logo
Aid groups hit back over development minister's ‘charity' comments

Aid groups hit back over development minister's ‘charity' comments

Independent13-05-2025

Aid organisations have hit back at the international development minister after she said the days of the UK Government acting as a 'global charity' were over.
Groups including Plan International UK and Bond said they rejected Baroness Jenny Chapman's description of aid during her appearance in front of the Commons International Development Committee on Tuesday.
Baroness Chapman, who took over as development minister in February after Anneliese Dodds resigned over cuts to the aid budget, told MPs: 'The world has changed, and with it so must our approach.
'The days of viewing the UK Government as a global charity are over.'
Baroness Chapman went on to say there was an 'absolute crisis' in public support for international aid, adding that 'many of our partner countries' also wanted to 'move on from this model'.
Arguing that the UK needed to focus more on sharing expertise than providing cash, she said: 'While our commitment to helping those living through emergencies is unwavering – for countries developing, we need to be an investor and not just a donor.
'It's about partnership and not paternalism.'
But her remarks drew condemnation from aid organisations, who warned that recent cuts to the aid budget could cost lives in the developing world.
Amelia Whitworth, head of policy at the charity Plan International UK, said: 'We entirely reject the notion that international development budgets are about acting as a 'global charity'.
'This framing is not only wrong, it is dangerous. International development funding is a vital pillar of a government's foreign policy. It helps build a safer, more stable and more prosperous world for everyone.'
Gideon Rabinowitz, director of policy at NGO network Bond, said: 'UK aid isn't about charity, it is about global solidarity and responsibility to our international commitments, and it's an investment in a safer, healthier and more sustainable world that benefits us here in the UK.'
Challenged over her remarks by committee chairwoman Sarah Champion, who said she 'never saw aid as charity', Baroness Chapman said she agreed, but had to 'speak very bluntly' when communicating with the public.
She said: 'We are not talking to ourselves and I want the public to know, I want them to have confidence in the money that we are spending so we get their consent to continue with this agenda.'
Baroness Chapman's appearance at the committee followed the Government's decision in February to slash the aid budget from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% in order to pay for increased defence spending.
The move prompted Ms Dodds's resignation from the role and sparked concern that it could cost lives in the developing world, coming soon after US President Donald Trump's decision to effectively gut the US Agency for International Development.
The UK's decision effectively cuts the aid budget by 40%, something Baroness Chapman said could not be done 'without thinking about what you are doing'.
Earlier in the meeting, Ms Champion also expressed 'frustration' that Baroness Chapman's opening remarks had been widely reported in the media, saying this was 'rather disrespectful to the committee'.
Baroness Chapman said she accepted the criticism and would ensure it did not happen again.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog
Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog

Auto Express

time13 minutes ago

  • Auto Express

Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog

Consumers have been advised to steer clear of using car finance claim firms, as the UK's top financial watchdog says they could be spending money unnecessarily. The Financial Conduct Authority has begun setting out advice surrounding a possible redress scheme with regard to the ongoing car finance scandal which, according to experts, could see billions of pounds made available for potential claims. Advertisement - Article continues below However, with countless companies now popping up to assist potential claimants, the FCA is keen to remind motorists that in using one 'they may end up paying for a service they do not need and having to pay up to 30 per cent in fees out of any award they may receive'. Rather than utilise one of these paid services, consumers can submit timestamped complaints and claims themselves. Tools such as those on the MoneySavingExpert website can help people search for previous finance agreements, while the site also provides a template in order to draft a letter of complaint. With the Supreme Court set to make its judgement next month in regard to whether 'discretionary commission arrangements' (DCAs) were illegal in the first instance, the FCA is also advising finance firms on how they should calculate claims for disgruntled clients. The FCA is keen for a redress scheme to strike a balance between being fair to consumers, but at the same time not disrupting the market by putting finance firms out of business. In its latest release, the FCA says that the latter scenario could 'reduce competition and could make it more expensive for consumers to borrow money to buy a car in the future'. Such a scheme will fall under one of two arrangements: 'opt-in' and 'opt-out'. With the former – considered the most likely scenario – claimants would be required to notify their finance provider prior to a specified date if they wish to be considered for redress. 'Opt-out', on the other hand, would mean that everyone who is eligible will automatically be included, unless they contact their firm to be taken off the list. Consumers can expect the FCA to announce within six weeks of the Court's judgement in July as to whether a full redress scheme will be implemented, and how exactly it will operate. Tell us which new car you're interested in and get the very best offers from our network of over 5,500 UK dealers to compare. Let's go…

Six Ukrainian regions targeted by Russia in one of war's largest aerial attacks
Six Ukrainian regions targeted by Russia in one of war's largest aerial attacks

BreakingNews.ie

time17 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Six Ukrainian regions targeted by Russia in one of war's largest aerial attacks

Russia bombarded six regions of Ukraine on Friday in one of its largest aerial attacks of the three-year war, Ukrainian officials have said. The night-time assault lasted for hours and killed three emergency responders in the capital Kyiv, according to authorities. Advertisement The barrage included 407 drones and 44 ballistic and cruise missiles, Ukrainian air force spokesman Yurii Ihnat said. Ukrainian forces said they shot down about 30 of the cruise missiles and up to 200 of the drones. Today is a day of our gratitude to every journalist, to all media workers, to everyone who develops new information platforms and resources. The world knows what is happening in Ukraine. Every country knows our position and hears what we are doing to defend our independence and… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) June 6, 2025 Ukrainian cities have come under regular bombardment since Russia invaded its neighbour in February 2022. The attacks have killed more than 12,000 civilians, according to the United Nations. 'Russia doesn't change its stripes,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said. Advertisement Mr Zelensky, as well as the Ukrainian interior ministry and the general prosecutor's office, said three emergency workers were killed in Kyiv while responding to the Russian strikes. 'They were working under fire to help people,' the interior ministry said in a statement. The war has continued unabated even as a US-led diplomatic push for a settlement has brought two rounds of direct peace talks between delegations from Russia and Ukraine. The negotiations delivered no significant breakthroughs, however, and the sides remain far apart on their terms for an end to the fighting. Advertisement Ukraine has offered an unconditional 30-day ceasefire and a meeting between Mr Zelensky and Russian leader Vladimir Putin to break the deadlock. But the Kremlin has effectively rejected a truce and has not budged from its demands. An explosion is seen after a Russian air strike on Kyiv on Friday (Evgeniy Maloletka/AP/PA) Mr Putin said in a phone call with US President Donald Trump earlier this week that he would respond to Ukraine's daring long-range attack on Russian air bases on Sunday. Russia's defence ministry claimed it had aimed at Ukrainian military targets with 'long-range precision weapons' and successfully struck arms depots, drone factories and repair facilities, among other targets. In Russia, air defences shot down 10 Ukrainian drones heading toward the capital early on Friday, Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said. Advertisement Flights at Moscow airports were temporarily suspended during the night as a precaution. Ukrainian drones also targeted three other regions of Russia, authorities said, damaging apartment buildings and industrial plants. Three people were injured, officials said. The Russian defence ministry said that air defences downed 174 Ukrainian drones over 13 regions early on Friday. It added that three Ukrainian Neptune missiles were also shot down over the Black Sea. Advertisement

Magic circle executive banned for sexual misconduct at karaoke bar
Magic circle executive banned for sexual misconduct at karaoke bar

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Magic circle executive banned for sexual misconduct at karaoke bar

A former employee at one of London's most prestigious law firms has been banned from working in the legal profession after touching a junior colleague's bottom in a karaoke bar. Vivek Ramsaroop has been punished after the solicitors' watchdog found that he grabbed a fellow worker's waist and started 'rubbing himself' against her while on a work night. At the time, he was an employee at the magic circle firm Linklaters. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has ruled that the incident, which took place in November 2022, amounted to 'serious sexual misconduct' and banned him from working for other law firms in Britain. As part of its findings, the SRA said Mr Ramsaroop harassed a junior colleague, referred to only as 'Employee A', at a social event organised for Linklaters' London office. The SRA said: 'Whilst at the karaoke bar, Mr Ramsaroop approached Employee A and stood closely to her talking and said the words 'you're gorgeous' and 'you're amazing'.' He then put his arms around her waist and kissed the side of her face for several seconds, the regulator said. 'Shortly afterwards, Mr Ramsaroop started dancing directly behind Employee A, grabbed her waist with both hands and touched her bottom,' the SRA added. Mr Ramaswoop then 'started rubbing himself against' his colleague on the dancefloor 'with his pelvis pressed against Employee A's bottom,' the watchdog said. During his time at Linklaters, Mr Ramaswoop – whose last known address was in Johannesburg – was involved in Linklaters' legal practice but not employed as a solicitor. He specialises in mergers and acquisitions. The SRA said Mr Ramaswoop's conduct constituted 'serious sexual misconduct' as it involved repeated physical contact directed towards a junior colleague. As a result, the regulator issued a so-called 'Section 43' notice against Mr Ramaswoop, which restricts firms from employing individuals deemed to have committed misconduct, even if they are not working as lawyers. Mr Ramaswoop was also ordered to pay a portion of the SRA's £1,350 legal bill. The regulator says it expects law firms to take a 'zero tolerance' approach to sexual misconduct, which covers any abuse of a person's 'professional position to initiate or pursue an improper sexual or emotional relationship'. Linklaters is one of Britain's four 'magic circle' law firms. Last year, it paid its partners an average £1.9m, while its newly-qualified lawyers received starting salaries of £150,000. A Linklaters spokesman said: 'This relates to an incident involving a former employee who had joined the firm a few weeks prior. We had reported the matter to the SRA and the individual left the firm with immediate effect.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store