logo
Eight Times Trump Made Claims that Undermined India But Wasn't Really Rebutted by New Delhi

Eight Times Trump Made Claims that Undermined India But Wasn't Really Rebutted by New Delhi

The Wirea day ago

In recent weeks, United States president Donald Trump has made statements that have either contradicted Indian interests or caused embarrassment for prime minister Narendra Modi, particularly in the context of India's sensitive positions on Kashmir, dealing with Pakistan, trade and economic sovereignty. They have either gone against core Indian diplomatic positions or publicly undermined Modi by undercutting his narratives of strength and sovereignty, fuelling domestic criticism and opposition's demands for accountability.
1) Trump's public claim of mediating the India-Pakistan ceasefire and Kashmir issue
On May 10, he posted on Truth Social:
'After a long night of talks mediated by the United States, I am pleased to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE. Congratulations to both Countries on using Common Sense and Great Intelligence. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'
On May 11, he posted on Truth Social:
'I will work with you both to see if, after a 'thousand years,' a solution can be arrived at concerning Kashmir.'
Context:
India has long rejected any third-party mediation on Kashmir, considering it a strictly bilateral issue with Pakistan. Trump's repeated public claims of US mediation and willingness to 'work with both' on Kashmir directly contradict India's stated position and diplomatic red lines. These statements made Modi appear weak and being pressured into a ceasefire, in contrast with India's historic resistance to outside intervention under previous prime ministers.
2) Trump's boast about using trade pressure to force India's hand
On May 12, 2025, Trump said:
'I said, come on we're going to do a lot of trade with you guys. So, stop it. Stop it and we'll do trade. If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade. Suddenly, they said, ok, we're going to stop. And they have. They did it for a lot of reasons. But trade is a big one. No one has used trade the way I have.'
Context:
Trump's claim that he used trade threats to force India and Pakistan into a ceasefire portrays Modi as susceptible to US pressure, undermining his image of a strong leader who will stand up for India's strategic autonomy.
In the MEA briefing on the following day, the spokesperson when asked about Trump's 'trade assertion' said that till the understanding on cessation of firing and military action on May 10, there were conversations between Indian and US leaders on the evolving military situation and 'the issue of trade did not come up in any of these discussions.'
This did not stop Trump from making similar assertions again.
3) Claiming credit for mediating the India-Pakistan ceasefire and linking it to trade
At the Oval Office of the White House, Trump said during a press conference with the South African president on May 21-22:
'If you take a look at what we just did with Pakistan and India. We settled that whole, and I think I settled it through trade.'
'And I said, 'What are you guys doing?' Somebody had to be the last one to shoot. But the shooting was getting worse and worse, bigger and bigger, deeper and deeper into the countries. And we spoke to them, and I think we, you know, I hate to say we got it settled, and then two days later, something happens, and they say it's Trump's fault.'
'But… Pakistan has got some excellent people and some really good, great leader. And India is my friend, Modi… He's a Great guy and I called them both. It's something good.'
Context:
Trump's repeated public claims of US mediation and linking the ceasefire to trade negotiations directly contradict India's official position and undermine Modi's diplomatic narrative. It negates New Delhi's claim that the ceasefire was negotiated directly between Indian and Pakistani DGMOs.
On May 23, the MEA said that it is the government's position that 'any India-Pakistan engagement has to be bilateral' but did not address directly the flaw in Trump's mediation claim.
The spokesperson then said:
'At the same time I would like to remind you that talks and terror don't go together. On terrorism itself, as I had said earlier, we are open to discussing the handing over to India of noted terrorists whose list was given to Pakistan some years ago. I would also like to underline that any bilateral discussion on Jammu and Kashmir will only be on the vacation of illegally occupied Indian territory by Pakistan. And on the question of Indus waters treaty, I am again repeating myself, it will remain in abeyance until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism. As our Prime Minister has said, water and blood cannot flow together; trade and terror also cannot go together.
4) Trump equating India and Pakistan, ignoring terrorism concerns
On May 11, Trump said:
'I am going to increase trade, substantially, with both of these great nations.'
On May 12-13, in Saudi Arabia, Trump remarked both nations have 'powerful' and 'strong' leaders who might even 'go out and have a nice dinner together.'
Context:
By publicly equating India and Pakistan and failing to mention the Pahalgam terror attack which India blames on Pakistan, President Trump undermined India's efforts to distinguish itself as a victim of cross-border terrorism. The 'hyphenation' with Pakistan is a diplomatic setback for Modi, since it makes India appear as just another party in a regional dispute rather than a key US partner.
Also read: Opp Questions Modi's Silence on US Mediation Claims, Trade Threats in India-Pak Ceasefire
5) Trump again claims credit, equates India and Pakistan
On May 22, 2025, Trump said at the Oval Office of the White House:
'If you take a look at what we just did with Pakistan and India. We settled that whole, and I think I settled it through trade. And I said, 'What are you guys doing?' Somebody had to be the last one to shoot. But the shooting was getting worse and worse, bigger and bigger, deeper and deeper into the countries. And we spoke to them, and I think we, you know, I hate to say we got it settled, and then two days later, something happens, and they say it's Trump's fault.'
'But… Pakistan has got some excellent people and some really good, great leader. And India is my friend, Modi… He's a Great guy and I called them both. It's something good.'
Context:
President Trump's continued public credit-taking and his equating of India and Pakistan as 'both great nations with strong leaders' undermined India's efforts to distinguish itself from Pakistan diplomatically and on terrorism issues.
6) Trump's public assertion of India offering zero tariffs under US pressure
On May 15, 2025, Trump said during a meeting in Doha:
'It is very hard to sell in India, and they are offering us a deal where basically they are willing to literally charge us no tariffs.'
Context:
President Trump's public disclosure of India's negotiating position on tariffs, especially the claim of 'literally no tariffs,' puts the Modi government in a difficult spot domestically, as it suggests India is capitulating to US trade demands.
7) Trump publicly opposing Apple's expansion in India
On May 15–16, 2025, Trump, in public remarks and during a CNBC interview, said:
'I had a bit of an issue with Tim Cook yesterday. I told, ', you my friend I've treated you very well. You're bringing $500 billion here, but now I hear you're expanding over India I don't want you in India.''
'We're not interested in you expanding in India; India can handle itself… we want you to produce here.'
Context:
President Trump's statements criticising Apple's expansion in India and urging the company to manufacture in the US instead of India directly undermine Modi's attempts to position India as a global manufacturing hub, again embarrassing the government's economic strategy.
8) Trump's threat to Apple's 'Make in India' plans
On May 23, 2025, Trump wrote on Truth Social:
'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'
Context:
These remarks directly undermine Modi's flagship 'Make in India' initiative, which aims to attract global manufacturing investment. Trump's threat of a 25% tariff on iPhones made in India for the US market discourages companies from investing in India, undercutting Modi's public claims of success in attracting global manufacturers.
The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump sees possible ‘Massive Conflict' between Israel and Iran
Donald Trump sees possible ‘Massive Conflict' between Israel and Iran

Hindustan Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Donald Trump sees possible ‘Massive Conflict' between Israel and Iran

President Donald Trump said Israel 'could very well' strike Iran but that he had advised against an attack while negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program were ongoing, as the departure of US staff from the region fans concerns about a coming strike. 'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' Trump told reporters at an event Thursday at the White House. In recent days, Trump has said he is less confident the US will reach a deal with Iran to curb its nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief. The president has repeatedly said that while he wants a diplomatic solution, he does not want Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons and warned the US could resort to military action if a deal is not reached. Special envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to travel to Muscat on Sunday for the sixth round of nuclear talks with Iran, according to a person familiar. But Trump has said that Iran is driving a hard bargain, and resisting demands to fully abandon nuclear enrichment efforts. 'We are fairly close to a pretty good agreement. It's got to be better than pretty good, though, but it's got to be — I prefer an agreement, as long as I think there is an agreement, I don't want them going in, because I think that would blow it,' Trump said. In a sign of the increasingly tense situation, the US ordered some staff to leave its embassy in Baghdad, officials said, after Iran threatened to strike American assets in the region if it is attacked over its nuclear program. The State Department also said US government employees and family members in Israel are restricted from traveling outside major cities such as Tel Aviv and Jerusalem until further notice. 'Look, there's a chance of massive conflict,' Trump said. 'We have a lot of American people in this area, and I said, we've got to tell them to get out, because something could happen soon, and I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning and missiles are flying.' Earlier in the day, Iran said it would inaugurate a new uranium-enrichment facility in response to a decision by the United Nations atomic watchdog to censure the Islamic Republic over its nuclear program. A key sticking point in discussions is whether Iran would be allowed to continue enriching uranium for civilian purposes. Iran says it won't end its enrichment, while Trump has said he would not allow Iran to continue producing the material. Trump later Thursday said the US remained 'committed to a diplomatic resolution' to the issue. 'My entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran,' Trump wrote in a social media post. 'They could be a Great Country, but they first must completely give up hopes of obtaining a Nuclear Weapon.' Trump earlier this week spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to brief him on the talks with Iran. Netanyahu has long been skeptical of diplomatic efforts to curb Iran's nuclear program and Trump said in May that he told the Israeli leader a military strike on Iran would be 'inappropriate' at that time because it could jeopardize the talks. Israel says it reserves the right to attack Iran with or without US support. CBS News reported that part of the reason why the Trump administration advised some Americans to leave the region is that US officials have been told that Israel is ready to launch an operation into Iran.

Air India Ahmedabad plane crash live updates: US, UK to join probe; Amit Shah holds key meeting
Air India Ahmedabad plane crash live updates: US, UK to join probe; Amit Shah holds key meeting

Hindustan Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Air India Ahmedabad plane crash live updates: US, UK to join probe; Amit Shah holds key meeting

Air India plane crash live updates: As of Friday morning, 81 bodies were recovered from the wreckage. After India launched a formal investigation into Thursday's Air India plane crash in Gujarat's Ahemdabad, one of the worst air tragedies in recent times, both American and British investigation teams were deployed to support the probe. The US National Transportation Safety Board announced it would send investigators to assist their Indian counterparts, while British Prime Minister Keir Starmer confirmed that a UK investigation team had been dispatched. ...Read More On the other hand, the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) has ramped up its emergency response, increasing the number of deployed teams at the crash site to seven. As of Friday morning, 81 bodies were recovered from the wreckage, said NDRF Inspector Vinay Kumar. At least 260 people were killed when an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick crashed 33 seconds after taking off on Thursday and rammed into a nearby medical college hostel. While the government so far hasn't released official figures of casualties, Union home minister Amit Shah confirmed that only one of the 242 people on board – 230 passengers and 12 crew members – survived; police commissioner Vidhi Chaudhary said the toll stood at 260 people, suggesting that more people died when the jet ploughed into a medical staff hostel in a blazing fireball. Officials said at least 50 more students were injured in the hostel. Eyewitnesses described a massive fireball and black smoke rising into the sky moments after the aircraft went down. Amit Shah holds a review meeting Union Home Minister Amit Shah held a meeting in the wake of the deadly Air India plane crash in Gujarat and obtained detailed information regarding the entire incident. In this meeting, Shah reviewed the rescue and relief operations and issued necessary instructions to the concerned officials. CM Bhupendrabhai Patel, Union Minister CR Patil, Union Minister Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu, and Union Minister of State (MoS) Muralidhar Mohol also joined the meeting. Shah also said that from DNA sample collection for the deceased and their families, to identification, and the safe return of mortal remains to their respective homes, would be fully supported by the government. Air India plane crash: Here are some key updates Ahmedabad police commissioner Vidhi Chaudhary said the toll stood at 260 people. The National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) Inspector Vinay Kumar said that the specialised force has recovered 81 bodies so far and has deployed seven teams to help with the emergency. A formal investigation has been launched by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) into the deadly crash of Air India flight 171. The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau is a division of the Ministry of Civil Aviation tasked with probing aircraft accidents in India. Union Home Minister Amit Shah held a meeting in the presence of Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel and obtained detailed information regarding the entire incident. The Indian government also constituted a high-level committee of people with expertise in multiple disciplines to examine the crash incident and devise ways to strengthen aviation safety by preventing such incidents in the future. The Tata group-owned airline has set up a dedicated passenger hotline number, 1800 5691 444, to provide more information. Those calling from outside India can call 91 8062779200. The Tata Group has announced a compensation of ₹ 1 crore for the families of each person who lost their lives in the crash. 1 crore for the families of each person who lost their lives in the crash. The flight was operating from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick on June 12, 2025, and carried 169 Indian nationals, 53 British nationals, seven Portuguese nationals, and one Canadian national. Former Gujarat chief minister and senior BJP leader Vijay Rupani was among the passengers who died after an Air India plane crashed in Gujarat's Ahmedabad. US President Donald Trump has said that the plane crash in Gujarat's Ahmedabad was "terrible and horrific" and offered support to India. Follow all the updates here: June 13, 2025 6:10 AM IST Ahmedabad police commissioner Vidhi Chaudhary said the toll stood at 260 people, suggesting that more people died when the jet ploughed into a medical staff hostel in a blazing fireball. Officials said at least 50 more students were injured in the hostel. June 13, 2025 6:08 AM IST As of Friday morning, 81 bodies were recovered from the wreckage, said NDRF Inspector Vinay Kumar. The National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) has ramped up its emergency response, increasing the number of deployed teams at the crash site to seven.

From silver screen to Parliament: journey of Tamil actors to Rajya Sabha
From silver screen to Parliament: journey of Tamil actors to Rajya Sabha

The Hindu

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

From silver screen to Parliament: journey of Tamil actors to Rajya Sabha

Kamal Haasan, one of Indian cinema's most versatile and multi-faceted actors, is set to enter the Rajya Sabha — seven years after making his political debut with the launch of Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM). Though his party has no representation in the Tamil Nadu Assembly, his path to the Upper House has been paved by the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). This move is the result of an electoral pact struck last year, in which the actor-politician agreed to campaign for the DMK-led alliance without contesting a seat, in exchange for a nomination to the Rajya Sabha. With this, Mr. Haasan becomes the eighth Tamil film actor to make the transition from the silver screen to the House of Elders. Here's a look at other Kollywood stars who have served in the Rajya Sabha over the decades. S.S. Rajendran Sedapatti Suryanarayana Thevar Rajendran — better known as S.S. Rajendran or S.S.R. — holds the distinction of being the first Tamil actor to enter the Rajya Sabha, elected on a DMK ticket in 1970. A key figure in Tamil cinema, the Latchiya Nadigar (Principled Actor) was known for his rationalist leanings, and consciously avoided playing mythological roles. S.S.R. had earlier made history in 1957 as the first actor in the world to win an election. Contesting as one of 15 'Independent' candidates of the then-nascent DMK — which lacked a formal election symbol at the time — he was elected to the Tamil Nadu Assembly from the Theni constituency, a seat he successfully retained in 1962. His Rajya Sabha tenure, however, saw a dramatic moment that brought him national attention. Just months after entering the Upper House, S.S.R. missed a crucial vote on the 24th Constitution Amendment Bill to abolish privy purses on September 5, 1970. As reported in The Hindu under the headline 'Rajendran was late by a few seconds', the actor-politician had been ill with a stomach upset but rushed to Parliament after being told his vote was vital. Tragically, he reached the Rajya Sabha lobby just as the doors were closing — missing the vote by mere seconds. The Bill, which was defeated by just one vote, marked a significant embarrassment for the Indira Gandhi government. At the time, the DMK had seven MPs in the Rajya Sabha; while five voted in favour, one, G.P. Somasundaram, was absent with the party's permission. S.S.R. began his career in cinema as a playback singer before moving to acting and then politics. Later, he joined the AIADMK and returned to the Assembly in 1980, winning from Andipatti — a constituency that would go on to elect M.G. Ramachandran (MGR) in 1984 while he was hospitalised in Brooklyn, New York. In 2002, the same seat sent another star-turned-politician, Jayalalithaa, to the Assembly through a byelection. S.S.R. passed away in October 2014, leaving behind a unique legacy at the intersection of cinema and politics. Sivaji Ganesan A contemporary of S.S. Rajendran in both cinema and politics, the legendary Sivaji Ganesan had a long, though largely unremarkable, political career. For much of his political life, Ganesan — born V.C. Ganesan — was aligned with the Congress (I). In March 1982, he was nominated to the Rajya Sabha, filling the vacancy left by the passing of Bollywood actor Nargis Dutt. However, his stint in Parliament was short-lived. In November 1984, Ganesan resigned both from the Congress (I) and his Rajya Sabha position. According to a report in The Hindu, the actor announced his resignation at a press conference held at his Chennai residence. Citing the frustration of his loyal fan base, he said, 'My followers, who have made sacrifices for the growth of the Congress party, can no longer put up with the insults heaped on me and the manner in which the reasonable claims of my Fans Associations for contesting the elections have been rejected. To demonstrate their strength in various constituencies, they have filed nominations.' Following his departure from the Congress, Ganesan aligned briefly with the Janata Dal and, in 1988, launched his own party: Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani. But the move failed to gain traction. In the 1989 Assembly elections, the veteran actor, despite his enormous popularity and devoted fan base, was defeated in Tiruvaiyaru. That loss effectively marked the end of his political career. Sivaji Ganesan passed away in July 2001, remembered more for revolutionising Tamil cinema than for his political foray. Jayalalithaa Two years after stepping away from cinema and entering politics, Jayalalithaa — who had starred opposite M.G. Ramachandran (MGR) in 28 films — was fielded by the AIADMK in the Rajya Sabha biennial elections of March 1984. At the time, she was serving as the party's propaganda secretary. Her nomination was formally proposed by K. Rajaram, the then Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Assembly, while Chief Minister M.G.R. himself backed the candidature of Valampuri John. In a striking coincidence, Jayalalithaa was allotted seat number 185 in the Rajya Sabha — the same seat once held by former Chief Minister and DMK founder C.N. Annadurai, a renowned screenwriter, in 1963. 'Jayalalithaa stole the scene wherever she was. Her maiden speech in the Rajya Sabha was widely acclaimed for its clarity of diction and elegant prose. Khushwant Singh, a fellow member, gushed that here was a beauty with brains. Even Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was impressed,' wrote author Vaasanthi in her biography Amma: Jayalalithaa's Journey from Movie Star to Political Queen. Jayalalithaa — then spelling her name as 'Jayalalitha' — was elected the AIADMK's deputy leader in Parliament, while R. Mohanarangan served as the leader. However, her rapid rise met with resistance. In 1985, during M.G.R.'s prolonged hospitalisation in Brooklyn, she was removed from her post. Responding to this, she told The Hindu, 'If Mr. M.G. Ramachandran was perfectly all right and in full possession of his mental faculties, able to understand questions and give instructions, then why are these leaders afraid to let me meet him?' Jayalalithaa resigned from the Rajya Sabha in January 1989 after being elected to the Tamil Nadu Assembly from Bodinayakkanur. She was then leading a faction of the AIADMK and went on to become the first woman Leader of the Opposition in Tamil Nadu. In 1991, she united the party, led it to a sweeping electoral victory, and became the youngest Chief Minister of the State. Jayalalithaa remained a dominant force in Tamil Nadu politics until her death in office in December 2016. Vyjayantimala Bali Vyjayanthimala Bali, the earliest Tamil film heroine to make a successful foray into Hindi cinema (1955) was also an accomplished Bharatanatyam dancer and a prominent political figure. A member of the Congress, she was elected to the Lok Sabha from the Madras South constituency in 1984 and 1989. In August 1993, Vyjayanthimala was nominated to the Rajya Sabha, following in the footsteps of her contemporary Sivaji Ganesan. However, her tenure in the Upper House was not without frustrations. In 1994, she raised a grievance regarding her exclusion from the official list of Members of Parliament eligible to implement the Prime Minister's Local Area Development (MPLAD) scheme. In a telegram addressed to Rameshwar Thakur, then Union Minister of State for Rural Development, she wrote: 'Already seven months have passed. I am disillusioned at the indifferent attitude of your department. The purpose of the Prime Minister's scheme is nearing failure. Immediate action is necessary to include my name in the Tamil Nadu list and release the funds for implementation.' Disillusionment with the Congress eventually led her to part ways with the party. In 1999, she joined the BJP. Cho S. Ramaswamy Cho S. Ramaswamy — acclaimed Tamil film comedian, satirist, journalist, and political commentator — entered the Rajya Sabha in December 1999 as a nominated member. Though not affiliated with any political party, Cho was widely known for his alignment with right-wing politics and for his sharp, independent voice in public discourse. Joining him in the Upper House at the time was another iconic figure from the world of films — legendary playback singer Lata Mangeshkar. As a nominated member, Cho remained true to his forthright style and was unafraid to challenge dominant narratives. In 2003, he expressed frustration over being denied the opportunity to speak during a Rajya Sabha resolution that deplored the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Writing in The Hindu in April that year in an article titled 'Resolution Lacks Moral Authority,' he recalled: 'I was one of the members listed to speak on the resolution. The Chairman decided that from among the nominated members, only one would speak, and that was not me. When I pleaded that since mine might perhaps be the only voice against the resolution, I should be given an opportunity to express my views, I was told that opposing the resolution would be an insult to the Chair, since the resolution was in the name of the Chairman.' Cho passed away in December 2016. S.S. Chandran Two years after Cho S. Ramaswamy entered the Rajya Sabha, another comedian from Tamil cinema, S.S. Chandran, followed — but through a different route. Unlike Cho, Chandran was openly political. His career saw him move across party lines — from the DMK to Vaiko's MDMK, before finally settling in the AIADMK. Ironically, it was Chandran's sharp criticism of DMK leader M. Karunanidhi, whom he had once admired, that paved his way to the Upper House. In June 2001, when the Jayalalithaa government came under heavy fire for the controversial midnight arrest of Karunanidhi at his Oliver Road residence, Chandran emerged as one of the most vocal defenders of the Chief Minister's actions. His blunt and unwavering support did not go unnoticed. The following month, when biennial Rajya Sabha elections were announced, Jayalalithaa sprang a surprise by nominating Chandran as one of the AIADMK candidates. In an interview with The Hindu, Chandran remarked, 'As a comedian, I can make the Parliament laugh with my jokes and make my point heard with due attention. In this, my role model is Piloo Mody, who was one of the best speakers in Parliament.' Chandran passed away in October 2010. R. Sarath Kumar Tamil film star R. Sarath Kumar, known for his transformation from screen villain to hero, entered the Rajya Sabha in 2001, the same year as comedian S.S. Chandran. His nomination by the DMK came as a surprise — even to the actor himself. Just hours after Jayalalithaa announced her party's Rajya Sabha candidates, DMK leader M. Karunanidhi unveiled Sarath Kumar's name, catching political observers and the actor off guard. At the time, Sarath Kumar was busy shooting for the film Samudram at A.V.M. Studios. Having joined the DMK in 1998, Sarath Kumar had previously contested the Lok Sabha elections from Tirunelveli but lost. Still, his active involvement in the South Indian Film Artistes' Association, where he served as secretary, helped him gain political visibility. Reflecting on his nomination, he said: 'I strongly feel that my outspokenness, sincerity, and the boldness with which I approach a subject made Mr. Karunanidhi feel that I am the best choice for the MP's post.' He added that he intended to speak in Parliament about the controversial arrests of M. Karunanidhi and two Union Ministers on June 30, 2001. 'If an opportunity comes, my maiden speech in Parliament could be about the imposition of Article 356 (President's Rule) in Tamil Nadu,' he said. However, Sarath Kumar's political affiliations shifted over time. In 2006, he quit the DMK, later had a brief association with the AIADMK, and eventually launched his own party — the All India Samathuva Makkal Katchi. In 2024, he merged his outfit with the BJP. (Note: Another prominent Tamil film personality from outside the acting world to be nominated to the Rajya Sabha is music maestro Ilaiyaraaja in 2022.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store