Pacific news in brief for 23 July
Photo:
Tonga High Commission Canberra
Tonga's Civil Aviation Office has temporarily lifted its suspension of Lulutai Airlines engineering licence.
The Office took action against Tonga's only domestic airline on Friday, due to breaches of Civil Aviation rules.
It said it is now satisfied all non-compliances identified have been resolved.
It also warned any further breaches could trigger the reinstatement of the suspension, and it will be closely monitoring.
Last week's grounding of Lulutai Airlines two aircraft left dozens of travellers stranded on Ha'apai over the weekend.
The director general of the justice ministry says the minister is awaiting legal advice before deciding on next steps for a Commission of Inquiry report into Vanuatu citizenship and related matters.
The
Vanuatu Daily Post
reports the inquiry was launched to investigate alleged irregularities in the country's citizenship programme which has faced scrutiny domestically and internationally in recent years.
Arthur Faerua confirmed the report has been completed and was officially handed over to the minister in May.
He said legally justice minister Job Andy has full authority to decide on next steps but he is seeking advice from the State Law Office on which parts of the report can be made public.
The leader of the opposition Alatoi Ishmael Kalsakau recently called on prime minister Jotham Napat to release the report directly to the public and not to the Council of Ministers.
Kalsakau argues the public deserves full access to the report, particularly if it involves national leaders.
Bougainville's government has given a one million kina cheque to Mission Aviation Fellowship (MAF) to help re-establish air services in the region.
The ABG chief secretary Kearnneth Nanei said the cheque symbolises the government's appreciation of MAF, and their ongoing partnership.
He said the government is committed to opening up Bougainville's airspace.
Nanei said it is part of the promise of open skies in Bougainville within 10 years, and the re-activation of airstrips in Nissan, Buin, Torokina, Oria, and in mountainous communities.
A Commonwealth delegation will be in Tonga this week for a number of workshops.
Dr Elizabeth Macharia, acting head of the Commonwealth's Rule of Law Section, will host dialogue on the Latimer House Principles, for members of the executive, legislature, and judiciary.
Adopted by Commonwealth countries in 2003, the Latimer House Principles are a set of guidelines to make sure that democracy functions effectively by keeping the executive, legislature, and judiciary independent, accountable and respectful of each other's roles.
The workshops this week are at the request of the Tongan government.
Palau's President is asking the national congress to approve US$237,000 to open an Embassy in Canberra, Australia.
The Island Times
reports Surangel Whipps Jr says establishing a diplomatic mission in Canberra could strengthen bilateral ties and ensure Australia's continued engagement.
He told the news outlet that, whether Palau likes it or not by December 2026, it will no longer be eligible for financial assistance from the EU.
Whipps said traditional allies like Japan, the United States and Taiwan are expected to continue supporting Palau while Australia remains undecided.
The funding request is included in the proposed national budget for fiscal year 2026.
Tourism in Fiji has slowed down slightly, with lower annual visitor numbers and earnings in the summer months.
The Fiji Bureau of Statistics has recorded a 0.3 percent decrease in tourism revenue between the March 2024 and 2025 quarters.
This corresponds with a 4 percent decrease in visitor numbers, or around 10,000 fewer visitors, over the same period.
The Bureau puts this down to fewer visitors from neighbouring Pacific nations and territories.
Pacific Trade Ministers have reaffirmed their commitment to a rules-based multilateral trading system.
The comments were made during the Forum's Trade Ministers meeting last week.
Ministers agreed given the Pacific's geographic challenges, countries need to work together through regional initiatives.
The initiatives include the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent, the Pacific Roadmap for Economic Development and the Pacific Aid for Trade Strategy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Governments Must Rise To The Moment And Vote In Favour Of A Moratorium On Deep Sea Mining
The 30th session of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) has ended with Greenpeace saying governments are continuing to fall short in protecting the deep sea. While high-level representatives from Palau, France and Panama attended to rally the international community, Greenpeace is calling for greater efforts from more governments to put a legal barrier between mining machines and the deep ocean. Upcoming ISA meetings must secure a moratorium and leave no room for rushed attempts to adopt a Mining Code. Recent developments have made it clear that outstanding political and scientific concerns cannot be hastily resolved under industry-driven pressure. Louisa Casson, Campaigner, Greenpeace International who attended the meeting, says: "Governments have yet to rise to the moment. They remain disconnected from global concerns and the pressing need for courageous leadership to protect the deep ocean. We call on the international community to rise up and defend multilateralism against rogue actors like The Metals Company. Leaders must respond by establishing a moratorium and reaffirming that authority over the international seabed lies collectively with all States-for the benefit of humanity as a whole." Juressa Lee, Greenpeace Aotearoa seabed mining campaigner, says: "Deep sea mining is the latest form of colonisation and extraction. Pacific civil society is overwhelmingly opposed to deep sea mining and must not be ignored in the rush by companies and states based in the Global North to start plundering the ocean." While calls for a moratorium on deep sea mining have not yet gained global consensus, they continue to gain momentum, supported by compelling arguments from a diverse group of countries. Croatia has just become the 38th government calling for a precautionary pause, moratorium or ban on deep sea mining. On Tuesday His Excellency Surangel S. Whipps Jr., President of the Republic of Palau, addressed the Assembly, drawing attention to persistent efforts and intense pressure from the industry to rush the negotiations and finalise a Mining Code. He stated: "Exploiting the seabed is not a necessity - it is a choice. And it is reckless. It is gambling with the future of Pacific Island children, who will inherit the dire consequences of decisions made far from their shores." In the first meeting of the ISA since The Metals Company (TMC) submitted the world's first-ever application to commercially mine the international seabed, governments at the ISA Council responded by launching an investigation into whether mining contractors, including TMC's subsidiaries Nauru Ocean Resources Inc. (NORI) and Tonga Offshore Mining Limited (TOML), are complying with contractual obligations to act in accordance with the international legal framework.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
How Pacific students took their climate fight to the world's highest court. And won.
By Jamie Tahana for RNZ Pacific It was 2019 when a group of law students at the University of the South Pacific's campus in Port Vila, the harbourside capital of Vanuatu, were set a challenge in their tutorial. They had been learning about international law and, in groups, were tasked with finding ways it could address climate change. Photo: Supplied / Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change Vishal Prasad admitted to being nervous as he stood outside the imposing palace in the Hague, with its towering brick facade, marble interiors and crystal chandeliers. It had taken more than six years of work to get here, where he was about to hear a decision he said could throw a "lifeline" to his home islands. The Peace Palace, the home of the International Court of Justice, could not feel further from the Pacific. Yet it was here in this Dutch city that Prasad and a small group of Pacific islanders in their bright shirts and shell necklaces last week gathered before the UN's top court to witness an opinion they had dreamt up when they were at university in 2019 and managed to convince the world's governments to pursue. "The protection of the environment is a precondition for the enjoyment of human rights," ICJ president Yuji Iwasawa ruled. Photo: AFP / John Thys "We're here to be heard," said Siosiua Veikune, who was one of those students, as he waited on the grass verge outside the court's gates. "Everyone has been waiting for this moment, it's been six years of campaigning." What they wanted to hear was that more than a moral obligation, addressing climate change was also a legal one. That countries could be held responsible for their greenhouse gas emissions - both contemporary and historic - and that they could be penalised for their failure to act. "For me personally, [I want] clarity on the rights of future generations," Veikune said. "What rights are owed to future generations? Frontline communities have demanded justice again and again, and this is another step towards that justice." And they won. Vishal Prasad (Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change) speaks to the press before the International Court of Justice following the conclusion of an advisory opinion on countries' obligations to protect the climate. Photo: AFP / Lina Selg The court's president, Yuji Iwasawa, took more than two hours to deliver an unusually stinging advisory opinion from the normally restrained court, going through the minutiae of legal arguments before delivering a unanimous ruling which largely fell on the side of Pacific states. "The protection of the environment is a precondition for the enjoyment of human rights," he said, adding that sea-level rise, desertification, drought and natural disasters "may significantly impair certain human rights, including the right to life". After the opinion, the victorious students and lawyers spilled out of the palace alongside Vanuatu's climate minister, Ralph Regenvanu. Their faces were beaming, if not a little shellshocked. "The world's smallest countries have made history," Prasad told the world's press from the palace's front steps. "The ICJ's decision brings us closer to a world where governments can no longer turn a blind eye to their legal responsibilities". "Young people around the world stepped up, not only as witnesses to injustice, but as architects of change". Vanuatu's Climate Change Minister Ralph Regenvanu (3rd L) speaks to the media after an International Court of Justice (ICJ) session tasked with issuing the first Advisory Opinion (AO) on states' legal obligations to address climate change, in The Hague on 23 July 2025. Photo: AFP / John Thys It was 2019 when a group of law students at the University of the South Pacific's campus in Port Vila, the harbourside capital of Vanuatu, were set a challenge in their tutorial. They had been learning about international law and, in groups, were tasked with finding ways it could address climate change. It was a particularly acute question in Vanuatu, one of the countries most vulnerable to the climate crisis. Many of the students' teenage years had been defined by Cyclone Pam, the category five storm that ripped through much of the country in 2015 with winds in excess of 250km/h. It destroyed entire villages, wiped out swathes of infrastructure and crippled the country's crops and water supplies. The storm was so significant that thousands of kilometres away, in Tuvalu, the waves it whipped up displaced 45 percent of the country's population and washed away an entire islet. Pam was meant to be a once-in-a-generation storm, but Vanuatu's been struck by five more category five cyclones since then. Belyndar Rikimani Photo: Supplied Among many of the students, there was a frustration that no one beyond their borders seemed to care particularly much, recalled Belyndar Rikimani, a student from Solomon Islands who was at USP in 2019. She saw it as obscene that the communities with the smallest carbon footprint were paying the steepest price for a crisis they had almost no hand in creating. Each year the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was releasing a new avalanche of data that painted an increasingly grim prognosis for the Pacific. But, Rikimani said, the people didn't need reams of paper to tell them that, for they were already acutely aware. On her home island of Malaita, coastal villages were being inundated with every storm, the schools of fish on which they relied were migrating further away, and crops were increasingly failing. "We would go by the sea shore and see people's graves had been taken out," Rikimani recalled. "The ground they use to garden their food in, it is no longer as fertile as it has once been because of the changes in weather." The mechanism used by the world to address climate change is largely based around a UN framework of voluntary agreements and summits - known as COP - where countries thrash out goals they often fail to meet. But it was seen as impotent by small island states in the Pacific and the Caribbean, who accused the system of being hijacked by vested interests set on hindering any drastic cuts to emissions. So, the students posited, what if there was a way to push back? To add some teeth to the international process and move the climate discussion beyond agreements and adaptation to those of equity and justice? To give small countries a means to nudge those seen to be dragging their heels. "From the beginning we were aware of the failure of the climate system or climate regime and how it works," Prasad, who in 2019 was studying at the USP campus in Fiji's capital, Suva, told me. "This was known to us. Obviously there needs to be something else. Why should the law be silent on this?" The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the main court for international law. It adjudicates disputes between nations and issues advisory opinions on big cross-border legal issues. So, the students wondered, could an advisory opinion help? What did international law have to say about climate change? Members of the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change. Photo: Supplied / Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change Unlike most students, who'd leave such discussions in the classroom, they decided to find out. But the ICJ doesn't hear cases from groups or individuals; they would have to convince a government to pursue the challenge. Together, they wrote to various Pacific governments hoping to discuss the idea. It was ambitious, they conceded, but in one of the regions most threatened by rising seas and intensifying storms, they hoped there would at least be some interest. But rallying enough students to join their cause was the first hurdle. "There was a lot of doubts from the beginning," Rikimani said. "We were trying to get the students who could, you know, be a part of the movement. And it was hard, it was too big, too grand." In the end, 27 people gathered to form the genesis of a new organisation: Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change, or PISFCC. A couple of weeks went by before a response popped up in their inboxes. The government of Vanuatu was intrigued. Ralph Regenvanu, who was at that time the foreign minister, asked the students if they would like to swing by for a meeting. "I still remember when [the] group came into my office to discuss this. And I felt solidarity with them," Regenvanu recalled last week. "I could empathise with where they were, what they were doing, what they were feeling. So it was almost like the time had come to actually, okay, let's do something about it." The students - "dressed to the nines," as Regenvanu recalled - gave a presentation on what they hoped to achieve. Regenvanu was convinced. Not long after the wider Vanuatu government was, too. Now it was time for them to convince other countries. "It was just a matter of the huge diplomatic effort that needed to be done," Regenvanu said. "We had Odi Tevi, our ambassador in New York, who did a remarkable job with his team. And the strategy we employed to get a core group of countries from all over the world to be with us." "It's interesting that, you know, some of the most important achievements of the international community originated in the Pacific," Regenvanu said, citing efforts in the 20th century to ban nuclear testing, or support decolonisation. "We have this unique geographic and historic position that makes us able to, as small states, have a voice that's much louder, I think. And you saw that again in this case, that it's the Pacific once again taking the lead to do something that is of benefit to the whole world." What Vanuatu needed to take the case to the ICJ was to garner a majority of the UN General Assembly - that is, a majority of every country in the world - to vote to ask the court to answer a question. To rally support, they decided to start close to home. The students set their sights on the Pacific Islands Forum, the region's pre-eminent political group, which that year was holding its annual leaders' summit in Tuvalu. A smattering of atolls along the equator which, in recent years, has become a reluctant poster child for the perils of climate change. Tuvalu had hoped world leaders on Funafuti would see a coastline being eaten by the ocean, evidence of where the sea washes across the entire island at King tide, or saltwater bubbles up into gardens to kill crops, and that it would convince the world that time was running out. But the Forum was a disaster. Pacific countries had pushed for a strong commitment from the region's leaders at their retreat, but it nearly broke down when Australia's government refused to budge on certain red lines. The then-prime minister of Tuvalu, Enele Sopoaga, accused Australia and New Zealand of neo-colonialism , questioning their very role in the Forum. "That was disappointing," Prasad said. "The first push was, okay, let's put it at the forum and ask leaders to endorse this idea and then they take it forward. It was put on the agenda but the leaders did not endorse it; they 'noted' it. The language is 'noted', so it didn't go ahead." Another disappointment came a few months later, when Rikimani and another of the students, Solomon Yeo, travelled to Spain for the annual COP meeting, the UN process where the world's countries agree their next targets to limit greenhouse gas emissions. But small island countries left angry after a small bloc derailed any progress , despite massive protests. Solomon Yeo of the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change, standing second left, with youth climate activists. Photo: Supplied / Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change That was an eye-opening two weeks in Madrid for Rikimani, whose initial skepticism of the system had been validated. "It was disappointing when there's nothing that's been done. There is very little outcome that actually, you know, safeguards the future of the Pacific," she said. "But for us, it was the COP where there was interest being showed by various young leaders from around the world, seeing that this campaign could actually bring light to these climate negotiations." By now, Regenvanu said, that frustration was boiling over and more countries were siding with their campaign. By the end of 2019, that included some major countries from Europe and Asia, who brought financial and diplomatic heft. Other small-island countries from Africa and the Caribbean had also joined. "Many of the Pacific states had never appeared before the ICJ before. So [we were] doing write shops with legal teams from different countries," he said. "We did write shops in Latin America, in the Caribbean, in the Pacific, in Africa, getting people just to be there at the court to present their stories, and then of course trying to coordinate." Meanwhile, Prasad was trying to spread word elsewhere. The hardest part, he said, was making it relevant to the people. International law, the Hague, the Paris Agreement and other such like were nebulous and tedious. How could this possibly help the fisherman on Banaba struggling to haul in a catch? To rally support, the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change decided to start close to home. Photo: Supplied / Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change They spent time travelling to villages and islands, sipping kava shells and sharing meals, weaving a testimony of Indigenous stories and knowledge. In Fiji, he said, the word for land is vanua, which is also the word for life. "It's the source of your identity, the source of your culture. It's this connection that the land provides the connection with the past, with the ancestors, and with a way of life and a way of doing things." He travelled to the village of Vunidologa where, in 2014, its people faced the rupture of having to leave their ancestral lands, as the sea had marched in too far. In the months leading up to the relocation, they held prayer circles and fasted. When the day came, the elders wailed as they made the roughly two kilometre move inland. "That's the element of injustice there. It touches on this whole idea of self-determination that was argued very strongly at the ICJ, that people's right to self-determination is completely taken away from them because of climate change," Prasad said. "Some have even called it a new face of colonialism. And that's not fair and that cannot stand in 2025." If 2019 was the year of building momentum, then a significant hurdle came in 2020, when the coronavirus shuttered much of the world. COP summits were delayed and the Pacific Islands Forum postponed. The borders of the Pacific were sealed for as long as two years. But the students kept finding ways to gather their body of evidence. "Everything went online, we gathered young people who would be able to take this idea forward in their own countries," Prasad said. On the diplomatic front, Vanuatu kept plugging away to rally countries so that by the time the Forum leaders met again, in 2022, they were ready to ask for support again. "It was in Fiji and we were so worried about the Australia and New Zealand presence at the Forum because we wanted an endorsement so that it would send a signal to all the other countries: 'the Pacific's on board, let's get the others'," Prasad recalled. "We were very worried about Australia, but it was more like if Australia declines to support then the whole process falls, and we thought New Zealand might also follow along." They didn't. In an about-turn, Australia was now fully behind the campaign for an advisory opinion, and the New Zealand government was by now helping out too. By the end of 2022, several European powers were also involved. Attention now turned to developing what question they wanted to actually ask the international court. And how would they write it in such a way that the majority of the world's governments would back it. "That was the process where it was make and break really to get the best outcome we could," said Regenvanu. "In the end we got a question that was like 90 percent as good as we wanted and that was very important to get that and that was a very difficult process." By December 2022, Vanuatu announced that it would ask the UN General Assembly to ask the International Court of Justice to weigh what, exactly, international law requires states to do about climate change, and what the consequences should be for states that harm the climate through actions or omissions. More lobbying followed and then, in March 2023, it came to a vote and the result was unanimous. The UN assembly in New York erupted in cheers at a rare sign of consensus. "All countries were on board," said Regenvanu. "Even those countries that opposed it [we] were able to talk to them so they didn't oppose it publicly." They were off to The Hague. Late last year, the court held two weeks of hearings in which countries put forth their arguments. Julian Aguon, a Chamorro lawyer from Guam who was one of the lead counsel, told the court that "these testimonies unequivocally demonstrate that climate change has already caused grievous violations of the right to self-determination of peoples across the subregion." Over its deliberations, the court heard from more than 100 countries and international organisations hoping to influence its opinion, the highest level of participation in the court's history. That included the governments of low-lying islands and atolls, who were hoping the court would provide a yardstick by which to measure other countries' actions. They argued that climate change threatened fundamental human rights - such as life, liberty, health, and a clean environment - as well as other international laws like those of the sea, and those of self-determination. In their testimonies, high-emitting Western countries, including Australia, the United States, China, and Saudi Arabia maintained that the current system was enough. It's been a tense and nervous wait for the court's answer, but they finally got it last Wednesday. "We were pleasantly surprised by the strength of the decision," Regenvanu said. "The fact that it was unanimous, we weren't expecting that." The court said states had clear obligations under international law, and that countries - and, by extension, individuals and companies within those countries - were required to curb emissions. It also said the environment and human rights obligations set out in international law did indeed apply to climate change, and that countries had a right to pursue restitution for loss and damage. The opinion is legally non-binding. But even so, it carries legal and political weight. Individuals and groups could bring lawsuits against their own countries for failing to comply with the court's opinion, and states could also return to the ICJ to hold each other to account, something Regenvanu said Vanuatu wasn't ruling out. But, ultimately, he hoped it wouldn't reach that point, and the advisory opinion would be seen as a wake-up call. "We can call upon this advisory opinion in all our negotiations, particularly when countries say they can only do so much," Regenvanu said. "They have said very clearly [that] all states have an obligation to do everything within their means according to the best available science." "It's really up to all countries of the world - in good faith - to take this on, realise that these are the legal obligations under custom law. That's very clear. There's no denying that anymore. And then discharge your legal obligations. And if you are in breach, fix the breach, acknowledge that you have caused harm. Help to set it right. And also don't do it again." Vishal Prasad still hadn't quite processed the whole thing by the time we met again the next morning. In shorts, t-shirt, and jandals, he cut a much more relaxed figure as he reclined on a couch sipping a mug of coffee. His phone had been buzzing non-stop with messages from around the world. "Oh, it definitely does not feel real. I don't think it's settled in," he said. "I got, like, a flood of messages, well wishes. People say, 'you guys have changed the world'. I think it's gonna take a while." He was under no illusions that there was a long road ahead. The court's advisory came at a time when international law and multilateralism was under particular strain. When the urgency of the climate debate from a few years ago appears to have given way to a new enthusiasm for fossil fuel in some countries. He had no doubt the Pacific would continue to lead those battles. "People have been messaging me that across the group chats they're in, there's this renewed sense of courage, strength and determination to do something because of what the ICJ has said," he said. "I've just been responding to messages and just saying thanks to people and just talking to them and I think it's amazing to see that it's been able to cause such a shift in the climate movement." Vishal Prasad Photo: AFP / William West Watching the advisory opinion being read out at 3am in Honiara was Belyndar Rikimani, hunched over a live stream in the dead of the night. "What's very special about this campaign is that it didn't start with government experts, climate experts or policy experts. It started with students. And these law students are not from Harvard or Cambridge or all those big universities, but they are students from the Pacific that have seen the first-hand effects of climate change. It started with students that have the heart to see change for our islands and for our people."
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Pacific news in brief for 29 July
The US provides Palau with financial support in exchange for US military access to its territory. Photo: ABC/Supplied A proposal from the United States to temporarily host asylum seekers in Palau has been met with resistance in the country's National Congress. The Pacific Island Times reported the proposal, presented on 18 July, sought Palau's agreement to temporarily host people who were seeking asylum in the United States but cannot be returned to their country of origin. Just one day after the proposal was presented, the leaders of both houses of the Olbiil Era Kelulau, or Senate, sent a joint letter to President Surangel Whipps Jr advising him not to proceed. The letter said while Palau is a strong US ally, it cannot afford to overpromise or commit to something it cannot fulfill. The Council of Chiefs, which advises the president and includes traditional leaders from Palau's 16 states, has echoed the congressional stance. Palau does not have a legal framework on accommodating asylum seekers or refugees. Allegations have been made of excessive travel spending by Tongan politicians. Former Cabinet Minister ʻEtuate Lavulavu, who also operates a newspaper, sayid he has evidence that one minister received up to $5 million Tongan pa'anga, another received $2m, and a third received $1m in their travel packages. Kaniva Tonga reported Lavulavu expressed concern not only about the alleged spending of taxpayers' money, but also about the financial struggles many people are facing. Deputy Prime Minister Taniela Fusimālohi said the government's travel budget has often doubled or exceeded the allocated amount, as shown in official budget documents. Transparency International Papua New Guinea (TIPNG) has welcomed the government signing a United Nations Transparency Pledge. The UN Convention Against Corruption's Transparency Pledge is a voluntary commitment to meet minimum standards of transparency. PNG signed it earlier this month in Vienna. TIPNG helped develop the pledge and its chairman, Peter Aitsi, said by signing PNG is committing to continuing to include civil society in implementing and reviewing the country's progress on meeting its international obligations to address corruption. He said this commitment builds on previous collaboration between Government and civil society. The US Department of Justice has announced the arrest of an American missionary to Tonga. The accused was indicted by a federal grand jury on 16 July, on charges related to the exploitation of minors outside the United States. According to court documents, the man traveled to Tonga for his mission with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and while there, he allegedly sexually abused minor boys. Homeland Security Investigations and the Diplomatic Security Service are investigating the case, with the help of Tonga Police and the Tongan Department of Public Prosecutions. A Fiji Airways Boeing 737 MAX was damaged by an aerobridge at Brisbane's International Airport on Saturday. The Brisbane Times reported that an aerobridge - the enclosed walkway which allows passengers into the plane - smashed into the cockpit's left-hand windscreen after the aircraft arrived from Nadi late at night. All pasengers safely disembarked via the forward stairs. A month ago, a Qantas Boeing 737 was damaged in similar circumstances at Brisbane International Airport, two months after an Air New Zealand Boeing 777 struck an aerobridge as it was being pushed back on the tarmac. Investors in Japan have been invited to Papua New Guinea to explore mining opportunities. The National newspaper reported 'OK Tedi Mining Limited' CEO Kedi Ilimbit saying at a seminar in Japan that this marks a new chapter in PNG's relationship with the country. Prime Minister James Marape was also at the event. The agenda included talks on PNG's so-called untapped mining and infrastructure along with social impacts and inclusive growth.
