local relief over retaliation for US tariffs
BRASILIA: Brazil's government has set aside for now plans for direct retaliation against steep U.S. tariffs taking effect this week, focusing instead on a relief package for industries hit hardest by the levies, sources familiar with the strategy said. Wide-ranging exemptions granted in U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order last week spared some of the most vulnerable sectors of Latin America's largest economy, to the relief of many investors and business leaders. That has left Brasilia cautious about responding to Trump with reciprocal tariffs or other retaliation that could escalate tensions, said government officials, who requested anonymity to discuss confidential deliberations. Talks with Washington are likely to be slow and complex, said one of the sources, so Brazil's government is prioritizing immediate relief for exporters, such as through public credit lines and other support for export finance. Another official said the government is studying potential responses to the tariffs that would affect U.S. companies, but sees them as a last resort if negotiations fail. Those potential countermeasures, now under review, could include suspension of royalty payments for pharmaceutical patents and media copyrights, two sources said. The government had also signaled last year that it was preparing a new tax that could affect big U.S. tech companies, but shelved the plan this year to avoid antagonizing Trump ahead of his April tariff announcement. At the time, Brazil was saddled with a 10% tariff, among the lowest in the world, which many credited to a longstanding U.S. trade surplus with Brazil. Trump then tied a steeper 50% tariff in July to what he called a political 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro, a right-wing ally on trial for an alleged coup plot to overturn his 2022 election loss. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva initially said he would respond under the country's Economic Reciprocity Law, passed by Congress to provide legal grounds for countermeasures against trade sanctions, fueling speculation about retaliation. Talk of reciprocal action has since faded, even as Lula criticizes Trump's rationale for the tariff hike, defending the independence of Brazil's judiciary and insisting any negotiations should remain strictly focused on trade. U.S. tariff exemptions granted last week for Brazil's aviation, energy and mining industries were taken in Brasilia as evidence that patient diplomacy and lobbying by affected U.S. companies seeking relief was the best way to get results in Washington. Brazil also said it plans to file a formal complaint at the World Trade Organization over the tariffs, even though that dispute settlement system has been stalled since the first Trump administration. 'You still need to go through the available channels,' one Brazilian official said, while acknowledging that a resolution is unlikely under the current state of the WTO. More immediately, the government is fine-tuning measures to shield sectors most hurt by the U.S. tariffs set to take effect on Wednesday, extending financial relief to companies already facing canceled contracts. Officials have said the package will likely include credit lines and possible tweaks to the export credit insurance and export financing mechanisms, according to one of the sources. Finance Minister Fernando Haddad, who said relief measures could begin rolling out this week, on Friday said the government was never committed to retaliating against Washington. 'We never used that verb to characterize the actions the Brazilian government will take,' he said. 'These are actions to protect sovereignty, to protect our industry, our agribusiness, our agriculture,' he told reporters. 'That word (retaliation) was not present in the president's speech, nor in any minister's.' - Reuters
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Slimmer advantage for local glove makers
PETALING JAYA: Analysts are maintaining their stance on the glove sector despite the finalisation of a 19% tariff on Malaysian glove imports by the United States. In a report to clients, CIMB Research said it was maintaining its 'neutral' stance on the rubber-glove sector, owing to ongoing headwinds, including persistently sluggish demand recovery due to cautious purchasing patterns, elevated costs stemming from the recent rise in Malaysia's sales and service tax and the minimum wage, and weak average selling prices (ASPs) in an oversupplied market. CIMB Research said that while Malaysia no longer holds a rate advantage over Thailand, Indonesia or Cambodia, the 19% tariff is still lower than Vietnam's 20% and China's 30%, offering marginal competitiveness in the US market. 'We expect some incremental shift in US glove orders to Malaysia, but higher tariffs will still increase cost base for US buyers, which may limit restocking or lead to leaner inventories,' the research house said. Meanwhile, Chinese and Vietnamese glove makers are likely to redirect supply to non-US markets at more competitive prices, intensifying global pricing pressure, it added. Maybank Investment Bank Research also said it was maintaining its 'negative' stance with no change to earnings forecasts for now. 'We believe upcoming results could be weak mainly due to the weakening US dollar versus the ringgit,' the research house said.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Trillion-ringgit question
PETALING JAYA: As Malaysia pledges to invest, including with purchases, over US$240bil in the United States to reduce its trade gap with Washington, economists and analysts generally think it is a necessary step that needs to be taken to secure a competitive tariff rate. That being said, some experts acknowledge that the amount of capital involved means that the commitment could be a significant bill to foot, especially over the short term. Minister of Investment, Trade and Industry Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz reported yesterday that Malaysia would be investing up to RM1.02 trillion – over variable time frames on different deals – which he said helped lower the country's tariff rate from 25% to 19% with President Donald Trump's administration. Notable deals include US$150bil in purchases by multinational companies in Malaysia's semiconductor, aerospace and data centre sectors over five years; US$70bil in Malaysian investments in the United States over 10 years; US$19bil Boeing aircraft purchase by Malaysia Aviation Group (MAG) for fleet renewal; US$3.4bil annually in liquefied natural gas purchases by Petroliam Nasional Bhd; and US$42.6mil annually in coal purchases by Tenaga Nasional Bhd . Nevertheless, it is telling that some of these deals, in theory at least, would go on past the tenure of Trump's second term in the White House, which is scheduled to end in January 2029. Senior economist at United Overseas Bank Julia Goh pointed out that had Malaysia not agreed to negotiate and compromise to secure the 19% tariff rate, it could have stood out as an outlier with the highest rate among Asean countries. She said this would naturally prompt investors to question the country's competitiveness. 'While the 19% rate means we lose the comparative advantage of having the lowest tariff in the region, it at least ensures we are not worse off than some of our regional peers. 'It is important to remember that zero tariffs are not an option – any agreed rate would be higher than what was in place before Liberation Day. The focus, therefore, is on securing the lowest possible rate,' she told StarBiz. Goh said the ideal or optimal rate of investments that Malaysia should commit to in striking the trade deal likely depends on the share of US exports and Malaysia's trade surplus, and as such, Putrajaya's commitment needs to be substantial enough to reflect that. She noted that securing a lower tariff rate could lead to cost savings and reduced tariff access for US suppliers would benefit both local firms and multinational corporations that source from the United States for domestic assembly, testing or manufacturing. 'Moreover, not all committed investments originate directly from the government. Many of the purchases are driven by commercial considerations,' she said. Looking from the perspective of the last three years, Asia Pacific chief economist at credit insurer Coface, Bernard Aw, observed that Malaysia's goods trade surplus with the United States averaged US$15bil to US$16bil from 2022 to 2024. Meanwhile, he said Malaysia's imports from the United States rose sharply in 2024 to nearly US$30bil, before estimating from Tengku Zafrul's statement yesterday that Malaysia is offering at least US$33bil worth of purchases each year across various sectors. 'If realised, these deals could turn Malaysia's goods trade surplus with the United States into a deficit,' he cautioned. Aw explained that the key American products that Malaysia imports are integrated circuits, computers, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, engines and aircraft, all of which the United States is already a dominant source, especially in aircraft and engines. 'This puts forth the question as to whether Malaysia can import more from the United States. 'In Malaysia's imports of electronic integrated circuits where the United States accounts for 14%, is Malaysia able to reduce imports from other key sources such as Taiwan, Singapore, China and Japan to increase US-originated imports? 'This may be possible in the long term as supply chains evolve, but a tall order in the short term,' said Aw. To meet its investment commitment, Aw further approximated that Malaysia is to invest US$7bil each year in the United States over the next 10 years. Citing the country's balance of payments data, he reported that Malaysia's direct investment abroad in 2024 totalled to around US$13.9bil. 'This means half of the country's foreign direct investment must go to the United States (from here on in), which seems quite challenging to achieve,' he said. Doris Liew, an economist specialising in South-East Asian development, opined that Malaysia's investments in the United States could give the former a stake in the latter's industrial development, with the hope that deeper economic integration will follow. Ideally, she said such integration will be two-way, encouraging American firms to invest in Malaysia as both markets become more interconnected. Liew said the latest round of tariff reductions placed Malaysia on more equal footing with regional neighbours by neutralising previous tariff advantages or disadvantages. 'As a result, investment decisions are now more likely to hinge on fundamentals rather than preferential trade treatment. Countries with trade agreements in place, including Malaysia, will enjoy a more level playing field compared to those without such deals, although that group is shrinking over time,' she said. She added that sectors such as semiconductors and data centres may particularly benefit, especially if they can leverage their foreign involvement to foster stronger technological integration with the US economy. This means aligning and linking both countries' supply chains to enable knowledge and technology transfer back home, as outward foreign direct investment also plays a role here by allowing domestic firms to acquire capabilities abroad and upgrade their operations locally based on global best practices. Head of dealing at Moomoo Malaysia Ken Low concurs with Liew, remarking that Malaysia's 'significant investment' could positively impact its economy by enhancing technological capabilities, driving industrial upgrading, creating new employment opportunities and attracting foreign investment through improved global market perceptions. In addition, he said the reduction of Washington's tariffs on Malaysia partly validated the strategic reasoning behind such a sizeable investment. Nonetheless, he said although the immediate tariff reduction provided some short-term economic clarity and relief, the longer-term benefits for Malaysia will depend primarily on the effectiveness of technology transfer, domestic productivity enhancements, and export growth stemming from these agreements. Of particular interest, economist Geoffrey Williams notably believes that Malaysia could have been given a larger tariff reduction. He commented that the number of planes to be bought by MAG is smaller than other countries, and it is not clear if the purchase is a normal replacement of the fleet, substitution of Boeing in place of Airbus, or an actual new net investment. 'It is also clear that orders of Boeing planes around the world are rising so delivery will be delayed and the new orders may not appear until long after President Trump has ended his second term. The orders could then be cancelled. 'So it may be smoke and mirrors and this would explain in part why the tariff reduction was small,' said Williams. His sentiment was perhaps reflected by the performance of the FBMKLCI yesterday, which dropped 6.37 points to close at 1,526.98 points, as losers edged gainers 463 to 356. Head of equity sales at Rakuten Trade Vincent Lau added that investors in the local bourse could also be cautious over US job prospects, which reports said were 'weakening', as well as dips in regional bourses over the past week. On the other hand, he said the decline yesterday has presented a buying opportunity, and listed the construction, technology and domestically driven sectors as those that will merit consideration. Head of Asia equity strategy at HSBC, Herald van der Linde, attributed the negative reaction of the FBM KLCI yesterday to fund rotation out of Malaysia into Indonesia and Thailand for bottom fishing. 'Also, after strong performance last year, we see rotation across Asian equities into Korea, Taiwan and Thailand, and, within Asean, Thailand and Vietnam. This, too, impacts performance of Malaysian stocks,' he said. Acknowledging that the tariff situation has not altered his year-end prediction of 1,600 for the local premier index, van der Linde perceives that Malaysia has cemented itself as a crucial link in the global tech supply chain. Offering a hint as to his favoured sectors, he said several European and American companies have decided to move or expand their manufacturing facilities in the country. 'Equipment makers, chip designers, testers, construction companies, and power producers are benefiting from an inflow of foreign investment. 'In addition, Malaysia is well positioned to benefit from the rise in data centres amid increased demand for cloud and artificial intelligence services, as large tech giants are already investing heavily in the market,' said van der Linde.
