Misconduct In Matrimonial Life Can Cost Government Job Too, Says Madras High Court
A public servant is expected to maintain honesty, integrity and good conduct both inside the office and in the society, the court observed
The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court recently observed that misconduct arising from personal matrimonial disputes, too, could be grounds for termination in government service, including contractual appointments.
The judgment came in an appeal filed by the Executive Secretary of the District Health Society, Ramanathapuram, and other officials, who had challenged a 2018 single-judge order that reinstated KS Subha Karuthukhan, a dental assistant, who was disengaged following his involvement in a criminal case related to a matrimonial dispute.
Karuthukhan had been working on a contractual basis at the Government Upgraded Primary Health Centre in Bogaloor. His services, originally for a one-year period, had been renewed periodically until 2017, when the authorities terminated his engagement following his implication in a criminal matter.
The single judge bench, while ruling in his favour in 2018, had held that involvement in a matrimonial case should not become a roadblock for someone serving in a government post, particularly on a contractual basis.
However, a division bench comprising Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice Dr AD Maria Clete disagreed with this interpretation.
Referring to the Tamil Nadu Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1973, the court held that misconduct, even in personal relationships, can be considered a valid basis for departmental action. The bench emphasised that government employees—permanent or contractual—are expected to maintain integrity and good conduct not just within the office, but also in society.
'A public servant is expected to maintain honesty, integrity, and good conduct both inside the office and in the society," the court noted, underlining that such standards are not limited to official duties alone.
Further, since the respondent's contract had already expired in 2017, the court said there was no question of reinstatement. The appeal was allowed, and the previous writ order was set aside.
First Published:
June 20, 2025, 18:22 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court orders inspection of Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham campus run by Mata Amritanandamayi Math
The Madras High Court has directed the Forest Department officials to inspect the Mata Amritanandamayi Math-run Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, a deemed university campus at Ettimadai, located at the foothills of Bouluvampatty ranges of the Western Ghats in Coimbatore district, and find out whether it fully complies with the 17 conditions imposed before granting building permission. A special Division Bench of Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy directed the jurisdictional District Forest Officer (DFO) to conduct the inspection along with amici curiae T. Mohan, Chevanan Mohan, Rahul Balaji, and M. Santhanaraman on a convenient date to all the parties concerned, and submit a detailed report before the court on or before September 12, 2025. The orders were passed after senior counsel R. Sankaranarayanan, representing the Math, told the court that the institution was fully in compliance of the 17 conditions imposed by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Head of Forest Force) on January 18, 2024, for converting 12.622 hectares of agricultural dry lands for educational purposes, and that it was also open to any inspection. 'If there are any defects, we will cure it immediately,' the senior counsel said after the High Court in July this year suo motu impleaded the Math as one of the respondents to a public interest litigation (PIL) petition related to the protection of forests and elephant corridors. The Math was impleaded following a complaint that it had erected a two-kilometre-long electric fence, disturbing free movement of elephants. Filing an affidavit on behalf of the Math, its authorised signatory G. Gopakumar, 54, residing on the Ettimadai campus, said: 'We have erected green solar smart fencing in the border areas of our patta (revenue document related to private land ownership) lands by complying with the technical specifications formulated by the Tamil Nadu Power Fences (Registration and Regulation) Rules, 2023.' He pointed out that one of the 17 conditions imposed by the PCCF permits fencing around the lands in conformity with the 2023 Rules. He also asserted that the institution had provided a 150-metre vacant buffer zone between the lands belonging to the institution and the border of the forest areas in order to ensure free movement of all kinds of wild animals, including elephants. 'We have provided three troughs and supply water through pipelines for drinking by forest animals. We ensure the availability of water at all times. We also allow the existing natural stream running through our patta lands without any obstruction or alteration of direction. We grow mainly forest trees which do not attract forest animals,' the affidavit filed by Mr. Gopakumar read. Stating that Mata Amritanandamayi, a spiritual leader fondly called Amma by her followers, firmly believes in showing compassion towards all living beings, the deponent of the affidavit said, she always promotes harmony in nature and insists on protecting plants and animals too. He also stated that the Math runs educational institutions because she believes that education would eradicate poverty.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
'Follow due procedure for choosing new DGP': Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
MADURAI: The pre-appointment procedure prescribed by the Supreme Court and the Centre for choosing new Director General of Police/Head of Police Force (DGP/HoPF) should be scrupulously followed by the State to maintain transparency and independence in the appointment process, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court observed on Thursday. Since the Additional Advocate General (AAG) M Ajmal Khan, representing the State, informed that the process for appointing a new DGP for Tamil Nadu is ongoing, the court said it concurred with the view taken by a coordinate bench of the Principal Seat of the Madras High Court that a petition against the selection at this stage is premature. Holding that no further interference is required in the above appointment process at this juncture, the court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by an advocate over the delay in initiating the above appointment process. A bench of justices SM Subramaniam and G Arul Murugan passed the order on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by K Yasar Arafath of Ramanathapuram, seeking to stop the government from extending the tenure of incumbent DGP Shankar Jiwal, who is set to retire on August 31, or appointing an acting DGP, without taking any steps for empanelling eligible IPS officers and forwarding their names to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) for preparing a panel.
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Semmencherry police station on waterbody: Madras HC seeks original master plan
CHENNAI: Talking tough against reclassifying waterbodies for other purposes without following the relevant laws, the Madras High Court on Thursday sought the respondent authorities to produce the original master plan to find out whether the Semmencherry police station was constructed on a waterbody land. The first bench, comprising Chief Justice Manindra Kumar Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan, granted a week's time for producing the original master plan when the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition filed by Arappor Iyakkam in 2019 on the issue came up for hearing. Stating that the original master plan had cited the land as waterbody but it was argued that the revenue records did not have entries to show it as a waterbody, the bench questioned Additional Advocate General J Ravindran, how can you disown the master plan. 'The master plan can be rectified only in the manner known to the law. Which law entitles them (CMDA) to reclassify the waterbody as institutional zone,' the bench questioned. It further noted that the state and the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) are making contradictory submissions on the issue. 'Once master plan is made, everybody is bound by it as long as it is there. Otherwise, it will open floodgates,' the bench said. The bench pointed out certain issues including whether it is in the jurisdiction of the CMDA to reclassify waterbody as institutional zone, and noted that the land was originally a pasture land and waterbody.
