logo
Defiant Weoley campaigner defends England flags project amid racism backlash

Defiant Weoley campaigner defends England flags project amid racism backlash

Yahooa day ago
One of the so-called 'Weoley Warriors' involved in a campaign to plaster the city with Union and England flags has spoken of wanting to 'restore pride' to 'neglected' working class communities in south Birmingham amid a backlash.
The national flags have appeared along major routes and on lamp-posts around Weoley Castle, Bartley Green, Northfield and further afield, with hundreds more planned to go up, said Matt Glover, representing the group.
He pledged the flags would almost certainly go back up if they are taken down by the council, which has said it has a duty to take down unsafe and unauthorised attachments on lamp-posts and highways structures.
READ MORE: Birmingham City Council issues safety warning over flags lining city streets
"It's just going to be cat and mouse. It will be a waste of public money," he said, claiming the group responsible were using safety gear and ladders to safely cable-tie flags and were acting responsibly.
The group, describing themselves as 'Weoley Warriors', claim as many as 1,500 flags have now gone up across Northfield and neighbouring areas, with requests for more coming in every day. More than £2,500 has been donated to a gofundme campaign to cover costs.
The proliferation of flags has caused a passionate debate in the city and beyond around national identity and how the flags are perceived.
While many residents have described them as 'positive', others have expressed concern about the underlying motivations of those involved, particularly after populist and far right organisations pledged their backing, including the leadership of Reform UK. Lee Anderson, Reform UK MP, described it as 'a disgrace' if the flags were taken down.
One dissenter, who lives in Northfield, said: "This is not about celebrating all those who live in our city equally. Just look at all the comments, the people saying 'if you can't love our England flag then you can leave'...it's dressed up as pride in the flag but it plays right into the hands of racists who think they can decide who counts as British and who doesn't."
Another said they were 'very uncomfortable' because, outside of sporting events, the flag had been tainted for so long by its association with far right views.
But Glover, a dad of four and Justice for the 21 pub bombing victims campaigner, denied political or divisive intent and was disdainful of claims of racism.
He said he was not personally putting up flags but described it as a 'positive' campaign that local working class people of all backgrounds, faiths and heritage supported. "We are working class people, not just white people, many of us are football fans, what we have in common is we are all proud of our flag and country, but people assume that makes us racist.
"This is the flag flown on government buildings, on Buckingham Palace, everywhere, and it's the flag our troops fight under, yet somehow we should be ashamed of it."
Mr Glover said he understood the council's safety concerns - listed in this article here - but claimed that those putting up the flags were acting responsibly and taking safety precautions.
"The city council are trying to find an excuse to remove the flags of this nation and are creating a divide and more anger in the community," he claimed.
He described himself as part of a group of 'proud men, some ex forces, some British, some Irish, who one day over a pint after a hard day's graft 'decided the country was in turmoil, the world was on the brink of war...and the council was more worried about losing face to binmen than anything else' so decided to 'bring the once tight knit community of Weoley, Northfield and surrounding areas some hope.'
"The outcome has been tremendous," he claimed.
In a lengthy statement Mr Glover described touring world war memorial and battle sites, crying at the sounding of the Last Post and said he has 'prayed for every single soul lost (in wartime)...it breaks my heart to be called racist knowing my flag was a symbol of unity and pride.
"It amazes me that some people are so stupid and blinkered that all they see is a stereotype of white English bald men as racists just for having a belief, passion and loyalty to this nation."
But he went on to add a list of views he also subscribed to and said they were shared by many working class people 'sick of the establishment'. "Yes, we are fed up of illegal immigration...of our taxes being spent on possible criminals and rapists; of two tier policing; of our own people not being able to get homes before foreign nationals; of foreign nationals getting (gifts and special treatment)," he added.
He referred to sharia law and said he was angry that Eid was widely celebrated in the city but not St George's Day. "This isn't racism - it's frustration from being pushed into a corner and silenced.
"If you want to live here...respect the flag of this nation, and if you don't like it, choose a country to move to that you do respect the flag of."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin emerges from the Alaska summit with increased stature and Trump echoing a Kremlin position
Putin emerges from the Alaska summit with increased stature and Trump echoing a Kremlin position

San Francisco Chronicle​

time13 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Putin emerges from the Alaska summit with increased stature and Trump echoing a Kremlin position

In Alaska, President Vladimir Putin walked on a red carpet, shook hands and exchanged smiles with his American counterpart. Donald Trump ended the summit praising their relationship and calling Russia 'a big power ... No. 2 in the world,' albeit admitting they didn't reach a deal on ending the war in Ukraine. By Saturday morning Moscow time, Trump appeared to have abandoned the idea of a ceasefire as a step toward peace -– something he and Ukraine had pushed for months -– in favor of pursuing a full-fledged 'Peace Agreement" to end the war, echoing a long-held Kremlin position. The 'severe consequences' he threatened against Moscow for continuing hostilities were nowhere in sight. On Ukraine's battlefields, Russian troops slowly grinded on, with time on their side. The hastily arranged Alaska summit 'produced nothing for Mr. Trump and gave Mr. Putin most of what he was looking for,' said Laurie Bristow, a former British ambassador to Russia. The summit spectacle Putin's visit to Alaska was his first to the United States in 10 years and his first to a Western country since invading Ukraine in 2022 and plunging U.S.-Russia relations to the lowest point since the Cold War. Crippling sanctions followed, along with efforts to shun Russia on the global stage. In another major blow, the International Criminal Court in 2023 issued an arrest warrant against Putin on accusations of war crimes, casting a shadow on his foreign trips and contacts with other world leaders. Trump's return to the White House appeared to upend all that. He warmly greeted Putin, even clapping for him, on a red carpet as U.S. warplanes flew overhead as the world watched. The overflight was both 'a show of power' and a gesture of welcome from the U.S. president to the Kremlin leader, 'shown off to a friend,' said retired Col. Peer de Jong, a former aide to two French presidents and author of 'Putin, Lord of War.' Russian officials and media reveled in the images of the 'pomp-filled reception' and 'utmost respect' that Putin received in Alaska. Putin has 'broken out of international isolation,' returning to the world stage as one of two global leaders and 'wasn't in the least challenged' by Trump, who ignored the arrest warrant for Putin from the ICC, Bristow told The Associated Press. For Putin, 'mission accomplished' Putin 'came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war,' said Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute. 'He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished.' In recent months, Trump has pressed for a ceasefire, something Ukraine and its allies supported and insisted was a prerequisite for any peace talks. The Kremlin has pushed back, however, arguing it's not interested in a temporary truce -– only in a long-term peace agreement. Moscow's official demands for peace so far have remained nonstarter for Kyiv: It wants Ukraine to cede four regions that Russia only partially occupies, along with the Crimean Peninsula, illegally annexed in 2014. Ukraine also must renounce its bid to join NATO and shrink its military, the Kremlin says. After Alaska, Trump appeared to echo the Kremlin's position on a ceasefire, posting on social media that after he spoke to Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' In a statement after the Trump call, the European leaders did not address whether a peace deal was preferable to a ceasefire. The pro-Kremlin tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda described it as a 'huge diplomatic victory' for Putin, whose forces will have time to make more territorial gains. The summit took place a week after a deadline Trump gave the Kremlin to stop the war or face additional sanctions on its exports of oil in the form of secondary tariffs on countries buying it. Trump already imposed those tariffs on India, and if applied to others, Russian revenues 'would probably be impacted very badly and very quickly,' said Chris Weafer, CEO of Macro-Advisory Ltd. consultancy. In the days before Alaska, Trump also threatened unspecified 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to stop the war. But whether those consequences will materialize remains unclear. Asked about it in a post-summit interview with Fox News Channel, Trump said he doesn't need 'to think about that right now,' and suggested he might revisit the idea in 'two weeks or three weeks or something.' Alexandra Prokopenko of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center and a former adviser at the Russian Central Bank, posted on X that it was 'an important tactical victory for Putin' that gives Moscow 'an opportunity to build alternatives and be prepared.' More pressure on Ukraine In a statement after the summit, Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' But Trump said 'there's no deal until there's a deal.' In his Fox interview, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be on Zelenskyy 'to get it done,' but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. Zelenskyy will meet Trump at the White House on Monday. Both raised the possibility of a trilateral summit with Putin, but Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said it wasn't discussed in Alaska. The Kremlin has long maintained that Putin would only meet Zelenskyy in the final stages of peace talks. 'Trump now appears to be shifting responsibility towards Kyiv and Europe, while still keeping a role for himself,' Tatiana Stanovaya of the Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Center wrote on X. Fiona Hill, a senior adviser on Russia in his first administration, told AP that Trump has met his match because 'Putin is a much bigger bully.' Trump wants to be the negotiator of 'a big real estate deal between Russia and Ukraine,' she said, but in his mind he can 'apply real pressure' only to one said — Kyiv. Hill said she expects Trump to tell Zelenskyy that 'you're really going to have to make a deal' with Putin because Trump wants the conflict off his plate and is not prepared to put pressure on the Russian president. Far from the summit venue and its backdrop saying 'Pursuing Peace,' Russia continued to bombard Ukraine and make incremental advances on the over 600-mile (1,000-kilometer) front. Russia fired a ballistic missile and 85 drones overnight. Ukraine shot down or intercepted 61 drones, its air force said. Front-line areas of Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk and Chernihiv were attacked. Russia's Defense Ministry said it had taken control of the village of Kolodyazi in the Donetsk region, along with Vorone in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine did not comment on the claims. Russian forces are closing in on the strongholds of Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka in the Donetsk region, which Moscow illegally annexed in 2022 but still only partially controls. 'Unless Mr. Putin is absolutely convinced that he cannot win militarily, the fighting is not going to stop," said Bristow, the former ambassador. "That's the big takeaway from the Anchorage summit.' ——

Bill Maher rips Hunter Biden after Melania Trump threatens to sue disgraced ex-first son
Bill Maher rips Hunter Biden after Melania Trump threatens to sue disgraced ex-first son

New York Post

time13 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Bill Maher rips Hunter Biden after Melania Trump threatens to sue disgraced ex-first son

HBO 'Real Time' host Bill says Hunter Biden better be worried about Melania Trump's threat to sue him for $1 billion after the scandal-scarred former first son claimed she was introduced to President Donald Trump by late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. 'Melania says she's going to sue Hunter Biden,' the late-night funnyman said Friday, drawing laughs from his audience. 'That's not the joke part. I really like this where she says she's going to sue him for a billion dollars.' Advertisement 'If Hunter loses, it's going to be weird for him writing a woman a check because she's not a prostitute,' said Maher, drawing chuckles and applause. 3 HBO 'Real Time' host Bill says Hunter Biden better be worried about Melania Trump's threat to sue him for $1 billion after the scandal-scarred former first son claimed she was introduced to President Donald Trump by late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Real Time with Bill Maher The first lady put Biden on notice Wednesday that she'll sue him unless he apologizes and takes down a podcast video where he made the false claim. Advertisement However, Biden crassly brushed aside Melania Trump's threat during an interview on YouTube show 'Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan' released Thursday. 3 From left, Donald Trump and Melania Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell seen at Mar-a-Lago in February 2000. Getty Images 3 Hunter Biden shrugged off Melania Trump's threat to sue him for $1 billion for defamation. YouTube / Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan 'F–k that. That's not going to happen,' Biden said with an arrogant smile. Advertisement Both the president and first lady have said they met in 1998 during a New York Fashion Week party hosted by businessman Paolo Zampolli. Federal investigators in 2023 raised the possibility of charging first son Hunter Biden for crimes related to sex trafficking. Justice Department Tax Division prosecutor Jack Morgan outlined nine instances in which then-President Joe Biden's son appeared to be communicating with prostitutes and coordinating their travel across state lines, in an October 2020 email to Assistant US Attorney Lesley Wolf released by the House Ways and Means Committee Hunter Biden had been staring at jail time after being found guilty in 2024 of illegal possession of a firearm and also pleaded guilty to charges in another indictment for willful refusal to pay $1.4 million in taxes. However, he was later pardoned by his father.

Pro-Palestine protesters chant ‘RAF shame on you' at air base demonstration
Pro-Palestine protesters chant ‘RAF shame on you' at air base demonstration

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pro-Palestine protesters chant ‘RAF shame on you' at air base demonstration

Pro-Palestine protesters chanted 'RAF shame on you' as they held a demonstration outside an air base calling for an embargo on selling arms to Israel. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered along the barbed wire fence of RAF High Wycombe on Saturday afternoon at the protest organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Protesters held banners that said 'end British military collaboration with Israel' and '61,000+ killed, 600 RAF spy flights'. There were chants of 'RAF you work for us, Israel is not your boss', 'RAF shame, shame – killing children in your name' and 'RAF blood on your hands'. A large Palestine flag was erected in front of a replica Second World War Hurricane fighter plane outside the entrance to the air base, with organisers bussing in protesters from High Wycombe railway station. The Palestine Solidarity Campaign said: 'On 16th August, as part of our summer of action for Gaza, we will be surrounding RAF High Wycombe, drawing on the legacy of protest at air bases like Greenham Common, and showing the strength of the public demand for an arms embargo.' A spokesperson for Thames Valley Police said: 'We are aware of a protest being planned to take place in High Wycombe today. 'We will work with the organisers, partners and the public to facilitate peaceful protest, balancing the rights of all and to keep our communities safe.' RAF High Wycombe in Buckinghamshire houses Headquarters Air Command and was originally designed to house RAF Bomber Command in the late 1930s. The station is also the headquarters of the European Air Group and the UK Space Command. Last weekend in central London, 15,000 people demonstrated peacefully in support of the Palestinian cause with only one arrest, the Metropolitan Police said, adding that 522 were arrested 'for an illegal show of support for Palestine Action on the same day'. The Metropolitan Police said on Friday that a further 60 people will be prosecuted for 'showing support for the proscribed terrorist group Palestine Action'. The force said this follows the arrest of more than 700 people since the group was banned on July 5, including 522 in central London last Saturday. More prosecutions are expected in the coming weeks and arrangements have been put in place 'that will enable us to investigate and prosecute significant numbers each week if necessary', the Met said. Last week, the Met confirmed the first three charges in England and Wales for offences against section 13 of the Terrorism Act relating to Palestine Action. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store